군사 전략: 역사적 전술 및 개념 개요

### 군사 전략: 전술의 개요와 그 의미
* ⚔ "미끼와 출혈" 전략은 한 쪽이 두 적을 선동하여 서로 싸우게 함으로써, **선동자가 나중에 공격할 수 있도록 힘을 비축**하는 동안 적들이 스스로 약해지도록 하는 것입니다.
* "참수"는 적군의 지도부를 제거하는 것을 목표로 하며, 잠재적으로 혼란을 초래할 수 있지만 **원하는 전략적 결과를 달성하지 못하는 경우**가 많습니다.
* 💣 '충격과 공포' 원칙은 적의 사기를 떨어뜨리고 항복을 강요하기 위해 **압도적인 힘**을 사용하는 것으로, **히로시마와 나가사키 원폭 투하**를 비롯한 역사적 사례가 있습니다.
* '살라미 슬라이싱'은 큰 반발을 일으키지 않고 더 큰 목표를 달성하기 위해 **작고 점진적인 조치**를 취하는 것을 의미하며, 종종 공격적인 의도를 모호하게 만드는 경우가 있습니다.
* 🌾 "벨룸 세이 입섬 알레" 전략은 **침략군이 지역 자원을 활용하여 자급자족**할 수 있도록 하는 전략으로, 특히 멀리 떨어진 분쟁이 장기화될 때 효과적입니다.
* ⏳ '파비안 전략'은 **적의 보급선 취약점을 이용해 직접 대치보다는 소규모 교전을 통한 소모전**에 중점을 둡니다.
* ⚖ '소모전'은 시간이 지남에 따라 적의 자원과 사기를 서서히 소모시키는 것을 목표로 하지만, **1차 세계대전에서 볼 수 있듯이 결정적인 결과 없이 분쟁이 장기화**될 수 있습니다.
* 🚧 '잉크 스팟 전략'은 **적대 지역에 보안 지역을 설정**하고 통제권을 확대하는 것으로, 반란에 대응하면서 지역 지원을 얻기 위한 민군 작전의 중요성을 강조합니다.

미끼와 출혈 전략은 한 쪽이 적을 약화시키면서 결정적인 공격을 위해 힘을 비축하는 전략입니다.

bait and bleed. It's the strategy where one side tries to get two of its enemies to fight each other. The idea is to let these enemies wear each other down, using up their resources and weakening their armies. And while they are busy fighting, the side using the bait and bleed strategy stays out of the fight, conserving its own strength. After the bleeding phase, the side that kept its strength can attack the weakened ones. Decapitation. It's the military strategy aimed at removing the leadership of a hostile government or group. This could achieve strategic paralysis, as the enemy doesn't know what to do anymore. But some are skeptical, saying that even though it's a seductive strategy because it promises to solve conflicts quickly and cheaply with little collateral damage, decapitation strikes frequently fail or are not likely to produce the intended consequences. Some even argue that killing the head of an organization might produce disorder in them, leading to politically ineffective unfocused attacks on civilians, and that sometimes their leaders are the most qualified persons in their organizations for peace.

negotiators shock and awe, also known as rapid dominance, it's the use of overwhelming power and spectacular displays of force to surprise the enemy and destroy their will to fight, making them surrender. It was initially created as an attempt to develop a post-Cold War military doctrine for the United States, and the doctrine of rapid dominance requires the capability to disrupt means of communication, transportation, food production, water supply, and other aspects of infrastructure. Some consider the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as examples of shock and awe. Salami slicing, it involves taking a series of small steps to have a larger gain at the end, which would have been difficult or unlawful to perform all at once. It can be useful for governments that don't want to have a Cassis belly, as it's more probable that those small steps are less noticeable than a big one. These small steps can be taken by camouflaging a fence as defense, and it gives the enemy only two choices, either silently suffer or risk an expensive and dangerous war. Bellum say ipsum alet it.

