기후 변화 대응: 도전 과제와 행동주의 전략

### 기후 변화를 막기 위한 투쟁: 과학적 경고부터 활동가들의 시위까지: 기후 변화를 막기 위한 투쟁
* 🌍 모지브 라티프와 같은 기후 연구자들은 수십 년 동안 지구 온난화에 대해 경고해 왔지만, **행동을 촉구하는 데 어려움**을 겪어 왔습니다.
* 🏭 화석 연료와 같은 산업계의 로비 활동은 위험을 알면서도 **수년 동안 기후 행동을 성공적으로 약화**시켜 왔습니다.
* 🛤 독일의 재생 에너지 확대는 **법 개정과 로비 활동**으로 인해 정체되어 있습니다.
* 🔬 변화에 대한 뇌의 저항과 현재의 이익을 극대화하려는 선호는 **기후 변화에 대처하려는 노력을 방해**합니다.
* 🌊 기후 변화는 이미 기상이변을 야기하고 있으며, **2050년까지 9,000억 유로에 달하는 잠재적 비용**이 발생할 것으로 예상됩니다.
* 🏘 웨일즈의 페어본 마을은 **해수면 상승으로 인해 유럽에서 가장 먼저 버려진 마을**이 될 수 있습니다.
* 📊 미래를 위한 금요일, 라스트 제너레이션과 같은 기후 운동가 운동의 영향은 **일부 진전을 이루었지만 여전히 과제가 남아 있습니다.**
* 🌱 연구자들은 **알렉산더 폰 훔볼트와 같은 초기 자연 과학자들**로부터 영감을 받아 기후 변화의 시급성을 알릴 수 있는 새로운 방법을 모색하고 있습니다.

기후 연구자들은 지구 온난화에 대해 경고하고 있지만, 심리적 장벽과 강력한 화석 연료 로비 때문에 사회적 행동은 여전히 제한적입니다.

hey hey many people are working to halt climate change, but only with limited success. Why have climate researchers been unable to halt global warming? I've been working in research for decades. I publish the scientific results, but that's achieved relatively little. Why doesn't scientific data about climate change lead to [Music] action? I guess I haven't been doing it right, or there have been a significant drop in global emissions. Coal, oil, and gas continue to be used as fuel. Why the world would be very different if it weren't for the dirty deeds of the fossil fuel [Music] lobbyists. Climate activists often in on trial, but can their controversial tactics force change? Of course, there is resistance, but we might ultimately be successful, but time is running out. Why is it taking the world so long to act? We can't assume that just because society feels ethically compelled to save the world, it will. It's psychology, mindset that determines whether it'll succeed or not [Music]. Researcher Mojib Latif is trying to find

the best way how can we still Save the Planet. Unbelievable. I've never seen anything like this. [Music] Before climate scientists have been warning about global warming for decades, but their words have fallen on deaf ears. Knowledge has failed to translate into action. We need to communicate the issues in a different, more emotional way. Germany's last generation protest movement emerged in 2021. Co-founder Leia Bonacera went on a hunger strike demanding a meeting with German Chancellor Olaf Schultz. [Music] I'm not sure you heard what I said. The fate of millions of people is at stake. The young activists planned their first protests in this Berlin Church. The group intensified its strategy after meeting with Chancellor Schultz. Their convictions are based on data provided by scientists such as Mujib Latif. [Music] Cycling onto the runway, climate activists have occupied the Hamburg Airport. Flight operations are paralyzed. We can't stand by while our planet burns and the German government's obsession with fossil fuel stokes the fire. I can't condone the tactics of the

last generation movement no one is above the law. Even if their goals are worthy, it's not that I want to anger people. I don't enjoy annoying them, but I've read the science, and I'm trying to figure out how this can work. Hey, hey, of course, it's stressful for people, for me too, and of course, the hate directed at us is [Music] horrible. I think the last generation is very focused on where we want to go, and we know that this method has often worked. Why shouldn't it work for us now? When is protest effective? When does it do more harm than good? Questions that researchers have been exploring for decades. There's a danger that protesters come across as missionaries, do-gooders, or know-it-alls. You have to be careful to strike the right tone and not make yourself out to be a savior of the [Music] world. I believe scientists have a responsibility to step up and say it can't go on like this, and even to go on strike as an act of resistance. I think I would lose a lot of

