능력주의와 능력 편향에 대한 비판

이지영 교사는 공정성과 능력주의에 대한 의문을 제기하며 우리 사회의 능력 중심 보상 관념에 도전합니다.

### 한국의 유명 강연자 이지영의 능력주의와 능력 이데올로기 비판
* 🏆 이지영은 페라리, 람보르기니 등 슈퍼카를 몰고 다니며 높은 명성과 미모, 명품 패션, 한강 전망 아파트까지 갖춘 한국의 성공한 부유층 강사로, **페라리와 람보르기니를 선보이고 있습니다.**
* ❓ 이지영은 능력주의와 능력에 따른 보상의 공정성에 대한 의문을 제기하며 **이러한 개념과 관련된 윤리적 함의와 가치에 대해 논의**하는 것이 중요하다고 강조합니다.
* 🎓 능력주의에 대한 비판은 **능력을 정확하게 측정하는 것이 복잡**하고 인생에서 운의 역할이 중요하기 때문에 **100% 공정하지 않다**는 믿음에 근거합니다.
* 🎢 이지영 대표는 능력주의의 한계를 인정하면서도 **다른 어떤 대안과 비교해도 가장 공정하고 정의로운 제도**라고 주장합니다.
* ☪ '능력의 이데올로기'를 비판하는 사람들은 **실행 가능한 대안을 제시하지 않고 자신의 견해를 격렬하게 홍보**하여 실패한 공산주의 이데올로기와 비교한다는 비난을 받습니다.
* 💰 이지영의 비판자들은 현 제도로부터 많은 혜택을 받으면서도 능력주의를 비판하는 그녀의 진정성에 의문을 제기하며, **기존의 불공정한 혜택을 인정하고 해결하는 것이 중요**하다고 강조합니다.
* 🇰🇷 능력주의와 능력 이데올로기에 대한 논의는 한국 사회에서 논쟁적이고 양극화된 이슈로 여겨지며, **다양한 관점과 해석**이 존재하고 있습니다.

Very famous and luxurious star lecturer in Daechi-dong, Lee Ji-young. Hello. I heard that she is a very successful person with tremendous wealth and outstanding abilities that ordinary people can't even dream of. With her high fame, beauty, high-end fashion, and a luxury apartment with a Han River view, along with showing off Ferraris, Lamborghinis, and supercars, our amazing superstar, Teacher Lee Ji-young, is truly excellent. I feel happy when I see people who do well and live well, so from now on, she is the best. Due to her outstanding abilities, she has a lot of money, but who is she really? Is this video really Lee Ji-young? I doubt my eyes. Suddenly, what's with this ability worship? Isn't it unfair to return to ability worship?

No, Yeong-saeng, you're really too harsh. Hashibuya, this misconception of summarizing in just 15 minutes is fair. Be careful of the trap of ability bias and the danger of falling into the ability trap. Did you reveal too much? I watched the video from start to finish diligently. But is it all good if it's about ability? Will the rewards I receive be given fairly? Is this fair? No, just raising doubts from start to finish ends up meaningless. Why is it like that? I thought it was more than just abilities. Ability bias is not perfect. Okay, so what should we do now? There's no way out, so let's just end by asking questions from start to finish like this. Then why suddenly focus on ability bias for two minutes? That's right. Criticizing ability bias is the trend these days. The reason why ability bias can never be fair is because of the diminishing abilities in Korea.

Don't look at negative reviews or facial expressions due to abilityism. There is no separate horror movie with a lot of angry expressions. It is fair to receive according to one's abilities. If the invisible class society that abilityism has put in place does not provide enough opportunities for everyone, then it is an unfair society. Why is everyone like this these days? Do you know who gets criticized no matter where they get infected as a group? It's this person right here. Suddenly, everyone went crazy cutting off abilities because of human beings. Harvard University professor and grandfather Michael Sandel wrote, What is Justice? Even to the communists in South Korea, all the way to criticizing them, saying that abilityism is not bad, not perfect, not fair. Michael Sandel exists in the imperfect fairness. Watch out. It's flying away. Even on strange channels among 50,000 Korean channels, abilityism comes out. Is abilityism fair? Abilityism calls it a problem. Among the two uncomfortable truths, the crazy ability around is bad.

