팔머 럭키의 방위 기술 스타트업 여정

팔머 럭키는 실리콘밸리의 속도, 혁신, 국방 기술로 펜타곤을 혁신하는 것을 목표로 합니다.

### 팔머 럭키: 매버릭 테크 창립자의 방위 기술 벤처: 팔머 럭키
* 🚤  팔머 럭키가 방위 기술 벤처의 일환으로 네이비실 임무를 위해 설계한 마크  **5 특수 작전 선박**을 소개합니다.
* 그는 **실리콘밸리의 속도와 혁신을 국방부에 도입**하여 전통적인 방위 산업과 낡은 기술 및 관행에 도전하는 것을 목표로 합니다.
* 💰  럭키의 **독특한 접근 방식과 외모, 그리고 기술 및 가상 현실에 대한 배경 지식**은 일반적인 방위 계약업체와 차별화되는 특징입니다.
* 🌐  기술 산업과 군대의 역사적 관계, 현재 국방에 대한 기술의 참여가 다시 부활하고 있는 상황, 그리고 **이러한 부활에서 럭키의 역할**에 대해 논의합니다.
* 🛠️  럭키의 회사인 안두릴은 군사용  AI 기반 시스템과 자율 로봇을 개발하는 **방위 기술의 최전선**에 서 있습니다.
* 🤖  그는 전쟁에서  AI의 **윤리적 의미**와 **책임감 있는 기술 배치**의 필요성에 대해 이야기합니다.
* 🌍  현재의 지정학적 환경, 특히 **중국과 대만의 상황**과 **현대 전쟁에서 기술의 역할**에 대해 살펴봅니다.
* 💼  이러한 어려움에도 불구하고 안두릴과 다른 국방 기술 스타트업은 **군의 요구에 맞는 혁신적인 솔루션**을 제공하기 위해 업계에서 진전을 이루고 있습니다.
* 🔮  럭키는 **기술 산업의 진화, 제로 금리의 영향, 그리고 현실 세계의 문제를 해결하는 방향**으로의 전환에 대해 이야기합니다.
* 🌊  그는 **우크라이나 전쟁에 대한 자신의 관점**과 **미국 정부가 빠르게 진화하는 글로벌 분쟁에 적응**해야 하는 시급성에 대해 이야기합니다.

[Music] I'm driving Palmer luy's personal warship, and we're all about to die. Sorry, guys. So this is a mark 5 Special Operations craft that I purchased from the Navy. Are you sure I'm not going to flip the boat? You're going to be fine. It's the fastest boat that the Navy ever built. It was designed specifically for Navy SEAL insertion and extraction missions. It runs really fast, and it's a lot of fun. While this boat may be part of the Old Navy, Lucky is trying to bring Silicon Valley speed and Innovation back to the Pentagon. Well, some of the United States technology is very bad. It's also extremely expensive and not necessarily adapted to the types of conflicts we're going to see in the future. The United States has a lot of investment in Legacy weapon systems that are not necessarily having China quaking in their booze. He's betting his new age defense company can take a slice of the Pentagon's $850 billion budget and reinvent how they do

business from the outside in. That is, if they can beat the incumbents and convince the top brass that a billionaire founder sporting Hawaiian shirts is just as serious about rebooting America's Arsenal as they are. You're not the typical Silicon Valley founder wearing a black turtleneck, nor are you walking around and talking like a buttoned-up defense contractor CEO. Like, how does that play? I am a little bit of a caricature, but it's because I just haven't changed. It was really easy when we started and all to say conflict is over, we're living at the end of History. This idea of putting our best brains towards things that can kill people is a waste of talent and a waste of money and unethical, and that's not what anyone's saying anymore. The war in Ukraine and China's rapid military action have renewed fears that the US defense industry isn't modernizing fast enough. That's brought a controversial handshake between Tech and defense back out in the open. The military has a long and storied