credibility if I did that. That's why I don't. Credibility is crucial. A lot of people listen to what I say. That's a huge asset, and I don't want to jeopardize it. Meanwhile, the last generation activists are facing pressure from raids to arrests and charges. There are 13 charges against me from the first protests I did with the last generation. Of course, I'm upset by the prospect of going to jail. It's a bit unfair. The people responsible for climate change aren't on trial. Protest challenges people, society, politics, democracy, and of course, there will be resistance, but we might ultimately achieve our goals. We can't allow an environmental RAF to develop. The last generation rejects anything to do with sabotage or even terrorism or violent damage to property. Mashed potatoes and paint can always be wiped off. Hello. But even so, many see the young activists as anything but peaceful. [Music] We are essentially radical, but not in our methods. No matter what happens in terms of the last generation strategy, we'll always be peaceful protesters because that's vital to a successful

resistance. The terrorism of the 1970s and '80s in Germany showed that you can't bring the state to its knees with violence; you can only lose. Leera has been sentenced to a fine of €800 by the Berlin District Court. A fine is not a prison sentence. To be honest, I'm relieved. It would be completely disproportionate to send her to prison. I still think it's a bit counterproductive because now there's a lot of talk about this form of protest and less about the actual issue, which is how do we reduce greenhouse gas emissions, an issue that's been debated since the 1980s. The media finally took up the story after scientists presented the evidence. Altogether, this evidence represents a very strong case, in my opinion, that the greenhouse effect has been detected and it is changing our climate. Now, Hon. James Henson gave the world a wake-up call and put the issue on the global political agenda. That Spiegel headline in 1986 was totally

over the top but in a way marked the beginning of the public discussion in Germany about climate change. The framework convention on climate change was adopted at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. The signatory countries agreed to prevent dangerous climate change. I believe it is very important for Germany's reputation in the world and even more so for future generations that we see the writing on the wall. As a young scientist, I was convinced that we had the data, the climate would be protected, and the problem solved. I would never have expected the massive backlash from lobby groups that ultimately prevented progress on climate protection, which is why emissions continue to rise to this day. Founded in 1989, the Global Climate Coalition has been one of the biggest lobby groups. Corporations, including Ford and Exxon, spend millions promoting false information. For several years after its merger with Chrysler, Mercedes-Benz was part of the group challenging the idea of human-induced climate change. The management of Exxon, for example,

financed advertorials in major US newspapers such as the New York Times for years. These look like normal opinion pieces, but they're paid for. Exxon systematically spread false information. Exxon was up to date with the scientific research. Our studies showed that Exxon's projections were even more accurate. Social scientists have shown that hundreds of millions of dollars have been pumped in every year to lobby against climate protection measures, and obviously very successfully. What happened with climate change was a bit like what happened with smoking. It was established that smoking is harmful to health, but then the smoker lobby, the tobacco companies, started to set up fake institutes. The industry, the tobacco industry, is on the defensive. It's a similar situation to 10 years ago when it was suggested that there is a link between smoke and lung cancer. The Royal College caused the shares of American Tobacco companies to fall sharply in April '62. Did the Royal College itself carry out any research investigations or

develop people who had no idea about the issue, made statements, and acted as if they did, arguing against the evidence and sowing doubt, saying, Well, it hasn't actually been proven that smoking is really harmful to health. For decades, large sectors of industry, the petroleum industry, the fossil fuel industry in general, have used false claims to attempt to save their business models, spending millions on smear campaigns that undermine the credibility of scientists. We can't carry on like this. We can't expect self-restraint from industry. We have to get politicians to take deliberate and effective action. To repeat, The climate is like a runaway train. Even if you pull the emergency brake, the train won't stop immediately. It'll keep going for hundreds of meters. That's the situation we're in. You have to realize that many people in business, in management positions, but also ordinary citizens, don't want to believe that climate change is happening. There's a huge market for excuses for doing nothing about it, and these lobbyists serve that market with arguments that are all too readily