So, shall we see what this grandpa is saying? Recently, on the JTBC broadcasting station, they directly connected with this grandfather. The show, What a Class Difference, is an entertainment program, but they connected with him through Zoom. Due to my fandom, I am also working from home. Wherever I am, people are asking, What did you buy? It's a pity. It's just turning off the camera. But now, in this place where we are making you at home, it's a place where we work remotely. Isn't it great? It's nice, right? The atmosphere is so good, luxurious, and fabulous. It's a very impressive ability to have a study for the sake of one's soul. How many people in the world already envy that? Moreover, this person is a Harvard professor, so it's a reverse turn. The most expensive city in the U.S. is San Francisco, followed by New York, and then Boston.

It's an incredibly expensive city. That person lives like that. Very much so. Just relax. Of course, they will be self-sufficient. Let's take a closer look at the Harvard professor pig. Confucius, who diminishes abilities, first. But it's already more strange. It seems like watching a video of Lee Ji-young earlier. She is also not giving answers but asking questions. Isn't she the most knowledgeable person in the world about meritocracy? But in her own video, she is asking questions like this. The video is about meritocracy. It is fair to receive according to abilities. If meritocracy is achieved, it is fair. Is it truly something earned solely through one's abilities? She is also asking questions. Then, if in Korea, one person does not receive income and rewards based on abilities, what criteria should they receive money based on? She asked this. Look, this is what I ideally think.

The standard for social compensation is directly related to the contribution to the common ground. It's a significant issue that people may not agree on. Without even understanding what the common ground actually means, it's hard to determine how to contribute to it. Also, not everyone may agree. I can't give a clear answer to what contributes to the common ground. I don't have a formula to answer the questions. So, we need to go through challenges. I don't know about the next generation. If you ask what this is about ability-oriented discussions, I can't give a clear answer. That's why even though Lee Ji-young kept asking questions, the video ended. But what we are talking about is a moral issue. It's an ethical issue, and we shouldn't avoid it. Important values ​​and so on come out even more. Ethics and other things come out like crazy, trying to catch the drifting clouds. Our conclusion is that this is something we cannot avoid.

This is a question about the value of non-existence. I put a question mark on myself. This is not about providing an answer, but it's just a question. It ends with a question. It's about TOPDOG C. Without an answer, I mean, not criticizing what I hate the most, but criticizing without a basis. Where in this world can't you criticize? No matter how good things are on Earth, everything can be criticized boldly with questions like this. Is it okay for intellectuals to be so irresponsible? Is it okay for people to be so irresponsible? That's why humans are just one step above animals. It's about whether a casino operator or an educator contributes more to society, who plays a more important role in common sense. This is the answer I've come up with. So, educators who teach children should receive more rewards and money than casino operators. That's the responsibility of ethics.

Taking charge of ethics, talking about a fairer and better world, what kind of nonsense is this? If that's the case, what happens if we build schools with money earned from operating casinos and educate children? Who will contribute more to society among the numerous professions on Earth, and who can create dust in a shared society? Then, are the greedy large companies in South Korea, who only care about making phones and cars, without a more important common declaration? Isn't it necessary? What if there were no cars? People in need wouldn't be able to get help. Then, when children are on school buses made by a company that used to make ships, is it possible for them to educate while transporting children? The most absurd thing is that the top scholar of this era, the rockstar of ethics, Harvard University political science professor Michael Sandel, is worried.

Professor Michael Sandel, a political science professor at Harvard University, what kind of university is Harvard? It's not a university that simply produces the best talents. Putting a Harvard University label on yourself without actually looking up or down at Harvard is not the way to gain social recognition. Seeking the halo effect of a prestigious university label is not the right way. Your head may swell without a conscience, so it's not appropriate to put a Harvard University political science professor label in front of your name like this, with a mismatch between the front and back. Michael Sandel, a Harvard professor who has returned to the topic of justice, how cool is it to have the title of a political science professor at Harvard University? In American history, the world's top, even in the United States, it's nice to have a professor who is not just a white man. What kind of person is he, who insists on such an educational background while advocating justice?

