소니 X1 OLED TV: 놀랍도록 오래 지속되는 디스플레이 기술

### 소니 XEL-1 OLED TV: 과거로부터의 폭발
* 📺 2008년에 출시된 소니 XEL-1은 놀라울 정도로 얇은 두께와 높은 가격대가 특징인 **세계 최초의 OLED TV** 중 하나였습니다.
* 🔍 XEL-1은 오래된 제품임에도 불구하고 **인상적인 모션 선명도와 전반적인 화질**로 오늘날에도 여전히 잘 작동합니다.
* 🎮 TV의 **960x540 해상도와 VRR과 같은 최신 기능이 부족**해 게임에는 적합하지 않지만 여전히 훌륭한 성능을 발휘합니다.
* 🌈 색 정확도와 밝기는 최신 표준에 미치지 못하지만 **XEL-1의 성능은 놀랍게도 현재 OLED 디스플레이에 근접**합니다.
* 🔊 TV의 오디오 품질은 괜찮지만 특히 **최신 소형 기기와 비교**했을 때 탁월하지는 않습니다.
* 💰 OLED 기술은 **XEL-1 출시 이후 수명, 색 정확도, 밝기가 개선**되는 등 크게 발전했습니다.
* 🏭 낮은 수율과 복잡한 제조 공정을 포함한 **높은 OLED 생산 비용**으로 인해 그동안 OLED 채택이 제한되어 왔습니다.
* 🔮 미래의 디스플레이 기술에는 **마이크로LED 또는 발광형 퀀텀닷 디스플레이**가 포함될 수 있으며, **프리미엄 소비자 시장에서 OLED를 능가할 가능성**이 있습니다.

2008년에 출시된 소니 X1 OLED TV는 오늘날에도 여전히 뛰어난 성능과 최신 기기와의 유사성으로 놀라움을 자아냅니다.

I just picked up a sick new OLED TV and okay adamir 11 diagonal Ines. The Sony X1 isn't going to impress your friends with its size anymore, but back in 2008, this thing stunned the world with its organic LED screen, its shockingly thin profile, and of course, its astronomical price. According to OLED info.com, Sony initially viewed this product as more of a prototype, but by the end of its run, tens of thousands of these little guys had made their way into the hands of wealthy, eagle-eyed enthusiasts. Kind of surprising given that even by 2008 standards, it was woefully Impractical. What's more surprising is that as far as OLED technology has come in 16 years, it still holds up shockingly well today. I mean, just look at the definition of this segue to today's sponsor, see Sonic reliability check, aord ability check, efficiency ability double-check. Take a look at the new vertex lineup on sale for Prime day using our Link in the description. Back in 2007, OLED had been

invented, and even featured in commercial products like this Pioneer car stereo. But most people had only ever seen one in a magazine or in an online article, and I still vividly remember the buzz around this thing, both from the optimists who saw it as a window into the future, and from the haters who criticized, well, everything 'cause they're haters. I'm really excited to try it 'cause I never got a chance back then, but first let's do a quick tour, shall we? All the brains are in this bottom box down here, and then it's attached using this kind of funky arm to what is, true to Sony's marketing, a shockingly thin panel. Though it kind of reminds me of LG's earlier OLED models where they had the really, really thin display but then a pretty big caboose down at the bottom of them. There isn't much in the way of viewing angle adjustments other than tilt, though if that's what it took for them to have this tank-like build quality, honestly, I'm okay with it. So many of these

survived. That you can still readily find them on eBay. We got a big fat speaker girl in the bottom that kind of makes it look more like a Bluetooth speaker. Now with display technology new product category anyone, huh, music video players, uh, anyway, unlike a lot of old display Tech that we look at, it's modern enough that we've got an HDMI input, a USB port in case we want to play our MP4s, RF coax, a landport because we've got the Japanese version, and a handy dandy headphone jack on the side in case you want to quietly game or watch TV next to your sleeping partner. You know, if I hadn't been porish back in 2007, I might have been able to see what a sick bougie bedside TV this thing could be. As it was, I was just like fairness to me, that's a pretty reasonable reaction too. Let's give it a shot. Almost feels wrong playing PlayStation 5 on it, but hey, it can. Doesn't support the most modern features. There's no variable refresh rate. It's

