Today, I will discuss content that is not completely folded over but rather resembles something more realistic, as often seen in communities. There are questions about why, when configuring the military police indoors, we can use existing rigid bodies and the Kelleher's four for this purpose. Ultimately, this can be related to discussions in robotics and other relevant fields. The planning aspect is also connected. I will now talk about the simulation of position 27. 

Today's topic includes first the issues of rigid bodies indoors and an introduction to H-Play's line body. Next, I will discuss how Yui Chi Five's support can address the challenges of the convex hull in the arm center, and the solutions for utilizing kinematic bridges in AMR and AGV.

I have provided three main corrections for the settings. To begin with the purpose, I would like to address that there are many individuals, like myself, who are studying mechanical engineering or computer science and want to use this knowledge in the industry. At first, they often start by looking at basic textbooks, watching YouTube videos, and utilizing social media to learn.

When I looked at beginner-level lectures, I always saw that they emphasized rigid body dynamics. However, if someone wants to use this knowledge in digital environments or other applications, they may want to delve deeper into the concepts. Unfortunately, there can be many errors in this process. As a result, I noticed that while textbooks and YouTube lectures instruct on using rigid body dynamics and joints, many people give up when they find that the concepts do not apply to their specific situations. This is where the real issue lies.

I used this tort play selection, but I was a bit disappointed because the buffer lens or data was somewhat lacking. This time, I want to talk about creating a more precise and sophisticated simulation. I'm slightly worried about the rigid body dynamics. It's not that rigid bodies are inherently bad, but when playing the game, performance is also important. From an optimization standpoint, it can be great to prioritize speed, but sometimes we have to sacrifice a bit of optimization to achieve more refined physical results. 

So, I would like to discuss the issues I'm currently facing, and I hope you can provide some insights. First, regarding the rigid body issues, the first problem is that when collisions are repeated, there can be a disruption in shape. The second issue arises when there is a significant difference in mass, which can lead to inaccurate results. For example, when it comes to cars...

The car, which has its tires removed, weighs about 1400 kg. The weight of the tires is approximately 20 kg each. This weight ratio is about 70 to 1. In this situation, we have already simulated using various terms and concepts, thinking about the brain and the official formulas. Compared to other models like FM 2, there were significant differences. In more complex cases, accurately representing the dynamics can be quite difficult. 

Secondly, among these joints, there is a fixed joint that connects the objects, but despite not being a spring, there is an effect caused by the movement of each object. Lastly, for those who use CAD in the industry, this can be quite relevant.

Private Joint is not a movie, but we are performing like a play. We are going to uncover two peaks, as explained by Kim Jin-kwan. The connection is gradually becoming clearer. Generally, in CAD, we talk about Helen Hunt's line, but the name is different. There are also characters like Joint and Computer Lab, but the front is well detached. This is not a feeling of position; rather, it’s about the aspect of light that I always mention. We have a blog where we have numerically uploaded some data. We tried to implement it the same way. The red ball here has a mass of 1000 kg, while the white ball has a mass of 1 kg, so the mass ratio is about 1 to 1000. These objects are fixed to each other, so they should not move.

To set this up, I first poured each of the white grain components and connected them. The connection is 3, and there are 11 prepared. Each connection is 3, and in this way, I added components one by one. After that, I made the red ones above feel similar, and I had to set a total of 12 components for each of my sons. It was a complex process. In this case, if you look at the Maganda, when you actually do robotics for decades, it becomes much easier. The components can be added much more, and it’s difficult to see everything at once. It was hard to manage the accessories as well. So, somehow, I managed to set this up well, and now it feels strange that something is off. I also feel like I'm missing something.

It should be fixed, but if you look at the next generation, instead of a structure, the kids seem to have some kind of spring, as they come down with an underline and then jump again. Now, if you experience it going forward, even when you come back, it feels a bit strange. I filmed from the side to check it out. When it pops back, it looks really good in the editor, but if you look closely, you can confirm that it's slightly shifting positions. However, since this is organically connected to various parts, even a small difference in form can cause significant differences in results. So, up to this point, I can say that the existing reason was that there wasn't a spring search effect. Therefore, this is something that everyone has received, and many components are needed, and there are times when the results are inaccurate.

향상된 점이 있음을 말씀드릴 수 있습니다. 다음으로는 킬레이션 바디에 대해 이야기하겠습니다. 일부 접시 블레이저는 다임과 같은 결과를 나타내며, 문제가 생각한 것처럼 똑같은 조건 하에서 발생합니다. 불러오는 백두 에스프리 효과가 없는 것은 확인해야 합니다. 그래서 이제 RC 클레이 섬바디에 대해 말씀드릴 때, 인스펙터 창에 있는 요소를 활용하면 매우 직관적으로 설정이 가능합니다. 두 번째로, 정교한 실내에서는 이 작업이 가능합니다. 저희가 처음 소개할 때 사실 킬레이션 바디 자체가 로보틱스가 아니라 일반적인 주빌레 내부 사용이 가능한 배경이었습니다. 그 후, 시린 드윗 2호 TX 패키지로 나오면서 로보틱스에 대한 언급이 있었습니다. 그래서 아시는 분들도 6R 때 사용하는 것에 대해 알고 계실 것입니다.

