25년 한국어 교육과정의 변화

### 권교 선생님의 25년 한국어 커리큘럼: 변화와 준비 팁
* 📚 새로운 시험 형식에 맞춰 논리, 어휘, 문법, 문학을 변경하는 등 **25년간의 커리큘럼이 완전히 개편**되었습니다.
* 🔍 이제 논리 문제에는 많은 학생과 교수자에게 **새로운 도전 과제인 강화 및 약화 요소**가 포함됩니다.
* 📈 문법 문제는 점점 더 복잡해지고 있으며, **지문을 기반으로 한 분석과 개념에 대한 깊은 이해**를 요구하고 있습니다.
* 📝 문학 문제는 **문학 작품을 읽고 해석하는 데 중점**을 둔 텍스트 기반 분석으로 변화하고 있습니다.
* 📅 커리큘럼은 **5월에 시작**되며, 기본적인 문제 해결 능력과 고급 개념으로의 점진적인 발전에 중점을 두고 있습니다.
* 📊 모의 시험은 **학생들이 실제 시험의 예상 난이도로 연습**할 수 있도록 제공됩니다.
* 👨 권교 선생님은 고급 주제로 넘어가기 전에 **기본 문법과 논리 개념**을 익히는 것이 중요하다고 강조합니다.
* 💬 커리큘럼은 **학생 피드백과 시험 변경 사항**을 바탕으로 지속적으로 업데이트 및 개선될 예정입니다.

권교 선생님은 논리, 문법, 문학에 중점을 둔 25년간의 종합적인 국어 커리큘럼을 개발하여 수준 높은 문제와 자료를 제공하고 있습니다.

Hello, I'm Teacher Kwon Gyo. Now, I will start the guided video for the Kwon Gyo Korean language original curriculum of 25 years. How has it changed in 25 years? Briefly, there are four areas: logic, vocabulary, grammar, and literature. Of course, there are vocabulary and within logic, there are strengthening and weakening aspects. If you just categorize them broadly, there are these five major areas. It's a completely new field. With the emergence of existing PISA-type questions, logical reasoning, the so-called logical keys, where strengthening and weakening issues are included, are now being asked. So, I think many of you are probably very concerned about this part, which hasn't been on the exam until now. I believe many instructors have also put a lot of thought into it. Now, I

I had prepared three sets before, actually shot them, and now there is a lecture on dealing with this, but based on that, as I tried to solve this first aid problem, I realized that, oh, even though it's not easy, then you all can do well enough. Yes, I have prepared a lot for that, so don't worry and just follow along. I will explain more specific details later. So, even for adult learners, there are certain parts that must be learned. For example, in the case of reading comprehension, in fact, reading comprehension questions have been asked easily now, and even in the national exams, reading comprehension questions are not that difficult. Of course, I don't know how it will be in the changing 25-year period, but even if the number of reading comprehension questions increases, if one or two of them become a little more difficult, then it will take a lot of time.

It's invincible. Because in the past, in subjects like grammar and literature, it took less time to solve problems, but now, even though you can ignore the passage and solve the problem, if you use the passage to solve the problem, especially in grammar, it takes significantly more time. Also, instead of literature, comprehension questions are increasing, so you have to read not just ordinary works but also the explanations of those works to solve the problems, which makes time absolutely insufficient. Therefore, as you do organic reading comprehension, the more you practice reading, the more your skills improve, and eventually, you will be able to solve problems that you couldn't solve before. You need to have such a reading training method to enhance your skills. Most people just say, Well, it's just reading comprehension, I can read and solve it, relying on intuition to solve the problems.