only 60 HZ, and even the resolution is a little bit of an oddball. It runs 960x540, which is exactly one4 of the pixel count of 1080p. Which even at the time was weird because HD was often 1366X768. For some reason kind of makes me wonder if like a 22in full HD model was ever considered, but then scrapped out of concerns for cost. I mean it have probably been like 20 grand. There's definitely things about the display that are not perfect by modern standards, but if you didn't tell me that this was 16 years old, I would not know. The motion clarity is awesome. There's a bit of a weird flicker, almost like Black frame insertion, but it's super clear. Even just like input leg is fine. Like dude, this plus a PS3 back in the day. I mean yeah, you got to sit kind of close and everything, but like holy crap, at this size, the resolution's fine. Overall, the most surprising thing about this to me

is how close it is to a modern device. Even the marketing is the same. Sony boasted rapid pixel response times, super high contrast ratios thanks to inky blacks, high peak brightness on a per pixel level, and they talked about the thin panel. All stuff that's only just starting to give way to new marketing focus points like AI. Goodie. Now, for funsies, what we wanted to do is take it another step and compare it to Apple's new Ultra Retina XDR Display with tandem OLED. This thing is incredible. Not only does the SDR and HDR accuracy rival the $20,000 reference display that we looked at last year, but this thing gets bright. And while 1600 nits isn't as high as some of the newer OLED TVs, this can do a th000 nits full screen sustained. And there's just nothing else like that at the moment. Though, with that said, if we account for the differences in time, boy, is this ever impressive. Like damn, it looked good in games, and I was like, Wellow, this looks really good for.

the time in games, but it's not even HDR. It just has nice punchy SD. HDR didn't exist yet as a standard. Holy crap, what is going on right now? This should not look this close. You can really see it in a couple spots, like when she brings up the flame. The flame gets really bright. Like even there, that it's way brighter on the iPad. Moon looks like more highlighted on the iPad. Like you can tell. Yeah, and the colors are a little off. Y, I am super impressed right now. Right, it's so good. Oh yeah, the highlights look way better on the on the iPad. Little bit of a green cast to that brown. We'll get to color accuracy later. It's, but if I took this away and you said watch this movie, enjoy this movie, I would enjoy this movie. Hold up, I'm going to let you finish, but LTD Store is having one of their biggest sales of all time. You can get 40% off a 3D down jacket, 50% off stealth hoodie Pro and

stealth sweatpants Pro and 40% off the and favorite RGB shirt, which is super comfy and comes with little specs of RGB throughout, just like my life. These special deals are only on for today, but we'll have more exclusive all the way until July 19th, so keep your eyes peeled by using our Link in the description. I was dude when I pitched the comparison to this for the video cuz this was something I asked plof to arrange for. My expectation was that it was really going to put in context the development that had been done over the last six years. Instead, all it's really showing us is how far ahead Sony was. Now there's issues it falls short of the coverage of even the srgb color space, and while its average Delta 2000 of 6.36 is about in line with high-end LCDs at the time, it's on a completely different planet from our calibrated tandem OLED. Even if it's the sort of thing that only a big nerd is likely to notice, frankly, these ended

up looking so close to each other that we were digging around in the shield menu to find out if it was doing some kind of HDR to SDR tone mapping, or something that was giving the xcl1 an advantage, but it just looks really good. I mean, I ran into the same thing on my TCL TV at home where SDR content looks great on it because it just allows itself to take full advantage of its full brightness, giving it a more poppy HDR look, even if you're definitely missing some color volume. And in How to Train Your Dragon, that difference in color volume, we saw that in the night scenes where there wasn't enough saturation. Also, the difference in color accuracy are very noticeable; you can really see the pink cast in the sky here compared to a properly calibrated display. One thing that's come a really long way in the last couple decades is audio performance in compact devices, so I'll be curious to see how the speakers are and now the spinning not too loud you got to kind of.

