I think we're done. Thank you. Thank you. Goodbye. So, Andrew Tate was interviewed by the BBC, and let's just say the interview had mixed reactions. So much so that the BBC actually took down the video only a day after they posted it on their YouTube channel due to the backlash. The video they uploaded was a highly edited version of the real thing that used jump cuts to make the journalist appear like she was being firm and assertive when in fact that really wasn't the case. Now, I'm no Andrew Tate fan, nor am I too big of a fan of the BBC. What I care about is honest journalism. So, in this video, I'm going to use my skills as a body language analyst to uncover the bias shown by journalist Lucy Williamson. Oh, and just the warning, some dark stuff is discussed during the interview, so be warned. So let's take a look. Let's start with the allegations. Have you raped anybody? Absolutely not. Have you trafficked anybody? Absolutely not. Exploited any women? Absolutely not. But you have admitted using emotional manipulation to get women to work in the

webcam industry for you no. So let's talk about what you've said yourself. Then you have said on the website for your original website for the Huskers University that you emotionally manipulated women to fall in love with you so that you could get them working in the sex industry for your financial gain. As I said I have to be very careful with what I say but let's put it this way. No women are coming out against me and accusing me of doing it. Yes they are. No they're not. Yes they are. No they're not. Who there's testimony from the current investigation, the current investigation which I cannot discuss, which I know intimately and you don't. I can tell you right now that the late the women who are in this case. File there are two American women who have been caught already admitting their mind and then nobody else is accusing me of anything. Let me read you then what you have said about what you have done. Sure you have said my job was to meet a girl, go on a few dates, sleep with her, get her.

to fall in love with me to the point where she'd do anything I say, and then get her on webcam so we could become rich together. I don't think that's what I personally said. I think that's exactly, no, that's, that's, that's no. I've never said that. That's something that you found on the internet. Doesn't mean I've said it. It's actually very interesting that me, one of the most famous people in the world, who's been vilified by the Legacy Media and places all over the Internet, while everyone has attacked me from every single angle, while federal agencies, multiple countries have called over 2,000 women who know me. We stand here with zero new accusations since my arrest. Zero. They call 2,000 people who knew me and could not find a single woman to make a new complaint. The only, the only complaints they have against me are the initial complaints, which we can prove are lies. And that's where it stands. So we see journalist Lucy Williamson pacify before instantly folding her legs. She then

grabs her own arm. This is all indicative of insecurity. We pacify when our defense mechanism gets triggered, and adrenaline is released into the bloodstream via the adrenal glands. This causes a heart rate to increase and the muscles to tense up. This causes a tingling sensation in the nerve endings as they are getting compressed by the tension in the muscles. As a result, this causes a strong urge to itch. We see her do this here instantly after Andrew starts standing up for himself. She then folds her legs and grabs her wrist with her other hand. This is likely to be a version of the self-hug. By making physical contact with herself, she's actually calming herself down. A study conducted by Lenchital in 2016 found that self-soothing techniques, such as physical touch, are used by the brain to reduce psychological arousal. It's clear she's experiencing emotional discomfort here, whereas Tate shows no sign of stress. I'm actually such a nice person that I've never had anything to somebody sits your arrest, who says.

exactly those things that with you it's all manipulation there's an ulterior oh it's Sophie the fake name no face no one's got the story happens to please him and wanting him to be happy that I was just kind of yeah okay do whatever you want and what does she accused me of a crime this imaginary Sophie she's making the point that there is has she accused me of a crime emotional or psychological I've asked you a question and I've allowed you into my house I'm asking you a question correct but you're not the boss here because I've allowed you into my house I'm asking you the question correctly and I'm telling you you get to decide the answer no we're equal here I've allowed you into my house you don't come here with a position of authority I'm doing you the favor Legacy Media giving you relevance by speaking to you and I'm telling you now this Sophie wish your BBC is invented which is no face of nobody knows who she is of course not and she

because you never invent anything and she's not [__] she's not filed criminal charges against me. What are we talking about here? What is she say anything about emotional manipulation? She's the sex industry for your financial absolute garbage. She has not found this person. If they exist, has not felt criminal charges against me. I welcome anybody who believes I've harmed them, male or female, any point in the past, to file criminal charges against me. I'll fight them. I know who I am. I know what I've done. I know the truth, and I know that I'll be found innocent of this attack. So there's other places in that same website where you say you get girls to fall in love with you, and they do it because they love you, because they want to do what you say. Convincing women to take part in some kind of business arrangement doesn't work long term because they're emotional. You've got to get to fall in love with you. Emotionipulation, that's abuse. What you've found are clips from the internet.