No, I thought about it and prepared to clarify any misunderstandings regarding that today. Before I talk about the setup method, I actually tried to use the real model. In typical seminars, people often say, Look, we have new technology! However, I found it very difficult to explain this using the typical format, so I plan to create a demo to introduce it. Now, before I talk about that, I should mention that when doing this indoors, the color alignment is crucial. So, I will briefly touch on that. 

Nikolai, does it involve physical operations? And do we have to make complex decisions about mistakes? There are three main ways to create a supply.

The first method is how to create basic shapes. So, in the upper DC inspector or in the context menu, you can right-click and select Cylinder to create a basic shape. However, basic shapes often have the drawback of being well-folded in DC but not precisely divided. 

The second method is the ZD H22 method, which allows for very precise production of meshes. However, small objects can sometimes have a more detrimental effect. If you look closely, you'll see that they are captured in a two-fold manner. In fact, this jawline is a part that doesn't need to be too tight. Additionally, in the tire area, you can see some detailed mesh elements. 

So, does that mean that the free J method is not good? If you ask this, yes, one of the samples inside Autodesk has something on the surface that is convex.

I have captured it at 7 o'clock below. It hurts, so if I capture it using the VH A12 method, it will practically collide. The situation has become like this, and all the president's tasks have turned out this way. The fan is just caught roughly. After that, in the case of Intercom 104, there is a limit of 250 triangles, so I have to manage that. Since it is used in a game engine, it has been optimized out of necessity. If I use the 2-day delay, this object has a mesh collision. So, for the 250 triangles, 50 triangles, and the first 1st triangle, I have to capture tightly. Based on my research, it is often used in projects where you hold water with your hands while holding the handle below the V or H. However, the upper part of the Tonto is completely computerized.

그래픽스에 대한 어느 정도의 깊은 지식이 필요해서 별도의 파라미터 설정이 필요하다는 단점이 있습니다. 마지막으로, 캐드 프로그램에서 결제에도 OL 지원을 하는 경우가 있습니다. 그리고 퓨전이 락과 소리 없이 이렇게 많이 대중적으로 사용되는 캐드 프로그램에서 자체적으로 모델링한 데이터를 패키지 형태로 보내주는 경우도 있습니다. 이런 도움을 사용하면 보다 현실적인 물리 적용을 위한 메시지를 생성할 수 있는데, 이것도 좀 까다롭습니다. 흔히 말하는 공명이 사유서 양이 많아졌을 경우에는 백팩처럼 택이 또 버프하게 하는 문제로 4차 비교를 해서 드리면 다 동일한 타이어인데 기본 모델의 예의 체가 22이고 포드 퓨전 3D를 사용했을 때는 다음과 같이 콜라를 이더 가서 핍니다. 그래서 이거는 각각의 프로젝트 목적에 맞게 간단하게 진행해야 합니다.

If you want to use the basic model, you can do so. If you want to keep everything tightly controlled, use the mismatch. And if you are using CAD, you can proceed with the method that has the head program as well. Now that we have set up these collars, we need to apply the play mountain and field. Here, we are at about 4:50%, which is the point of setting the route. This route refers to the existing rigid body you used, which is the pack l bobby pet constraining 9. In this case, do not move in the XY channel. The score is set to S, with the last left being the final constraint you can see. However, the play information can be accessed from anywhere, and there must be an object that can be manipulated. The rest can be individually connected to this object, and it can be rotated or manipulated in that way. This route is set for a single object town.

It is possible to fix an object, but there are certain objects that cannot be fixed at all. For example, in the case of number 8, whether it is a complete base on the lower part or in the case of a rabbit, you need to set up the parameters accordingly. I brought this reference because, as I mentioned earlier, in the case of a 202 connection, you actually need to create a pin object. In this scenario, it should move more than one, so we can use a beam object and work with that empty book object.

Now, there is a demo in the Erwin T software. It’s quite simple. In this case, I extended the fixed part at the very bottom. After doing this, if we don't do the scaling correctly, we can slightly adjust the top by placing it in the root and aligning the rest of the objects accordingly. After matching everything with the light, if we add the cuff to the play area, it will automatically adjust the most basic elements to the collision body.

Root and Ah Ah sushi are now done, and next, if you look below, you can see the joint types like Fixed or Mud that are installed. It's not a package installed according to the Nikon plant; it's fundamentally there. After that, you need to set the configuration, and I've briefly organized the coordinates into four main types. For most situations, using discrete settings should resolve your issues. However, if you want to move more fluidly, like a vehicle in water, or if you want to achieve a more realistic indoor simulation, you should use the continuous setting. If you want to perform a highly precise simulation, even at the cost of performance, you need to set it to Container Style. After that, you need to specify the joint types that are present before the file, and there are four types in total.