Come on, how about it? It already feels like a public figure, Professor Eungpahwon, who returned as a hard Haru. When you look at Professor Bal, a white Harvard professor in the U.S., the feeling is completely different from when you look at Grandpa. He was this kind of person. He was brought in and treated as a great scholar on JTBC's Different Class. Have you ever heard a professor like this in South Korea? What is this situation? It's insane elitism. Then let's visit Professor Michael Sandel's personal website. But already, starting from the URL, it's just justice4bird.org. Just from the URL, it's already coming down from Harvard, and the image going in is already the Harvard University logo. When you see the Harvard University logo with Mike Sandel's care logo, you just have to wait.

It looks like this. Now, can you see the Harvard logo on the left? What is justice? Michael Sandel, which country's students are you? It's our country's students, right? We are probably students at Yonsei University, not Harvard. His lectures on Islam are selling incredibly well in Korea. Every book he publishes becomes a bestseller in Korea. He receives a warm welcome, even treated like a celebrity. If you attend Harvard, a prestigious school, and boast about your educational background, where is the discomfort? Whether you go to a prestigious university or a lesser-known one, in the end, isn't it about studying hard at school? Gathering the smartest people and showing off, that's what it is, right? It's uncomfortable in a society where educational background and class matter. Professor Michael Sandel from Harvard, the Harvard logo will never fall off. If you go to Japan, it's Harvard in Japanese, Harvard in English, and Harvard in Korean.

What is the definition of this person, Herbert, who introduced the bestseller The Inevitable Ability to the world as a hot topic? This book is also very funny. It says on the book that it is a New York Times bestseller, emphasizing it. They're selling the book by sniffing the abilities of the New York Times. In the U.S., the most capable new character, where we haven't heard of, in Mexico or somewhere, the newspaper has both sides of page 3 written all over it, saying, Isn't this person crazy about ability? Check out the Korean version. It caused a sensation with the Amazon New York Times bestseller, National Central Library Excellent Book, and recommended books by MBC and KBS. The most capable book shopping mall in the U.S., Amazon, and the most capable New York Times are definitely not it. Let's throw it away. Korea also has the National Central Library, not some local remote library. Next to it, too.

Look, Harvard University has been crazy about the best lecture skills for 20 years in a row. This book doesn't show any contradictions to you. Look at the fact that this person will be the same with books next time, sticking his face in front of the misconception of fairness. It clearly demonstrates the ability as a famous best-selling author. Tara Westover, the author of the book Educated, is now recommended as the most important book for this moment. A very capable best-selling author recommends it, so it's not acceptable for an incompetent person to recommend it. It's attached with the recommendation of a tremendously capable best-selling author. Next to it, there are also mentions in The New York Times and in Time. It is a recommended book in the Seoul National University Library's borrowing rankings for 2020 and 2021, and it is also introduced in major daily newspapers. Non-major daily newspapers don't even bother recommending it. Even if an incompetent newspaper recommends it, it doesn't matter. It's the same for the bestseller list at Kyobo Bookstore.

The best CEO in South Korea must be Kyobo Bookstore. The most capable people are all gathered there. Is meritocracy fair, Professor Michael Sandel? Meritocracy is fair. The next book is amazing. The title is Things Money Can't Buy by Michael Sandel. But the price of this book is 14,400 won. Even with a 10% discount, it's still expensive. The original price is 16,000 won. If you don't have money, you can't buy it. What determines value? It's a kind of thing. The value of this book is determined by 14,400 won. I find this hypocrisy very difficult. Everything is contradictory. Seon-hee, in reality, the best universities are making money by producing outstanding individuals with that book as the goal. How much money have you earned in Korea nearby? But listen to this. Is it unfair? Is it fair that the money I earn will be taken away?