some text from the internet, and you're going to sit here and tell me that that's the reason your website. Your words, it's the website you've taken down, and I wonder why those comments have been taken. No websites, no websites are taking down. My website is the same, it's been the same for a very long time. The comments on this website, on the original website, have been taken down, and I wonder why you are accusing me. I'm guessing what you're trying to say is you're accusing me, and you're trying to say that I'm guilty of the things I'm accused of, and I'm emotionally manipulating people. I'm saying that you have set your emotionally manipulated people here for your own financial. Getting no, absolutely not, and I'm asking you about that. Absolutely not is the answer, as I've said before. The only other person who's been found, despite absolute rigorous destructive levels of investigation and prodding into my life, is this imaginary Sophie by the BBC who doesn't exist. It's not just thousands of

women have come out of my defense. Thousands of women have come out my defense, and you've not mentioned that. Thousands of women come out my defense because the problem is when women accuse you of serious crimes. Okay, let's agree that thousands of women. Let's agree that sounds the problem that some people say you haven't done it. It's a problem that's to say you have thousands of women come out my defense. And as we stand right now, we have open criminal investigation. The people who are involved in the criminal investigation are saying we're not victims of anything. Andrew's fine. He's never hurt us. You're saying no. I have the opposite to that. I have to counter that. I have someone called Sophie with no face, a fake name who we've invented. And she's not accusing you of anything. When Tate defends himself and speaks, Lucy constantly pacifies and scratches her arm. This only happens in line with when Tate defends himself. It doesn't happen when she's asking the questions, which is interesting. From this, we can safely say

that she's getting stressed when Andrew provides a defense for himself. This is biased journalism. The journalist is getting emotional, likely due to anger, which is a common cause for stress when he answers her questions in a way that she doesn't like. It's in clear view that the BBC interviewer has her own agenda and is only there to try and demonize him. She has no interest in impartiality in letting Andrew tell his side of the story. You said women's intimate parts belong to their male apart. I said that if a woman marries a man, she takes his last name, and traditionally, the man gives her away. I've been pushing traditional religious beliefs because I'm a religious man and traditional beliefs in regards to marriage, which everybody accepted 10 to 15 years ago. That's not a crazy conspiracy theory. If you're going to sit here and say that me believing a woman should take a man's last name in marriage makes me the most dangerous man in the world, then you're just going to

lose even more credibility than the BBC's already lost in the last four to five years if that's your point. If that's your narrative should be able to outside marriage doesn't sound very religious. That's not what I said they should be able to. I said a lot of high value men, a lot of rich men do it, and then we discussed at length on podcasts why rich men do it. And we also discussed why women decide to be unfaithful. It's not a gendered argument. We discuss unfaithfulness as a whole. What are the reasons and motivations for men? What are the reasons, motivations for women? Let me ask you another question. Sure, you have said that a woman's internet parts belong to her male partner, and if she goes on only fans, he is entitled to a cut of her income. You are extremely. It's actually very. It's very confusing to me why you're going to sit here, take long format podcasts I've done, which are three or four hours long in context where I've sat with only fans girls.

or 15 only fans girls where we've been joking back and forth ignore every comment and satirical comment and sarcastic comment that the females have made and then come along and say you said this and that you're the most evil man in the world. I don't know if you understand what sarcasm is. I don't know if you understand what sarcasm is. I don't know if you understand what context is. I don't know if you understand what satorical. I'm saying it was a very interesting talk show. The woman was saying my man's car belongs to me because he's my man and she was on only fans and then 20 minutes later when she said she was on only fans and said ah well you're selling your body that belongs to him because he's your man and she laughed. She laughed. She laughed and she said haha yeah that's probably true. If you watch the show. If you watch the show it will make sense. Do you believe that a woman's intimate Parts belong to her?

