삶의 본질과 의미 탐구

### 생명의 본질: 지각 너머의 존재에 대한 탐구
* 🤔 삶을 이해하는 것은 개인적인 사건, 감정, 업적 등 다양한 렌즈를 통해 바라볼 수 있기 때문에 **복잡**합니다.
* 🌌 마음의 무한한 속성은 다양한 관점을 허용하지만, 사회는 종종 **삶이란 행복과 타인을 돕는 것**이라는 단일한 관점을 강요합니다.
* 💭 그러나 **이타주의조차도 개인적인 만족에 대한 욕구**에서 비롯될 수 있으며, 이는 삶의 동기에 대한 진실성에 대한 의문으로 이어질 수 있습니다.
* 🍂 인생을 **'떨어지는 나뭇잎' 또는 '바다로 흐르는 강물'**에 비유하여 지성과 의도를 넘어선 존재의 단순함을 강조하기도 합니다.
* ⏳ 감정과 성공의 일시적인 특성은 영원한 것은 없기 때문에 **지속되지 않는 것에는 의미가 없다**는 것을 강조합니다.
* 🔄 기쁨과 불행은 상호 의존적이며 서로 없이는 존재할 수 없기 때문에 **행복 추구는 중심 신화**로 비판받습니다.
* 🌀 궁극적으로 진실은 부정과 거짓 신념의 제거를 통해 도달하며, 삶은 **신기루이며 우리가 인식하는 것은 실제로 우리에게 일어나고 있지 않다**는 것을 드러냅니다.
* 🌌 본질적으로 삶은 **'모든 것에 아무것도 없는 것'**으로 묘사되는데, 이는 존재에 대한 기존의 이해에 도전하는 심오한 깨달음입니다.

삶은 본질적인 의미나 영속성이 결여된 채 끊임없이 변화하는 경험입니다.

the title of this solo podcast is What is Life. It's very difficult to know what precisely life is. Is it the events that occur in a human being's life? Is that life? Is it how he feels? Is it his accomplishments, his failures, how his children turn out, what his family life is like? From what angle can one view something? And this is the difficult thing about everything, is that there's so many angles, there's no clear guide to anything. One can view anything at all from any perspective. The mind is infinite, it travels to all domains in a flash, in an instant. We are told by society that we should do this and that, and we should view life from this perspective, and that life is about happiness, life is about helping other people. But even if you look at the standpoint of, or the viewpoint of helping other people, what is that but a chance to make oneself feel good? So there's nothing negative or positive about any of these things. The question is, what is the truth? Is life all about

wanting to feel good because that seems to be the driving force behind the fundamental existence of man is the desire to feel good. I wish to succeed so that I may feel good. I wish to become wealthy so that I may feel good. I wish to help others so that I may feel that I'm a benevolent individual and that I have done for my fellow man. I wish to be kind to others so that I can gain a sense of moral correctness. So everything is related to an ulterior motive of wanting to feel good. And really, you know, I grow tired of sometimes mentioning these disclaimers, but there's no negative or positive here, there's no right and wrong, there's no good and bad. It isn't wrong or negative to want to feel good, it's an examination of the truth. Well, what is it that life fundamentally, in its ultimate grainy reality, what is it? I think it's a falling leaf. I think it's a river that flows toward the ocean without having any interest in arriving at the ocean.

nor any interest in being proud of its effort of moving towards the ocean. I think it's the wind that blows a knock on the door, a clapping of one's hands, anything and everything that has nothing at all to do with the intellect. That is life, anything at all that does not involve the domain of thought and thinking, or strategizing, or intentionality, or wanting to achieve, or hoping to provide, or desiring to gain, or needing to give. Where there are not even the seeds of rules, where there isn't even the shadow of hope, where what is is and there is no opinion about what is. What is life? It's the ringing of a bell, that's one's entire life. There is no significance to anything, and the reason that there is no significance to anything is because nothing lasts. There cannot be anything significant about something that does not last. An emotion arrives today and it leaves the very next minute. A success arrives today and it fails to have an impact after a few weeks or a few days. There is a