Do you fear this? Now, Teacher Lee Ji-young mentioned that her video is just a simple book advertisement. Then, it's not okay. It's not simple at all. Right now, she is like a dictator in the field of basketball, emphasizing righteousness and fairness. Teaching on this topic is similar to what others are doing. Teacher Lee Ji-young mentioned that even the college entrance exam, which Koreans believe to be fair, is actually unfair. Then, talking about entering Seoul National University through an unfair route, Teacher Lee Ji-young, but she doesn't seem to feel ashamed, just like Michael Sandel who proudly teaches at Harvard University. She shows off everywhere, from Seoul National University to various places, making a lot of money through her efforts, buying multiple supercars, and bragging about it all.

You mentioned that it's not fair compensation. Then, I don't know why you, who received such unfair compensation, don't share your unfair rewards with the poor and weak in our society. Live with a heart of repentance, putting in words. But you won't, right? I feel uncomfortable. What is this? These huge assets, even the compensation in this unfair world, are too uncomfortable. Establish a kind heart, lie down in a luxurious penthouse, lie down on the finest sofa, and raise unjust income. Sometimes, speeding in the supercar I unfairly obtained, I feel so sorry in front of you. This is what? It's not a woman's sincerity. What is this lying in the best house, accepting refugees, and writing articles in the media because it looks good.

I don't know the difference as an actor, everyone seems too polite. Don't just think it's an ad. Please don't run away. Is it okay to advertise only people close to the teacher Lee Ji-young? Then, should we change the ad like a book of Red's style, once? Will you advertise it? Because the contents of the book, clothes, etc., have been agreed upon, you have advertised, right? Then, if you shoot a video as a lecture concept, the audience in the video will be like, Who are those people on the audience stand? Are they students who came to listen to the lecture, or are they employees of the company? If they are students, it's a really funny situation. Gathering students studying to improve their abilities and wasting time to enhance the abilities of these people is not important among the possible tasks. If you conducted such education, it would be a very serious job neglect.

You know, it's not like employees or their own search. The problem with this is the concept of instructors who come out in the end of the day like scammers, saying they will make money or help you make money. But when you look into the background, those who do that kind of thing, what are they doing? I have no idea about this easy-type scam and lived without knowing about it. After watching one of your videos, I became disgusted with him. Of course, just because you don't like someone doesn't mean you'll suffer any losses or disadvantages. Because he is already more popular, has more money, and more abilities than Yoon Sang. At least with sniper videos, he can't do any damage. The reason why this situation unfolds is precisely because our society lives in a meritocratic manner. Beneficiaries of meritocratic society, teachers, become famous as wealthy figures. Now, there are even those who want to attract good hearts.

I don't understand why a meritocratic society teaches studying to bad kids to improve their abilities. According to their own logic, isn't Kwon In the real lackey of this unfair meritocratic society, making huge amounts of money from the far end of this unfair meritocratic society? The kids who only learned from you go to Sky and good schools, further strengthening the meritocratic world, making it even more insane. The meritocratic society, Papa Ra, Ssaem, should stop blocking those preparing for the 1 20 exam, who are trying to overcome the talented. This is an action without even a sense of professionalism about their own profession. What are they doing at such an important time? With just one child, they neglect the precious lives of others and feed themselves as a good creditor and as a shield. Teacher, meritocracy is bad.

Okay, next time, after overcoming all forms of meritocracy, please also teach the kids what criteria the world should run on. Even Bonita, who holds that position, a star lecturer, a famous lecturer, doesn't even share it with poor instructors. It's so annoying. Let me summarize. Meritocracy is not 100% fair, okay? Even I see it that way. Who said meritocracy is perfect? The world is too complicated, so measuring ability precisely is impossible. Luck also plays a role in life. That's why even if I understand it, believing that meritocracy is always fair 100% is, in my opinion, nonsense. In this world, there is nothing more fair than meritocracy. It's the most fair and righteous path compared to any other system in the world. Therefore, the world still operates based on merit.

