대통령 토론: 위스콘신주에서 열린 바이든 대 트럼프 토론

### 바이든 대 트럼프: 2024년 첫 대통령 토론의 하이라이트
* 🎙 2024년 첫 대선 토론회에서는 **바이든 대통령과 트럼프 전 대통령**이 경제, 이민, 낙태, 세계 위기 등 다양한 이슈를 놓고 격돌했습니다.
* 📊 최근 마퀘트 여론조사에 따르면 위스콘신 유권자들에게 가장 중요한 이슈는 **경제**였으며, **이민과 낙태를 각각 19%와 15%**가 꼽았습니다.
* 🌐 트럼프는 자신이 **인플레이션이 없는 완벽한 경제**를 만들었다고 주장한 반면, 바이든은 트럼프가 경제를 '파괴'하여 **인플레이션을 일으켰다**고 주장했습니다.
* ⚖ 또한 낙태에 대해서도 의견이 달랐는데, **트럼프는 로 대 웨이드 판결을 뒤집은 것**을 칭찬하고 **바이든은 이를 비판**했습니다.
* 😕 위스콘신주 유권자들의 선거 열기는 2020년에 비해 낮아져 **46%가 매우 열성적**이라고 답했습니다.
* 📺 이번 토론은 '두 대통령 이야기'와 '두 미국 이야기'로 나뉘었는데, **트럼프는 프레젠테이션에 강했고 바이든은 정책 세부 사항에 더 집중**했습니다.
* 🗣 두 후보 모두 향후 4년간의 비전을 제시하기보다는 **서로를 비판하는 등 많은 논쟁과 네거티브 공방**을 벌였습니다.
* ❓ 사회자는 **공정하게 질문**하고 중립적인 언어를 사용하며 후보자들에게 자신의 견해를 표현할 기회를 제공했다는 평을 받았습니다.

위스콘신주에서 열린 대선 토론에서는 실질적인 정책 논의가 부족하고 비판에 집중하는 등 비전에서 극명한 대조를 보였습니다.

the first time in four years. That is our big story. Tonight at nine, it was billed as must-see TV, and it lived up to its name. The candidates for president make their pitch to voters and trade plenty of jabs in the process. Tonight we have fair and balanced team coverage here in studio. We're going to break down the debate with our political expert, Mordecai Lee. But let's start things off with our political reporter Jason Calvi. Well, Biden versus Trump. The rematch with both candidates attacking the others. You just heard they fought over abortion, immigration, world crises and much more. Now, the most important issue for Wisconsin voters in the new Marquette poll is the economy. Here's what the two candidates said about that issue. And black Americans. He caused this inflation. I gave him a country with no essentially no inflation. It was perfect. It was so good. All he had to do was leave it alone. He

destroyed it with his green new scam, and all of the other. All this money that's being thrown out the window. There was no inflation when I became president. You know why? The economy was flat on its back. 15% unemployment. He decimated the economy, absolutely decimated the economy. That's why there was no inflation at the time. There were no jobs in the candidates also fought over abortion and immigration in Wisconsin. 19% in the latest Marquette poll said immigration was their most important issue. 15% in the recent Marquette poll said abortion was that number one issue for them. The two sparred over the reversal of Roe v Wade. What happened is we brought it back to the states, and the country is now coming together on this issue. It's been a great thing. Thank you, President Biden. It's been a terrible thing. Voters in Wisconsin say they're not as enthusiastic about this

election. 46% said they're very enthusiastic. Flashback to the same time back in 2020. It was higher, with more than 59% saying they were very enthusiastic. So with this debate, much earlier than normal, will be on the lookout to see if more people get interested in this race here in battleground Wisconsin. 12% in the Marquette poll said they were still undecided. Those are the folks who will be watching very closely. Ben, Steph, Jason, thank you for that. Joining us now to break all of this down is political expert Mordecai Lee. You know, it's a big political night. If this man is sitting at the desk. All right, Mordecai, your biggest takeaway. My biggest takeaway is it was a tale of two presidents, which means it was a tale of two Americas. It's unbelievable that somebody could have watched and said, I agree.