repeated are people unwilling to acknowledge things that require them to change their [Music] behavior. My experience is that it's incredibly difficult to let go of habits. Lobbyists know that all too well. To show why, let's look at a brain. You can see there are specific regions in the center of the brain that control our actions subconsciously, so to speak. There are two spheres, and this here is the Basel ganglia. This controls subconscious activities. When we decide to take conscious action, that's up here at the front, up here in the upper area, is where the signals are sent from. But once this is automated, it happens subconsciously. You don't have to think about it anymore. Why is this so difficult? Isn't change also built into the brain somewhere? What we can do is overwrite a habit with a new habit. We have to identify actions or activities as a new habit because we can't just switch off the old one. We have to decide what is a better alternative. We're running out of

time we can't wait for new habits to become ingrained. How can we change now? It would be nice if there was a button somewhere that we could just hit and the brain would change. Mobility behavior is a good example. It takes time to get used to new forms of movement, but once they're learned, they stay learned. The problem today is whether it's lobby groups or the way we imagine the future, is that we stick to what we know and try to protect it. Is this another reason why the expansion of renewable energies is stalling? [Music] After an initial boom in Germany, things began to go downhill around 2017. Laws prevented expansion and companies left the country. Legislation on renewable energies has been modified in such a way that the expansion has been massively hindered and has practically come to a standstill. We even saw an economics minister talking about how it was ing trillions, a claim he couldn't back up, and saying the energy transition was unaffordable. There was a whole PR campaign and all sorts of

[Music] Stories proving the extent of the carbon lobby's power is difficult, but one example: over 600 lobbyists were officially accredited at the 2022 UN climate conference in Egypt. [Music] More and more lobbyists are running around at climate conferences on behalf of industry. And then what about the president of the 2023 climate conference? The president of the 2023 climate conference is also the head of a huge oil company. A conflict of interest in the fight against fossil fuels? That's a no-go. It's unacceptable. We know personally I feel like the guy in Groundhog Day. Time and time again, the lobbyists show up and manage to get everything done their way. [Music] I this is really [Music] frightening. The situation in the forest near Lupain remains tense. Fires continue to rage in the dry forests near Lupain. As someone who sits at a desk and makes computer simulations, actually seeing it is different. The village of Ker was evacuated yesterday. Climate change is causing more frequent extreme weather.

including longer dry [Music] spells. It's unbelievable what a fire can do. It's indescribable. I've never seen anything like it. Everything is destroyed [Music]. It's the extremes that have changed. We either have extremely heavy rainfall or, like right now, extremely long periods without rain. So, we can definitely say yes, we are noticing climate change. We need to acknowledge the need for more investment in coming years to make sure we're okay. The high cost of extreme weather due to climate change. In the worst case, it could reach 900 billion e by [Music] 2050. Climate change is already costing a lot today, several billion euros a year for Germany. But this is just the beginning. The forest fires in Canada continue to spread. Canada has launched an international appeal for help. Two weeks of forest fire is now flooding a Biblical disaster. It's the fourth night of heavy rainfall in Greece. A state of emergency has been declared in the [Music] region. Storm Daniel hit the East Coast of lib with full force at the

weekend authorities are expecting up to 20,000 deaths in the coastal town. [Music] of cities and villages, especially vulnerable to extreme weather, may eventually have to be abandoned. Could a small town in Wales be the first in Europe? Fairborne, a village on the Irish Sea, has recently been making headlines across Europe. The sea level here could rise by as much as 30 cm by 2054, making Fairborne vulnerable to flooding from the sea, a nearby estuary, and river runoff flowing down from the hills. Is it already beyond saving? 2054, when the local authority has said that they are no longer spending money on the coastal defense. If it breaches, well, big changes have come along, and you adapt. Some of that's painful, some of that you do swiftly, and it's [Music] effortless. That's the problem in this region, is that these communities are on the coast, putting them at risk from rising sea levels. We'll eventually have to ask ourselves if it's always worth helping.