Crank it useless. Okay, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Just get me off of this thing. Good dialogue clarity though. God, this is a good soundtrack, and these speakers do not do it justice. Plug your headphones in. Yeah, plug your headphones in, which isn't a guarantee they'll sound good. Hold on. I'd watch theit out of movies like this. Yeah, it's almost like dialog enhancement is on. Yeah, so the musical score is not standing out enough. The clarity, if I was an elderly person watching content on here though, is outstanding. There's a whole other paragraph scripted talking about how they compare to each other, and I just don't know if we need it because you can have the conversation of well, which one is the more bestest in these specific ways, but at the end of the day, for most people, that's not what they're asking. What they're asking is, am I enjoying this experience, and I am even seeing it next to the state of the art. I am. I don't need it, but one area where a lot

of advancements have been made are in OLED longevity. We did notice some reverse burning on the display where the sides are a little bit brighter than the middle, and our suspicion is that this is because a lot of content back then was letter-boxed, so those pixels probably weren't used as much. Now, part of why our Sony looks so good is it's taking advantage of modern processing tricks that didn't exist back when it came out. It's hooked up to an Nvidia Shield, but part of why it looks so good is that it's just kind of incredible. So, I guess the question is why did it take so long to get from this to this? Well, research and development costs a lot even at the best of times, and unlike with LCD, which can be manufactured in a few separate parts before being assembled, OLED is put together in mostly a singular package. So, instead of a product ecosystem with a few companies that are focused on components like backlight, Liquid Crystal layer, color filter, polarization film, and then tossing individual components if there are errors within the batch, it's

one company focused on one finished good for the most part speaking of Errors. You can get notified about our next round of scribe drivers at LTT store.com. Every pen is made of a failed screwdriver shaft so you can own your own piece of one of my most expensive mistakes. Another huge Factor making OLED expensive is the difference in yields from a single sheet of mother glass due to the Precision and cleanliness that are required at the deposition step to make an OLED panel display. Companies needed to learn to work more like a semiconductor Fab. You vaporize organic material in a vacuum and you deposit the sublimated particles perfectly onto the mother glass. A bit too much material or a bit too much moisture or heat during this process and that entire sheet is ruined necessitating the use of clean rooms. On the other hand, LCD is a lot more tolerant to dust and defect so in a less perfect environment you could still get a perfectly working panel. And don't forget just like with our OLED here LCD prototypes and little concept models.

were coming out decades before we saw a mass adoption of that technology. Companies like Epson and Sharp were releasing early LCDs as far back as the 1980s, and it wasn't until about 20 years later that big for the time 40, 50, 60-inch LCD TVs started replacing the bulky CRTs in everyone's living rooms. So the progress here is largely thanks to LG, if we're being realistic, who really banked on making OLED a premium but obtainable option and who continue to invest in new innovations like the tandem OLED panel that this iPad has. That stacks two OLED layers on top of each other to produce that brighter image. Now that the competition is heating up though, and manufacturing processes are a lot more mature, and there's some actual demand thanks to HDR advances on the content side of things. Who knows in another four years, OLED, whether it's tandem QD W or otherwise, could be your standard issue, and future technologies like microLED or, man, those emissive quantum dot ones, woo.

