With 99 marks, a boy was walking around arrogantly. Now, who will explain to that boy the importance of humility? You have set a world record in playing. He falls off the bicycle and starts crying. A child came back from school, started crying loudly, and his mother got scared too. What happened? He cried a lot and then started saying, Mom, I was beaten up in school today. I was beaten up today. He beat me up today. And he started crying loudly. His mother got worried. We will discuss it tomorrow.

I saw this childish act of saving praise here yesterday, here yesterday, the child's intellect was lamenting. The child's intellect neither has a place to speak nor does the child's intellect have any place for behavior. Praise. And when the intellect is completely refined, even in the assembly, someone is hugged. This child's intellect loses its boundaries, so sitting inside the assembly, they stare. Praise. Honorable Chairman, now the whole country has understood the truth.

Hello, I am Ravish Kumar. The analysis of the level of speech given by Prime Minister Modi in the Lok Sabha should not be done by any political scientist but by a child psychologist or a specialist in child psychology. It should be observed what image of a child and his childhood is in the Prime Minister's mind, what is the meaning of child intelligence. The Prime Minister was transforming innocent examples of childhood into cruel metaphors of politics and presenting them. He started presenting the country with the next.

He needs to be taken to the next level, but soon Modi came to his level or whatever level he came at, it didn't feel good seeing the Prime Minister there. The way the Prime Minister depicted the minds, hearts, and intellect of children today, it seems that the perspective of parents, grandparents, and family members towards children can change. It was becoming apparent that they were criticizing Rahul Gandhi through the stories of children, but they should have been mindful of how unfair it would be towards children in public life.

This criticism was easy to make using Rahul Gandhi's name. In the entire speech, he did not mention the opposition leader's name even once. As far as I heard, Akhilesh Yadav was mentioned, and he addressed and read a couplet of Tulsidas, where Tulsidas beautifully and profoundly depicted the child form of Lord Rama in the Ramayana, he also depicted stubbornness. In the entire speech, the Prime Minister kept making fun of children and childlike intelligence. I remember a story, respected Chairperson, a story comes to my mind.

A boy was wandering around proudly with 99 marks and showing off to everyone in the country, Look how many marks I've got! When people heard 99, they used to cheer loudly, boosting his morale. Then his teacher came and asked, Why are you distributing sweets? You didn't get 99 out of 100, you got 543 out of 543! Now, who will explain to that boy? You have set a world record for failing! Is there any small child who goes out with a bicycle?

And if a child falls off a bicycle and starts crying, then a big person comes over to him and says, Look, the ant died, look, the bird flew away. Hey, you ride the bicycle very well, you haven't fallen. By diverting his attention like this, they soothe the child's mind. Nowadays, the trend of soothing the child's mind is going on.

People and their echo system nowadays are working to soothe the mind. In Prime Minister Modi's speech when the mention of a crying child was made, you should also see what kind of child he is. He is a crying child, a lying child, a child who hides his mistakes, celebrates by lying when he fails. While discussing exams, the Prime Minister does not consider failing or getting low marks important, but today he is giving less importance to Rahul Gandhi's success.

The Prime Minister started giving importance to his speech by twisting his own words in the conversation and focusing more on the lower scores given to his speech in the discussion. Listen to both the Prime Minister's speeches together, and you will notice the difference. Prime Minister Modi today stripped away his natural innocence from childhood. As many times as a child came in his stories, the mention of childlike intelligence was made. Do think about it. He established childlike intelligence in a negative way. He was talking about the wisdom of childlike intelligence in a way.

Children are constantly made fun of for their intelligence, and their actions are criminalized, which psychologists explain day and night. When children do these actions, it is normal, it is good, let them do it, they will change their habits later on. A child's understanding is considered beyond the deceptive world of diplomacy, but Prime Minister Modi was establishing child intelligence as a form of deception in his politics. Nowadays, a new drama of simplifying things has begun.

A new game has been played. Let me tell you a story. A child came back from school and started crying loudly. What happened? He kept crying a lot and then said, Mom, I was beaten in school today. He said, I was beaten in today's class. I was beaten by him today. He kept crying loudly. His mother got worried. She asked him, Son, what happened? But he wasn't telling, just crying, I was beaten, I was beaten. The child was not saying that he was beaten by that child in school today.

He had abused a child's mother, he did not tell that he had torn a child's books, he did not tell that he had called the teacher a thief, he did not tell that he had stolen someone's tiffin and eaten it. Yesterday, we saw childish behavior in the assembly [APPLAUSE]. We saw the lament of a childish mind here yesterday, I was beaten, he beat me, he beat me, he beat me here, he beat me there, this was going on. Honorable President [APPLAUSE], sympathy was gained.

