카말라 해리스 대 도널드 트럼프: 주요 토론 하이라이트

카말라 해리스는 첫 대선 토론에서 도널드 트럼프와 경쟁할 수 있는 능력을 보여주며 미정인 유권자들에게 영향을 미칠 수 있는 가능성을 보여주었습니다.

### 카말라 해리스 대 도널드 트럼프: 첫 토론의 하이라이트
* 🎤 카말라 해리스는 대선 토론에 데뷔하여 트럼프가 **"8천만 명에게 해고당했다"고 고심하는 동안** 메모나 보좌관 없이 도널드 트럼프와 맞서는 모습으로 수백만 명의 마음을 사로잡았습니다.
* 🎯 토론 초반에 해리스는 참석자들이 지루함 때문에 트럼프의 집회를 일찍 떠난다는 점을 교묘하게 지적했는데, 이는 **트럼프의 군중 규모에 대한 자부심**을 건드린 것이었습니다.
* 📉 트럼프의 답변은 종종 산발적이었고, **이민과 경제와 같은 중요한 이슈에 대해 해리스에게 효과적으로 이의를 제기하는 데 방해**가 되었습니다.
* 🔍 트럼프의 강점 중 하나는 **프래킹과 경찰 기금에 대한 해리스의 입장 변화**를 강조하며 이러한 중요한 주제에 대한 해리스의 신뢰성에 의문을 제기한 것입니다.
* ⚖ 진행자들은 실시간으로 트럼프의 팩트 체크를 통해 **이민자들로 인해 반려동물이 피해를 입는다는 트럼프의 잘못된 주장**에 대해 언급하며 보수적인 시청자들의 비판을 이끌어냈습니다.
* 🌍 중동 분쟁에 대해 논의할 때 두 후보 모두 구체적인 계획을 제시하지 못했지만, 해리스는 **2국가 해법과 가자지구 재건의 중요성**을 강조했습니다.
* 💡 트럼프는 **관세 인상과 국경 통제** 등 자신의 지지층이 공감하고 공화당의 일관된 메시지를 반영하는 친숙한 정책에 대한 약속을 되풀이했습니다.
* 🤔 결국 해리스가 트럼프에 맞서 자신의 입장을 고수할 수 있는 능력을 보여주기기는 했지만, **선거의 성공에 결정적인 무소속 유권자들에게 효과적으로 어필했는지는 여전히 불확실**합니다.

So let's now welcome the candidates to the stage. Kamala Harris. Donald Trump has been in numerous presidential debates, but this is the first presidential debate that Kamala Harris has been in. And I think millions of Americans were watching to see how she would perform without a teleprompter, without notes, without aides by her side. Donald Trump was fired by 80 million people. So let's be clear about that, and clearly, he is having a very difficult time processing that. Early on in the debate, Vice President Harris set a trap for Donald Trump when she brought up out of thin air this idea that people were leaving his rallies early because they were so bored with the things he was saying. You will see during the course of his rallies, he talks about fictional characters like Hannibal Lecter. He will talk about windmills causing cancer. And what you will also notice is that people start leaving his rallies early out of exhaustion and boredom. This wasn't in response to a question.

It was just something that she kind of planted there because she knows that Donald Trump cannot take any allegation about his crowd sizes and move on. People don't leave my rallies. We have the biggest rallies, the most incredible rallies in the history of politics. He was a little bit more all over the place, and it prevented him from attacking her on a range of issues where he might have had the forehand, from, you know, immigration to the economy. Donald Trump probably had his most effective attack lines of the night when he was talking about the positions that Harris has changed over the course of her political career. Fracking. She's been against it for 12 years. Defund the police. She's been against that forever. She gave all that stuff up very wrongly, very horribly, and everybody's laughing at it. The fracking issue is a huge one in Pennsyl, where this debate was held, because big parts of Western Pennsylvania, this accounts for a lot of jobs.