history with the tech industry. [Music] Post-World War II, billions in defense funding transformed California into Aerospace and Technology boom towns. The first company to manufacture microchips that guided missiles, satellites, and helped Silicon Valley get its name was funded by the Pentagon. Founders of that very company pioneered modern-day venture capital and helped cultivate a vibrant tech industry. Today, there's a new generation trying to bring back America's past, proven by Palmer Loy's collection of unusual vehicles. You sure it still works? It should. It should, yeah. So this is a 1967 Disneyland Autopia, designed by Bob Gurr and Walt Disney. As far as I know, mine is the only complete Autopia that is outside of the parks. Mine has the original mechanicals, original gearboxes, original wheels, the whole deal. When I got it, though, uh-oh, technical difficulties. Got a, got a, got a flaad screwdriver. Oh, there we go. Look at that, we got to get moving. All right, there we go, back in.

back in business. So, are you sure this is street legal? We're on the street, aren't we? You grew up in Long Beach, right? Not too far from here. That's right, close to the port, and it was a place with a lot of car culture, a lot of Aerospace culture, a lot of Defense activity. I grew up watching the Marine Corps practice right offshore in their helicopters, watching Navy ships do exercises and, you know, get it gets in your brain and it doesn't [Music] leave. Southern California, unlike a lot of places, is a place where almost everybody knows someone who has served in the military or has a family member who served in the military. When that's the case because of the density of military population here, you don't really have the crazy political ideology that you get in places like the Baran. But when I started Andril, of course, it was a totally different world, uh, defense was not cool, and it was definitely not the hottest thing. Before launching Andril, Luckey worked on virtual reality headsets.

his parents' garage. By age 18, he had a prototype that kickstarted the modern VR movement and caught the world's attention, including Mark Zuckerberg. Zuckerberg bought Oculus for $2 billion. Lucky was later ousted. The thing is, I'm actually not nearly as political of a person as people think I am. I mean, people think you got kicked out of Silicon Valley. Yeah, I got kicked out of Silicon Valley because I made a $99,000 political donation. The reason that people pay attention to it at the end of the day is because it's novel for a person in Tech to have supported the person who became president that year. To be clear, he means this guy. Meta disputes that Lucky was fired for his political views, but whatever the reason, the result was a rift between Lucky and the valley. So he turned his attention to defense and set up shop in Southern California. This, my extraordinarily tall door. The house was built in the 1980s, and I've kept all the bones the same. I think it's a pretty cool place. Has some

good Miami Vice Vibes. I've got my 2-in-uh teal shag carpet. This is my fish tank. It's about a 6,500 gallon aquarium. This looks like a Dungeons and Dragons table. Oh no, this is just my coffee table, although it does have a map of our Dungeons and Dragons campaign. What kind of character are you in Dungeons and Dragons? I aan chaotic neutral wizard named nrim 5. He's from the Lost Nation of Atlantis. How much success have you had with that? Pretty limited so far. Pretty limited so far. I know you're a big gamer. What are the connections between navigating a virtual Battlefield and a real Battlefield? Probably the main similarity is some of the technology that we're applying to things like heads up displays and augmented reality for soldiers and Airmen to allow them to see where the danger on the battlefield is. It's also worth noting that really virtual reality came out of military research in the first place and the games industry and the military.

industrial complex have always shared kind of back and forth. How'd you get interested in defense technology? I briefly was able to work as a lab technician on an army project called Brave mind that it was treating veterans with PTSD using virtual reality exposure therapy, and that was actually before I started Oculus. I kept in touch with a lot of friends in the defense industry, and what I heard over and over again is that it was broken. The incentives were wrong. They were being punished for doing the right thing, rewarded for doing the wrong thing. They made more money when they were over budget, and uh, that really got me worried, especially in a world where we were running a new experiment as a country, an experiment where for the first time in American history tech companies were not working with dood. The relationship between Silicon Valley and Washington splintered after the Cold War. Top talent caught the do wave, ditching government jobs in windowless rooms for positions at shiny Tech firms. Everybody used to work on

