카말라 해리스: 미디어 조사 및 정책 책임의 필요성

### 카말라 해리스의 정책 입장과 미디어 대응에 대한 우려
* 🏥 의료 국유화와 미실현 자본 이득에 대한 세금 부과에 대한 **카말라 해리스 의원의 입장에 대한 우려**가 제기되었습니다.
* 🗳 해리스가 자신의 정책 입장을 명확히 밝히기 위해 **언론 인터뷰나 토론에 참여하지 않는 것에 대한 비판**이 있었습니다.
* 📊 해리스와 바이든을 대하는 언론의 태도를 비교하며 **해리스의 정책에 대해 더 비판적인 질문**을 던져야 한다는 목소리가 커졌습니다.
* 🧑 후보자가 자신의 의견에 동의하지 않을 수 있는 사람들을 포함하여 **다양한 미디어 매체 및 청중과 소통**하는 것이 중요합니다.
* 👩 특히 해리스가 대통령이 될 가능성이 있는 상황에서 **국가에 대한 정책 비전을 명확하게 밝히지 않았다는 비판**이 제기되었습니다.
* 🤝 해리스의 인도계 미국인 유산이 적절하게 다루어지지 않고 있다는 지적과 함께 **정체성 정치보다는 정책에 초점을 맞출 것**을 촉구합니다.
* 📰 일부 인터뷰어가 어려운 질문을 하거나 대안적인 관점을 제시하지 않는다는 제안과 함께 **해리스에게 유리한 언론의 편향성**에 대한 비판이 제기되었습니다.
* 🏈 정치를 축구팀에 비유하며 리더십 자리에 **'최고의 선수'**가 필요하다는 점을 강조했습니다.

카말라 해리스는 대선 후보로서 투명성과 책임성을 확보하기 위해 어려운 질문에 직면해야 합니다.

for K. Harris's part, though I think she owes the people of this country an answer. Where does she stand on nationalizing healthcare? Are you for it or are you against it? Where do you stand? This is a big one that people don't talk about. Affects small business owners, including black and white business owners across the country. She favors what's called a tax on unrealized capital gains. What that means is even if you have a business, you know you're a businessman too, right? So you're operating a business. But take somebody who's maybe in a tougher position than you are. That means you have to pay taxes even when you don't have the cash to pay those taxes because the government says that it's worth something. And you have to pay 25% of that value every year. Well, what if you don't have the cash in your pocket? That forces you to either sell your business, take out a loan to pay taxes. That's a formula for real economic calamity. She has consistently supported that. That's what we need to be talking.

about. Are you still in favor of it? If so, why? Let's have that policy debate. And I think that hiding from those issues is something that leaves the American people holding the bag. She'll get to that, I'm sure, when debates come in, everything else. Mons, she does interviews. I agree with that. I want to ask you to think about the flip-flopping too. Isn't that what politicians do, though? And what I mean by that is JD Vance was calling Trump America's Hitler, right? But now he's, when it comes to Trump, he's the HW Tu girl. Like, he's just, you know, sucking him off every chance he gets. And that's what a lot of y'all do, like just politicians in general. You hear so many different Republicans have said so many negative things about Donald Trump, but then soon as he becomes a nominee, everybody just falls in line. And normally, they fall in line in unison. And you can rage against Rage Against the Machine. It doesn't feel like Trump, like not there. Like, so here's what I will say is it.

fair game to press JD Vance hard on why he said certain things about Donald Trump before versus what his view is on Donald Trump today. Yes, I think that's fair game. And has he been pressed, and has he answered for that? Yes, he has. What I would love to see is both candidates, and Kamala Harris hasn't done this yet. I'd love to challenge her to do it, 'cause I think it's good for the voters of the country. She hasn't sat down for one media interview of a hard-pressing one-on-one variety yet, and she's actually the leading candidate now in many of the polls for US president. So, I just think we deserve a country where the people are willing to show up. She should show up here. She should show up on CNBC, where I was this morning, and actually engage in hard questions about what her beliefs are. You saw JD say what you will on three yesterday, pressed on exactly that very issue, and I think that's good for the American people to then be able to make their own judgment. It's not your judgment or a