A new drama has been played for [applause], but those who know the truth reveal that in a case of thousands of crores of rupees scam, bail has been granted. They have been punished for calling people of the OBC category thieves. After making irresponsible statements in the Supreme Court, they had to apologize. There is a case of insulting great personalities like the great freedom fighter Veer Savarkar. There is a case going on for calling the President of the country's largest party a murderer.

There are serious allegations against many leaders, officials, and institutions for lying, and the cases are ongoing. Respected Chairman, in childlike innocence, there is no filter in speech or behavior, and when this childlike innocence is completely lost, they even strangle someone in the assembly. When this childlike innocence loses its boundaries, they sit inside the assembly and stare, their truth, respected Chairman.

The country understood [applause] that's why today the country is saying to them, It's not about you, you won't be praised. Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi compared the childlike intellect of the Prime Minister when talking, the humility of the Prime Minister was moving to the next level from arrogance. They were talking about taking the country to the next level. Soon, that level started to appear in their speeches. They established a childlike intellect as a wisdom that doesn't think right, whoever thinks, thinks wrong. Life.

Rahul Gandhi remains unsuccessful, calling him a child prodigy is also a reflection of his own political generosity where even arrogance appears small, humility becomes very clever. The Prime Minister today, in his speech, turned his party's defeat into a great victory, slogans of 400 were raised, slogans of 370 were also raised, and although BJP had 303 seats, he interpreted and established 240 seats as a big win. This could be his political perspective and skill, there may be mistakes in it.

They also did not consider the victory of the BJP in the Odisha Legislative Assembly and the victory of the TDP in the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly to be bigger than the loss in Uttar Pradesh. They defined the loss in a different way, saying that although the vote percentage has increased there, the number of seats has decreased. They did not mention the loss in Ayodhya, but they did give advice that the Congress should introspect on its loss. The Prime Minister had turned his defeat into victory; this was their introspection. However, the Congress

The way they have handled their defeat has made it clear how deep the wound of not getting 303 or 400 seats is. On July 1st, Rahul Gandhi had said they accept sitting in the opposition, are happy, and will fulfill their role. But on July 2nd, the Prime Minister said such beautiful things about the Congress, who is going to sit in the opposition, in his humble manner. The public of this country has also given a mandate to the Congress in the 2014 elections, and the mandate of this country is that you [praise].

Sit in the opposition, keep arguing until the logic is exhausted, then keep screaming, keep shouting. Honorable Chairperson, this is the first opportunity in the history of Congress when the Congress has not crossed the figure of 100 continuously three times. This is the third biggest defeat in the history of Congress. It is the third worst performance. It would have been better if Congress accepted its defeat, followed the orders of the people, introspected. But this

Are those who are busy governing [APPLAUSE] sitting in opposition a bad thing? Before 2014, BJP did not sit in the opposition for 10 years in the Lok Sabha. They lost three consecutive elections to a new party in the Delhi Legislative Assembly. Before the elections, the Prime Minister kept saying that Rahul won't get seats equal to his age. Opposition parties won't be recognized. When Congress got 999 seats and Rahul Gandhi became the opposition leader for the first time, the Prime Minister of those 99 seats.

Prime Minister Modi started making fun especially aggressive today. His language was dense, and he continued to express his anger in a controlled manner. While talking about Rahul Gandhi, he mentioned examples that Congress could demand verification for. For instance, the ruling party has demanded verification regarding some of Rahul's statements. The Prime Minister said that those who called the OBC community thieves have been punished by the court, but in Rahul Gandhi's case, the Supreme Court

Was it fair for the lower court to decide on the Prime Minister's case without clarification from the Ahmedabad lower court why Rahul was sentenced to 2 years, which led to his membership being revoked? Justice B.R. Gavai, heading a bench of three judges, said in his order that the lower court in Ahmedabad did not provide any clarification. The court stated that Rahul's statement was not a reliable testimony. However, the court's decision not only sentenced Rahul but also those who supported him.

Rahul Gandhi, who has been sent to the parliament, mentioned in his speech how 20 cases were misused against him by agencies and taken home. How does Prime Minister Modi respond to this? First, watch his response, then listen to Rahul Gandhi's statement of 1st July. Esteemed chairperson, sympathy was sought to carry out this new drama [applause], but the country knows the truth. Thousands of crores are on bail in the case of his manipulation.

People from the obese category have been punished for calling them thieves. They had to apologize after making irresponsible statements in the country's Supreme Court. It is a case of insulting great personalities like the great freedom fighter Veer Savarkar. There is a case of calling them assassins by the country's largest party. I have seen a new format of the show I, Myself Attack on Saregama TV. Half seen before, we have not seen I, Myself Attack by Order of the Government.