with both of them, or I disagree with both of them. In other words, you either agreed with how Trump saw the world, or you agreed with how Biden saw the world. It was there was no sort of connecting point. Now, there's no doubt that in terms of presentation, Trump was stronger. He's a better candidate. He's a better orator. He's a better showman. Biden was better on the details of policy. Now, Biden was not. His voice seemed a little off, and he seemed to mumble a bit. I think that might be because he sort of stutters a little bit all his life; he stuttered. But as a policy wonk, I heard more details about policy from President Biden than I heard from Trump. I think what a lot of voters were hoping to see tonight is somebody to paint a picture of what their vision of America should be. And it seemed, at least from our vantage point, that there was

just a lot of bickering between two old men. There's no doubt you've really nailed it, because it was very negative even towards the end. When they had their summary statements, there were really sort of criticizing the other person, as opposed to saying a lot about their vision for the next four years. They got it in a little bit, but it really wasn't enough. And Steph, to your point, even when the subject changed, they would go back to the previous subject because they just wanted to get another shot in. And this was supposed to be the substance debate. I mean, they set this thing up. No people in the audience, they were not allowed to interrupt each other. They're going to cut their microphones off. Did we get any substance of what their four years, their next four years could look like? As president, we didn't get a lot of substance. I think what we have to do is we have to look

at how they criticized each other as an indication of what they would not do in the next four years. You know, the way, for example, Trump would describe the border, or he would describe Putin. Then Biden would describe the border, and he would describe Putin. And they were criticizing each other as if to say, and that's not what I'm going to do, do you think? Last question here. Do you think the questions by the moderators were asked fairly, because sometimes we've watched debates in the past, whether presidential or otherwise, where the questions seem a little tilted one way or the other. I think they did a very good job because they used words that were as neutral as possible, and they tried to give the person a chance to say it. You've got 90 more seconds. What do you want to say about this subject? So I

Post-presidential debate FOX6 News analysis | FOX6 News Milwaukee

FOX6 News Milwaukee

바이든과 트럼프의 불꽃 튀는 토론: 요약

대선 후보들은 경제, 이민, 낙태를 중심으로 다양한 이슈를 놓고 격돌했습니다.

위스콘신 유권자들은 토론에서 뜨거운 감자였던 이민과 낙태에 대해 우려를 표명했습니다.

두 후보는 또한 로 대 웨이드 판결의 역전을 놓고 설전을 벌여 청중들로부터 다양한 반응을 이끌어냈습니다.

2022년 대선 토론회: 두 대통령 이야기

2022년 선거에 대한 열기는 특히 격전지인 위스콘신주에서 2020년보다 낮습니다.

마퀘트 여론조사에 참여한 유권자의 12%는 아직 지지 후보를 결정하지 않은 부동층으로, 이번 선거에서 중요한 그룹입니다.

이번 토론은 트럼프의 강력한 프레젠테이션과 정책 세부 사항에 집중하는 바이든의 대조적인 모습을 보여주며, 유권자들은 미국의 미래에 대한 설득력 있는 비전을 찾고 있습니다.

토론은 부정적인 논쟁과 비판이 주를 이루었고, 후보들의 향후 4년간의 비전에는 거의 초점을 맞추지 않았습니다.

실질적인 내용을 제공하기 위해 마련된 토론이었음에도 불구하고, 후보들의 차기 대통령 임기에 대한 의미 있는 통찰력이 부족했습니다.

계속되는 중단과 이전 주제로의 회귀로 인해 실질적인 토론의 기회는 더욱 사라졌습니다.

대선 후보들은 국경 통제와 대외 관계에 대한 서로의 정책을 비판했습니다.

사회자는 중립적인 언어를 사용하고 각 후보에게 답변할 기회를 주면서 공정하게 질문을 던졌다는 평가를 받았습니다.