people adapt if the worst can no longer be prevented and the decision was made that in Fairborne it's not M. People are aware of the effects of climate change but they're not doing much about it. I keep telling people that we are running into big problems, okay, but nothing is really happening in terms of climate action. So why do you think nothing happens? Probably because people don't believe it. They've got to see it to believe it and slowly but surely they are awakening to what's going on. It's just like the village I live in. We're threatened by being flooded by the sea. They have come to look what they purchased, the houses they purchased that they were going to leave for their generations, for their children, were then spiraling down to being worthless, and that shook them right down at the roots. He shook everybody, you know. How can this happen to us? [Music] I've got no car. I wash once a week. I shower once a week. I wash my hair once a

fortnite. Uh, that when I wash in the sink with my clothes, I save the water, and I use it for putting down the toilet, right? Right. And my wants are very few these days, yeah. And so this village will be given up. This is what want believe. I don't believe. I'm optimistic. I think with all the clever people we've got in the country, they're bound to come up with some solution, with some solution to this. The authorities have since rode back. Evacuating residents was never on the cards, despite what was said in the last 10 years. But if no more money is spent on coastal protection, the town is in danger of being flooded. What do you do with 400 houses, M 400 families? Every time we have a meeting, we talk to the council about this, and they haven't got an answer. Uh, and it's what that is the most frustrating thing to actually threaten to decommission your village and not know where you're going to put the people is sheer.

lunacy lot. So, it's a lottery. There are the lucky ones who will be helped, and there are the less lucky ones who won't be. Another example that shows that when faced with the effects of climate change, humanity is helpless. If the experts are right, Fairborne will one day be lost to the sea. That day is still a long way off, and that makes it hard for us to grasp. That's another reason why people don't act. How do you see your future, your future self in 10, 20, 30 years? It doesn't look too bad. The interesting thing is that you can see how you're changing, so you can relate to it. The question now is, what's happening in your brain? Do you have an emotional connection to this person? That's the interesting part. That means I can see myself now as I might look in 20 years, but I still have no feeling at all for what that actually means. That's it. Do you have a sense of yourself, or who is this person you see?

here he's completely alien to me. That's exactly my point. We've demonstrated what happens in the brain when we imagine the present and the future. This is a view of the brain from below. This is the back of the head. This is the frontal area. When you think about your present as you're standing here next to me, your brain creates an image of yourself. You have a sense of who you are. When you imagine being here in a week, a month, a year, that changes. This frontal activity decreases. The brain creates an idea of the future, but you're a stranger in that future. This area is much less active. Your future self is a stranger to you. So, that means that because my future self is a stranger, I'm not affected by something that will happen in the future. Me 20 years time is a complete stranger to my brain. That's why it's so easy to live without thinking about the future. It can't defend itself, and that's a problem when it comes to creating.

long-term change. Long-term changes are exactly what the student movement Fridays for Future is fighting for. [Music] They want the world to act now to give young people a future worth living. Demonstrated in front of the Swedish parliament in Stockholm for more climate protection soon became the global protest movement Fridays for Future. People took to the streets in more than 200 cities in Germany today calling for more action on climate change. Friday Friday spokesperson CLA Deo is leading the demonstration. My here's a picture of the demonstration and here's the stage for it. Are we going to get it? So what do we want? What year was that? That was 2021. Friday for Fridays for Future has become normal for many. It's our job to keep creating new momentum and saying hey there's a lot of us and a lot of people behind us and listen to us. But have groups that take a tougher stance like last generation made Fridays for Future [Music] redundant. I believe we can learn a lot from the anti-nuclear movement in

Germany. We can apply some of its lessons, such as the interaction between a more moderate branch of the movement and a more offensive or militant branch. That's an important precondition that they don't break apart but at least roughly agree and coordinate. They can exist together side by side. Our main aim is to bring people together. Personally, I think it's good that other organizations get more attention, but we still manage to bring people together and show, Hey, there's a lot of across-society friendly, peaceful demonstration. Inevitably, fizzle out. They can't keep getting bigger. The peak was 1.4 million demonstrators in Germany. Then after that, before the pandemic, the numbers dropped [Music] significantly. 75% of Germans say that the Fridays for Future protest have had little or no impact on them. Asked about the influence of Fridays for Future on their attitude towards climate change, 4% answered very strong, 19% strong, 35% less strong, and 40% not at all. The important thing is to see the