constant need for replenishment. A constant need to replace what has disappeared. Therefore, there is nothing permanent. Everything in this life is temporary. Therefore, how can it have any significance? Nothing can have a weight, a w-e-i-g-h-t. Nothing can have a weight if it is here only for a moment. I think one of the central myths that leads humans astray is, once again, something that is so invisible, like prescriptions, that it is never even thought to be examined. And that is the need to become happy. And whenever I say anything, it will be a natural reflexive tendency of your mind to immediately jump to the opposite. So, if I say that a myth that leads man astray is the need to be happy, the mind will often immediately jump to, Well, then should I be sad? And happiness and sadness, joy and misery are all the same because they only exist because of the other. There would be no need for happiness if there was no misery. So, they are interdependent.

and because they are interdependent, they cannot survive in their own soil. When one thing requires another, then it doesn't in fact exist. It is only a reaction to. It is spawned by something that is real, something that is true, exists of its own domain. It needs no support, it requires no explanation. It is truth, it is solid, it is incontrovertible. It depends upon no one and nothing. So what is life? Like all things, I think that one arrives at the truth by way of negation, by way of elimination, by way of subtraction. And when all the things that one has believed to be significant, when all the things that one has believed to be real, and all the beliefs that one has had are removed, when they are seen through, when they are recognized as a whim of the mind and an imbibement of influence, then the amorphous and unspeakable nameless non-entity that remains is the closest thing to the truth. While there is everything in this life, it is all a mirage. It's, it's

passing clouds. It's one explosion after another. It's sound that comes and goes. And we as humans get in the way. And as we get in the way, we feel as if it is happening to us. But in reality, things happen in the vicinity of ourselves. They do not really happen to us because there really is no us for them to happen to. I think it's very important not to attempt to read into my words, uh, because if you do, then you will fall into the trap of intellectualization. The words must have a communion with one's interiority without being touched by the filtering mechanism of the mind. For the filtering mechanism of the mind will repackage them into untruth. It will repackage them into ideas to analyze and philosophize about. And this will lead to questions that are based largely in intellectual gymnastics. And this is precisely the habit of the mind because it recognizes that when a human hears truth, its job is to remove him as quickly as possible from that truth in order to keep it within its

domain of the mind. Whatever gets through, gets through, and what does not, does not. There is no need from my end for things to get through as their. It would be best if there was no need for you [Music] to need to allow things to get through. Whatever the communion is, it is. Whatever the chemical reaction that takes place between two elements takes place. Involvement is interference. So, what is life? It's nothing in everything, and all the things that one has thought that his life really was, it really is not. Good night.

What Is Life? - Kapil Gupta Solo Podcast

The Truth Seeker Podcast

인생은 다양한 관점이 존재하고 명확한 기준이 없어 정의하기 어렵습니다.

기분을 좋게 만들고자 하는 욕구는 인간의 행동과 동기를 이끄는 원동력인 것 같습니다.

궁극적으로 인생은 목적지에 도착하는 데 특별한 관심이 없는 낙엽이나 바다를 향해 흐르는 강물에 비유할 수 있습니다.

인생은 일시적인 순간이 특징이며 지속적인 의미가 없습니다.

감정과 성공은 일시적이기 때문에 끊임없이 보충이 필요합니다.

기쁨과 불행은 상호 의존적이며 공존하기 때문에 행복을 추구한다는 것은 신화입니다.

삶은 상호의존적이며 고립되어 존재할 수 없고, 진정한 존재는 견고하며 어떤 지원도 필요하지 않습니다.

진리를 향한 여정은 신념을 부정하고 제거하는 과정을 통해 현실에 가장 가까운 무정형의 비실체에 도달하게 됩니다.

사건에 대한 인간의 인식은 신기루와 같으며, 사건은 우리 주변에서 일어나기 때문에 진리를 지적화하면 그 본질이 왜곡될 수 있습니다.

삶은 간섭할 필요 없이 일이 진행되거나 진행되지 않는 과정입니다.

원소들 사이의 교감과 화학 반응은 자연스럽게 일어납니다.

궁극적으로 생명은 모든 것이 아무것도 아닌 역설이며, 그 본질에 대한 우리의 인식에 도전합니다.