There is a concept in engineering called degrees of freedom (dof). In this context, a fixed joint does not allow for movement, so it remains static, and the parent vector is fixed as well. On the other hand, a planar joint allows movement along the x and y axes, which gives it one degree of freedom. When we talk about a revolute joint, it allows for rotation, which adds to the complexity as it requires specific points for the rotation to occur. 

In fact, the term spherical joint is not often used, but it does come into play when discussing rotation. For example, if you rotate around the x-axis, it differs from rotating around the z-axis. When it comes to practical applications, it seems that the joint types are not frequently used, so I do not categorize them separately. After that, we can discuss other types of rotations.

If you have set the type and moved on, you need to select a reference point. As you can see on the left, there will be a small tire icon appearing. When you click the red box at the LG joint, the joint will activate. Here, you need to align the hanger, pod, and rotation correctly so that you can decide which direction to anchor the joint. 

The important thing here is that this joint will rotate based on the anchor point, not the object itself. For example, if the object is here but a bit higher, the rotation will occur around the anchor. Therefore, aligning it to match the purpose is crucial. In Unity, the unit is set to meters, but in basic CAD programs, it is usually in millimeters. You might be working with 2 meters or converting to 0.01 millimeters, so it's essential to set this up correctly, especially if it’s a complex task.

I have a separate organization set up, but if you continue to work with CAD, you will see that it encompasses the entire center of mass of CAD. Alternatively, using a milling tool based on the two-phase extrusion standard is actually much more convenient. Finally, I need to explain the movement aspect, which is based on the motion of the origin point in physics. This is grounded in the primary linear equations that involve vibrations. To put it simply, the stack trace is connected to the impact and is related to the interesting target velocity. You need to set these two according to their respective phases. Therefore, if you use both stiffness and target velocity, the power will move to the corresponding position in the next frame, and you will also use damping and target velocity.

When it happens, it will move immediately to the next case, which is related to the speed of liberation. Here, the position or speed is set based on the joint type established earlier. For instance, after a linear movement, it will move in an execution manner. If you think of the target as being given in GPX and M, that would be correct. Similarly, regarding the wrap-around rotation, I will ask my question later. Starting from April, I am discussing here the extreme velocity, which can be set to a certain number of meters. This might be a bit challenging for those in the B group, as there are 26 people involved, but it is expected to be much simpler for those in the opposite group. Therefore, I need to actually proceed with this to see how the village moves.

On the left, there is a game that has been brought in. Now, I called the key and wrote down the entire coding for the movement. So, when we are moving, it’s simple. When this object is activated, it appears as if the front wheels and the left and right wheels are rotating. However, if I want to turn left, the left wheels will rotate forward while the right wheels will rotate backward. This is set up in a way that mimics real-life scenarios. Similarly, the AGV (Automated Guided Vehicle) operates in the same manner. In such cases, to maintain the center of gravity, I added components known as bearings at the front. The back is the same. If we execute a magic trick, we can see how smoothly it rolls. Now, I understand that the key is joining the tank body.

Could you explain the concept of the maximum bookstore? You mentioned that in the joint, there is a difficult care program called Chukwon Jeongdojeon. Generally, this program has a function that is referred to as binding within the parameters. So when you click, it shows you the exact distance to the anchor point here. Typically, in CAD programs, there are features that allow you to capture this kind of information. 

For example, in the case of a 1:1 scale, if you have a completely flat surface, it is centered at 1.2. Before transitioning to the T model, you would move the object to a point of 1.5 and then relocate the component back to its original reference point. This way, it gets separated and comes to life. 

As a result, at the very end, each object has its own reference point, which you can write down. In Unity, you can work with anchors without any issues.

Probably, those who work with CAD will find it more convenient since there are many parts involved. The conclusion is that the route with many components is centered around the legs, and it is positioned again in the second location. That's correct. However, this actually relates to how programs like Yuiichi's can handle components. It allows you to set a reference for the object based on which direction it rotates. There's not much you can do about that. Those models that have good airflow might not be a big deal, but for those with significant volume, it can become somewhat repetitive. 

In terms of smooth communication, here’s a suggestion: when you’re assembling, make sure that each part's origin point is not set based on a common origin, but rather based on the anchor point. Otherwise, the engineers in the field will really struggle a lot.

하고 막 출중의 한 명이 한계를 군 캐드에서 하느냐 심각함 이쪽은 아트 쭉은 뭐죠? 뭐 4 스톤 바이든 제가 준비한 내용은 오늘은 여기까지입니다. 4 어 쓰러졌습니다.

And one of the performers is questioning the seriousness of the limits in the cad. What about this art? What about the four stone Biden? The content I have prepared ends here for today. I collapsed.

[유니티 TIPS] Unity Simulation 완전 정복

유니티 테크놀로지스 코리아 (Unity Technologies Korea)공식 유튜브 채널입니다.
유니티 개발과 최신 유니티 기술 소개 및 유니티로 만들어진 다양한 콘텐츠를 만나보실 수 있습니다.

[유니티 TIPS] Unity Simulation 완전 정복

스크립트