The biggest problem with solving problems based on intuition is not that you can't finish the problem, you solve it well and complete it, but later, even if you spend time, your score does not go up. You end up hitting a limit, experiencing something like a trap. For example, one of the main reasons why organic churches explain solving methods by problem types like example problem-solving methods is that the examiners have various traps. So, if they decide to make it difficult this time, you can easily fall into those traps. They are not making it easy for you. So, even though you know all the ways to solve, just because of the difficulty of the problem, you are just looking at the rest. Then, if you know the traps in advance and prepare for them, your skills will improve gradually like this. Instead of thinking about those things, you just want to solve them alone.

Listening to lectures is tiresome, right? No, you shouldn't study with that kind of mindset. Therefore, it's important to read thoroughly and accurately. By doing so, you can save time and improve your overall test scores. Don't miss out on being able to do well on exams. Next, let's talk about grammar. In fact, it's a challenging aspect even for instructors. Why is that? Because they show you questions. For example, in the questions they present, what can we understand? One question is clearly structured in a similar way to the CSAT exam. In cases like this, even if you know grammar rules, you still need to read the passage carefully so that you don't fall into the traps set within the passage and can solve the problems accurately. Of course, when reading the passage, you need to have a solid understanding of grammar concepts. Now, the rest of the questions are a bit more knowledge-based, where you can solve the problems just by looking at the options without paying much attention to the passage.

I designed it so that you can solve it. So, when you think it will come out the same, the first thing we can consider is how to prepare for reading comprehension questions. Actually, in the case of these reading comprehension questions, they can be killer questions. So, what's funny is that there are students who study Chinese characters very hard. In the previous test version, it's not coming out now, but there was a person who studied really hard for that. It's just one question, and the accuracy rate is around 30% to 50%. So, even if you get it wrong, it's not a big deal because more than half get it wrong. However, many people tend to ignore grammar killer questions. The scope is as wide as grammar. In fact, I think grammar is easier to study than reading comprehension.

I have prepared for all the killer questions, so I can get a high score, right? So, if you think about it, the conclusion is that I cannot give up on these killer grammar questions. For example, since I can't give up on these killer grammar questions, I have to solve them. As I solve them, what's challenging is that it takes a lot of time, and the more time it takes, the higher the probability of getting the answer right decreases. That's a real killer. So, you shouldn't study with the traditional memorization method for grammar. You should try solving passage-based questions a lot and practice a lot of SAT-style traps. So, I'm telling you in advance, for now, I will just briefly mention the basics. What I'm struggling with the most right now is conjunction grammar. Actually, I've been pondering over conjunction grammar a bit because the concept of conjunction grammar itself is a bit tricky. I will explain it later, but I have some concerns about conjunction grammar.

Oh, and we're going to solve practice problems, but there are no past exam questions. Where can we find past questions? Right now, we can't create past questions, right? So, we have no choice but to solve similar problems a lot. That's why the name Gye-gi Moon is alive and well. Besides, since I will continue to steadily teach anyway, I'm just going to keep it that way. Instead, I've only created 300 grammar problems as similar problems. Why did I do that? Because I used to be a SAT instructor. So, I have an abundance of material. Of course, I didn't just copy the SAT passages as they were. I may have used some questions as they were from the SAT questions, but for the most part, I modified them all to fit the current level of difficulty and made them similar. And the dilemma that arises is that I could provide more questions than that.

Due to the difficulty, but now I'm going to talk about the second thing. So, the first thing is, as I mentioned earlier, a killer problem that can take up a lot of time has been created, and in order to thoroughly prepare for this killer problem, I had no choice but to create similar problems. I have already prepared 300 problems in advance, but I didn't say anything about it because I didn't want to tell you how I prepare. I have already prepared 300 problems in advance and now I am in the process of proofreading and writing interpretations. So, don't worry at all about the problems. And the second thing I will do is provide more detailed information when explaining the grammar later. The second thing that is troubling about this grammar is what part should be shortened. So, clearly, a new example from the beginning of the greeting innovation.

