AMD Ryzen 9000: 성능 향상 및 시장 포지셔닝

### AMD 라이젠 9000: 높은 기대 속에 실망스러운 출시
* 🖥 Ryzen 9000이 출시된 후 AMD의 신제품은 **성능과 테스트 방법에 대한 토론**을 불러일으켰으며, 많은 사람들이 **출시가 성급하고 인텔의 관행**을 연상시킨다고 생각했습니다.
* 🔧 Ryzen 9000의 초기 성능 문제는 **Windows 11 버그**와 관련이 있었으며, 이후 Microsoft에서 패치를 제공하면서 **새로운 Zen 5 아키텍처에 대한 소프트웨어 지원 개선**의 필요성이 강조되었습니다.
* 💰 이 분야의 소프트웨어 개발자의 평균 급여는 **월 약 120,000루블**로, AMD가 하드웨어 시장에서 혁신을 지속함에 따라 숙련된 전문가에 대한 수요가 증가하고 있음을 반영합니다.
* 📈 AMD는 Ryzen 7000에 비해 **GHz당 16%의 성능 향상**을 주장하지만, 실제 테스트 결과 **8코어 9700X는 과중한 작업에서 5% 미만의 미미한 성능 향상**만을 달성하고 게임에서는 **이전 제품보다 성능이 떨어지는 것**으로 나타났습니다.
* 🔍 새로운 아키텍처에는 더 많은 연산 로직 유닛과 최적화된 캐시 시스템 등 내부적으로 상당한 업그레이드가 이루어졌지만, 전반적인 성능은 **출시 전 40% 향상**되었다는 소문에 따른 기대치를 충족시키지 못했습니다.
* ⚡ 일부 모델의 열 패키지가 감소했음에도 불구하고, **Ryzen 9000 시리즈는 에너지 효율 및 열 방출에 어려움을 겪고 있으며, 16코어 9950X는 까다로운 작업 중에도 여전히 높은 온도**에서 작동합니다.
* 🆚 인텔이 코어 울트라 200 시리즈 출시를 준비함에 따라 **Ryzen 9000은 치열한 경쟁**에 직면해 있으며, 출시를 서두르기로 한 AMD의 결정은 향후 몇 달 동안 **추가적인 최적화 과제**로 이어질 수 있습니다.
* 📅 AMD가 Zen 5 아키텍처를 지속적으로 개선하고 향후 출시를 준비함에 따라, 사용자는 **보다 저렴한 가격에 안정적인 성능**을 위해 구형 **Ryzen 7000 시리즈**를 고려하는 것이 좋습니다.

AMD의 Ryzen 9000은 상당한 개선이 이루어질 것이라는 약속에도 불구하고 이전 제품을 능가하는 성능을 발휘하지 못하고 있습니다.

Finally, the dust has settled after the release of the Ryzen 9000, and we can calmly explore AMD's new products. Zen 5 was not something many were eagerly anticipating as a breakthrough, but I think those who follow the hardware market already know that AMD has followed in the worst traditions of Intel regarding how to properly test their products. Today, we will discuss why AMD was in such a hurry, what the new Ryzen chips are like, the actual performance gains and heat output, and whether it is worth considering the Ryzen 9000 for purchase. This is MK, and we operate across a wide range. Follow us on Telegram, VKontakte, and watch us on YouTube as we delve into the new Zen 5. 

It seemed that the low performance in the initial tests of the Ryzen 9000 was a bug in Windows 11. The reason lies in the software. Zen 5 features an improved branch prediction module, and just a week after the release, Microsoft issued a patch to resolve the issue. In general,

Разработчики сейчас нужны как золото. Задачи таких программистов включают в себя проектирование, разработку, тестирование, исправление ошибок и обновление программного обеспечения. Средняя зарплата специалистов составляет от 120,000 рублей в месяц и растет с развитием навыков. Компьютерная Академия Топ с упором на практику обучает по программе Разработка программного обеспечения. Эту профессию может освоить каждый в возрасте от 15 до 55 лет. Компания существует на рынке образования более 16 лет, и качество обучения подтверждается огромным количеством отзывов. В состав Академии Топ входят IT-школа, IT-колледж и IT-университет, более 380 оффлайн-филиалов по всей России. Небольшие группы, удобные локации, современные аудитории с новым оборудованием, опытные преподаватели и настоящее обучение. Учиться можно и удаленно, но наверняка и в вашем городе есть филиал Академии. Цель — трудоустроить каждого студента. Сделать это можно в процессе обучения или после защиты.