means the war will feed itself in Latin, and it's the strategy where an invading army sustains itself using the resources of the territory it is invading instead of relying on long supply lines from its own country. The army lives off the land, taking food supplies and other resources from the local population. This can prove especially effective if the war is fought far from their homeland, making their supply lines both long and costly. Fabian strategy, it's a military approach where you avoid large direct battles with your enemy, and instead, you focus on wearing them down over time through smaller, more manageable skirmishes, and by making it difficult for them to get supplies or rest. Militaries use this strategy only if they believe time is on their side, usually because the side employing the strategy is fighting in or close to their homeland, and the enemy is far from home, forcing them to have long and costly supply lines. This strategy was first used by Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus in the Second Punic War. Military districts dividing one's own

territory into military districts where each part of the military is responsible. It has various pros such as improved local control and training facilities and programs tailored to the specific needs and conditions of the district. They are often more responsible for administrative than operational matters. Attrition warfare is a type of military strategy where the goal is to wear down the enemy over time by constantly attacking them and causing them to lose soldiers, equipment, and supplies. Instead of trying to win quickly with a big decisive battle, the focus is on making the enemy gradually weaker and weaker until they can't keep fighting anymore. In real wars, this means lots of smaller battles and continuous pressure on the enemy, making it harder for them to replace lost soldiers and broken equipment. Sometimes a side that perceives itself to be at a marked disadvantage may deliberately seek out attrition warfare to neutralize its opponent's advantages over time. When attritional methods have worn down the enemy sufficiently to make other methods feasible, attritional methods are often complemented or even abandoned by other

strategies. Although attrition warfare may seem like a logical choice for combatants with more resources or advantages than their opponents, there are also significant disadvantages. Perhaps the most common reason for failure of attrition warfare is related to the time required to fulfill one's war goals, as the geopolitical conditions may change over time. For example, the opponent can gain new allies in the meantime. Additionally, the attrition strategy gives opponents time to adjust tactics and strategy. An example that shows attrition warfare being used ineffectively is World War I, when military commanders on both sides ineffectively relied on attrition warfare, which resulted in casualties without a strategic result. Battle of annihilation. Battle of annihilation is a military strategy focused on completely destroying the enemy's ability to fight in one pivotal battle, even the first one. This can be useful when time is not on their side and they need to end the war quickly, and when the element of surprise can prove pivotal to the results of the war. Also, it was famously used by

Napoleon, such as in the battles of Ostet and Gina blockade. It's when one side tries to isolate and cut off an area, usually an entire country or region, from outside resources, supplies, and communication. The goal is to weaken the enemy by preventing them from getting the food, weapons, fuel, and other essentials they need to continue fighting. And it differs from an embargo or sanction, which are legal barriers to trade rather than physical barriers. Also, blockades often result in the starvation of the civilian population, like during the blockade of Germany during World War I. Nowadays, if blockades are made with the main goal of starving civilians and preventing humanitarian aid from reaching them, they can be considered a war crime and potentially a crime against humanity. There are three types of blockades: close, distant, and loose. A close blockade entails placing warships within sight of the blockaded coast or port so they can immediately stop any ship trying to enter or leave. This type of blockade is very effective because it tightly controls the area, but it's also the hardest one to do since ships need

to stay at sea at all times, even with storms in bad weather, usually far from any support, and they are vulnerable to sudden attack from the blockaded side whose ships may stay safe in Harbor until they choose to come out. In a distant blockade, the blockaders stay farther away from the blockaded coastal port, which means that they need more ships on station, but they can usually operate closer to their bases and are at much less risk from enemy raids. It's important to note that distant blockades were basically impossible prior to the 16th century due to the nature of the ships used. A loose blockade has a different goal than the other two; the blockading ships are withdrawn out of sight from the coast but no farther to lure the enemy into venturing out but to stay close enough to strike. Ink Spot strategy: when a military needs to subdue a large hostile region with a relatively small military force, it uses the inkpot strategy, which consists of establishing a number of small safe areas dispersed over the region and then pushing out.

from each area extending its control and making the areas larger until eventually they join up only pockets of resistance clear and hold. It's the counterinsurgency strategy of clearing an area of enemies and then keeping the area clear of insurgence while winning the support of the populace for the government and its policies. Once an area has been cleared, local police authority is reestablished rather than military authority, and government authority reasserted. This strategy encompasses the use of civil-military operations, which consist of minimizing civil interference and, on the contrary, maximizing civil support for future military actions. Only highly strategic areas are initially chosen for clear and hold operations, but once they are secure, the operation gradually spreads to less strategic areas until the whole desired area is under control. This strategy was most famously known by the US Army during the Vietnam War, and there is still a hot debate on whether it is successful or not. Some of the most critical elements are that the traditional military forces dislike the limited role they play in the clear and hold strategy and may