When showing the questions, I mentioned that I would focus on memorization-style questions while aligning with the flow of other exams. However, if I say I won't give what's really difficult, I'll just remove everything. If I say I'll focus on it, but don't actually provide it, it feels uncomfortable for both the teacher teaching and the students learning. Therefore, I think it's too hard to remove everything, as it might make everyone uneasy. So, I will discard teaching materials to the very minimum. Hey, this part is too much for anyone to see, let's discard it. Since it has never been covered in the college entrance exam, I have decided to discard that part. But it's not a big deal. Anyway, the key point is whether it's Korean grammar or the 57th rule plus alpha in Korean spelling. I will just discard them all because they are not essential. The rest will be mixed with some concepts and will be enough for question setting.

I can do that, and I have already created 300 questions, but if I put effort into the remaining part, I can create about 200 more questions from there. So, it's quite painful for me. From my perspective, that's why I think like this. Ultimately, it should work well for all of us, so I will provide much higher quality questions than other instructors. I have been an instructor who continuously creates questions, and I am still creating them. With a research team that can maintain such quality or even explanations when creating those questions, I will make and provide them sufficiently. That's my promise. Regarding the scope beyond that, I think we should try out the exam for the children a bit and discuss it. So, I will see the reactions of all of you once and if you say that such questions are needed, as a teacher, I can create and provide them as much as needed. So, that's the direction I will take.

In terms of grammar, there are two main issues. One is that killer questions can come out in grammar, so I have prepared many similar questions to prepare well for that. Through solving those, I ask you to master grammar firmly. The second is about memorization. It was really difficult to set the scope. So, regarding that scope, I have set it to a level where you can grasp the concept to some extent, so please follow along with confidence in the scope, not too narrow, not too wide, but at an appropriate level. I hope you understand these two points. And literature is actually the most regrettable. I can teach the concepts of literary interpretation very well, but this part has already started to become text-based. In fact, there have been cases where text-based literature questions have been asked in the college entrance exam.

Yes, there were a lot of questions in the past, but now it's not being produced well. Through those questions, I have already created 100 questions. For example, in the future, I will continue to create questions for any exam that requires more than 100 questions. You can consider that the question production is almost done until now. The logic, grammar, and literature are the same. In fact, you can use the previous questions as they are, but there are slightly different types of questions, so I will create new questions using those types and proceed like that. So, without saying anything, I've actually been creating questions since example questions came out in November last year. I've been working on the question bank, writing explanations, and so on. So, don't worry and follow along. That's the first thing I want to say. Now, let's talk about the overall curriculum.

When you wonder how to proceed, in cases where the basic of Chosia is lacking, you should just follow along like this. Just as it is. However, the existing students are the issue. So, what changes for existing students? Only one thing changes. From personnel to the basic of Korean logic, you don't have to listen to this. You can just come like this. After all, the key point is the basic. Now, in order to adapt to the changed exam, you need to solve many problems. These many problems are provided in the basic texts. So, you need to focus on this and proceed. Therefore, for students who already have differences in basics, you don't need to listen closely to the detailed grammar concepts in the all-in-one. So, go to the basic texts and listen to the grammar concepts again, while solving passage-type questions, and confirm that this concept could be difficultly tested in the passage.

Please take a look, and I will mention in advance that grammar is difficult. When I looked at the difficulty level, the sample questions were not as easy as I thought, so we will create questions that are equally or more difficult. Of course, it will be a bit lower than the college entrance exam. If you try the latest college entrance exam questions now, many students who have studied grammar say they have a hard time solving them. So, it will be quite challenging, not just for the college entrance exam. This could become a killer question. If you don't manage your time well here, it will take an incredibly long time to solve the remaining questions. Even for the national exam, some students say that it took a long time to adjust due to the changes. Once you pass 25 years, you may be able to catch up in the national exam, but if you don't prepare thoroughly and steadily, you won't make it. So,

Even Korean language instructors are on high alert, so a Korean language war is happening right now. That's how you should see it. So, this is how it happened. Now, what are the steps? Well, I will explain each step in detail along with a schedule. First of all, it will start in May. I thought about starting earlier, but it seems a bit inappropriate. Since we should do the top national exam after May, we will start from May. We will start with the basics of May. Oh, we are doing logic together. Yes, we have excluded only the logic part in the all-in-one. So, we are proceeding like this, excluding only the logic part. Oh, there is not much difference. So, should I listen to all of the all-in-one or just the logic part? That's the point. Therefore, since it is the same course content, we filmed it all the same way and just separated the logic part like this.

