삼성 갤럭시 S24 울트라: 카메라 및 디스플레이 분석

### 갤럭시 S24 울트라 논란에 대한 반박: 사실과 허구 구분하기
* 📱 갤럭시 S24 울트라는 **배터리, 카메라, 디스플레이 문제**로 인해 온라인에서 비판을 받고 있으며 일부 사용자는 **기대에 미치지 못한다**고 주장하고 있습니다.
* 🔍 삼성은 **5배에서 10배 사이의 줌 품질**을 개선하기 위해 **5배 카메라를 탑재**하는 등 하드웨어를 크게 변경하여 더 높은 줌 수준에서는 성능을 희생했습니다.
* 🔋 배터리 수명은 논쟁의 여지가 있는 부분으로, 일부 사용자는 **새로운 Snapdragon 프로세서 또는 디스플레이 기술 때문인지 S23 Ultra에 비해 배터리 수명에 대한 신뢰도가 떨어진다**고 보고했습니다.
* 🖥 처음에는 낮은 밝기에서 입자가 거칠어지는 등의 디스플레이 문제가 보고되었지만 소프트웨어 업데이트를 통해 대부분 해결되었으며, **디스플레이는 스마트폰 중 최고**라는 찬사를 받고 있습니다.
* 🌍 삼성의 접근 방식은 **글로벌 매력과 최첨단 혁신의 균형**을 유지하며 틈새 시장보다는 광범위한 고객층을 대상으로 합니다.
* 📸 S24 울트라의 강점으로는 **하드웨어 개선과 실용적인 카메라 변경**이 있으며, 향후 모델에서 더욱 개선될 가능성이 있습니다.
* 🔮 앞으로 디자인 변경, 혁신과 대량 생산 간의 균형 등 **S25 울트라의 방향성에 대한 의문**이 제기되고 있습니다.
* 💬 이 토론에서는 **사용자 기대치가 높고 브랜드가 경쟁력을 유지하기 위해 다양한 요소**를 고려해야 하는 스마트폰 개발의 복잡성을 강조합니다.

갤럭시 S24 울트라는 배터리, 카메라, 디스플레이 문제로 비판을 받고 있지만 하드웨어의 변화는 향후 개선의 가능성을 보여줍니다.

there's something wrong with the S24 Ultra, at least that's what Twitter will have you believe. Today I'm going to take a look at the narrative at there being something wrong with the Galaxy S24 Ultra. Let's [Music] go. On the surface, on paper anyway, the S24 Ultra has amazing numbers and specs. It is an upgrade over the S23 Ultra in every department that you can think of, every category that Samsung can make a smartphone with. It's better than its predecessors and likely what's out there at the moment in other brands as well. But there's something missing, at least when you read online, people make you believe that this phone is lesser than what it actually is. So let's break down what people are saying. There's a lot of things people are saying: lesser battery life, worse camera performance, worse zoom performance, especially in the longer range zoom. There are algorithm issues and hardware issues that are plaguing taking good photos at longer magnification length. Display issues as well, especially in the early stages of the phone being

out there was the display graininess issues. People were saying that the colors were off, especially with the new coating on the display, making it less reflective. People were blaming that and then giving it a bad name and saying that the whole display is ruined. Those are some of the issues, the main ones: battery, camera, not just in magnification L too but even in normal algorithmic purposes, and then the display. That's what people are saying. The thing is, are they right, and there's a case to be made for them to actually be correct, especially when you talk about the camera, the zoom in terms of that 10 times and Beyond. Samsung made major changes to the hardware on the s24 ultra. A lot of people were thinking, okay, Samsung are the best at 10 times and Beyond, whereas I think Samsung kind of gave up that Crown this year in favor of a different type of Zoom performance. Samsung brought in the 5x camera so you could focus between five and 10 with a high resolution sensor doing that digital cropping between five and 10.

times Zoom, thus improving the quality of Zoom at the length of Zoom that most people are going to be using, which is between 0.6x and 10x. Very rarely are people going to be going beyond that, and if they are, Samsung's 10 to 20 time zoom is serviceable for the purposes that people would want. But beyond that, like 30X and further, yeah, Samsung have made the Zoom, or at least the zoom performance is worse than what you've had previously. Is that a bad thing? It depends on how you use your phone. Obviously, Samsung have a lot of user data to go through where they can actually see how people are using their smartphones and what zoom lens they're potentially using. And for me, I'm very much in the ilk of, I would rather have better Zoom between zero and 10 than I would between 10 and 100, because for me, a lot of my stuff that I do, my life with the kids especially, takes place in that 0 to 10 range, and having better Zoom

