If you were to choose only one camera from Sony with the flagship body and overwhelming specs, the latest UI, and comfortable operability, it's the Alpha 9 Mark 3. Hello, I'm Boram. Originally, I was planning to compare Sony's best cameras, the Alpha 1, Alpha 7R5, and Alpha 7C, to see which one suits me best for creating content. However, in the midst of that, the Alpha 9 Mark 3 was released. So, let's compare the Alpha 1, Alpha R5, and Alpha 7S. First, let's talk about the release prices. The Alpha 1 is 7,980,000 won, Alpha 7R5 is 5,290,000 won, and Alpha 7C is 3,790,000 won. The Alpha 1 is more than twice as expensive as the Alpha 7C. However, since the release years of the cameras are different, the actual selling prices vary significantly. Based on the lowest prices, the Alpha 1 is 6,823,000 won. All three cameras fall into the expensive category of camera bodies, and the depreciation is also significant. However, the used prices are different.

When comparing, the Alpha 1 is available for purchase at around 400, while the Alpha 7R5 is around 400 Alpha 7CR 300. If you buy a new one, the price difference is significant, but if you actually buy a used one, the price difference narrows to some extent. Side by side, it's obvious that the Alpha's CRR is the smallest. The specific sizes are as follows. Sony cameras are originally easier to set up and store than other third-party cameras, but the Alpha 7 is completely square, making storage especially easy. However, as you can see, the viewfinder is small. The specs of the viewfinder are as follows. In fact, it can be seen that the viewfinder was sacrificed for the size of the Alpha 7CR. The body material is all magnesium alloy, which seems to have reduced the gap between devices a lot. However, the depth of the buttons is different, which can only be felt by those who have used several bodies. In the case of C2NCR, such as the Alpha 6700, it is a crop.

The buttons on the body lack depth, so it requires a lot of force from the fingers. In short, the key touch is not great. Also, in the case of HDMI, it supports Alpha 7 CR man micro HDMI, and Alpha 7 CR does not have a jog dial. The jog dial is used to focus at the desired position in spot focus mode. Although it can be replaced by direction keys, it requires adaptation. The contents are as follows, including both memory cards and batteries. In fact, Alpha 1, Alpha 7, and Alpha 5 are almost similar, and Alpha 7 CR is 40% heavier. In terms of memory cards, Alpha 1 and Alpha 75 can use both SD cards and CFexpress cards with dual slots. Alpha 7 CR has only one slot and can only use SD cards. It's not a big disappointment that Alpha 7 doesn't have continuous shooting like Alpha 7, but it's a shame that it's not a dual slot. It would be a big problem if there is a memory card error while working. The LCD specs are as follows, usually.

For taking horizontal photos, tilt is comfortable, and for taking vertical photos, swivel is convenient. The older Alpha 1 supports tilt, while the recently released bodies mainly have swivel. The Alpha 7, which is considered a premium camera, supports both tilt and swivel. Currently, Sony's Alpha 7R5 and Alpha 9 Mark 3 are the only ones with this type of display. The image stabilization function is 5.5 stops for Alpha 1, 8 stops for Alpha 7R5, and 7 stops for Alpha 7CR. Before Alpha 7R5, all had 5.5 stops, while Alpha 7CR has 7 stops. The advanced cameras Alpha 7R5 and Alpha 9 Mark 3 have 8 stops. There is a significant difference in image stabilization in photos. Since the release of Alpha 7R5, it is possible to see that handheld shooting, which was previously impossible, is now achievable at 1 second intervals. However, in videos, it seems difficult to perceive the difference without a gimbal.

If you want to reduce shaking in the video, GV1 or Alpha 9 Mark 3's dynamic active will be more helpful. The most important sensors are as follows: R5 and Alpha have the same sensor, and Alpha 1 is specialized for video shooting. It uses the R5 sensor as it is, with the same 61 million pixels, and except for video performance, it is almost the same. Alpha 1 is a stacked sensor like the Alpha 9 series, with almost no rolling shutter effect and a relatively high pixel count of 50 million. In terms of continuous shooting, considering that the R5 CR is 8 frames per second, the difference is quite significant. Alpha 5 mainly uses an electronic shutter, so the mechanical shutter is hardly used, resulting in a much longer shutter life and no blackout. Once focused, it hardly misses a shot. The shutter speeds of each camera are as follows: Alpha 1 practically does not use a mechanical shutter, so it goes up to 32.

It should be considered possible and without constraints, and there is no significant inconvenience as Alpha 7R5 can be done. On the other hand, in the case of Alpha 7CR, it is possible up to 1 minute with an electronic shutter, but usually, many people use a mechanical shutter, and when the rear curtain is fully opened, 1 minute is a somewhat disappointing specification. Of course, there are ways to attach an ND filter or switch to an electronic shutter, but it is cumbersome. It only supports Alpha 1, not from Alpha 7R5, all devices released have a feature that has much more accurate AF performance than existing cameras. Of course, if you take continuous shots, Alpha 1 without blackout focuses better. When taking a picture with R5 or CR, the shutter goes down every time you take a shot, covering the sensor, so you have to refocus. However, if you are taking a really important shot, R5 or CR accurately focuses. The video specifications are as follows in the table below. Except for R5 and CR, they have the same specifications, and basically, the video specifications of Alpha 1 are much better.

As you may know, when purchasing these three Canon bodies for video purposes, there are usually very few cases, so considering that the photos are the main focus, I think all three models are overflowing with specs in videos. I also conducted a heat test. Since it's winter, there seems to be no need to test it outdoors, so I only tested it indoors. First, I tested all three bodies with the LCD closed. Then I tested them with the LCD open. Due to insufficient memory card capacity, it stopped in the middle, but now during video recording, it seems unlikely that the camera will turn off due to overheating. I think all three cameras have specs that are overflowing for taking photos. If you want to choose the camera that suits you best within a set budget, it would be good to clearly define the purpose. If it's for sports or animal photography, the Alpha 1 seems to be more advantageous, and if it's for portraits or landscapes, the R5 seems to be more advantageous.

If you are not doing commercial filming or traveling lightly, it seems like a good choice to go to Al [MUSIC].

단 하나의 카메라를 고른다면(feat. a1 a7r5 a7cr)

Scripts