Capitol Hill or the government for the military now everybody works for an internet St up the defense industry. Consolidated power around five big primes to supply the military's hardware and software. It's a large complex oligopoly with a strict chain of command that filters ideas through layers upon layers upon layers of bureaucracy for Tech startups looking to get a piece of the action welcome to the Valley of Death. The government tries to nurture new ideas but the amount of time it takes to go from prototype to adoption puts most startups in the defense Market graveyard. It seemed impossible for Outsiders to compete until SpaceX and paler sued the government claiming the bidding system unfairly favored the incumbents. Paler co-founder Peter Teal's Venture firm was the first to invest in andero. It's no coincidence that the only two companies to break through in the last 35 years since the winding down of the Cold War really uh were both founded by billionaires. It's it's it's unfortunate.

but it reflects the reality that we've created where this muscle we used to have as a country of turning small innovative defense companies into large-scale providers of weapons. We lost it, and the only way to bypass that was to already have made billions of dollars somewhere else. As a country, we need to do [Music] better. So this is the old LA Times Printing plant. It was the old LA Times Printing Press. I started Oculus in Orange County, and it was a place where I could hire people from all over the country. When I moved up to the Bay Area, it actually became a lot harder to hire people who weren't already in the Bay Area. But this is a place where you can build great companies that draw from all of America, not just from that one tight little isolated bubble. Well, I was actually wondering, is it hard to poach people from sort of big tech companies? Oh, no, no. The way that you poach people from big tech companies is to tell them that their career is

meaningless, and that they're wasting their lives on something that doesn't matter. A decent trick of people when you can kind of shock them out of the Matrix being, What are you doing with your life? There's big problems in the world, and you're not part of solving them. That's been behind a lot of the people who leave big tech companies come to work at andil anderl has been clear from the get-go. To come here is to build weapons and surveillance systems. They started with this tall autonomous security tower that sits on borders in the US and abroad. Launched in the early days of the Trump presidency, they've expanded their Arsenal to autonomous submarines, counter drones, and other robots that are cheaper to build with menacing names. This is a half-scale model of Fury, which is an autonomous fighter jet that we're building. This is wisp. This is scanning infrared imager that's able to detect aircraft by building a 360° sphere that it integrates as scams and uh, this is an electronic.

warfare system. It can jam and hack and make sure that you're able to talk and the other guy isn't in a whole bunch of really powerful ways. You're trying to run a defense tech company like a startup. How does that compare to like Lockheed Martin and Boeing, and how do you get Washington to accept that most new R&D is down on a Cost Plus basis, meaning the contractor gets paid for their time, their materials, and then a fixed percentage of profit on top. Of course, that incentivizes you to come up with expensive solutions and to drag it out as long as you can. Andal we're the opposite because we're a defense products company that makes things that work and sell them rather than getting paid to do work. Uh, it means that when we do something faster, it helps our profit margins. You're building products that the government doesn't even know it needs yet, right? Very often, it's pretty rare that we work on something that is consensus in the government where there's widespread belief that what

we're doing is the right solution to the problem. Often, we're building things that they've written off as not feasible or not viable. There was a lot of skepticism about applying artificial intelligence to defense, a lot of skeptic about artificial intelligence in general. Chat GPT was one of the most helpful Technologies to us because it helped convince people that AI can do things they didn't believe computers could do. Are we getting to a point where battles could be fought by AI and counter AI only? We're not going to have systems that are acting entirely on their own without human Direction, but will we see dogfights between AI fighter jets that don't have people in them? Yes, absolutely. In fact, in Ukraine, there's been a variety of engagements where you had unmanned systems destroying other unmanned systems. It seems like what's happening in Ukraine has marked a shift in Warfare strategy. What's happening in Ukraine is fascinating because they can't afford to treat Warfare as a thing to be think tanked or as a thing to be debated in.