Diploma programs at which representatives of leading IT companies are present provide students with only relevant knowledge from real practice. There are no monotonous lectures, and communication within the team is always interesting. This is not a three-month course; everything is serious. Upon completion of the training, students will master the basics of programming languages, develop their own projects, obtain a powerful portfolio, and receive a state-recognized diploma. The program can be paid in installments, with interest-free financing provided by the Academy itself, without involving banks. A 13% tax deduction is possible. Follow the link in the description or scan the QR code on the screen to learn more and reserve a course. With the promo code MK, you will receive a 20% discount. Become a certified IT specialist with the Academy. Classes start in just two weeks, so hurry! Even before the official announcement, we were fed rumors about the super-fast Ryzen 9000, initially promising a 40% performance increase, then 25%, which is still significant, but the presentation...

Everything has been arranged in its place. AMD claims an average of 16% extra performance per GHz compared to the Ryzen 7000. It's not a record, but it's on par with other major Zen updates. Let's break down who is footing the bill. 

First of all, Zen 5 is a significant step forward in the internal structure of the core. It has one and a half times more arithmetic logic units, a third more address generation blocks, two new quad-pole caches for the first and second levels, as well as numerous optimizations for tasks. It's hard to call the Zen 5 architecture a mere stepping stone; AMD engineers have truly excelled here. 

Secondly, the manufacturing process for the CCD chips with cores has been slightly reduced. AMD continues to use its successful chiplet design from the 3000 series. The new processors can have up to two chips, each with eight cores, along with a separate input-output chip featuring integrated graphics. The latter has remained completely unchanged, still using the same six-core design.

The technology process is based on a 5-nanometer node and incorporates two RDNA 2 blocks inside, along with support for 28 PCI Express 5.0 lanes. The official memory frequency has slightly increased from 5200 to 5600 MHz, but we know very well that even the Ryzen 7000 series can easily exceed 7 GHz in practice. Therefore, the focus is currently on the capabilities of DDR5. The core technology process has decreased from 5 to 4 nm at TSMC, which provides a 20.2% improvement in energy efficiency, while transistor density has increased by 6%. Against this backdrop, AMD even took the risk of lowering the thermal package of three new products: the six-core Ryzen 96X and the eight-core 97X from 105 to 65 watts, and the twelve-core 9900X from 170 to 120 watts. Only the senior sixteen-core 9950X remains at its 170 watts. AMD decided not to change the frequencies, wisely considering that following Intel's degrading path would be bad for business. Other processors, as usual, will be revealed later; first, they need to capitalize on the profitable opportunities.

Users are willing to overpay for X in the name; they have added a bit of software features. There is a new curve sharper function that allows for more precise tuning of the voltage curve. The PB mode raises the thermal package quite well, even on AMD's official slides, where the 9 700X is constrained by 15% of the eight-core 65W. They also increased the memory operating mode to one-to-one for Ryzen 7000; it used to be at a frequency of 6,000 MHz, but now they promise up to 6,400 MHz. Oh, and there are new chipsets. According to AMD, the only significant change between the 600 and the M series is support for Ryzen 9000 out of the box without needing a BIOS update. Everything else remains the same. The top-tier X870 has plenty of USB, SATA, and PCI Express 5.0 for SSDs and graphics. Meanwhile, the B850 is a copy of the popular B650; it also supports overclocking of RAM and processors but limits graphics to sixteen PCI Express 4 lines. The lower-end B840 looks like a mockery of users, just like the A620; it can overclock as well.