journalist judgment, but it's what people at home are able to see to assess. Do I actually believe somebody who believes they changed their mind over the course of time? Harris might have changed their mind, and I think it's okay. Flip-flopping is one thing; changing your mind thoughtfully is another. But you deserve to be questioned on it, and it's up to the voters to decide whether or not they believe you. Right now, we're not getting that chance, and I do think it is, you know, you're saying, Well, we hopefully we're going to see that. I'm not sure yet that we will. It's been about a solid month that KLA Harris has been the presumptive nominee. We got the convention coming up, what, this coming week, next week? I think it is vital for the health of this country that the same treatment that the media gave Joe Biden in that last few weeks after his debate. They didn't do that for three years. Yeah, for three years, we missed that. The fact

that it took that early debate and Donald Trump demolishing in that debate for the country to suddenly wake up and say that Joe Biden is not a functioning US president. It is actually a damning indictment of the entire media and its relationship to the political class. So, we can't make that same mistake with Kamala Harris. I think the media needs to demand that she at least face the same kind of questioning that, frankly, JD Vance and Donald Trump are getting right now. And then the public is, it's up to them to decide. That's a functioning democracy. But you're not stop defending her, Charlamagne, and people that have asked her questions. They asked her who's her favorite rapper. Yeah, they don't ask her hard-pressing questions. And they all, anything she says and does, and same for Tim Walls, they just kind of like B it up like it's something like, and trumping them, anything they do, they tear it down and demonize and scrutinize it. So, there's obviously a bias here. And then we have

these puppets who are going up to bat for her. Like, who even is this lady? I've never seen her in my life. They're trying to find somebody to replace Angela. You know, they've just had like three different random black ladies on there. I just wonder, like, true, why would they look at, you know, the Biden and the Harrison campaign is just completely lied. 'Cause she went on stage and lied to people and said Biden is perfectly fine. And then we just witnessed her. They never talk about that. Put her in first place in front of this man without, you know, no elections happening to vote her in. Y'all F to tell us we supposed to listen to these people that been lying to us. Well, Biden did kind of win, but I feel like Biden ain't damn near win. They ain't do no race. They didn't do nothing. It's weird. This is weird. And I'm confused how people are falling for this. Turn around somebody, you know, everyone knows this person just

blatantly lied to me. Now I'm going to vote for them to be my leader. Like, that just doesn't have off identity politics. Literally off of that. Well, he's racist, so uh, I'll go with this. Are getting right now, and then the public is, it's up to them to decide. That's a functioning democracy. But CU, you're not implying by her not doing the interviews and based off the way that Biden was treated in those last couple weeks. You're not implying you don't think she's competent to be the president of the United States, right? I'm saying the media is covering for her right now the same way they covered for Biden for three years. You think they're covering, or you think that she's just using her paying this? She's using a strategy, okay? I think she's using some smart, which politicians do. That's fine, but I think it's the media's job now to cut through that strategy and say, This person very well could be the president of the United States, has at least a 50%.

chance right now according to most forecasts of being the next president. She deserves to be questioned, not with kid gloves, but questioned with the gloves off on what exactly her policy vision is for the country. Until that happens, I think the voters are hiding in the dark, and that's what allows the machine to work, 'cause we know she's questioned a lot on that behind closed doors. Who's funding the campaigns of both parties, you know, behind closed doors? A lot of donors ask a lot of questions. That's how you raise hundreds of millions of dollars in just one month. The voting public deserves that same level of transparency. And one of the things I will you say what you will about, you know, you could criticize either side. I like that Donald Trump showed up at the Libertarian Party convention, right? That's a third party. Had a convention. I actually spoke there. He spoke there as well the next night. I like that he spoke to the National Association of Black Journalists in Chicago. I'd love for K Harris to show up.

at the National Association of Black Journalists. Well, she wanted to do, but they wouldn't let her do the virtual thing. She does have a D. He said, Show up, see how they up, let me get on. Well, they wouldn't let her do the virtual thing. You know what's crazy? The only policy she has talked about is something that Trump said already, and she said it a day or two after he said it, the literal next day. I believe this was, We not doing taxes on. It's real-life people really think life is sweet right now. It's real-life wars going on. Y'all want to be in this bit. She ain't show up. No, literally. I don't want no excuses from a [ __ ]. They F to see us across this world. No, literally. I'm just tired of everyone keeping moving the needle. Like, obviously, this guy's a pay chill. Like, he let Joe Biden come on there and say, If you not black, if you don't vote Joe Biden. Then he also questioned KLA Harris on her Blackness. And now, oh, I