which this is better than the S23 Ultra in that range is what I'd like. The other thing they kind of say too is the 3x camera is not very good, and I'll tend to agree to an extent that it's not the best in class, but it's not terrible. It's not like you're taking photos that look like watercolor paintings with it. It just hasn't got the same quality of detail as the other cameras that are on the phone. So we'll look about that with the S25 Ultra potentially a little bit later, but that's the camera situation. Is they're saying that the zoom is bad and that it's a terrible phone because of it, but I don't think that's right. That's a very shallow take to be had. The battery has been something that I've definitely noticed. I was a very big power user of the S23 Ultra, still am. It does record some of my YouTube videos, and I think the thing is is that the battery on this doesn't give me the same confidence as

what I had as the S23 Ultra had. Other people have said this too. Alex from Alex Gear and Tech is very much on record as saying that the battery is a bit hit and miss. The S20 Ultra, whether that's down to the Snapdragon HJ3 for Galaxy not being as efficient or the phone just drawing too much power from that processor to do the tasks that it needs to do. Whatever the case or could be the new display, which we'll get on to in a minute, this is definitely not as long-lasting in the battery stakes and day-to-day life as what we've had in the past with the S23 Ultra confirmed. Is it terrible? No, it's still definitely a best-in-class battery performance. It just doesn't have that same level of comp confidence that you had with the S23 Ultra, but again doesn't make the phone worse because the rest of the phone with its performance capabilities far ways and exceeds what the S20 Ultra was capable of doing. So you have to think about that on top of the battery.

you can't just isolate the battery on its own, which then brings me to the display because the display was what a lot of people were saying. There's a lot of issues with it. It all started right at the start of the year with the display having that anti-reflective coding, and a lot of people said that it's causing issues with the display being discolored. There's like a yellowish hinge to it, tinge to it, hinge, hinge. And to be honest, I saw that at the start of the year, but Samsung fixed that with an update by bringing in an extra option to make the display more vivid. That fixed it totally, so that problem's gone, that's not existed anymore, but everyone kept talking about the grainy display issues where it extremely low brightness when you've got a dark sort of picture on the screen. You could see some grain, and yes, I've seen the internet that affect very small minority of users who end up being the loudest when they talk about their issues they're having, but then I'm not.

experienced that this display is the best display on a smartphone, period. The anti-reflective coating is so good that it just blows away any other phone that I've used. The ability to be able to see things outdoors so clearly because of the fact it's not bouncing reflections off trees or the ocean, wherever you are, is amazing. And the brightness to go with that. I've had some issues with the outdoors and overheating. The display kind of dims a lot quicker than I remember the S23 Ultra doing. That seems to have sort of gone away as time has sort of gone on. The software updates that have sort of come out since have kind of rectified that issue, and it's been able to sustain itself in peak sort of brightness a lot longer than what I've had previously in the last few months. This discourse about the S24 Ultra isn't by accident. The market is super competitive with high-end Ultra flagship smartphones, and with the amount of money that you're spending on these things, the scrutiny on the detail and

the quality is going to come from the most intensive of power users that have a platform to share it. There is stronger hardware as well coming out from brands that overseas that don't necessarily launch everywhere, but the hardware discourse is that people are expecting more than what they're expecting before, even if what they're getting is still super incredible. If we go back 10 years, smartphones could do a fraction of what they can do now, but people's expectations are higher, so that's why they are scrutinizing and going over with a fine-tooth comb everything that the phone does, and they want it to be at its 100% every single time that you turn it on and use it. But there's a discourse that's missing from the conversation that I think is very, very important to how Samsung are making their phones now. Samsung are a global brand. They aren't making phones just for certain countries, especially at this level. They are making phones for a wider generation, whether that be in the US, whether that be in the home market in Korea, whether that be

here in Australia, Samsung have a lot of types of consumers to consider when they're making phones to appeal to that broad audience. So yeah, they could throw everything out of phone, and they've got the R&D to do it and make a phone that appeals to 1% of the population. That would be really good for that 1%, but for 99% of people that like Samsung phones and want to enjoy their capability, they'll either be priced out of the market, or it won't appeal to them because it's too much phone. And what ends up happening is Samsung will slowly sort of erode away, and they'll become a niche brand, not a global brand, which is what they are. So I think Samsung had to find a balance, and the last couple of generations, particularly from S22 Ultra onwards, Samsung have tried to strike that balance between Hardware Innovation and software Innovation. Because if you put better Hardware on here or more advanced Hardware, it's going to inflate the cost, and then that put buyers off, and then we're not going to see the