male of course not. I've just answered the question. And does this woman believe that her man's car belongs to her? We. It's not a gendered argument. The Reason God is asking you about these comments is because we've got the chief executive of Rape Crisis naming you individually as spreading a dangerous ideology of misogynistic rape culture. Absolutely. It's the comments you make that are leading people to say things like absolutely. National organizations who are saying that are blaming you for increasing levels of misogyny. Schools that are saying they are having increased incidents of girls being attacked. The female teachers being harassed. If that was if that was of you and your teacher, that's absolutely. That's absolute garbage. I am never ever encouraged a student to attack a teacher, male or female, ever. It's disingenuous and awesome. Awesome. It comes with a side order of misogyny. How does having a Bugatti and a cigar come with a misogyny? Because it's all mixed together in what you teach.

teach that a woman if a woman comes home and accuses you of cheating, you should hit her with a machete, shove her off is that what I is that what I teach that's what you say no if you actually want it will be about the woman attacking me with a machete. As usual, you've not watched the video taken out of context, flipped it, and attempted it to attack me with a small. This isn't an interview, it's an interrogation. They are throwing accusation after accusation at Tate, giving him no real chance to defend himself and giving him a hostile reaction when he tries to defend himself. She repeats questions that Tate has already answered as if she's trying to coax a confession out of him. This is just all around bad journalism and it's no wonder why the BBC tried to cover it up. I don't like Tate, but I do like good journalism. When she repeats the question that he has clearly just answered, she tenses her mouth and does a distancing behavior. She knows that she's

intentionally doing this. This is why her defense mechanism gets triggered when she gets called out on it. A distancing behavior happens when someone is afraid or uncomfortable. She knows what she's trying to do here. The National Police leave for violence against women, the NSP, NSPC rape crisis, epidemic of misogyny even amongst primary school children. The idea that I made primary school children misogynistic because I own a nice car. You have an image of financial success, but it comes along with attitudes towards women that are really problematic. My attitudes towards women is that we're shooting protected and provided for, and I've said that at length. In fact, I've said that over 50 times online. You never mention it. I say that my girlfriend doesn't have to work unless she wants to. I take care of her. I die to protect the woman. I've talked about how I've stood up and faced a knife to protect a woman. You want authority over her in the way you have over a child or a dog, absolutely not. If you want to go down.

this argument we'll go down this nuanced argument. I said that if I have responsibility for her safety, I should have a degree of authority over her safety, meaning, meaning, and let me explain my point. If I'm the one who has to fight and die to protect her, I'm the one who decides how we walk home, I'm the one who decides the group we take, because it's unfair for her to say, I want to walk through the most dangerous neighborhood in the world, but you have to face the knives, that's what I've said, and they're going to sit here and pretend I'm trying to treat women like dogs, which is garbage. Every single man, every single man in the world who loves this woman, understands that he has to protect her, and every single woman in the world likes the idea of a man who would protect her. If you were to say to most women, Do you want your husband to protect you in a violent attack? they'd say, Yeah, of course. When you compare women and the

authority over women that you believe you should have to having authority over a child or a dog. It's not the same because a woman is a free legal adult. Correct, you're equal, free legal adult, my equal. But if I had a girlfriend and we were walking home late at night and I said, Let's not walk down the area, it's a bad area. I'll protect you, everything happens. I want to take the long way. And she said, No, I will. I have to walk this way, even though it's the most dangerous route. I must then. I would say, You're welcome to. You could do it. You're a free legal equal. But I'm not going to walk with you and protect you. I think that I should be able to decide the route because I have an obligation. And my obligation as a man is to protect and provide for females. I am asking you about things that you have said that have caused major national organizations, including the police, to worry about you by name. That's what I'm asking you. It's not what I say.