For the remaining reincarnations, you can think of it as being prepared for students who have been trained, and I will explain in detail later what to teach. So, think of the schedule roughly like this, and now, in basic problem solving, when it comes to solving past problems, from what I've seen, if you lay a strong foundation in basic grammar, I've always felt this before, but for students who lack basics, there are cases where they struggle when it comes to advanced grammar. It often happens. Therefore, I always say that for subjects like advanced grammar, you should master the basics, do enough homework, and then listen so that you can follow the flow well. On the contrary, the difficulty level of grammar has increased. Even though the scope may have decreased a bit, the difficulty level itself has gone up, so you need to study thoroughly. This is crucial.

I assure you that if you thoroughly study this and want to convey everything I want to say, you should go to the studio for filming. So, even though I could publish the book faster, it will probably be around the end of June. I will film the grammar part in advance in May and do some shooting. Do you understand? That's how it will go. The rest of the grammar, you have already done, and there will be more changes in the sentences. The previous questions will remain the same, but there may be some changes in the similar questions. In the future, the grammar part will be more focused on vocabulary, so we will recruit more questions based on vocabulary and insert them accordingly. Therefore, we will put more effort into familiarizing you with the vocabulary.

So, if you look at it that way, and now we have logic and literature, and I was wondering whether to insert it as literary reading or to insert it as logical force, but it's a matter of volume. So, if we force literature into this reading, the reading becomes too thick and becomes unbearable. Therefore, we will integrate logic and reinforce weak culture in three stages and provide it as one book, one authority. Of course, the content taught in each is a bit different, but it seems most appropriate to bundle them like this, in my opinion. So, using literary production, we have already created a hundred problems, so please try solving them once. There may be some overlap with the problems, but it can't be helped. Frankly, it's a bit of a mix, like this. If you feel like you need to study more about this, you should delve into it a bit more.

Through solving past questions, I tried to solve ten key questions. If you think you have the same ten questions, there is no need for you to solve them again. It is very helpful to try solving the same questions twice, so please try solving duplicate questions once. In terms of logic, you will go through about 200 questions. In fact, I have already created almost all the questions, so I just need to create some derived questions. I will talk about logic later, but you know my way of teaching, right? I don't talk about miscellaneous things like the history of logic or philosophy. I just say that this question is asked in this way, and if you understand this question in this way, it will be helpful. But if someone still doesn't understand after I have explained it several times, then just memorize it. Memorize it, and when it appears, just apply it like this.

Approach it, the problem will be solved. You will hear these kinds of stories in the reviews after taking the course. There are many stories like this in the course reviews. In terms of grammar, there are comments like, I've never seen a teacher teach grammar like this before, or It's strange that the instructor, whom I saw for the first time, solves the problems well. So, it's strange that they praise it too much when they don't understand it. At that time, shouldn't they praise the instructor for teaching the difficult area well and making the problem solvable? Well, the logic is the same. It's the same for grammar. I always lecture like that. What's important is not that you become a scholar and study the concepts deeply and accurately. What's really important? It's that the problem is solved. So, clear away the unnecessary things, especially if instructors who haven't solved problems teach strange things. If you make problems and solve them, this won't happen.