white papers. They have to actually win today, and that means that a lot of barriers to trying new ideas have been lifted. And that's one of the reasons you've seen, for example, the proliferation of small unmanned armed quadcopters. It's why you've seen the proliferation of a lot of really interesting counter-drone systems, things that were not nearly mature enough to be deployed, let's say by the United States. Uh, but they are willing to deploy them in a very early stage maturity because they know they can't win doing things the old [Music] way. The old way meant having the biggest, most expensive weapon on the battlefield. Now it's about having a swarm of commercial technology available quickly and cheaply. To that end, the Pentagon recently announced the replicator program to FastTrack thousands of low-cost autonomous drones. Startups and Venture capitalists who historically shunned military work declared it's time to build to get in on the action. The old school way of working through five six large primes and developing technology

just doesn't work. You have to work with the private sector to bring new technologies in. Big Tech firms have had more long-term success offering hardware, AI, and cloud services in exchange for billion-dollar deals, but there's been friction on the tech company side from engineers who don't want anything to do with the military. Some tech employees have pushed back on working with the US government and the US military. Do you see where they're coming from? Fundamentally, I think it's an emotional thing. They came to a company to work on consumer tech. They weren't told that their work would be used for potentially violence, and they don't like that. And I empathize with that because to them, it feels like a little bit of a bait and switch. Critics see the technology you're building, worry it could be misused on American citizens, for example. Are they right to worry? Oh, of course, anything can be misused. But like if you want to point to things that can be misused against American citizens, I mean, the military

has a lot of guns. The military has a lot of aircraft. You have to have trust in the system. You have to believe that democracy works, and you have to believe that the right way to control these is on the policy side. There are actually things I would like to build that the DoD would not use and would not deploy, that they do think are beyond the pale, and that's the way that it should be. US foreign policy and military policy shouldn't be in the hands of corporate executives. The heart of Anduril's technology isn't its hardware, but its software engineers. Here, they have developed a proprietary AI-driven system called Lattice that acts like an intelligent control center for the company's hardware. Lattice is our AI system for controlling distributed robots. We're doing processing and computer vision machine learning on that data and producing an operating picture of the world so we understand the chessboard, so to speak, and then the autonomy can apply those very logical decisions about what to do and move forward and act.

me through the process from identification to decision or decisions. So we've got a manned crew that's going to try and fly in and land somewhere. They have some mission they need to do on the ground, but there are threats that are unknown. So we're going to send the autonomous systems forward. They're going to try and draw out any enemy fire. And with the autonomous systems, you're okay if they die. You're okay if they get taken out because that tells you more information about the battlefield so that you can make informed decisions. Interesting, but there's still a long way to go, still a lot to build. There's the old saying, Hardware is hard. The United States used to be able to build things that would fly twice as fast as our adversaries, and we'd be twice as fast for a decade. Those days are gone. Hardware advantages like that are going to be quickly copied by our adversaries. So a lot of the most durable advantages we build, for example, using software to make decisions twice as fast or ten times as fast, is a

capability that I don't think our adversaries are close to copying. Lattis is just one example of the military's increasing use of AI. The Pentagon has been developing project Maven, an AI system that analyzes images from military drones and helps suggest targets. Google initially won this contract in 2018 but backed out after thousands of workers protested the deal. Paler Amazon, Microsoft, and anderl are currently among the main contributors. Maven is now deployed but there are still open questions about AI's combat readiness. At the end of the day, you just have to be correct and you're doing it from afar and so yes, I would still submit that that is one of the toughest things that my organizations have encountered, is that idea of distinguishing enemy from non-enemy or combatant from non-combatant and the scale of it is impressive. There are concerns that AI could deepen the fog of War, what do you think about that? No, I super disagree, I think AI is going to be a

tool to put all the cards on the table for everyone. My hope is that you're going to have dictators who make better decisions because even they have better information from AI. Let's use Putin as an example. I don't think he would have launched this invasion in Ukraine if he would have understood what was actually going to happen. Remember, they believe this is like a 3-day Special Operation. They were going to roll in; it was going to be over very, very quickly. If he had had a better understanding of what he had and what they had, I think he probably would not have made the play. There are a lot of thorny ethical questions. We're talking about a possible future of self-guided bombs and Killer Robots. Who is liable when a human isn't in the loop? The key is that a person is responsible for the deployment of those systems. The existence of an algorithm cannot replace human responsibility for deploying that weapon system, and it has to be a person who deeply understands the limitations of that system and who's