Wanting to endorse Trump 'cause I think he's bad for democracy, but you're up here caping for someone who you already... I don't know, man, it's just sad that it's not just him that's the bad part, it's both of them, and obviously like they have their... they already have their pay in, so they're going to go up there and bat for it. They're not being, uh, what, impartial to the facts here. Like, I think V makes a lot of good points. Go on TV, show up in person, and campaign for your campaign. You've yet to talk policy, you've yet to get grilled by the media, and they've held your hand and coddled you, and they've built you up to be this figure, and you've yet to stand on that. I think that that is a fair criticism. Maybe she's still getting her policies together, that's a fair request. It's just like when you listen to Trump, he makes it so simple. He be like, Well, we're paying too much for that, we're going to do that.

I'm going to cut that off. This is why, and when they have this, this is what happened. So I can make this cheaper for us, and I'm going to do this, and it's going to help these people. Oh, how do I help these people? Well, I'm going to go over here, I'm going to do this, and we did this last time, and that didn't work, so we're going to do this. And if they don't do that, I'm going to put a tariff on them, going to make no money for them at the end of the day. Take all the black, white, and out of it. You got a candidate who has been the president before. No numbers were good. You have another candidate who hasn't been the president and has been the vice president, and numbers for what they're in charge of are bad. So if you go off that alone, stat alone, if no one knew, if you say you got person A, person B, I bet a lot more people would choose person A. That's sad that we have to break it down like this.

if two teams went out there and play at each other and one team has plays and one team don't got plays which team going to win yeah when they running a three-fold defense and this then this coach got a route for his receiver yeah they going to win and his other team say y'all just run y own rout I'm keep br they they already have a play they already have a Playbook and scheme it's right in front of you literally watching the B Administration she is part of the Biden Administration to expect any difference from someone who's a part of the current Administration that's bad is a is foolish obviously there's going to be some changes she's a new face to the thing but uh we know we know that she's the most liberal governor and now you have a radical a liberal radical like Tim Walls who puts tampons in men's bathroom and inform encouraged uh the BLM in the burning of his own City and then and then his family members leaked information of where the police going to

be so they could evade arrest. I mean, we understand where the position is going to be, and anyone that's playing a blind eye to that, you're a fool, and you're obviously complicit in the destruction of America. Association of Black Journalists. Well, she wanted to, but they wouldn't let her do the virtual thing. She does have a day job, but the day job is run. Come on, at this point, she is going full-time running, reading off a teleprompter at the rallies, the same thing four times a day. She should show up for that interview. If Donald Trump sits down with the National Association of Black Journalists, I'm sorry, a scheduling excuse is not a valid reason for the we know to also show up. But if K, not to cut you off, I'm sorry, if K is down with NABJ, we know where she's going conversation-wise, right? I think it's honestly not necessarily true. I don't think that's true. I think that I think the person who

did that interview for Donald Trump. If they had taken the same approach with respect to Kam Harris, I think that'd actually be a pretty good conversation for the country. Know if I want to see, I want to see the vice president news. I think she should go across the even better, even better, right? So one of the things I liked, I mean, Donald Trump went to the Bronx. People could say it wasn't the real Bronx or whatever, but he showed up in the Bronx. He showed up in the South Bronx, showed up in inner cities in the country. Even in my own campaign, I went to the south side of Chicago, went to a room full of what, 95% black, 95% Democrat. It's not a traditional Republican primary location. I went to Kensington in the inner city of Philadelphia. Speaking as a former candidate myself, I could tell you those trips had an impact on me, right? It had an impact on my view of a national unity that I believe is possible in this country that I wouldn't have had if I hadn't showed up there.