fight against the climate crisis as a marathon. We've got to keep at it, the climate activists say. Everything should already have been done with other issues in the past, and I'd even include the anti-nuclear movement. There wasn't the same urgency. People, of course, wanted to get rid of nuclear power plants as fast as possible, but there weren't any tipping points in two, three, or five years. This is a challenge for which there's no solution, no Silver Bullet. Fridays for Future got the ball rolling. We managed to get climate protection laws passed. We made them happen in the first place. The Constitutional Court ruled on climate action. There are lots of examples of the climate movement bringing about change. A victory for the climate activists. Their constitutional lawsuit was successful. The climate protection act is partially unconstitutional and must be amended. [Music] In their quest to change popular opinion, CLA dueno and mojib Latif have been inspired by one of History's Greatest natural scientists, Alexander Von Holt. Gathered data from around the globe nearly two

centuries ago, he was even the first to observe man-made climate change in Venezuela. He clearly refers in his journals to the fact that all the smoke and fumes coming out of industrial chimneys would change the atmosphere and predicts that this will have an impact. We haven't actually learned anything; we just carry on destroying the forests, we destroy the environment in all sorts of ways, and somehow we can't convince people to stop. Scientists are expanding on Holt's work at Berlin's botanic garden. Researcher Yona Zimmerman has collected and counted tiny diatoms in the Arctic Ocean, which are crucial for the entire Arctic ecosystem. The more diatoms there are, the healthier the water. But Zimmerman has documented their decline. Diatoms lived on the underside of ice; they're a food source for krill, the crustaceans that whales and penguins feed on. But now that the glaciers are retreating, there are fewer krill. Unless krill is leading to fewer

whales nowhere is climate change more evident than in the Arctic. Mojib Latif visited the region back in [Music] 2010. I wanted to see for myself what was happening in the Arctic. I knew from my research that major changes were occurring, but it's not the same as actually seeing it, especially the glaciers. The vast loss of ice is breathtaking. [Music] [Music] In climatological terms, the ocean has various functions. On the one hand, it absorbs heat, which slows down global warming, but on the other, it also absorbs carbon dioxide, which humans released into the atmosphere. This is both a blessing and a curse. It's slowing down global warming, but the water is becoming acidic, and marine organisms are suffering as a result. Me number s, you're dropping [Music] off. We're heading to the mesocosms, which are kind of huge test tubes that allow us to examine under realistic conditions what increased levels of CO2 are doing to [Music] organisms. We don't know exactly how the

ecosystems react to acidification. We're very excited to find out if long-term experiments produce the same results as the short-term ones. We learned a lot from these experiments. We can now develop computer models to project changes that will occur as a result of carbon uptake. We're now able to predict what will happen if we carry on as usual. We've all been witnessing these dramatic developments for decades, including the automotive industry. But back in the early 1990s, Mercedes-Benz still described its latest super luxury S-Class as environmentally friendly. We at Mercedes-Benz are proud to be setting new standards and pioneering new environmental technologies with our new S-Class. [Music] To many, it was a clear-cut case of greenwashing. The new Mercedes-Benz S-Class was decried by environmental experts. The S-Class weighs around 2.2 times more than an average conventional car. The manufacturing process produces about 52 tons of waste, which is 2.2 times more than with an average car, and

amounts to about as much waste as two people in Germany produce in their entire lives. We advertise our green credentials because we believe that we are making a great contribution and will continue to do so in the future. Take the Mercedes S-Class. This really is scandalous in a country like ours. These cars are so heavy, the energy cost of powering them is apping. We haven't made any progress in the transportation sector, especially with Automotive traffic. Cars have become bigger and bigger, and in cities where space is in short supply, SUVs are squeezing out everything else. [Music] The largest S-Class ever made. People were annoyed because it was so wide it couldn't fit on car trains. And this is one of the smallest SUVs on the market. The best-selling SUV in Germany is the t-rock. If you do some research, you'll discover it weighs about 1300 kilos, 1500 kilos. Even that's the same as a 1980s S-Class. It's just as big if you look at them like