You don't need to know this in detail, you just need to understand it like this. So, I will provide you with practical concepts that are directly related to your score, so don't worry and come on. And since this is a causative problem, of course, logic problems related to the 7th-grade level will be included. I will review it again later, but you shouldn't solve all the 7th-grade problems. There is a significant difference between the 9th and 7th grades, and 7th-grade problems are really difficult. If you aim to reach that level, it's actually not just one year, it's one year, you must continue to solve logic problems persistently. Yes, so I don't categorize it that way, but it's challenging enough to try the 9th grade, which includes problems of such difficulty, and distribute various problems derived from there. This way, you can train yourself sufficiently in logic.

I believe I can help you solve the problem without worrying about it. And now, if reading comprehension or logical reasoning might come out a bit more difficult, we assume that and practice reading comprehension or logical reasoning. So, you might wonder if it will be really difficult at that level. Of course, but if you study at that level of difficulty, what seems easier than that will be too easy. Even if you get confused or nervous in real situations, it will be much easier than the problems you solved during training. That's why we practice training. Let's try solving practice test questions at the same level of difficulty. You can take a mock test for that. So, a mock test is a bit more challenging in terms of difficulty than just example questions.

There may be some episodes where you aim high and go in, but for the most part, you will just go along with that level and adjust to the difficulty of the actual test. So, the correct answers will come out quite similar. But if you study hard, that's when you do intense training. So, through intense reading and logical training, you will be able to handle even the difficult parts with certainty. Probably, by the first year, you won't go beyond this point. Korean is really the key here. The rest is obvious. Just take them as they come out. But for intense reading and logical training, since it's about preparing for problems that you haven't encountered before, I think not everyone will go this far. And now, in October and December, there will be compressed clean mock exams.

Now, the thing about going in, what is handcrafted now, is already widely known and recognized, such a mock test. Even though this mock test has not been around for a long time, why is it so well known? I personally create problems, supervise them, and discuss them with Youngjin Science to raise the quality of the questions. That's why I dare to say that. However, originally, the mock test was given every 25 days, but now, since I am making the questions myself, it takes much longer than before. So, I have to spend more time and effort, which is why maybe every 20th mock test, every 20th, like this, every 5th, every 5th, if I can be a little ambitious, I will try to provide up to the 10th mock test. That's how it will proceed, so I cannot guarantee that the schedule will always be perfect. Especially when it comes to compressing the final concepts, I have some concerns. I will do my best after thinking about it carefully.

I will try to organize it to meet the schedule. Now, I will explain each part in detail. Initially, for the comprehensive reading, logic, grammar, and literature, it was said that 50% would be revised. In fact, except for reading comprehension, other parts like logic and literature will be completely renewed. As for grammar, you can see it like this. The concepts I taught will still be used because there are problems that can be solved without looking at the passages, just by looking at the choices. Since the concept explanations themselves will not change due to grammar, right? However, there are slight changes in the passage-type questions, so I need to explain that as well. In the existing grammar questions, the concepts that were emphasized in the traditional grammar questions sometimes appear in the passages. Therefore, in exams like the CSAT, such things are also asked in the form of passages. So, I will provide detailed explanations like this, along with the questions.

You should see it this way because you need to solve it. There are grammar problems that used to be memorized because solving them is key to understanding the concept. There are also passage-type questions, and through passages, you can realize that concepts can be asked in the form of questions. There are no hints, so you should adapt a bit. Eventually, this whole process is to smoothly transition to the intermediate level. The intermediate level is a process to move on naturally. Since the intermediate level is intricately specialized, concepts are broken down and various questions are prepared, so just follow along. I really ask you to follow along from the beginning because suddenly coming in at the intermediate level and trying to solve questions and explain them, you might hear grammar explanations for the first time and wonder, Oh, is this how this question is solved? I hope you don't feel lost.