India by Order, obviously of the Prime Minister of India. 20 plus cases, your jail sentence, my house taken away. No problem. Lens attack in the media 24/7. Every single day, abuse, attack, abuse, attack. And then the most enjoyable and beautiful part of it, 55 hours of interrogation by the ED. Enjoy, be calm, and of interrogation, the officer, camera switch off, camera and ask me, Rahul ji, you've been sitting for 55.

Adversaries, why don't you shake like a stone? He asked me. Prime Minister Modi only said OBC, he did not say anything about Lalit Modi, Rahul Gandhi had stated in reference to Lalit Modi being made an issue of OBC insult, but it did not hold in court. An old issue from the 2019 elections was brought up in 2023 when a decision came from the Gujarat court. Prime Minister Modi also mentioned 370, saying that during 370's time, the Constitution of India entered into Jammu and Kashmir's borders.

Couldn't do it here, people dancing with the Constitution on their heads couldn't muster the courage to implement the Constitution in Jammu and Kashmir, but in December 2023, the Supreme Court said in its verdict that Article 370 is not a symbol of sovereignty or federalism. It means that both are forms of federalism, even if not equal or uniform, but they are two sides of the same coin, both aspects of federalism. The Supreme Court did not say anywhere that with the presence of 370, India's

The Constitution was not applicable there. The Indian Constitution could not enter the boundaries of Jammu and Kashmir, and those who were dancing with the Constitution did not have the courage to implement the Constitution in Jammu and Kashmir. When everything changed in Jammu and Kashmir after Article 370, why didn't the BJP field candidates on the three seats of the Kashmir Valley? The Prime Minister did not answer this in his speech today, nor did he answer why the BJP lost in Ladakh. The answer to this should come from his speech as well.

The Prime Minister Modi's speaking capacity was estimated today, it was amazing. The opposition's sloganeering was increasing, and his voice was getting louder. He did not seem tired at all. The Prime Minister has already painted the political picture of India before 2014 several times. But today, for quite a while, he kept reminding of the time of 2014, when he received a massive majority and became the Prime Minister. He walked through that era of the past for a long time, and

From there, he began addressing the Lok Sabha, saying that as the leader of a party that brought a clear majority, Prime Minister Modi mentioned the seven words before 2014 that nothing could happen in India. Honorable Chairman [Applause] Those days will be remembered, it will come to our attention that the people of our country had lost their self-confidence and the country was sinking into despair. At such a time, the biggest loss was the loss of trust, the biggest trust was lost, which was of the citizens.

Self-confidence and when trust and self-confidence are there, then it becomes difficult for that person to stand society and the country, and from the mouth of every human being, [Praise] nothing can happen to this country. At that time, these seven words were heard everywhere, nothing can happen to this country. These words were heard before 2014 because these seven words of despair had become a kind of identity. The Prime Minister feels that since 2014, a belief has been created regarding change. It may seem that this change has come, but it is also the same India.

There are figures that I am giving today, more students are going abroad to study, taking heavy loans. India's money is going out in the name of education. After spending crores of rupees, most students are not getting decent jobs abroad. Today, on a website called The Morning Context, I was reading a report by Pradeep Shah, in which he mentioned that the Bureau of Immigration's data shows that in the first 10 months of 2023...

In 2022, 76,500 Indian students went abroad to study. More than 75 lakhs students went abroad. It is not just about seeking better institutions but behind this, there is also an understanding that Indian educational institutions are no longer worth spending 57 years of life. In the last 10 years, their standards have deteriorated. Just last month, there was news in many places that 4300 millionaires from India are preparing to settle abroad. Prime Minister Modi is watching the country's image in his own way.

They were showing but all these figures will be found outside the speech. Prime Minister Modi was talking about some echo system of Congress but did not mention the well-established ecosystem of Godi Media and IT Cell. He hinted on one side and forgot to look at his own side. Those who are leaving the country to settle, those who are going abroad to study, why did they not accept India's progress? The Prime Minister should ask them this too.

One should ask whether they are leaving India due to the impact of any echo system. Today, I, the President, give a warning to this echo system. I want to taunt this echo system. I appreciate every move of the echo system, the way the echo system has decided that they will stop the country's development journey, derail the country's progress. I want to reveal today that the answer to every conspiracy of theirs will now be in their own language. This country will never accept anti-national conspiracies.

You must have heard this statement correctly once that just like after 2014, once again, in the name of patriotism, attacks will be made on journalists and writers without evidence, and people will be put in jail. Is Prime Minister Modi also warning those YouTubers who could not become lapdogs of the media? The Chief Minister of a state was put in jail for 5 months without any solid evidence. What kind of ecosystem was behind this Hemant Soren? The Prime Minister did not answer this.