this slimmer but 10 cm taller, and this car has worse aerodynamics than this one. If you add up how many SUVs are sold in Germany and how much they weigh compared to normal cars, we're talking an additional 750 million tons per year or half a million VW Golfs. What's so great about it? What people like is that it's taller. Almost 40% of cars in Germany are SUVs, and basically on the road, you're elevated, but you can no longer see anyone else. You can't see children. Imagine that a mother's at the wheel and hears a child. You can't see it. You could have nine children in a row, and only the ninth is visible. There's a heated discussion in America. There are even studies about child fatalities caused because drivers can't see when moving around. When driving normally, 7,000 accidents and 200 deaths a year because people don't see these children. In an SUV, you sit higher than in a normal vehicle, and that gives

people a sense of security and no doubt also of [Music] superiority. I'm having Deja Vu. When you compare the two cars, you can see we haven't made any progress in terms of Environmental Protection and resource conservation, and that's just not okay. Mention the SUVs. People who drive SUVs believe they've made an environmentally friendly choice because they've been manipulated into thinking that. You get into your SUV, you think, Wow, it's a small car. I'm doing something good for the environment. I feel very comfortable. Of course, you do. It's like an S-Class sass, maximum luxury with a clear conscience. That's the Mercedes promise. But environmentalists argue that the best choice is no cars at all. But wanting more is an instinct that's deeply anchored in our brains. That's because the brain isn't set up for less but for more, for maximization. What happens when we get more than we expected? Dopamine is released in the brain's happiness Center, and we experience a kick, a rush, something positive and pleasurable. This maximizing is built

into a brain experience it as a positive feeling. The opposite is experienced as dumb. So that means climate protection needs to be fun. Nobody saves the world because it's the ethical thing to do. Save the world if you have a clear benefit right now, and it makes sense in the long run. For example, if I want to buy organic, it has to be because that's cool now, not because it saves the world in 30 years' time. There has to be an immediate benefit. Then people will change their behavior. Is that the problem with the energy transition, that people feel they're being burdened and because they think Renewables are costing them more, they aren't going along with it? Affordability would be leverage. Instead, we try to solve problems in even more complicated ways and tell people to be ethical. We're completely unaware of the basics of human thinking. We want to maximize what we have. The trick now should be to combine this with a narrative about sustainability and sustainable products. Only then will we get somewhere. Climate researcher Mojib Latif.

and most of his colleagues have been telling the world about global warming for decades, but to no avail. Now, young people are trying to stop climate change with various forms of protest, but it seems that most of us will only act if we can really see the benefits of protecting the environment. But if we don't, there will be no way of preventing climate catastrophe. [Music] [Music]

Protecting the climate - How the human brain prevents us from saving the world | DW Documentary

DW Documentary gives you information beyond the headlines. Watch top documentaries from German broadcasters and international production companies. Meet intriguing people, travel to distant lands, get a look behind the complexities of daily life and build a deeper understanding of current affairs and global events. Subscribe and explore the world around you with DW Documentary from Deutsche Welle (DW), Germany's international broadcaster.

Subscribe to: 
⮞ DW Documentary (English): https://www.youtube.com/dwdocumentary
⮞ DW Documental (Spanish): https://www.youtube.com/dwdocumental
⮞ DW Documentary وثائقية دي دبليو (Arabic): https://www.youtube.com/dwdocarabia
⮞ DW Doku (German): https://www.youtube.com/dwdoku
⮞ DW Documentary हिन्दी (Hindi): https://www.youtube.com/dwdochindi

Follow DW Documentary on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dwdocumentary/
Follow DW Documental on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dwdocumental

Please follow DW's netiquette: https://p.dw.com/p/MF1G


DW Documentary

기후 변화에 대응하기 위한 투쟁

수십 년에 걸친 연구와 과학적 결과 발표에도 불구하고 기후 변화는 멈추지 않고 있으며 석탄, 석유, 가스가 여전히 연료 사용을 지배하고 있습니다.

기후 운동가들은 논란의 여지가 있는 전술을 사용하여 변화를 강제하려고 하지만 저항과 법적 문제에 직면해 있습니다.

젊은 활동가들과 과학적 데이터에 의해 주도되는 독일의 마지막 세대 시위 운동은 평화적인 시위에 대한 헌신을 유지하면서 현상 유지를 방해하고 인식을 제고하고자 합니다.