And so he was pretty effective in going right at her and saying that these are positions she's changed in the past and how do we know that she's not going to change her position again? During the course of the debate. Conservatives were screaming that the moderators from ABC were unfair to former President Trump on a number of occasions, but not too many occasions, but quite notably several, the moderators corrected him, fact-checked him in real time. They're eating the dogs, the people that came in, they're eating the cats, they're eating, they're eating the pets of the people that live there. And this is what's happening in our country. I just want to clarify here. You bring up Springfield, Ohio and ABC News did reach out to the city manager there. Uh He told us there had been no credible reports of specific claims of pets being harmed, injured or abused by individuals within the immigration community. These were statements that Trump has made repeatedly that have been

fact-checked many times as not being true. So, they didn't kind of wade into something that was maybe more, you know, a gray area, but still, it was notable how it happened, and many conservatives, even some lawmakers, were alarmed. One other key point in the night was when both candidates were asked about what they would do to resolve the conflict in the Middle East. We must have a two-state solution where we can rebuild Gaza, where the Palestinians have security, self-determination, and the dignity they so rightly deserve. I will get that settled and fast, and I'll get the war with Ukraine and Russia ended. If I'm president-elect, I'll get it done before even becoming president. This is not an easy issue, obviously, but neither of them would lay forth a plan about what they would do to have this behind them. Harris talked about how she wanted to help families. She kept talking about this opportunity economy, which is, you know,

kind of a buzz phrase that Democrats are using, but there weren't a lot of specific new policies. There was one point when former President Trump was pressed on his approach to replacing the Affordable Care Act. I'm not President right now. But if we come up with something, I would only change it if we come up with something that's better and less expensive. And there are concepts and options. We, we have to do that and you'll be hearing about it in the not too distant future. Former President Trump brought forward a lot of the ideas that he's had in the past. He wants to raise tariffs. He wants to shut down the border between the US and Mexico. They are popular ideas with his base and the fact that he's going to stick to these ideas and continue to push for them and drive them home, that is the kind of consistent message that a lot of Republicans and conservatives and independents want to hear. The debate at the end of June between Biden and Trump was a disaster for Biden and knocked him

out of the race. Harris cannot afford to have a bad debate. So many Americans do not know her, do not really understand what her policies are. And if she kind of fumbled her way through the evening, it could have been the end of her candidacy as well. So we learned that she can hold her own, that she can go toe to toe with former president Trump for 90 minutes, whether she did enough to win over independent voters, whether she did enough to kind of uh assure people in places like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, that she's the one that will take the country where it needs to go in the future. It's unclear.

Trump vs. Harris, Analyzed: Fiery Debate Puts Former President on Defense | WSJ

The Wall Street Journal takes you inside carefully selected stories and events in a visually captivating way so you can dig deeper into the news and insights that matter to you. 

The Wall Street Journal

카말라 해리스는 첫 대선 토론에 참가하면서 보조 장치 없이 연기를 펼치는 것을 목표로 했습니다.

그녀는 도널드 트럼프가 지루함을 이유로 사람들이 집회를 일찍 떠나게 하여 집중을 방해한다고 은근히 비난했습니다.

트럼프의 가장 효과적인 공격은 프래킹과 경찰 자금 지원 중단과 같은 주요 이슈에 대한 해리스의 입장 변화가 있었습니다.

토론에서는 후보자의 입장 변화에 대한 질문이 쏟아졌고, 보수주의자들은 사회자가 트럼프에게 불공평하다고 비판했습니다.

사회자는 특히 이민자 커뮤니티와 반려동물 피해에 대한 트럼프의 주장에 대해 실시간으로 팩트 체크를 했습니다.

두 후보 모두 중동 분쟁 해결에 대한 질문을 받았지만 명확한 계획을 제시하지 않았고, 해리스는 기회 경제를 통해 가족을 돕는 데 중점을 두겠다고 강조했습니다.

트럼프의 일관된 메시지와 정책 아이디어

트럼프 전 대통령은 더 좋고 저렴한 옵션이 있을 경우에만 변경할 것이라고 말하며 건강보험개혁법을 대체하는 자신의 접근 방식을 강조했습니다.

그는 자신의 지지층에게 인기가 있는 관세 인상과 미국-멕시코 국경 폐쇄와 같은 과거 아이디어를 되풀이했습니다.

트럼프의 일관된 메시지는 공화당원, 보수주의자, 무소속 지지자들에게 어필하고 있지만, 6월 토론에서 바이든의 성적은 그에게 재앙으로 여겨졌습니다.

카말라 해리스의 결정적인 토론 퍼포먼스

많은 미국인들이 카말라 해리스와 그녀의 정책에 대해 잘 알지 못했기 때문에 카말라 해리스의 토론 연기는 후보가 되는 데 매우 중요했습니다.

해리스는 90분 동안 트럼프 전 대통령을 상대로 성공적으로 자신의 주장을 펼쳤습니다.

그러나 그녀가 무소속 유권자들의 마음을 사로잡거나 주요 주에서 국가의 미래에 대한 그녀의 비전을 확신시킬 만큼 충분한 성과를 거두었는지는 불확실합니다.