Samsung that we know now existing for much longer because they'll just be bleeding cash into areas that people aren't interested in. I think it's a much more mature approach from Samsung to take that look because ultimately we want them to keep making phones. They will get to the point that we know they're capable of. It's just going to be a bit slower than what we're used to seeing from them. So what do I think about this all? Well, I think we know what my thoughts on the s24 ultra are. I've got my review live. I know what this phone phone strengths are and I know what it can do better at in future versions of the phone. I do however like the hardware changes that Samsung made when it comes to thing like the display and the camera. The 5x camera at first I was really skeptical but in use of it it's much more practical than a three and a 10 times because that Gap is too big between three and 10. So that five times fits it perfectly and with the 50

megapixel resolution and larger sensor. It means the gap is actually not existent anymore. You could take good sharp photos at any one of those magnification lens between that 5 and 10. And that begs the question, what does Samsung need to do next? The S25 Ultra, there's already some rumors that Samsung are changing the boxy industrial design and going back to their previous note design with the rounded still kind of square but not as sort of sharp as this. So, is that something, is that the direction they need to take? Is it just a design change to keep it fresh as opposed to trying to change internally the hardware and slap lots of new cameras on there? Or do they need to push this innovation to the level and make this a DSLR-like camera or mirrorless-like camera experience just to make people happy, even if it then becomes too expensive and won't be available as widely because making products with that hardware innovation means that you're going to have failure rates, you might not be able to scale the production as

high and wide as what they're capable of doing right now. That's also stuff that needs to be factored in when you're looking at a phone like the S24 Ultra. Like a 1in sensor isn't going to solve the problem as much as we all think that bigger hardware will increase the capability of the phone tenfold. The phone is more than its camera system. It's the S Pen, it's the display for entertainment, it's the multitasking software for productivity, it's the big battery, it's the big processor. All of that completes the package of the Ultra. It's not just this thing or this thing that's here. It's this thing that you hold in your hand and put into your pocket. This was a little bit of a different take on this phone because a lot of people are looking at this and thinking Samsung could do more. I want this, I want that, but you need to be grounded and have some perspective as to where Samsung is heading and the new direction they're taking. That's it.

that's all I wanted to say. If you have any thoughts or comments, you can leave them in the comment section below. Tell me I'm wrong, start an argument, we'll see what happens. Other than that, hit subscribe if you like this and go back and check out my other Samsung stuff. And I'll see you in the next one.

What's WRONG with the S24 Ultra?

Tech with Benefits

갤럭시 S24 울트라에 대한 엇갈린 반응

갤럭시 S24 울트라는 인상적인 수치와 사양을 자랑하지만 온라인에서는 배터리 수명, 카메라 성능, 줌 및 디스플레이 품질에 대한 문제를 강조하고 있습니다.

삼성은 5배에서 10배 사이의 줌 성능을 우선시하면서 하드웨어를 크게 변경하여 더 높은 줌 수준에서는 화질이 저하될 가능성이 있습니다.

이러한 변화가 대다수 사용자의 요구에 부합하는지를 두고 의견이 분분합니다.

S25 울트라의 3배 카메라는 동급 최고 수준은 아니지만 일부 비판에도 불구하고 나쁘지 않습니다.

배터리 성능은 S23 울트라만큼 강력하지 않아서 헤비 유저에게는 다소 아쉬움이 남지만, 여전히 동급 최고의 성능을 제공합니다.

낮은 밝기에서의 변색 및 입자 거칠기 등의 디스플레이 문제는 삼성이 업데이트를 통해 대부분 해결했지만 일부 사용자는 여전히 이러한 문제를 경험하고 있습니다.

삼성 S24 울트라 디스플레이와 시장 경쟁

삼성 S24 울트라 디스플레이는 반사 방지 코팅과 높은 밝기로 호평을 받고 있으며, 초기 과열 문제는 소프트웨어 업데이트를 통해 해결되었습니다.

하이엔드 스마트폰에 대한 파워 유저들의 집중적인 조사로 인해 지속적인 혁신이 필요하지만, 삼성은 대다수의 소비자에게 가격을 책정하지 않으면서도 광범위한 글로벌 고객층에게 어필해야 하는 과제에 직면해 있습니다.

이에 따라 삼성은 글로벌 브랜드로서의 입지를 유지하기 위해 하드웨어와 소프트웨어 혁신 간의 균형을 찾기 위해 노력하고 있습니다.

삼성은 재정적 손실을 피하기 위해 관심 분야에 집중하여 혁신 속도를 늦추는 등 보다 성숙한 접근 방식을 취하고 있습니다.

S24 울트라는 특히 5배율 카메라를 탑재하여 배율 렌즈의 격차를 해소하는 등 하드웨어적으로 큰 변화를 가져왔습니다.

S25 울트라의 방향은 디자인 변경 가능성에 대한 소문으로 불확실하지만, 삼성이 내부 하드웨어 혁신에 집중해야 할지 아니면 생산상의 어려움에도 불구하고 DSLR과 같은 카메라 경험을 만드는 데 우선순위를 둘지는 여전히 의문입니다.

S24 Ultra는 S펜, 고화질 디스플레이, 멀티태스킹 소프트웨어, 대용량 배터리, 강력한 프로세서 등 강력한 카메라 그 이상의 기능을 제공합니다.

이 휴대폰의 다양한 기능을 고려할 때 삼성의 방향성은 현실적인 관점이 필요할 수 있습니다.

이 휴대폰의 전반적인 패키지는 엔터테인먼트와 생산성 모두를 위한 다목적성을 제공합니다.