The strength of this very system is on the basis of which the Prime Minister has given this warning to all of you. In this election, employment emerged as a major issue, but Prime Minister Modi eliminated this issue firmly. In the country, opportunities for employment and self-employment are emerging on a large scale. It needs to expand, get a new form, and be colored according to the needs of modern India. Skill development should be based on it, and based on that, India should also be a leader in Industry 4.0.

I am emerging, and we are also working towards the future of our youth. Honorable S Ji, this is a study. In the last 18 years, this study is very important. This study says that in the last 18 years, the private sector has set a record in job creation. In the last 18 years, the biggest record has been set today. How are the jobs? In the first 5 years of the IT sector, salaries have stagnated. Many reports like this keep coming. Is it all lies? The Prime Minister spoke on Agniveer and NIT.

He also said that lies were told about Agniveer, but he did not say anything detailed about Agniveer. He did not say anything about the questions being raised about Agniveer, just said that they are silently working on reforming the army, continuously reforming to build a combat-ready army. Due to not reforming on time, our army has suffered a lot, but because it is not appropriate to say all these things publicly, I have sealed my lips.

I am sitting here, honorable chairperson, national security is a serious issue. Honorable chairperson, the goal of such reforms is changing the form of war in any situation. Resources are changing, weapons are changing, techniques are changing. In such a situation, it is a huge responsibility for us to tell our forces about those challenges. To fulfill this responsibility, even if we have to face abuses, even if we have to endure false accusations, even if we have to remain silent, we work.

In times like these, spreading lies about how the country's army is weakening the efforts to make the army modern is weakening. I would like to tell every student and every young person of the country that the government is very serious about stopping such incidents, and at the war level, we are taking one step after another to fulfill our responsibilities. Those who play with the future of the youth will not be spared in the matter of neatness.

Continuous arrests are taking place across the country, and the central government has already enacted a strict law [applause]. Necessary steps are being taken to overhaul the entire system responsible for conducting examinations. Prime Minister made only this statement on the paper leaks happening nationwide. Today, Rahul Gandhi had written a letter to Prime Minister Modi suggesting a debate in the Lok Sabha on NEET. Prime Minister Modi did not mention Manipur in his entire speech; before him, all opposition leaders had mentioned Manipur.

Hopes of giving an answer could have been there, but should the opposition have continuously chanted slogans regarding Manipur while the Prime Minister was speaking? Chanting slogans a couple of times could have been done, but the strategy of chanting slogans throughout the entire speech did not seem right. The opposition should have also patiently listened to the Prime Minister's speech. They should have demanded mentioning and verifying the rules, where the Prime Minister was wrong and where verification was needed.

However, the government should have also thought about why the Prime Minister does not mention Manipur. What is Manipur's fault in this when slogans started about Manipur, then Prime Minister Modi could have assured Manipur that they are speaking, they could have given some message to Manipur. Even the Prime Minister should have stood firm when slogans were raised about Manipur, he should have ignored them. Whenever you oppose slogans of the opposition, on this issue as well.

During the Prime Minister's speech, Defense Minister Rajnath Singh condemned the continuous chanting of slogans and stated that the opposition's behavior was not appropriate. Later, Home Minister Amit Shah requested the Speaker to bring this condemnation proposal to the floor of the house, and the condemnation proposal was approved by voice vote. I appeal to the honorable Speaker, Justice Do Manipur, Justice Do Nyay, respected Speaker, through you today, I assure the citizens of the country during the President's address.

Thank you. When the discussion on the proposal was taking place, at that time when the Prime Minister was addressing, the way in which the opposition has continuously disrupted the parliamentary norms, the way it has been done, I propose that this entire house condemns this act. Prime Minister Modi, during his speech in Hathras, Uttar Pradesh, stopped his speech expressing condolences on the deaths of many people due to the chaos during a satsang. He expressed condolences on this incident. News is coming that the

The number of casualties could be more than 100. This is preliminary information. We do not have much information right now, but at the same time when you were talking about the incident in Hathras, slogans were raised against Manipur from the opposition. The Prime Minister ignored it then. Prime Minister Modi's speech is long. It would not be right to claim that all aspects are included in it. I am leaving out many aspects for today. If an opportunity arises, I will include them in the analysis.

Mentions of the Prime Minister's statements come up often, but what was shown in his speech today should be a cause for concern. At the beginning of the parliamentary session, the generosity and cooperation he spoke of did not even last for two moments of formality. The pride with which he said that Modi has not bowed and will not bow reminded us of the politics of confrontation. Greetings, I am Ravish Kumar.

लोक सभा में प्रधानमंत्री का भाषण | PM's speech in Lok Sabha

लोक सभा में प्रधानमंत्री का भाषण | PM's speech in Lok Sabha