discussions on Ted uh as far as these gentlemen are concerned it's been a year since this controversy has sort of uh come and uh a lot of things have transpired since then and uh I think it'd be really great to hear the good

things and the interesting and maybe the bad uh all the things that have transpired since then so I was wondering uh perhaps Dr. Sheldrick if you'd like to start if uh you want to just give us a synopsis of what's been going on as far

far as you've been concerned since the since your um video was pulled yes well the the immediate effects of this were um dramatic when there was a huge viral protest on the internet that um I hadn't expected I was traveling with my wife Jill in India at the time this all blew

up and I was out of internet contact for several days we were in a remote holy town in Madhya Pradesh called Maheshwar I got onto the internet and suddenly I got all these emails from people saying we support you we're behind you don't

let them censor you I didn't know what they were talking about and by the time we got to go uh the situation became a little bit clearer um and I just got back to England I'd only been back for a day or two and I had this email from the

curator of Ted the guy who runs it Chris Anderson saying uh dear Rupert can we talk on the phone can I call you so I said sure So anyway he rang me up we had a long conversation um and he asked me to work with him on solving this problem

Well, I pointed out it was not me that had created the problem that Graham and I had been, uh, speaking in a TEDx event in London called "Challenging Existing Paradigms", and we'd actually done what it said on the [Laughter]

label. Uh, anyway, the whole situation kept running out of control. TED kept trying to close down these debate forums, and they had to open up new ones trying to shake off the debate. It ended up was the the debate about our talks have had more comments than any other talks

on TED, even though they were from a small TEDx event in London. When my talk was taken off the TED website, it had 35,000 views. It's now all over the internet. It must have had at least a million, and probably similar for Graham's.

Um, but it what really this is saying, showing, is is that this attempt by these, uh, dogmatic skeptics to suppress this had a tremendous effect on actually amplifying the message. Um, they're part of the process. I don't bear them any ill

will, um, because they actually are doing what they should be doing. If there's a parent paradigm change going on, there's bound to be conflict, and people won't be aware of the fact that there's a change unless they see that conflict in action. And they actually manifested, uh, this

whole process. Um, a year, in April this year, there was a group

Rupert Sheldrake on being banned by TED

Jungian Online

논란에 대한 초기 반응과 그 이후의 사건들.

논란이 시작된 지 1년이 지났고 많은 일이 일어났습니다.

셸드릭 박사에게 동영상이 삭제된 이후의 사건을 요약해 달라는 요청을 받습니다.

그가 인도를 여행하는 동안 대규모 온라인 시위가 벌어지는 등 즉각적인 효과는 극적이었습니다.

그는 오프라인 상태에서 응원의 이메일을 받았고 인터넷에 다시 접속한 후 상황을 알게 되었습니다.

영국으로 돌아온 그는 TED 큐레이터인 크리스 앤더슨으로부터 이 문제를 논의하자는 전화를 받았습니다.

TED 조직의 대응과 예상치 못한 결과.

셸드릭 박사는 그레이엄과 함께 TEDx 행사에서 기존 패러다임에 도전하는 것에 대해 연설하고 있었다고 밝혔습니다.

토론 포럼을 폐쇄하려던 TED의 시도는 오히려 역효과를 낳아 더 많은 토론을 이끌어 냈습니다.

이 강연은 온라인에서 수백만 건의 조회수를 기록했으며, 이는 TED 웹사이트의 초기 조회수를 훨씬 뛰어넘는 수치입니다.

검열의 의도하지 않은 결과와 갈등의 역할.

메시지를 억누르려는 시도가 아이러니하게도 메시지를 증폭시켰습니다.

셸드릭 박사는 회의론자들의 행동이 패러다임의 전환을 강조한 것이기 때문에 회의론자들을 원망하지 않습니다.

1년 후인 4월, [문장이 완성되지 않은] 그룹이 등장합니다.