not about whether you protect your partner or not. It's about what you have said that has caused such concern in the UK. And I want to put it to you that you don't really care about the harm it calls. That's not true because that's not true. Making controversial statements like this online has made you a lot of money. Okay, so first thing, I genuinely am a force for good in the world. You may not understand that yet, but you will eventually. And I genuinely believe I'm acting under the instruction of God to do good things. I'm not interested in damaging the world for money. Because if I was interested in damaging the world for money, I could have sold drugs. Or I could make rap music and encourage everyone to stab each other like all the drill artists do. Well, you can make controversial statements online that attract a lot of follow. So you then direct to your website. I could make jokes. I mean, I could make. I could make jokes online. Who doesn't? I mean, I can make a joke. Are you saying

that all the controversial things you've said a joke. No, I'm saying that these organizations and the BBC are going to sit here and pretend that I am the face of damaging the youth is absolutely garbage. It's completely disingenuous. And the reason and the reason this is not a conversation that we were very good at the questions this has all been discussed answers have been provided so if we could please move on from this side of the interview I would appreciate it there is no doubt that Andrew take has deliberately made offensive jokes and said ridiculous things to gain traction online every celebrity does this just look at the whole Jeremy Clarkson Meghan Markle Fiasco and the big media companies fall for it every time which I think is part of the reason why the BBC removed this video they realized that many many people maybe even the majority support Tate and the video was gaining a huge traction of support that was in a way making tape money Tate's body language appears really controlled during the entirety of this interview he maintains

his hand positioning, which was taught to him by his father, is a consciously controlled behavior, so it doesn't really give us an insight into what he's feeling. He gestures freely and openly, showing that he's experiencing little to no stress whatsoever. When you make controversial statements, it attracts people to follow you, and then you direct them to your website where they pay you a monthly fee to learn how to be like you. And so, the more controversial statements you make, the more money you get. The fact that that's the path you've outlined to my online university and to my presence on the internet, the fact that you believe that's the path, just shows you've done absolutely zeroes. Okay, so how many of the people who sign up for Hustler's University come to you through your social media? Genuinely, how many of the people who sign up for Hustler's University come to you through your social media, where you direct them to the website? And Lucy, I encourage you to go out there, do some genuine research, watch my videos, watch my videos at

length and truly understand what I'm doing. How many of the people who sign up for Hustlers University at 49.99 a month come to you because they see your social media comments. There's an online school University which I don't own. I influenced four along with many other influencers and they sign up for your website which I don't own. And once again that's once again, once, once, once again there's nothing to do with me. And you're gonna sit here and say that I made a joke. I made a joke online four years ago because a woman said that she owned her man's car. And you made a joke and that means that you because you have a Bugatti are the most misogynistic dangerous man in the world. This is going down a path of absolute Insanity. It's not true, none of this is true. Tate is doing a lot of head tilting here. Now this is actually a method of sound localization and it indicates a great level of focus from Tate by tilting the

head it puts one ear higher than the other. What this does is it allows the brain to better detect the location of the Sound Source. The brain measures the tiny delay between the sound reaching one ear and the other to triangulate its location. By tilting it allows us to measure an extra axis. This is a natural behavior that occurs when someone is hyper focused. And it's clear that Tate is genuinely trying to listen to what this woman has to say. Why are so many women saying that when their boyfriends start following you they're not they experience more control. So many they experience more abuse. How many enough enough. Well that's the first time I've heard of it. So in fact one is too many. Oh of course yeah. So of in fact I've seen thousands and thousands of comments and have endless emails from women praising the fact praising the fact that their sons are listening to me. It's praising the fact that the things I'm saying does not worry it would worry it would be concerned about it. It would it.

would worry me if I was genuinely damaging the world, but for you to sit here and say, Andrew, you've become the most Googled man in the world, you have billions of views, and one woman, one is now saying that her husband is not the same man she wants them to be, when thousands and thousands of people are saying the opposite, well then I would say that that's something to do with case after case after case, with quote after quote after quote of people who are genuinely concerned about the impact you're having, and you brush it off as if it's nothing. No, what you have done is come here with an agenda. You've come here with loaded questions. You've come here with things taken out of context. You come here with things that you don't understand. It's satirical. And then you're gonna also sit and say that one woman said that her boyfriend changed when he watched one of your videos. And then I don't know what you expect me to say to that. That's fantastic.