love to see K. Harris going to rural Mississippi, going to Alabama, going to showing up at a Fox News moderated Town Hall. Well, she does do that now. We can't act like she doesn't do even even the past week. She hit all of the Battleground States, and she's actually hitting the street, which I think in a lot of ways is more effective right now than sitting down questioning. Though, is not I. I want to see her answer questions from people who disagree founded on Face Off with the people you disagree with. So, like Town Halls, you mean? Yeah, Town Halls. And/or hostile journalists. And here's why. When you stop talking to people hostile, hard-hitting. Yeah, hard-hitting. Yeah, I say CU. You see black women in a hostile situation. You ever did you see that when you went to any them places? She know how to handle it. She's not black. I hope so. I hope so for the country. But here's what I will say is when you stop talking to people.

who disagree with you. It becomes a lot easier to demonize them. I agree, and that's what happens in the country. So, say what you will about, you know, I know we probably have different views on who we're voting for this cycle, but I will say, more so than most Republicans, and in this cycle, more so than the Democratic opponent, Donald Trump has talked to people who disagree with him, faced off more than Kamala Harris has. And I think she has a couple of months left to see if she has it in to level up. If you want to sit across the table from Xi Jinping or Vladimir Putin, then you better be willing to sit across the table from your fellow Americans who disagree with you and face that question. And that's my challenge to her. If she does that, I'm not going to say I'm going to vote for her, but because I disagree with her on the policies, but I will respect her as a candidate in a way that I don't until she actually doesn't. You not support your fellow Indian because she's an

Indian well one thing's actually funny you bring that up. I believe we're all American. We got a vot policy. Of course, a lot of the in American Community is a little bit disappointed or a little bit offended at least at the fact that she doesn't really own that part of her identity anymore in the way she did before, right? I'm not saying it. I'm just, I'm, I'm don't blame messenger, but I'm telling you as a just, you can take it as a fact that a good, at least in my read of it, I think a lot of Indian-Americans do have a little bit of disappointment about that. My whole view is I don't like identity politics, period, right? One direction or another, thank you. We got to revive our shared American identity, okay? And so, if we are really committed to the ideals of this country, I think we should focus on what policies are you advancing regardless of your race, regardless of your skin color. So, whether she's dealing with attacks or

she's dealing with leaning into it. I'm against it in both forms. Forget the identity politics around the board and focus on how you're going to have policies that lift up all Americans. That's what I favor talking about. But since you bring it up, I'm just don't shoot the messenger here. I think there are some Indian-Americans out there that do feel some sense of offense about, well, I want to tell Indian Americans that's not true. She claims both sides, Black and Indian. This is my last question. I know you got what were your thoughts when an I think V made a lot of great points. I think that the way that they keep going up to bat and defending her and trying to be the excuse maker for her is a problem to me as a viewer that's consuming this content. I don't think that you could sit here and listen to them and say they're giving you an unbiased point. They're going up to bat for everything, like everything he presented, all valid, all valid if you

vote on with actual logic, and you're an actual voter that thinks with your brain. I think he made a lot of points. Go talk to people that disagree with you. Whether or not we respect your policies, we'll respect you as a candidate because we know that you went up and stood in the fire. You're avoiding the fire. I respect it. That's what I'm saying. Then they was like, Well, she tried to go virtually to NABJ. Don't do that, bro. He said, Come in, sit down in person. Oh, she has a full-time job. You haven't showed up as the VP for four years. You're not showing up now. Camping. She campaigned. That's her job. I don't think she's running. I'm sick. Her job is to campaign. Oh, oh. Have you ever seen a black woman in a hostile situation? She's not black, bro. It's not even... It's not about that. It's not about that 'cause it's the fact that you won't

you're like he said everything. V said, I stem. I told y'all, whatever V think, I think damn near most of the time. If it's the fact that you won't, you scared of the smoke. You supposed to be, you scared of the smoke. You with a reporter, with a reporter. Go on Fox, go on the Card Enemy Channel, go any, go like, like, like, just, I don't know, man. I can't respect that, bro. I just can't respect that at all. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I was going to say, um, what is our policies, bro? That's nobody know. We don't know. That's all. But what type of office they run? I don't think that she's worried about what's going on right now in this administration. I think she's worried about the next four years. I think, I think a great question, I think a great question to ask KLA Harris is, I don't, I would say if I could sit across from her in her face, I would ask her, why do you let the media prop you up as this great