It's only memory, but why was the bus cut down to just sixteen lines of PCI Express 3.0? It's unclear; even AMD's lower-tier models operate with eight lines of PCI Express 4. Reducing the bus bandwidth by half due to insufficient video memory can cut performance by up to a third. In short, they took the A620, reduced its bus, and called it B840. For some reason, it's hard to imagine what A820 might turn out to be; perhaps they'll stick in PCI Express 2.0. In general, avoid the B840 chipset; it seems like some kind of joke from the marketers. It will be released later this year. It’s better to go for the A620. 

To summarize: the number of cores is the same, the frequencies are the same, the power is the same, but they cut down the architecture and upgraded the marketing. As a result, according to marketing slides, the 9950X is faster than the 14900 by up to 56% in work tasks and up to 23% in games, and they've even reduced the price by 20-50 dollars compared to Ryzen 7000. It looks like a win, but for some reason, sales haven't taken off. Let's take a look at the real tests from AMD.

I still overestimated the energy efficiency of the 5, squeezed into 65 watts. The eight-core 9700X performs on par with its predecessor in heavy tasks, with an average increase of less than five percent, literally within the margin of error in games. Yes, the consumption is only 60 watts compared to 80 watts for the 7700X, but we are talking about desktops where even an extra 50 watts will not be noticeable. However, the performance increase is a different story. If we allow the 9700X to utilize the thermal package with the power limit, it surpasses its predecessor by an average of 10%. It's pleasing that AMD did not play cat-and-mouse games and has already released a new firmware update that returns the thermal package of the 9700X and 9600X to the old 105 watts. According to AMD's tests, this adds heat to the eight-core processor. But even such a move did not allow the 9700X to outperform the 7800X in games; the 64 MB cache turned out to be more significant than the minimal increase from the new architecture. Thus, the newcomer falls short in heavy tasks.

In projects on 10-15 FPS, they perform similarly. Moreover, the low-frequency 7800X 3D turns out to be energy-efficient, while the six-core wattage is quite sufficient. Therefore, games with overclocking improve performance, with the performance gain relative to the seven cores fluctuating around 7% in work tasks and reaching zero in games at high resolutions. Well, it's clear again: we were deceived; the Ryzen 9000 is not a new generation on Zen 5 but merely a rehash of Ryzen 7000. But wait, in single-threaded tests, everything looks great, exactly the promised 15% increase. Moreover, the fresh Ryzen chips, with the power of one core, managed to break into the top. So why is it so disappointing in multi-threaded performance? It's all because the Zen 5 architecture is still frankly raw. AMD didn't just postpone the announcement of Ryzen 9000 for no reason, and it's clearly not just a typo on the lid. Perhaps it was simply a ploy to buy some time. Apparently, the company just doesn't...

I managed to polish the new processors and decided to launch them on the market before the release of the Core Ultra 200 in October, which, according to the first tests, promises to be very interesting. Currently, the Ryzen 9000 has a host of growing pains; the latency between cores in different dies reaches up to 200 nanoseconds, which is three times more than that of the Ryzen 7000. The longer the cores wait for data, the lower the overall multi-threaded performance. AMD has already promised to fix this in the next firmware update, so in the future, chips based on Zen 5 will be further accelerated. Moreover, Windows itself is not ready for the new processors. According to AMD, the dual data pipeline requires additional optimizations in the system core, which were added to the current build of Windows 11 23 H2 just a week ago. Users of Windows 10 may never receive the necessary patch for branch prediction. This is how operating systems die, and tests confirm AMD's words: a simple system update boosts the performance of the 9700X by 10%. It seems that’s all.

The company is justified only if the same update increases frames by 7,700x with the same 10%, so the overall delta between generations remains unchanged, and the difference between chips in games stays within the margin of error. Meanwhile, the blue processors did not receive a boost; apparently, the deal between Microsoft and Intel has concluded, and as we know, a rising tide lifts all boats. There will be no revealing of Zen 5 against the backdrop of Zen 4 here. As a result, against its predecessors, the Ryzen 9,000 looks frankly weak on paper. Yes, they are cheaper, but in practice, prices for Ryzen 7,000 have plummeted over the past couple of years, following the old red tradition. There is no point in paying 26,000 for the 9,600X when the 7,600X costs a third less and is only slightly weaker with improved energy efficiency. Even the sixteen-core 9950X averages 135 watts in work tasks, which is 10% higher than its predecessor.