If you follow me, I will explain the concept of verb conjugation very accurately. So, I will explain it exactly like this, so please repeat it as it is and follow along for review in this comedy. Let's skip the explanation part; it's something that has been mentioned continuously, so you should be able to interpret the text organically. You need to encounter various types of solution methods, traps, and so on, and you need to do those things. In terms of grammar, you must master the basic grammar knowledge necessary for problem solving. Don't miss that and after mastering that, you need to solve passage-type questions as well. You will proceed at a slower pace than the grammar that was previously covered. However, I have excluded areas that were slightly focused on memorization, such as punctuation or something like that.

It's not really being discussed in terms of notation, so most of the memorization-based content has been removed. So, you can see that about 50% has been revised. So, the logic is completely newly established. Once again, it's not a theory of grasping at straws, but it is thoroughly focused on problem-solving. I have now given a lecture on this once to the researchers. From the perspective of the students who learned it, they thought, Oh, this is good. Oh, it's very good. This solves all the problems. However, they also mentioned that they might need to solve more problems. So, I had about 60 logic problems in there, but it seems that just those 60 problems may not be enough. You may need to go through the logic lecture as well. In my opinion, not only basic logic but also going through the logic lecture and solving as many problems as possible is recommended. Literature is too.

Don't worry. Honestly, when I look at literature, you can just read, think, and solve problems. So, I'm not sure if the basic concepts of literature are really necessary. If you do need the basic concepts, I will provide the basic concepts in the text and even provide problems. I will explain it at that time, so don't worry. You don't need to worry much about literature. Just follow along. Just think that way and follow along. And now, in the case of the Korean language logic basics, I will only provide the logic part from now on, like this. So, if you need to review it, you don't need to listen to the whole thing again. Therefore, you can just listen to the logic part again. Of course, if the class starts a little late, you can skip it altogether.

From the very basics, we thoroughly focus on problem-solving, and we go all the way to explaining the concepts. So, only problem-solving is the key, and grammar is an absolute no. You must listen to the sound and repeat it. It's the same as the beginner's level, so listen, review thoroughly, and come. When I say students who can start from what I've mentioned, I'm talking about the new students. Or I'm talking about students who already know the concepts very well. Do you know about the GEPT and TOEIC tests? The quality is incomparable. That's why we not only solve past questions but also create similar questions very well. We work hard to finalize those similar questions by creating them diligently and gathering opinions from our research team. Especially, the second reading comprehension will be strengthened. I've been strengthening it before, explaining it like this all along, and from now on.

Reading comprehension will become even more important, so I will focus more on that. However, the pace of explaining the reading and grammar parts will be very slow, so I suggest you think of it as your own self-study room. Therefore, when you are self-studying and come across a concept, a problem, or anything you don't understand, feel free to ask questions at that time, and we will respond promptly. As mentioned earlier, not only simple college entrance exam questions but also questions directly from the college entrance exam can be included. However, just including college entrance exam questions is not enough; there should be a clear distinction. In fact, knowledgeable people may feel the difference. However, even if that's the case, if you just mix in college entrance exam questions with other questions, it may not be possible to create questions in my opinion. So, I will continue like this.

I have brought some questions, so what is grammar? I've already made all the window frames, so I've already made 300 questions. I've transformed the questions I made before into a more challenging form, so it's not that difficult. So, even with just the questions I've made so far, they are almost like the first questions. So, in comparison to the 25 years, these are the first questions. So, I've already made all the questions up to now with this first question, so let's go with that. Do you understand? So, in terms of grammar, just study with the same textbook. Oh, that's how you should see it. And now, in terms of enhancing or weakening logic, the gist of literature, like in textbooks, even if you had a basic logic table, you must have forgotten everything because it's probably something you're hearing for the first time. So, the same concepts will be explained, and you will solve more related problems. Oh, and then, in the practical part.

