로저 워터스의 반유대주의: 가자 분쟁에 대한 그의 견해에 대한 비난

### 로저 워터스의 반유대주의 발언과 하마스 공격
* 😡 핑크 플로이드의 로저 워터스는 최근 글렌 그린월드와 함께 출연한 팟캐스트에서 자신의 반유대주의적 견해를 다시 한 번 확인했습니다.
* 🤔 워터스는 이스라엘에 대한 하마스의 공격이 1,400명 학살의 심각성을 경시하는 '거짓 깃발' 작전이라고 주장해 논란을 일으켰습니다.
* 😠 그는 문서화된 증거를 무시하고 유대인의 속죄일 연휴 기간에 패러글라이더를 이용한 새로운 공격 방법을 사용했다며 공격에 대한 설명을 조작된 것이라고 일축했습니다.
* 💔 발표자는 워터스 장관의 발언에 혐오감을 표하며 민간인 표적에 대한 공격과 아기와 노인을 포함한 무고한 사람들의 고통을 강조했습니다.
* 😡 발표자는 워터스가 음모론을 조장한다고 비판하며, 그의 수사를 알렉스 존스의 수사와 비교하고 끔찍한 사건의 현실을 강조합니다.
* ⚖ 발표자는 이스라엘-팔레스타인 분쟁의 복잡성을 인정하면서도 하마스의 행동과 양측의 무고한 민간인들의 고통을 규탄해야 한다고 강조합니다.
* 💔 발표자는 일부 좌파 진영 내 반유대주의적 기류에 대한 우려를 표명하고 평화와 폭력 종식을 촉구합니다.
* 📣 발표자는 시청자들에게 로저 워터스의 음악을 보이콧할 것을 촉구하며 마무리하고, 워터스의 과거 정치적 입장이 한때 인정받았던 점을 언급하며 워터스의 발언에 대한 혐오감을 다시 한 번 강조합니다.

로저 워터스의 반유대주의적 발언이 분노를 불러일으키며 불매운동을 촉구하는 목소리가 커지고 있습니다.

Hello, hello, hello. A video, a video about Roger Waters. Why not? Why not? This has been doing the rounds; this broke yesterday.

But I was, I'm in two minds on whether to talk about it, but it annoyed me so much.

Even though, even though I let it float out again, I thought, "No, I'm going to talk about it," because I've been talking about

it, and hey, views; might get some views on the back of it, you know. But anyway, Waters, he of Pink

Floyd, um, you might, did you have any doubts that he was a raging anti-Semite? Did you

have any doubts about that? Well, he doubled down; he tripled down; he confirmed everyone's suspicions that he really isn't a nice chap at all. But then we already knew that, didn't we?

If he's not spitting on fans' faces, or, you know, commenting on the looks of David Gilmour's wife, um, all I can say about

Roger Waters is: imagine waking up next to that. Well, first you think of the bank balance; when you really think of

you take one for the team to be sleeping next to a multi-millionaire, and it's always worrying when a

multi-millionaire, you know, rants and raves and tells everyone how to behave, isn't it? Um, but yeah, he appeared on a

podcast with a guy called Glenn Greenwald. I'm not familiar with his work. I think it's called 'System

Update,' and you think, okay, well, there was talking about, you know, what's going on in Gaza at the moment. For those who

aren't familiar with what happened on October 7th – it's over a month ago now – um, there was an incursion by Hamas

militants. Remember, in the UK, Hamas is a proscribed terrorist organization, up there with the likes of ISIS and...

Al-Qaeda. We must remember the context of all this, and there was an incursion resulting in, you know, 1,400 people being

slaughtered, to put it mildly, in a polite word. And then, um, a number

of people being kidnapped—babies as well as babies. They kidnapped babies and the elderly; like I say, 80

year-olds to babies were kidnapped and taken into Gaza, where they're being held, again, as a bargaining chip, you

know. Um, so Raj is on there, and he's, you know, he's very pro-Palestine, very anti-Israel, and

um, oh, he goes there, doesn't he? He actually, um, you know, talks about the attacks and puts forward, you

know, the old idea that, you know, maybe, just maybe, you know, it was a false flag; these are false

flag attacks, and nobody really knows, nobody really knows what happened, and that, you know, the Israelis were, you

know, talking it up a bit. Um, now, again, there's been some horrible things, horrible things documented, and there's even a website

the Israeli government, you know, shared a website where they show evidence—all their evidence—of the incursion. Um, but yeah, again, this is this

is what really, you know, when when you say that he was also surprised that the Israelis were were caught out by the

attack—well, not really, because they came in on paragliders. It was a new form of attack which no one had ever seen before,

and this came at the end of the Jewish Yom Kippur, um, you know, religious holidays. But and that's why they were holding a

festival, because they attacked a music festival. And here you have, you know, Raj, you know, sparring this stuff,

absolutely, you know, saying that, you know, the massacre—the massacre was blown out of all proportion—and see, and something there's

Something fishy about the attack, and you just go, "Oh, come on, Roger, come on, you know." And I'm just reading some of the

headline quotes, you know. Um, again, he says he writers are making up stories about the attacks, and you

just, you just balk at this. It's just, it's impossible. 1400 innocent people were slaughtered. It

would have been different, I think, if Hamas had attacked military targets. Actually, attack military targets; they weren't

going to do that because they, they would have been outgunned and outnumbered. Um, so they attacked a civilian

civilian target, and and here we are. And it's plainly obvious when you start throwing around these tropes about

false flags. This is real Alex Jones territory, and look where it got him. He'll be saying next, he'll be wrapping

his head in tinfoil and saying, "Oh, did you notice all the Jews had the day off on September 11th? I swear, I

swear." We'll be saying that next, you know, and it's just, I just can't believe I can't

believe someone isn't controlling him, someone isn't pulling him aside and going, "Come on, Roger." Now, again, my stance on the whole

conflict is I try not to pick a side because it's a religious war, and when you factor religion into any of this,

it's going to be ugly. But you know, when Hamas did this, I said, "Yeah, Israel, destroy Hamas." But Hamas used human

shields; they hide in schools and hospitals. So it makes it guerrilla warfare, you

know. This is where we're at. I do not have a side, but I think what Hamas did needs to be addressed, and when you

see these people on the streets of the various Western metropolises, you know, marching, there will be some people there that support a

mass and again they might as well be waving the ISIS flag or cheering for the IRA or any other — insert your

favorite terrorist organization here — and while I can understand why certain leaders are not calling for a

ceasefire, it would be nice if we could stop this because at the end of all this, it's only ever innocent people that die.