jokes. No, that's how you explain for you to sit down. I'd like to apologize for any of that. For you to sit down, for you to sit down. It's fine, no, it's fine. It's easy for you to sit down and say that one woman said that I'm with her boyfriend watching Andrew take video and now he won't do the dishes or whatever your argument is. And that I'm somehow the worst, most dangerous man in the world because I have a car. It's just disingenuous. And I'm enjoying this interview very much because this shows, this shows the world, it's great. It shows the world the truth about the Legacy Media because they beg me for interviews, they beg me. You have been begging me for months. Please, we need to be relevant. And then you come here with loaded questions trying to paint a picture of me which is completely, not only false. When Tate asks the journalist to specifically state how many women claim their boyfriends have become more controlling, the lady immediately does a distancing behavior.

she looks away, which is the brain's way of protecting itself from a source of stress. Now, in terms of survival, looking away has a massive disadvantage as you're not focusing on the immediate threat. However, evolutionary psychologists would argue that we evolved to do this behavior not to protect us, but to signify to others that we are uncomfortable or are experiencing stress. We are social animals, and knowing what other people are feeling helps maintain that cohesion that is essential to our civilization. She looks away to signify her discomfort, showing that she feels uncomfortable. As she has no idea how many women claim this, she again has no hard data to refer to. Again, it's just terrible journalism. Surely you would provide some statistics for your claims. Since you came out of custody, there seems to have been a lot about your charity work. Correct on your social because all I've always done the charity work, but now I'm promoting it. There seems to be a real shift. Yeah, I wonder what's behind that. Well, I've always done the charity work. I've been doing the

charity work for years. I believe that it's my legacy to Legal positive influence on the world, and I've been doing charity work for over five years post my incarceration. My unfair unjust incarceration mad at post that I've made it more clear to the charity work I'm doing, but this is again once again very interesting. I spend 25 million dollars a year feeding children, men, male children, and female children in Turkey, Syria, Iran, and Iraq. I literally spend 25 million dollars a year feeding children, and I'm still the worst man in the world because four years ago I made a sarcastic comment. Because some people would look at that and say, Okay, so before you got money from attracting people to your website by making controversial comments, but that might have got you into trouble, and so now you're looking for a new market. You're looking for a new market of followers who are attracted by a different sort of persona. I've always done the charity work, so that is obviously correct, and I

have proof that I've always done the show. Your work so you're so we can see something interesting here when Andrew starts talking about his charity work. Look at his right leg it begins to bounce. This is actually a pacifying behavior caused by stress. But if you've watched any of my other videos before you will know that stress can be caused by both positive and negative emotions. Since he only starts doing this Behavior the moment he starts talking about his charity work. It shows that it's strongly related. He does this because he's excited to talk about it and use it to paint him in a good light. Excitement is a form of stress and he's eager to talk about it which actually triggers the defense mechanism causing his muscles to tense up and his heart rate to increase. This then causes him to bounce his leg as a way to vent that buildup of stress. Stress is a scale and how much you have changes the reaction the body gives off when women speak out against you online disagree with what you say they describe.

being bombarded with rape threats and death threats trolley by your followers would you like to say anything to your followers about how to behave and that's absolutely correct. I would love to do that. I don't think that anybody who disagrees with me male or female should be trolled. I don't think they should be insulted or attacked. I think the idea should be discussed openly and fairly and maturely. It doesn't matter if a man agrees with me or disagree with me or a female. I don't think my followers should come along and attack her and if my followers are doing that I'm upset by that. But let's make a very important clarification that's not my followers that's the internet. If you were to log into any video game Lobby I don't play video games and somewhere to sit there and say something stupid they would be trolled with similar comments. That's the unfortunate reality of the internet as a whole. That's nothing to do with me but I encourage all of my followers to open to