로비가 기후 변화 진전에 미치는 영향

베를린에서 시위를 벌이다 800유로의 벌금을 부과받은 리라의 사례는 온실가스 배출 감축에 대한 지속적인 논쟁을 강조합니다.

1989년에 설립된 글로벌 기후 연합과 엑손, 포드 같은 기업들은 기후 보호 조치에 반대하는 거짓 정보를 홍보하고 로비를 위해 수백만 달러를 지출해 왔습니다.

담배 업계의 전술과 기후 변화 증거를 훼손하려는 화석 연료 업계의 노력은 놀라울 정도로 유사하며, 위기 해결을 위한 정치적 행동의 필요성을 강조합니다.

습관 변화의 도전과 로비가 재생 에너지에 미치는 영향

습관을 바꾸는 것은 뇌의 무의식적 통제 때문에 어렵고, 오래된 습관을 덮어쓰려면 새로운 습관을 파악해야 합니다.

독일의 재생 에너지 확대는 2017년 이후 개정된 법률과 로비스트의 영향력으로 인해 정체되어 있습니다.

기후 변화로 인해 기상이변이 더욱 빈번하게 발생하고 있으며, 이로 인해 막대한 경제적 비용이 발생하고 그 영향을 해결하기 위한 투자의 필요성이 커지고 있습니다.

페어본의 취약성: 위험에 처한 마을

웨일즈의 한 마을인 페어본은 2054년까지 해수면이 30cm 상승할 가능성이 있어 홍수에 취약할 것으로 예상됩니다.

지역 당국은 2054년까지 해안 방어를 위한 예산 지출을 중단하겠다고 발표하면서 마을의 미래에 대한 우려가 커지고 있습니다.

주민들은 기후 변화에 대한 인식에도 불구하고 당국의 조치와 해결책이 부족해 무력감과 좌절감을 느끼고 있습니다.

미래의 자기 이미지가 장기적인 변화에 미치는 영향

현재와 미래를 상상할 때 뇌의 활동은 서로 달라서 미래의 나를 낯선 사람처럼 느끼게 합니다.

이러한 단절은 장기적인 변화의 우선순위를 정하는 데 어려움을 초래할 수 있습니다.

미래를 위한 금요일 운동은 기후 변화에 대한 즉각적인 행동을 옹호하기 위해 시작되었지만, 사람들의 태도에 미치는 영향은 엇갈리고 있습니다.

기후 위기는 빠른 해결책이 없는 장기적인 과제이며, 미래를 위한 금요일과 같은 이니셔티브를 통해 변화를 위한 운동이 탄력을 받고 있습니다.

기후 운동은 기후 보호법의 개정이 필요하다는 헌법 소송을 이끌어내는 등 정책에 성공적으로 영향을 미치고 있습니다.

북극에서의 연구는 중요한 규조류의 감소가 전체 생태계에 영향을 미치고 있으며, 열과 이산화탄소를 흡수하는 해양의 이중적 역할이 해양 생물에 유익한 동시에 해롭다는 점을 강조하고 있습니다.

산성화의 영향과 자동차 산업의 대응

산성화에 반응하는 생태계에 대한 장기적인 실험이 진행 중이며, 단기 연구와 일관된 결과를 도출하는 것을 목표로 하고 있습니다.

메르세데스-벤츠는 일반 자동차보다 무게와 폐기물 배출량이 훨씬 많은 친환경 S클래스로 그린 워싱에 대한 비판에 직면했습니다.

독일에서 SUV의 증가는 교통량 증가, 차량 크기 증가, 운전자의 시야 문제로 이어져 어린이 사망 및 사고의 원인이 되고 있습니다.

SUV를 운전하는 사람들은 종종 자신이 환경 친화적인 선택을 하고 있다고 생각하지만, 이러한 인식은 잘못된 것입니다.

인간의 뇌는 극대화를 추구하고 더 많은 것을 추구하며 쾌락을 경험하도록 연결되어 있기 때문에 지속 가능한 행동에 대한 동기가 복잡해집니다.

실질적인 변화를 이끌어내려면 윤리적 고려에만 초점을 맞추기보다는 지속 가능성에 대한 즉각적인 혜택과 설득력 있는 스토리가 있어야 합니다.