That's right, it's just a matter of perspective. If you think about it, even attaching the word ideology of ability is funny. The ideology of ability, this thing, what kind of communist drug is that? Ability enters the scene, and the world just naturally operates based on abilities. The cause, even all 7.5 billion people are the cause. Everyone is an accomplice in creating the ideology of ability. It's not just one or two people pointing fingers as the culprits. That's why it's natural, without any ideology. Since they don't know anything. But why do they attach ideology to everything here? They write GR and push forward with the ideology of ability, claiming it's 100% correct, no, 200%. They push and push with all their might, using their chairs to push us to the end. What's next? What comes after that? The method of pushing and beating is too intimidating. While claiming that the ideology of ability is the problem, people who come out with that argument are barely presenting it as an alternative. It feels like a twisted logic reminiscent of the failed logic of communism in the past.

Are you doing communism, but isn't it all about the heart? If you say it like this, it's different. So nowadays, in the world of communism, why are you so extreme? Even though we are extreme ourselves, why do you criticize me with such nonsense? Look at who Mike Sandel, who advertises like that, is hanging out with. But communists, now they are the ones who make the same arguments. Both Michael Sandel and now Lee Ji-young are making the same arguments. The top-notch abilities are saying this, and when you press them, they say nonsense. They talk about communism, nonsense. Gender quotas, school quotas, regional quotas, equal don't-ask-just-work employment, these are all things that barely come out due to coexistence. Why is it all communism? Why is it that your own life is considered a failure if you fail without breaking down meritocracy? I can somewhat understand this, but after making a lot of money and succeeding greatly in society, breaking down meritocracy.

Scenes of talking the same nonsense are so, so disgusting that I don't even know what they are talking about, making me angry and frustrated. The souls of failed communism are bringing the dirty energy of the Korean Peninsula again today. Let's not do that, Lee Ji-young. If you really want to say that, then coolly admit the unfair things you have already gathered unfairly. That's the only way to be sincere.

스타강사 이지영 선생님 멈춰

윤튜브

이지영 교사는 호화로운 라이프스타일을 과시하는 것으로 유명한 성공한 부유층 인사입니다.

그녀의 능력과 재산에 대한 관심이 집중되면서 능력 숭배와 편견에 대한 논란이 커지고 있습니다.

이 논란은 공정성, 기회, 능력주의가 사회에 미치는 영향에 대한 의문을 제기합니다.

능력주의와 사회공헌에 관한 윤리적 질문

하버드대 교수가 능력주의와 사회공헌에 대한 윤리적 문제를 제기합니다.

이 비디오 토론은 지식인의 책임과 사회에서 윤리의 중요성을 중심으로 진행됩니다.

교수는 카지노 운영자보다 교육자의 사회적 기여가 더 크다고 주장하며 공동 선언문 작성에 있어 대기업의 역할에 대해 질문합니다.

마이클 샌델 교수와 하버드 대학교의 제휴를 둘러싼 논란

마이클 샌델 교수가 사회적 인정을 받기 위해 하버드대 출신임을 강조했다는 비판에 직면해 있습니다.

한국에서는 그의 성공과 유명인 대접에도 불구하고 명문대 출신을 강조하는 것에 대한 불편한 시선이 존재합니다.

이 논란은 뉴욕타임스에서의 성공과 한국에서의 호응을 크게 부각하는 그의 책 홍보에도 영향을 미쳤습니다.

'에듀케이션'은 베스트셀러 작가가 강력히 추천하고 저명한 출판사와 서울대 도서관 대출 순위에도 소개된 책입니다.

그럼에도 불구하고 불공정하다는 비판과 비난에 직면해 있습니다.

이 책의 가격도 논란을 불러일으키며 접근성에 대한 의문을 제기하고 있습니다.

이 글은 불공정한 능력주의 사회를 영속화하는 데 있어 교사와 공인의 역할을 비판합니다.

능력주의가 가장 공정하고 정의로운 제도라는 생각에 도전하며 인생에서 운의 역할을 강조합니다.

저자는 능력주의 시스템과 그것이 사회에 미치는 영향에 대한 재평가를 촉구합니다.

능력 이데올로기라는 개념은 극단적이고 무의미하다는 비판을 받습니다.

실패한 공산주의를 연상시키며 공격적으로 추진되고 있다는 주장이 제기되고 있습니다.

비판은 이 이데올로기가 불공정성과 연관되어 있고 그로 인한 좌절감으로까지 확장됩니다.