candidate and prop you up as some great hope when you're a part of the current Administration that put us in the hole that we're in and the problems that we're looking at, and you've yet to go in campaign in the month you've been a candidate and speak on what your plan for the future is. You just go and say a bunch of [ __ ], but you don't actually get into the nitty-gritty and the meat and potatoes and tell us what your policy and your plan for the future is. You've been rated an extremist and a radical, and you picked up another radical who is a confirmed radical, and I'm supposed to trust you as the vision for the future, not politic. Got one question that either as up aive. Do you believe I could play in women's sports? That a question. That's a simple, simple question. Looking at this interview, yes or no. I don't need no yes or no. Looking at this interview though, if you agree with anything Charlamagne has said, if

you think Charlamagne ate Ram up, then you are actually brainless. You're actually part of the problem. It's look, that's what it is, it's a perspective, bro. They looking at it and they're like, they're not hearing anything he's saying. He's not, how can he be a white, argue with him? You can't argue with, he's not a white suac. You cannot argue with v, he's a guy, minority, that's a billionaire, that came into politics, self-made, and made an assessment of his common sense. If you agree with genius, brainless. I think you're, they say he's genius level K, say she said, like she don't know very many people who she's met who are smarter than V. I feel like what he's saying is basic common sense. It's the way he break it down, like pause, argue with that, please. What do you have to say about that? That's why he's not rebutt, he's just coming with another question after he have a small re and

then he'll debunk it, and then he'll move on. I think, I think, I think I like the way he's kept his cool here because they obviously have a very biased against the things he's trying to talk about, and they keep going to B for her, and he kept presenting with more logical and factual statements. I mean, how can you argue with this guy? Like, it's just, I just think that people are so far in their own beliefs, they're going to anything that is said that supports that delusion or belief, they're going to side with, and I think that's a problem. You need to be subjective here and have a real argument. This might be why Angela left, bro, because I feel like when I used to watch her, she was actually kind of smarter than all of them. She asked real questions. Yeah, she didn't go and kiss their ass, not brainless and pick a side, you know? And I just, I don't really appreciate how Charl and whoever that random girl is are just

putting on a c for her let let like what's the what y'all got to be getting paid here. Angela thinks for herself like this is the second girl that we've seen I think they also third J that they just they always agreeing with shaag you have to be yes man to be on The Breakfast Club you can't think on another side well you know I you know I'm going keep it 100 it's it's a black woman more black women I was saying as a black woman I feel like she was going to go for Kamala no matter what I was going to say that also I can't just say being yes man this also shows what the black community community thinks if they don't get another side of a perspective and I just I don't know man I just I'm just surprised that people don't look at it like hey we have a leader right and this leader is supposed to talk on our behalf to other countries you know you got to have plays so I'm just I'm just looking

like do people put that in perspective like it's a person that actually controls our safety and our safety is literally being harmed right now and people are not looking at that right win is coming when a corner when a corner pressing you you need to on a threefold you need to go on a goat route don't need to say I mean do what you want to I mean whatever you think works just be free I just have a problem with with their positions they we don't know their positions on nothing we don't know their polies on they don't have I'm just tired of I'm just tired of every media Source or every source of media having a bias especially like like sources like this that a lot of people that are not white consumed like you're letting them tell you what to think and they don't they don't even give like a nice uh opinion that you can help base it off of they tell you what to think I'm tired imagine having a football team we can have why can't we have a

transgender right here. Oh, we need a white guy right here, a black guy right here, a Mexican guy right here. He can't wrap nobody up. Oh, we need a woman on the line. America's a football team. We need the best players out there. No, that simple though. It's that simple. Put the best players in the best positions, get you a good coach, Trump, and let's rock and roll. You can't have an open school where anybody can just come in. No, you got to have a certain, this Elite School, exactly. Had a certain GPA to come in this school. We need Nick Saban. You got to be born here. It's just what it is, man. You can't, you can't. I mean, man, this shit's, I, when, when you look at money a certain way, you can understand. I think the other side just think money don't, is just more and more. I learn about politics, the more and more it seems like the NFL to me. You, the New England Patriots, you know, it does, it does, they

will do whatever they got to do to win. You know, all right guys, let's know what y'all think about this. Vama Swami destroy them once again. Shout out, that's my dog.

Vivek Ramaswamy DESTROYS The Breakfast Club AGAIN!