advocate for a more traditional war-making role, and that the strategy takes time, which a government may, for various reasons, lack. The strategy also requires significant numbers of on-the-ground clearing, combat, and holding police forces, and it can be successful by only isolating the population from insurgents. Others argue that the initial limited goals of clear-and-hold operations enable guerrilla forces to regroup militarily and that the strategy relies too heavily on physical security issues and ignores the role that ideology, nationalism, and other belief systems play in fomenting insurgency in the first place. Maneuver Warfare. It's the conceptual opposite of attrition warfare, and it's the strategy that emphasizes movement, initiative, and surprise to achieve a position of advantage while minimizing frontal combat. Its goal is to destroy the enemy's will and ability to fight, and it's mainly used by small militaries that are more cohesive, better trained, or more technologically advanced. It's especially used in modern times thanks to the use of mechanized vehicles, bypassing and cutting off enemy strong

points often results in the collapse of that strong point, even where the physical damage is minimal, like what happened with the Maginot Line. Since tempo and initiative are so critical to the success of maneuver warfare, command structures tend to be more decentralized, with more tactical freedom given to lower-level unit leaders. If you want to discuss this video or suggest an idea for the next one, join my Discord. Link in the description.

Every War Strategy Explained in 8 Minutes

I explain interesting stuff using paint.

💼 Business Mail: operamp4@gmail.com


The Paint Explainer

군사 전략: 미끼와 출혈, 참수, 충격과 공포, 살라미 썰기

미끼와 출혈은 한 쪽이 적에게 서로 싸우도록 유도하여 나중에 공격할 수 있도록 자신의 힘을 비축하는 전략입니다.

참수는 적대 집단의 지도부를 제거하는 것을 목표로 하지만 그 효과에 대해서는 논란의 여지가 있습니다.

충격과 공포는 압도적인 힘을 사용하여 적을 놀라게 하고 사기를 떨어뜨리는 반면, 살라미 슬라이스는 눈에 띄지 않는 작은 단계를 밟아 더 큰 이득을 취하는 것입니다.

군사 전략: 군사 전략: 적을 유지 및 약화시키기

"전쟁이 스스로를 먹여 살린다는 뜻"의 이 용어는 침략군이 긴 보급선에 의존하지 않고 현지 자원을 이용해 생계를 유지하는 것을 의미합니다.

파비안 전략은 직접적인 전투를 피하고 소규모 교전을 통해 적을 지치게 만드는 전략으로, 공격자가 집에 가까이 있을 때 주로 사용됩니다.

소모전은 지속적인 공격을 통해 시간이 지남에 따라 적을 약화시키는 것을 목표로 하므로 불리한 상황에 처한 팀에게 적합한 전략입니다.

군사 전략: 소모전 및 전멸 전투

소모전은 시간이 지남에 따라 적의 자원을 고갈시키는 데 의존하지만, 지정학적 조건의 변화와 상대방이 적응할 시간으로 인해 비효율적일 수 있습니다.

섬멸전은 한 번의 중요한 전투에서 적의 전투 능력을 결정적으로 파괴하는 것을 목표로 하며, 종종 기습을 통해 빠른 성과를 달성합니다.

봉쇄는 특정 지역을 외부 자원으로부터 고립시키고 차단하여 적을 약화시키는 데 사용되지만, 민간인 아사로 이어질 수 있으며 전쟁 범죄로 간주될 수도 있습니다.

봉쇄 전략과 잉크 스팟 접근 방식

봉쇄 전략은 폭풍이 몰아치는 동안 바다에 머무르는 것으로, 원거리 봉쇄에는 더 많은 함선이 필요하지만 기지와 가까운 곳에서 작전을 수행합니다.

느슨한 봉쇄는 적을 유인하는 동시에 공격할 수 있을 만큼 가까운 거리를 유지하는 것을 목표로 합니다.

잉크 스팟 전략은 소규모 안전 지역을 설정하여 점진적으로 통제권을 확대하고 반란군을 소탕하며 민간인의 지지를 얻는 것으로, 특히 베트남 전쟁의 맥락에서 그 효과에 대해 논란이 있었습니다.

전통적인 전쟁 전략이 효과를 발휘하려면 시간과 상당한 지상 병력이 필요하지만, 제한된 정부 자원으로는 어려움을 겪을 수 있습니다.

비평가들은 이러한 전략이 게릴라 세력의 재편성을 허용하고 반란의 근본적인 원인을 무시한다고 주장합니다.

반면 기동전은 분산된 지휘 구조를 사용하여 유리한 위치를 확보하고 적의 거점을 교란하기 위해 이동과 기습을 강조합니다.