The temperatures also remain unnoticed; just as they heated up above 90° during heavy tasks, they continue to heat up. The heat dissipation from tiny crystals remains a serious problem. The battle with the shadow of the Ryzen 7000 from AMD is ongoing. It has yet to hold up against the formally updated Core 14. The newcomer looks better, and it’s no coincidence that AMD rushed to release it before the Core Ultra 200. The company clearly knows more about its competitors than we do. 

AMD promised us that the Ryzen 9950 X would be up to 20% faster than the 14900K in games. In practice, the situation is quite the opposite. Top Intel noticeably outperforms the new AMD leader in most projects. The engineers at AMD need to address the latency issues, and the new Windows will certainly boost FPS, but not by a third to achieve the promised increase. This is because AMD adjusted the tests in its favor. The twenty-thousand-ruble i9 was tested in stock mode with a 125-watt thermal package and DDR5 6000 RAM, meaning it was tested in a mode in which it will never operate.

We checked that even a 170-watt installation can reduce the performance of the 14900K by 15-20%. This allowed AMD's marketers to portray such superiority in the consumer segment. The six-core Ryzen 9 600X also does not shine; after optimizing Windows, it becomes on average 10% faster and is capable of competing with overclocked i5 processors at the same price. However, the latter is one and a half times faster in multi-threaded tests. So, there is no visible victory for AMD here. Meanwhile, Intel is not wasting any time. The first tests of the Core Ultra 9285K show that the new chip will outperform the 9950X in single-threaded performance by almost 5%, and in multi-threaded performance by a full 15%. Therefore, it is not surprising that AMD rolled out new products, which will look quite pale. The Ryzen 9 9000 demonstration illustrates the saying, Haste makes waste. In the Zen 5 architecture, they packed so much new stuff that now AMD programmers, along with Microsoft, will spend another six months optimizing the code for the hardware.

выходом Windows 11 24 H2, и после нескольких обновлений, мы, возможно, увидим обещанные 15% прироста между поколениями. Но первые впечатления уже подпорчены, и даже так они мало кому интересны. Даже на фоне обновлений, новинки от Intel выглядят не так привлекательно. А ведь у Intel сейчас вообще нет вариантов, и она должна всех удивить своими Core 200 Ultra через пару месяцев. Не просто же так AMD торопилась с релизом Ryzen 9000, поэтому сейчас нет никакого смысла даже смотреть в сторону новинок на Zen 5. Если хотите надежные и быстрые ПК на долгие годы вперед, собирайте на Ryzen 7000 — они сильно подешевели и без проблем тянут топовые карты. При этом на Zen 5 выйдет еще как минимум одно поколение, так что проблем с обновлениями у вас не будет. Не хотите Ryzen? Подождите буквально пару месяцев. Intel получила щелчок по носу и сейчас активно полирует десктопные Core Ultra 200.

The next batch of blue products regarding the Ryzen 9000 series follows a cyclical pattern. The Ryzen 2000 series didn’t differ much from the 1000 series, only by a few percentage points. However, back then, AMD at least honestly acknowledged this. Most likely, by the release of the budget 9500F and the gaming 9000 X3D, the company will have refined Zen 5, and the new products will indeed look more interesting compared to their predecessors. But by that time, there will already be competitors in the market capable of intensifying this rivalry. As users, we can only observe the confrontation between these two titans over our wallets. For the latest news from the world of IT and science, read our Telegram channel—no copy-pasting, we work in our own style. Links to the Telegram channel are in the description and pinned in the comments. My name is Mikhail Kroshin, and this communication session has ended. I wonder how many people will recognize me by this shirt I bought from the charity shop. Alright, I’ll be waiting for you in the comments. By the way, I love corn! I look forward to it every year.

I plant, I water, and my dad helps me work with it. It's more fun to plant corn together. Let it grow quickly!