might finally start popping up in the premium consumer space just like this segue to our sponsor is popping up in my personal space. Delete me, you may know how to keep your digital identity private, but how about those you care about? Delete me's family plans cover not just you, but your loved ones as well. With their family account management, you can easily add and monitor personalized protection for each member. This means reducing the risk of exposure to spam and scams for both kids and adults. It really is as simple as setting up everyone's profile, then leaving the rest to the team to hunt down and remove data. Plus, if you're ever curious about what information is removed, Delete me can send out quarterly personalized reports supports for everyone under your plan. So keep yourself and your family protected from data brokers. Hit up our link in the description and use code LTT at checkout for 20% off any Delete me plan. If you guys enjoyed this video, make sure to check out the CRT versus OLED video. I think the results might surprise you.

this thing gets hot, dude. 38 Watts passively cooled in a chassis this size, she toasts.

I Bought the World’s First OLED TV from 2008!

Linus Tech Tips is a passionate team of "professionally curious" experts in consumer technology and video production who aim to educate and entertain.


Linus Tech Tips

소니 XEL-1 OLED TV는 2008년 당시에는 실용적이지 않다고 여겨졌지만 유기 LED 화면과 놀라울 정도로 얇은 두께로 세계를 놀라게 했습니다.

이 제품은 인기를 얻었고 프로토타입으로 여겨졌지만 최신 OLED 기술과 비교하면 여전히 잘 유지되고 있습니다.

시야각 조정이 제한적이었지만 내구성이 뛰어났으며 여전히 eBay와 같은 플랫폼에서 구매할 수 있습니다.

소니의 2005년형 디스플레이와 애플의 울트라 레티나 XDR 디스플레이 비교

소니의 2005년 디스플레이는 낮은 해상도와 이상한 재생률에도 불구하고 여전히 현대 표준에 필적하는 인상적인 모션 선명도와 이미지 품질을 제공합니다.

빠른 픽셀 응답 속도와 높은 명암비와 같은 디스플레이의 기능은 최신 마케팅 포인트와 유사하여 시대를 얼마나 앞서 나갔는지 보여줍니다.

이에 비해 Apple의 울트라 레티나 XDR 디스플레이는 놀라운 SDR 및 HDR 정확도와 탁월한 밝기를 제공하여 현재 시장에서 단연 돋보이는 제품입니다.

이 비교는 두 기기 간의 16년 차이를 고려할 때 소니 디스플레이의 인상적인 성능을 강조합니다.

스텔스 스웨트 팬츠와 인기 RGB 셔츠를 오늘 하루만 40% 할인된 가격에 만나보세요.

7월 19일까지 더 많은 독점 할인이 제공됩니다.

지난 6년 동안의 제품 개발을 비교해보면 소니가 훨씬 앞섰음을 알 수 있으며, 스텔스 스웨트팬츠와 RGB 셔츠는 뛰어난 사용자 경험을 제공합니다.

기술 장치의 오디오 성능은 지난 수십 년 동안 크게 향상되어 특히 대화에서 뛰어난 선명도를 제공합니다.

OLED 기술은 높은 연구 개발 비용, 제조의 복잡성, 생산 공정에서 요구되는 정밀성 때문에 개발하는 데 오랜 시간이 걸렸습니다.

LCD와 달리 OLED는 단일 패키지로 조립되기 때문에 오차 허용 범위가 훨씬 낮아 생산 비용이 더 많이 듭니다.

OLED 기술의 발전은 혁신에 대한 LG의 투자 덕분이며, 탠덤 OLED 패널의 개발은 더 밝은 이미지와 전반적인 기술 발전에 기여하고 있습니다.

나를 삭제하는 가족 요금제의 부상

이제 가족을 위한 맞춤형 디지털 보호를 위한 가족 요금제를 제공합니다.

가족 계정 관리를 통해 각 구성원을 쉽게 모니터링하고 보호할 수 있어 온라인 위협에 노출될 위험을 줄일 수 있습니다.

삭제된 데이터를 추적할 수 있는 분기별 맞춤 보고서도 제공되며, LTT 코드를 사용하면 20% 할인을 받을 수 있습니다.