You know, they never go after the military; they never go after, you know, Netanyahu or the, you know,

whoever the opposite is in Gaza. They never take out the political people; it's always the innocents that get it, and it

always will be. Um, and that's where we're at. It's never going to end until we get

rid of religion. It's never going to end. And if you really want to blame someone, if you want to blame someone for this,

blame that nice Mr. Hitler, because he's the man that caused all this all those years ago. And it's amazing

that that one man's actions, that madness, has trickled down to this point; it's trickled down to here. And wouldn't it

be nice if we could all just get along? That's what we need to do. And I don't

think people like Roger Waters are helping the situation; he's just stoking anti-Semitism, you know, and it's not good.

It's not right, you know. He values one set of people over another, you know, and that's when you know something's wrong.

Oh, those Jews, those 1400 Jews, false flags, not real — that's the problem. No, you've got to treat both sides equally, and he

isn't doing that, and that's where you're going to end up destroying the other side. That's what

I've always said: if you take one side of the argument in this, you're favoring the destruction of the other side. I'm

only favoring the destruction of Hamas, but that's going to come at a great cost to civilians, and that's the real shame

of it. Um, but yeah, I just I just wanted to talk about my absolute and utter disgust for Roger Waters again. This is

for someone when I was younger, I was like, yeah, I liked, you know, his political message, and you because again I'm left

lefty. I'm an old lefty myself. Um, but what I don't like about the left wing is

this constant anti-Semitic undercurrent that runs through it, and that disturbs me greatly. Um, and yeah, peace, that's what we want; we

want peace for everyone in all the wars, in all the conflicts. Why can't these soldiers just lay down their arms and

refuse to fight? But they can't, because it's all based on ideology, whether it's, you know, Russia versus

Ukraine, or all this, you know, you've got, like I say, the Russians fighting the supposed Nazis, and then you've got

the Islamic groups fighting the Jews. And if you think about what's in his mind, it contradicts; he's contradictory in

his support. But anyway, that was my thought on this. Um, I've already sold my Waters records ages ago, and I would

urge you to uh, do the same and never buy another one of his records again, um, unless you believe in all this stuff,

unless you believe in in uh, the the, like I say, the terrorism that Hamas provides. Um, and that's that's fine;

that's fine; that's an opinion to have, isn't it? So there we have it: Roger Waters at it

again, and it just goes to show that Polly Samson was right when she called him out earlier this year.

Um, and again, he never took her to court; there was no uh, there was no defamation court case, was there? Uh, that's because

was known in his little heart that she's right and he'd have a hard time

proving it in court. So there you go. Thank you for watching. Sorry it's like this, but you know, you talk about the

things you want to talk about, uh, and that was the video. Um, that's it. Thank you for watching. Let's peace, let's have

peace, let's all get along. That's the video. Thank you for watching. [Music] Tata

Roger Waters Suggests Hamas Attack on Israel a "False Flag"

AAAAHHH! It's Darren Lock

소개 및 로저 워터스의 논란의 여지가 있는 발언

이 동영상에서는 로저 워터스의 최근 발언에 대해 설명합니다.

발표자는 처음에는 망설이지만 논란을 해결하기로 결정합니다.

워터스의 반유대주의적 견해가 강조되어 있습니다.

워터스의 과거 행동과 성격이 언급됩니다.

워터스가 글렌 그린월드의 팟캐스트에 출연한 것도 주목할 만합니다.

이스라엘에 대한 하마스의 공격과 워터스의 대응

연사가 10월 7일에 발생한 하마스 공격에 대해 설명합니다.

하마스는 금지된 테러 단체로 지정되어 있습니다.

공격으로 인한 사상자 및 납치 규모를 설명합니다.

워터스의 친팔레스타인 및 반이스라엘 입장이 언급됩니다.

워터스는 이 공격이 허위 신고 작전이라고 주장합니다.

워터스의 주장에 대한 비판과 연사의 관점

화자는 워터스의 주장을 반박하고 혐오감을 표현합니다.

연사는 공격의 규모를 고려할 때 워터스의 주장이 불가능하다는 점을 강조합니다.

연사가 하마스가 민간인 표적을 공격한 이유를 설명합니다.

화자는 분쟁에 대해 중립을 표명하지만 하마스의 행동을 비난합니다.

연사가 서구 도시에서 일어난 분쟁에 대한 반응에 대해 이야기합니다.

화자는 분쟁의 근본 원인에 대해 히틀러를 비난합니다.

연사는 워터스가 반유대주의를 부추긴다고 비판합니다.

연사는 양측의 동등한 대우가 필요하다고 강조합니다.

화자는 민간인 사상자에 대한 우려를 표명합니다.

연사는 자신의 좌파적 견해에 대해 이야기하고 좌파 내부의 반유대주의적 저류에 대해 비판합니다.

이 스피커는 시청자들에게 워터스의 음악을 보이콧하라고 권유합니다.