I will solve more problems up to that point, so it is set up like that. So, even if you understand all the concepts, if you can apply them all, that would be a genius, right? Even if the same concept is explained the same way, your understanding will be much higher and clearer if you hear it for the second time than the first time. Therefore, I think there is a need for that, so please listen to it again. Then, it's not just a simple physics problem, but you have to divide it among physics problems. You can't take this lightly. If you ask how it will be up to this point, divide it, and until then, it will really become difficult. Just by doing that, you can say, Ah, this is a Grade 7 level problem. If it actually comes out, it will become almost like a killer prison from now on. You won't solve it very well. It will be much easier to solve than that, though. Just in case.

If one becomes difficult, I will stop here. I have changed the 7th grade problem into an emergency level. If you try to solve the problems derived from it with our research team, you will understand the logical problem patterns and be able to accept how the concepts we discussed earlier are applied. Please don't miss out on this process. Also, in literature, there are examples of strengthening and weakening. I showed one or two examples in literature before, but in the future, it seems like more will come. In fact, in the strengthening and weakening comprehension passages, we make the questions a bit more difficult to think about the problem a little more. But as you need to think about it again, it can be a bit annoying, actually.

There is a separate appropriate text, so we gather only those texts separately to create questions, which will help increase your adaptation. In the context of enhancing logic, you can consider strengthening or weakening. The last literature, literature that is already prepared, will be used as it is, allowing you to see that this can be used to change the format for testing. This is 100% new, so there is no need to worry. It will definitely become a textbook that you must solve. Also, in September and October, the comprehensive training series for reading comprehension and logic will be released. It is essential for achieving high scores. About 50% of the reading comprehension will be revised because we think we need to make some adjustments in terms of rhetoric and lengthy passages. Logic will be completely new, consisting of logical problems.

I will provide you with the materials to create, so please do not forget the title of the textbook titled Kang Hoon Training, the title of the master of that field. You need to lay down the difficulty, so even if the exam turns out to be difficult, you can prepare thoroughly and study diligently with that mindset. While taking the course, I hope you can solve problems along with the textbook. Now, for the final, well, the final is a bit long for us, so I will diligently create a problem once from question one to question two, and I will work hard on questions one to two. But, creating problems is not easy, and through outsourcing production, I have experienced that the quality differs too much. However, students don't really perceive this well. Quality is, in fact, essential.

Basically, students who have taken multiple mock tests created by different instructors and research teams feel that the quality of the tests varies. Some students say that the quality of the tests is the best when they solve a particular type of test, but on the other hand, some students say something else. Some students even choose not to solve certain types of tests. Therefore, from my perspective as a test creator, when I look at the outsourced test questions, I simply cannot accept them. These are questions that do not follow the flow of the existing past questions or the basic principles of question creation. If you try to solve such questions, your skills may actually decline. This is not a joke. Instead, students' standards that have been well maintained so far may be shaken. So, in order to provide high-quality questions, I put a lot of effort into it.

If you watch and make an effort, that's why it comes out like this. The level may be a bit difficult, of course, you should consider that. However, through this difficult level, we make sure that it is possible to overcome when the test is difficult. So, by following this flow, I explained it once, and the rest is related to communication in our research lab. So, if you search for Kwon Gyu Naver Cafe on Naver, you can get good answers to your questions, and there are various other events, so it would be great if you join the cafe and enjoy these events to receive many benefits. Next, if you search on YouTube, there are various introduction videos, and my filming schedule for Gongdangi usually takes some time.

So, because the timeliness is a bit lacking in scheduling and shooting, if there is a lecture that needs to be uploaded quickly, through YouTube, even if it comes via mobile phone, we will provide it. I hope you have received various information from YouTube and watched it well. I'm not good at Instagram. I'm not good at Instagram, so even if you're 44 years old, you're a bit vulnerable to various social media platforms. Therefore, our department head should manage it well, so I hope you can benefit from many events here. That's what I mean. Now, as we are about to wrap up, don't worry about the 25-year curriculum. We have already prepared for it in advance, so there will be no problem with the technology. We are planning to compile all the textbooks, and for the issues after that, we will continue to work on the textbook production.