Что за спешка, AMD? Всё о Ryzen 9000 | Zen 5 с запасом

Мой Компьютер

AMD의 Ryzen 9000: 자세히 살펴보기

AMD의 Ryzen 9000 출시는 Windows 11 버그로 인해 초기 성능 문제에 직면했으며, 이는 나중에 Microsoft에서 패치를 적용했습니다.

새로운 Zen 5 아키텍처에는 향상된 분기 예측 모듈이 포함되어 더 나은 성능을 목표로 합니다.

컴퓨터 아카데미 탑은 업계 전문가의 취업 및 관련 지식에 중점을 둔 실용적인 소프트웨어 개발 교육을 제공합니다.

AMD의 Zen 5 아키텍처 및 새로운 프로세서

AMD의 Zen 5 아키텍처는 GHz당 16%의 성능 향상을 제공하며, 더 많은 산술 논리 유닛과 새로운 쿼드폴 캐시를 포함해 내부 구조가 크게 개선되었습니다.

새로운 프로세서는 최대 2개의 칩과 각각 8개의 코어를 갖춘 칩렛 디자인을 사용하며, 통합 그래픽과 향상된 메모리 주파수를 제공합니다.

AMD는 일부 모델의 열 패키지를 낮추고 새로운 칩셋을 도입했으며, M 시리즈는 Ryzen 9000을 즉시 지원합니다.

AMD의 B840 칩셋 및 Ryzen 9000 시리즈

AMD의 B840 칩셋은 버스 대역폭 감소와 의심스러운 마케팅 전략으로 인해 판매 부진으로 이어졌다는 비판을 받아왔습니다.

Ryzen 9000 시리즈는 이전 제품과 비슷한 코어와 주파수를 제공하지만, 9700X는 최적의 조건에서 이전 제품을 10%만 능가하는 등 큰 성능 향상에 어려움을 겪고 있습니다.

새로운 아키텍처의 미숙함과 회사의 발표 지연으로 인해 Ryzen 9000 시리즈의 진정한 영향력에 대한 의문이 제기되고 있습니다.

AMD의 Ryzen 9000 프로세서: 출시 및 과제

AMD는 코어 울트라 200이 출시되기 전에 Ryzen 9000 프로세서를 출시했지만, 높은 코어 지연 시간 및 멀티스레드 성능 문제 등 상당한 성장통에 직면해 있습니다.

펌웨어 업데이트를 통해 이러한 문제를 해결하겠다는 약속과 최근의 Windows 11 최적화로 성능이 향상될 수 있지만, Ryzen 9000은 이전 모델에 비해 여전히 약해 보임니다.

또한 AMD의 테스트 방식은 현재 대부분의 프로젝트에서 상위 인텔 프로세서가 새로운 AMD 리더를 능가하고 있기 때문에 약속한 성능 향상에 대한 의문이 제기되고 있습니다.

AMD 대 인텔: CPU 패권을 위한 전쟁

170와트 설치는 14900K의 성능을 15~20% 감소시킬 수 있어 AMD가 우위를 차지할 수 있습니다.

Ryzen 9 600X는 오버클럭된 i5 프로세서와 경쟁하기 어려운 반면, 인텔의 Core Ultra 9285K는 단일 및 멀티스레드 성능 모두에서 9950X를 능가할 것으로 예상됩니다.

AMD가 Ryzen 9 9000을 서둘러 출시하면서 최적화가 지연될 수 있으며, 인텔은 곧 출시될 Core Ultra 200이 강력한 영향력을 발휘할 것으로 예상됩니다.

Ryzen 9000 시리즈 블루 제품은 주기적인 패턴을 따르며, 2000 시리즈는 1000 시리즈와 약간의 차이만 있습니다.

AMD는 보급형 9500F와 게이밍 9000 X3D를 출시하여 Zen 5를 개선할 것으로 예상되어 신제품이 더욱 흥미로워질 것으로 예상됩니다.

그때까지 시장 경쟁은 더욱 치열해져 사용자들의 지갑을 열기 위한 경쟁이 치열해질 것으로 보입니다.