going to be held to account when it goes wrong, but or as hell, and it's not going to be perfect. There will be people who are killed by AI who should not have been killed, that is a certainty. If artificial intelligence becomes a core part of the way that we fight Wars, we need to make sure that people remain accountable for that, because that's the only thing that'll drive us to better Solutions and fewer inadvertent deaths, fewer civilian casualties. I don't want AI to do these things, but a lot of times the existing Technologies are much worse. China and Taiwan, how does this play out? It can play out in a lot of different ways. Everything that Andel is working on on the R&D side is oriented towards that fight right now. China believes that they can take Taiwan. They believe that the United States is some combination of won't stop them, isn't willing to stop them, won't win if we do try to stop them. They believe Taiwan is in a similar position with their own.

military. We have to change their minds. I'm probably going to eat these words, but if China ends up invading Taiwan, I'm going to feel like we've really failed in our [Music] mission. You actually spent a lot of time in China working on Oculus headsets. What do you know about China's capabilities in AI? What don't you know? I spent time in China back in the Oculus days because that's where we did our Manufacturing, and we didn't really have a choice. I deeply understand how dependent our country has become on Chinese manufacturing, Chinese engineering, Chinese supply chain materials. It's really extraordinary how they've pulled themselves up from almost nothing to being an economic superpower, and we did this too. We're the ones that gave them the blueprints. We're the ones that gave them the tech. We're the ones that shipped it all overseas, and I'm part of the problem. I'm one of the guys who did it. What do you worry that China is outpacing the US on technological innovation like could the US military

lose it its edge to China well depending on who you ask China has between 50 times and 300 times the military ship building capacity of the United States. This is a huge problem especially if you're fighting a war where you lose all your ships and it takes you decades to rebuild. They lose all their ships and they rebuild the same year. This is really inarguably an area where China has outpaced the United States. Now they haven't outpaced us everywhere but in a lot of the areas that matter for a fight in the Pacific they are kicking our ass and the United States is not going to be able to win by following the same strategy they do. We're not going to be able to build enough shipyards and train enough welders to build 300 times more ships. That's off the table so we have to win with our brains despite all its Innovation andal and other defense Tech startups are still bit players in the world of military suppliers. Venture capitalists plowed in a hundred billion doll between 2021 and

2023, but only a handful of companies have won meaningful [Music] contracts. Right now, Ander is very much in a high-growth stage. We've done a lot of things that I'm very, very proud of, but I'm very aware of the fact that we are not a profitable business. We are living on borrowed time, and so I... I... I. It's hard for me to come and feel like I've made it when I know that, you know, anyone can raise money from VCs, buy a really big office, and fill it full of people. The question is, are those people building the right things, and will those things pay off? It's not your average Newport Beach Boat. No, it's not. Is it most of my neighbors like it, and a handful hate it, but that's good enough. We've got a mock M2 heavy barrel 50bmg machine gun. Have real ones that I can... that I can throw on, but I... I... I keep... I keep the fake ones on most of the time. One of the other cool

features of the boat is these shock-mounted seats. You'll notice they bounce up and down. So we're going to go below deck into the Navigator's room. This is also where we run all of our Communications gear, processing gear, computer gear, radio gear. You've got all of your rifle racks here so that you can rack them up. So these are twin MTU engines. The boat's got a little over 5,000 horsepower. This whole thing is basically a big giant jet [Music] ski. So what else do you have in your personal Arsenal. Oh, I got a whole bunch of stuff. Got a uh60 Blackhawk, 1985 X Marine Corp hanvey. How many helicopters I used to have seven but I only have six now. I do hear that you have a vault where you have every video game ever created. A while ago I purchased the world's largest video game collection and I I also collect US Air Force nuclear missile bases. So I put that in one of my missile bases 200 ft underground. Where's that. Oh, I can't tell.