I will do my best to help you pass without any problems in 25 years, so please trust and follow me as I am continuously researching and creating. Fighting!

25 공무원 국어 권규호 합격 커리큘럼

권규호공무원국어

25년 동안의 권교 한국어 교육과정의 변화

권교 한국어 커리큘럼은 논리적 추론과 독해에 중점을 두고 논리, 어휘, 문법, 문학 분야에서 발전해 왔습니다.

독해 문제와 문법 문제가 점점 더 복잡해지면서 지문에 대한 철저한 이해와 탄탄한 문법 개념이 필요합니다.

많은 학생들이 문법 킬러 문제의 광범위한 범위와 시험 점수에 미치는 영향에도 불구하고 그 중요성을 간과하는 경향이 있습니다.

문법 문제와 수능 준비에 대한 고민

강사는 어려운 문법 문제를 포기하지 않겠다는 각오로 수능 스타일의 트랩 연습을 강조합니다.

300개의 문법 문제를 미리 준비했으며 앞으로 더 많은 문제를 만들 계획입니다.

또한 연사는 문법을 가르치기 위한 최선의 접근 방식을 고민하고 있으며 학생들에게 양질의 문제를 제공하기 위해 최선을 다하고 있습니다.

혼란스러운 문법 및 문학 준비 계획

한 튜터가 광범위한 주제를 다루기 위해 시험용 문법 및 문학 문제를 대량으로 만들고 있습니다.

튜터는 학생들에게 문법 개념에 대한 기본 텍스트에 집중하라고 조언하며 문제가 까다로울 것이라고 경고합니다.

준비 계획은 5월에 시작되며, 국가 시험에 중점을 두고 기초와 논리를 다룰 예정입니다.

문법 및 논리 교육 일정 재구성하기

강사는 고급 문법을 다루기 전에 기본 문법을 마스터하는 것이 중요하다는 점을 강조하고, 점점 어려워지는 문법 난이도를 강조합니다.

논리에 대한 교수법은 문제 해결에 중점을 두고 문제를 풀고 필요할 때 암기를 적용하는 데 중점을 둡니다.

강사의 강의 방식은 문법과 논리 모두에 대한 강의 리뷰에서 깊은 개념 학습보다 문제 해결 능력을 우선시한다는 평을 받고 있습니다.

양질의 문제를 만드는 데 더 많은 시간과 노력을 기울일 수 있도록 모의고사 일정을 조정하고 있습니다.

10회 모의고사까지 제공하는 것이 목표이지만, 일정이 항상 완벽하지는 않을 수 있습니다.

독해, 논리, 문법, 문학 영역은 지문형 문제에 대한 상세한 해설을 제공하는 데 중점을 두고 수정될 예정입니다.

언어 학습에 대한 새로운 접근 방식

암기나 이론보다는 문제 해결과 논리에 중점을 둡니다.

이 방법에는 철저한 문법 복습과 연습, 그리고 지문형 문제 풀이에 대한 광범위한 작업이 포함됩니다.

또한 독해력을 강화하기 위해 유사한 문제를 만들고 마무리하는 것도 포함됩니다.

다가오는 대학 입학 시험 준비의 변화

- 독해와 문법을 강조하며 설명 속도는 느리게 진행됩니다.

- 문제 난이도가 높아져 개념에 대한 더 깊은 이해가 요구됩니다.

- 9월과 10월에는 수사학과 논리적 문제에 초점을 맞춘 독해 및 논리를 위한 종합 교육 시리즈가 출시될 예정입니다.

강훈 트레이닝의 수준 높은 시험 문제를 위한 노력

교과서 제작자는 학생들의 성공을 위해 양질의 시험 문제가 중요하다고 강조합니다.

문제의 난이도는 인정하지만 철저한 준비가 필요하다고 생각합니다.

또한 제작자는 학습 및 지원을 위한 추가 리소스를 어디서 찾을 수 있는지에 대한 정보도 제공합니다.