CartierFamily

주요 이슈에 대한 카말라 해리스의 입장

의료 국유화에 대한 카말라 해리스의 입장과 미실현 자본 이득에 대한 세금 제안은 특히 소규모 사업주들의 우려를 불러일으켰습니다.

이 세금 정책은 사업주에게 현금이 없는 상태에서 세금을 납부하도록 강요하여 잠재적으로 경제적 어려움으로 이어질 수 있습니다.

해리스가 자신의 신념을 명확히 하고 정치적 이슈에 대해 오락가락하는 태도를 바로잡기 위해 언론 인터뷰에 적극적으로 나서야 한다는 요구가 있습니다.

미디어 편견과 카말라 해리스의 리더십

토론과 도널드 트럼프의 활약으로 조 바이든의 무능함이 대중에게 알려지면서 정치인을 대하는 미디어의 편향성이 부각되었습니다.

카말라 해리스가 언론으로부터 부드러운 질문을 받고 있어 책임감과 투명성에 대한 우려가 제기되고 있습니다.

연설자는 언론이 해리스에게 더 엄격한 질문을 요구할 것을 촉구하며 캠페인의 투명성과 리더십 잠재력의 필요성을 강조합니다.

정치 후보자 및 후보자의 행보에 대한 비판

연설자는 한 정치 후보의 가상 참여 부족과 정책 토론 지연에 대해 불만을 표출합니다.

후보자와 현 행정부와의 관계를 비판하고 두 후보자의 과거 역할의 효과성에 의문을 제기합니다.

연설자는 두 후보의 서로 다른 접근 방식과 배경이 유권자의 명확한 선택으로 이어져야 한다고 주장합니다.

다양한 커뮤니티와의 소통의 중요성

연사는 미국이 직면한 문제를 외면하는 사람들을 비판하고 정치 지도자들이 다양한 커뮤니티와 소통해야 한다고 강조합니다.

또한 소외된 지역에 직접 찾아가 자신의 선거운동 경험을 공유하는 것의 중요성을 강조합니다.

연사는 정치 지도자와 반대 견해를 가진 사람들 간의 직접적인 소통을 촉구하며, 국민 통합과 이해를 증진하기 위한 방법으로 타운홀과 격렬한 인터뷰를 옹호합니다.

의견 불일치에 직면하는 것의 중요성

연사는 다른 견해를 가진 사람들과 소통할 필요성을 강조하며, 카말라 해리스보다 더 많은 노력을 기울인 도널드 트럼프의 노력을 강조합니다.

그들은 해리스가 동료 미국인들과 맞서고 인도계 미국인으로서 자신의 정체성을 소유하도록 도전합니다.

연설자는 정체성 정치에서 벗어나 모든 미국인을 고양하는 정책에 집중해야 한다고 주장합니다.

연설자는 후보자가 직접 참여하지 않고 어려운 질문을 해결하려는 노력이 부족한 것에 대해 불만을 표합니다.

논란의 여지가 있는 상황을 회피한 후보자의 이력을 강조하고 현 행정부에서 후보자의 효율성에 의문을 제기합니다.

연설자는 후보의 급진적 협회와 리더십 비전에 대한 회의론을 표명하면서 후보의 정책과 미래 계획에 대한 명확한 설명을 요구합니다.

V의 주장에 대한 논란의 여지가 있는 관점

자수성가한 억만장자이자 소수자인 V는 정치에 대한 상식적인 주장을 제시하며 다른 사람들의 믿음에 도전합니다.

연사는 샬라마뉴와 다른 사람들이 편향된 반응을 보이고 진정한 토론에 참여하지 않는다고 비판합니다.

그들은 안젤라의 독립적인 사고에 감탄을 표하며 사람들이 항상 한 편에 동의해야 할 필요성에 의문을 제기합니다.

미디어와 리더십의 다양성에 대한 비판

연사는 여론에 영향을 미치는 편향된 미디어 소스에 대한 불만을 표출합니다.

그들은 성공을 위해 다양성에 관계없이 최고의 인재를 주요 직책에 배치해야 한다고 주장합니다.

연사는 정치와 NFL을 비유하며 둘 다 어떤 대가를 치르더라도 승리하려는 열망에 의해 움직인다고 말합니다.