[Music] You all right? We're going to do some turns. Everybody, hold on. [Music] All right, what was that? That was one of our own weeks, but we're going to go find one of the other ones. Hold [Music] on. You want to try steering? I'm good. All right, we'll bring us down to zero. So as we accelerate, uh, you're going to hear first the first turbocharger kicked in, and then after we get at about 20 knots, you're going to hear the second turbocharger kick in, and that's when the engine changes pitch. I try a starboard turn. You're going to move your stick over to the right, and then watch your positions here. I'm turning a warship. When I say Center, Center, Center, now. There you go. We're going fast like the beach is approaching. All right, we're going to do a a little bit of a fast stop. You're going to pull on the throttle. Just pull, pull. Keep going. Give it here. We go. All right, leave it there. There you go. Oh my.

God so am I hired no you started endural in 2017 and you've lived through Silicon Valley in the era of zerp and easy money. Sure, what do you think about the frenzy the zero interest rate phenomenon? Yeah, there's a lot of companies that shouldn't have existed. They never should have been funded. All that money went to paying people to do things that were a waste of time. I know lots of young Founders who were working on crypto art nonsense and a fifth delivery app or a 10th delivery app. And now that money has become harder to come by, you know what they're working on? They're working on energy, they're working on National Security, they're working on transportation and uh. I think that I see people working on real problems because the market forced them to, and that's a good thing in my opinion. So it's time to build, it's time to built the war in Ukraine. It's been 2 years now. How are we going to look back on it? Well, I think that we're going to

look back on it as one of the best examples of the hubris of the modern era. Thinking that we lived at the end of History, the end of conflict, the large-scale War was a thing of the past, that artillery is irrelevant, that Manpower is irrelevant, that sternly worded letters from the United Nations mean anything at all to expansionist dictators like Putin or X. That's I think going to be the legacy of this fight is the US government working fast enough to like Foster the agility we need to to survive or win Global conflicts. It depends on what kinds of fights we fight. Hopefully we have enough time uh we might not why not well let's say that China starts making moves on Taiwan and moves on other countries in the next 24 months. I think we're going to be in trouble. I think in 36 months 48 months we're actually still kind of in trouble. If it takes long enough I think that the United States military has recognized the problem uh but you know like you're

steering this boat. When you turned, how long did it take for the boat to respond? A while. It was a bit of a lag time. The US military is the same way. It's a large machine. It takes a long time to move, even once you've applied the control, even if once you've applied the input. I think that's the phase we're in. The government has realized the problem. They've applied the input. We're waiting for the system to adjust. [Music]

Palmer Luckey Wants to Be Silicon Valley's War King | The Circuit

Bloomberg Originals offers bold takes for curious minds on today’s biggest topics. Hosted by experts covering stories you haven’t seen and viewpoints you haven’t heard, you’ll discover cinematic, data-led shows that investigate the intersection of business and culture. Exploring every angle of climate change, technology, finance, sports and beyond, Bloomberg Originals is business as you’ve never seen it.


Bloomberg Originals

미국 방위 산업을 혁신하는 팔머 러키의 사명

팔머 럭키는 해군 군함을 구입하여 실리콘밸리의 혁신을 펜타곤에 도입하여 전통적인 국방 시스템에 도전하는 것을 목표로 하고 있습니다.

기술과 국방의 결합은 제2차 세계대전 이후부터 이어져 온 역사적인 관계로 새로운 것은 아닙니다.

럭키의 색다른 접근 방식과 어린 시절부터 이어진 군사적 영향력은 미국 방위 산업을 현대화하려는 그의 사명을 이끌고 있습니다.

오큘러스의 창립자인 팔머 러키는 최신 VR 기술의 프로토타입을 만들고 회사를 마크 주커버그에게 매각한 후 유명세를 탔습니다.

이후 그는 축출된 후 방위 기술로 방향을 전환했습니다.

루키가 방위 산업에 관심을 갖게 된 계기는 가상현실 치료를 통해 외상 후 스트레스 장애를 겪는 퇴역 군인을 치료하는 프로젝트에 참여하면서 방위 산업의 잘못된 인센티브에 대한 우려에서 비롯되었습니다.