engage in open discourse and be fair and honest, and talk in a way which is mature. No need to troll anybody, male or female. She is super stressed here, and I'm not entirely sure why. She pacifies by scratching her face, but also does what's called the Globus sensation. When we get stressed, obviously our defense mechanism gets triggered, and our muscles begin to tense up. This includes the muscles in the throat. When this happens, we get an overwhelming urge to swallow. This is also referred to as a lump in the throat, and she does this here, showing clearly that she's stressed here. Maybe it's because she knows that the interview is not going her way, don't you think? As the BBC, it'd be very interesting to come here and discuss the fact that I was put in a dungeon for 92 days and then locked in house arrest without charge. Do you think that's a far more interesting conversation than old YouTube sneakers? Do you think that would be interesting here under house arrest because there's an ongoing investigation?

into rape and human trafficking allegations against correct. I've been incarcerated without charge, and don't you think has been dropped correct. So, I am incarcerated without charge, and I think that'd be a far more interesting conversation if you actually want to do some genuine journalism and investigation. We could talk about the fact that an innocent man who has yet to be charged with a crime has had his Liberty deprived of him, and I think that would be a far more interesting angle than talking about me being the most dangerous man in the world. She again tenses her mouth here, showing high levels of stress. Andrew does none of us here; he's energetic and expresses freely with his hands, showing high levels of confidence. She, on the other hand, shows all the telltale signs of stress. If she had better prepared for the interview and had statistics to hand to quantify her claims, then she wouldn't be in this situation. All I see here is bad underprepared journalism and this question about schools being very worried about your influence, Boys in

primary school. Or, you know, boys as young as 11 are quoting you at school, attacking girls, refusing to respect female teachers. Would you like to say anything about? I'd like to say, law, I do understand with my massive influence, and I am now one of the most influential people on the planet, that I do have to be slightly more careful with things I say. I'm not going to disagree with that. Some of the jokes I made four or five years ago on a YouTube channel, they got 300 views, I would no longer make, because like the only fans joke, the one you mentioned, repeat when she said, My man's car is my car, and then she said she did only fans, and I said, What you saw on only fans? She said, My tits, and I said, Well, those are your man's tits, as a joke, hahaha, everybody laughed. The point, the fact that I could do that on a podcast five years ago, it only got 300 views. Now, I understand, I'm the most influential man on the face of the planet. I would be

more careful with certain things. I say that doesn't mean the things I originally said were genuinely out to harm people. Do you really believe you're the most influential man on the face of the planet? I know it's Google person on the planet. Do you believe you're the most influential man on the face of the planet? I know it's Googled man on the planet. I think we're done. Yeah, thanks. Lucy, is enjoyable. Nice to meet you. No, it was fun. It's good. Thank you. Thank you. Goodbye. This is hilarious. It summarizes the whole interview perfectly. She gets put down by Tate, proving the fact that he is the most Googled man on the planet. She pacifies by rubbing her arm with her hand and exhales strongly, which is another effect of high stress levels. She also rubs her knee and tenses her mouth again, which are all pacifying behaviors. She knows that she's completely lost all credibility during the interview and that it swung completely in Tate's way. Tate, on the other hand, is ecstatic. He's

bouncing his leg like crazy, which is a response to the high levels of stress caused by excitement. This stress is positive and is caused by excitement and pleasure, as opposed to a negative emotion such as anger. He bounces his leg to vent that stress. From this body language alone, we can tell that Tate thinks that he's had an exceedingly amazing interview, whereas the BBC journalist knows that she has had a car crash of a time. Again, I don't condone everything Tate says, and I think he's wrong about a lot of things, but I do value fair journalism. The BBC came to intentionally destroy his name, and it backfired in their face. The fact that they had to delete the video due to the overwhelming backlash proves this without a shadow of a doubt. So thank you so much for watching this video, guys. If you did enjoy it, please be sure to hit the like button and subscribe for more content. And I'll see you in the next video. Goodbye. [Music] Thank you

Body Language Analyst REACTS to Andrew Tate BBC Interview! | Exposing The BBC Bias

Body Language Analyst REACTS to Andrew Tate BBC Interview! | Exposing The BBC Bias