루키는 방위 시장의 어려움에도 불구하고 외부 업체가 경쟁하기 어렵다는 점과 억만장자가 창업한 SpaceX와 Palantir 같은 기업의 드문 돌파구를 강조했습니다.

안두릴의 설립자는 미국 전역에서 인재를 채용하여 보다 다양한 인력을 구축하는 것을 목표로 하고 있습니다.

안두릴은 자율 보안 및 방위 시스템을 개발하는 데 주력하고 있으며, AI와 첨단 기술을 사용하여 혁신적인 솔루션을 개발합니다.

이 회사는 기존 방위 계약업체와는 다른 접근 방식을 취하며, 제품을 효율적으로 생산하고 정부에 판매하는 것을 우선시합니다.

미 국방부는 리플리케이터 프로그램을 통해 저비용 자율 드론을 빠르게 추적하는 방향으로 전환하고 있습니다.

일부 직원들이 윤리적 문제로 인해 군과의 협력을 거부하면서 기술 기업들은 내부 마찰에 직면하고 있습니다.

이러한 반발에도 불구하고 앤두릴의 독점 AI 시스템인 래티스는 군사용 하드웨어를 제어하는 데 중요한 역할을 하고 있습니다.

군사 작전에서 자율 시스템과 AI의 역할

자율 시스템은 군사 임무에서 정보에 입각한 의사결정을 위해 적의 공격을 유도하고 정보를 수집하는 데 사용되고 있습니다.

프로젝트 메이븐과 같이 군사 데이터를 분석하고 목표를 제안하는 데 AI의 사용이 증가하고 있지만, AI의 전투 준비 상태와 윤리적 영향에 대한 우려는 여전합니다.

AI가 의사결정을 위한 더 나은 정보를 제공할 수 있는 잠재력이 부각되고 있지만, 자율 유도 무기의 사용과 인간이 개입하지 않았을 때의 책임에 대한 윤리적 문제도 제기되고 있습니다.

AI가 전쟁에 미치는 영향과 중국의 기술 발전

인공지능은 전쟁에서 우발적인 사망과 민간인 사상자를 초래할 것으로 예상되며, 이에 대한 책임의 필요성을 강조하고 더 나은 해결책을 모색해야 한다는 목소리가 커지고 있습니다.

중국은 대만을 점령할 수 있다는 믿음과 기술 혁신, 특히 군사력에서 미국을 앞지르며 특히 태평양 지역에서 상당한 도전이 되고 있습니다.

미군의 전통적인 전략은 성공할 가능성이 낮기 때문에 혁신과 인텔리전스를 통한 승리로의 전환이 필요하며, 현재 안두릴과 같은 스타트업은 이러한 전략에서 작은 역할을 하고 있습니다.

앤더의 고성장 무대와 호화로운 라이프스타일 엿보기

앤더는 고성장 단계에 있지만 아직 수익을 내지 못해 벤처캐피털의 자금에 의존하고 있습니다.

그는 모의 50밀리미터 기관총이 장착된 독특한 보트와 방대한 헬리콥터 컬렉션으로 호화로운 라이프스타일을 선보입니다.

또한 앤더는 세계 최대 규모의 비디오 게임 컬렉션과 미 공군 핵미사일 기지를 소유하고 있어 그의 사치스러운 취향을 엿볼 수 있습니다.

제로 금리와 우크라이나 전쟁의 영향

제로 금리 시대에는 많은 불필요한 기업에 자금을 지원했지만, 이제는 에너지와 국가 안보와 같은 실제 문제를 해결하는 방향으로 전환하고 있습니다.

우크라이나 전쟁은 미국 정부가 글로벌 분쟁에 신속하게 적응해야 할 필요성을 강조하는 현대적 오만의 상징으로 여겨질 가능성이 높습니다.

미군도 이러한 문제를 인식하고 있지만, 미군의 규모가 크기 때문에 새로운 우선순위에 적응하는 데 시간이 걸릴 것입니다.