AI 챗봇 비교: OpenAI 채팅 GPT와 구글 제미니

### AI 챗봇 대결: OpenAI 채팅 GPT 플러스 대 구글의 제미니 어드밴스드
* 🤖 오늘은 **레시피 작성, 여행 일정, 이메일 초안 작성**과 같은 실제 시나리오를 제시하여 OpenAI의 Chat GPT Plus와 Google의 Gemini 고급 AI를 테스트해 보았습니다.
* 🍽 레시피 챌린지에서 **Chat GPT는 태국식 코코넛 디핑 소스를 곁들인 츄로**를 제안했고, **Gemini는 태국에서 영감을 받은 코팅을 입힌 츄로**를 제안하며 맛의 통합에 대한 서로 다른 접근 방식을 선보였습니다.
* 🔊 빨간색 미드 레인지 턴테이블을 검색할 때 **Chat GPT는 더 많은 옵션**을 제공했지만 색상 요구 사항을 충족하지 않는 옵션이 포함된 반면, **Gemini는 빨간색으로 제공되는 모델**을 정확하게 식별했습니다.
* ✈ 여행 추천의 경우, **Chat GPT는 미주리주 페스투스라는 작은 마을의 합리적인 여행 일정**을 제안한 반면, **Gemini는 인근 세인트루이스의 명소**를 추천하여 추천 범위가 더 넓다는 것을 보여주었습니다.
* ✉ 두 챗봇 모두 연차 신청 이메일 초안 작성에서 우수한 성과를 보였는데, **Chat GPT는 이모티콘을 사용한 캐주얼한 어조**를 채택한 반면 **Gemini는 문화적 언급을 통해 좀 더 공식적인 접근 방식**을 취했습니다.
* 📄 긴 비디오 게임 리뷰를 요약할 때 두 챗봇 모두 정확한 요약을 제공했지만 **Chat GPT의 버전이 원문에서 더 많은 언어를 차용**했습니다.
* 🔍 전반적으로 테스트 결과, 두 AI 모두 장단점이 있지만 **Chat GPT가 더 자세한 답변**을 제공하는 경향이 있어 이 비교에서 더 선호되는 것으로 나타났습니다.

ChatGPT는 구글의 제미니 어드밴스드보다 더 스마트하고 상세한 응답을 일관되게 제공합니다.

[Music] It's the AI chatbot battle. Today, we're testing OpenAI Chat GPT Plus against Google's Gemini Advanced AI. Chatbots are mind-blowing but not without faults, so let's see what each offers and which one gives the best results. To compare the chatbots, I'll prompt them with real-world scenarios like finding and modifying recipes, researching travel, and writing emails. The goal isn't to break the AIs with bizarre riddles or logic problems; I'm looking to see if real questions prompt useful and accurate answers. So, let's dive in. OpenAI Chat GPT Plus subscription costs $20 a month and allows for access to Chat GPT 4, 40 do for regenerative AI images, higher usage limits, and early access to new features. Google's Gemini Advance subscription is also $20 a month and allows access to its 1.5 Pro chatbot, image FX, documented image upload for analysis, code editing, and 2 terab of Google One storage. The context window between the two differs.

greatly. However, Chach BT 40's contacts window is 8,192 tokens, whereas Geminis can handle 1 million. First, we'll use the chatbots to find recipes, shopping, and travel suggestions. So, one way I like to test AI chatbots is by throwing fusion recipes at them. It's pretty easy to make a turkey sandwich, but if you start mixing in different flavors and combinations, it forces the chatbots to pull in different data sets and try to combine them. Let's ask it to create a churro recipe with a Thai twist and with some pumpkin spice as well. And of course, it's going to have like the flat flour and the water and salt and butter and all that stuff, but we're looking more for the spice mix, right? So, it's bringing in together cinnamon, nutmeg, ginger, and cloves, things you'd expect from pumpkin spice. So, instead of integrating the Thai flavors into the churro itself, ChatGBT is instead recommending we create like a Thai

coconut dipping sauce. So, this necessarily wasn't where I was going for, but it's not a bad suggestion. But let's see how Gemini fares with this test. Okay, so going through the water and the sugar and the butter and eggs and stuff. Google has recommended we add some pumpkin puree, cinnamon, ginger, cloves, nutmeg, and then saying to put a Thai-inspired coating on top of the churro. So, as you can see, each chatbot gave us very different takes on a Thai-inspired churro with a pumpkin spice twist. I wouldn't say neither are necessarily bad or good. I would probably try both and probably enjoy both. But that's the thing that makes reviewing these AI chatbots a little tough, because each time you ask it a question, it can yield a completely novel answer. I'm looking to buy a mid-range turntable available in red. It doesn't have to have a phono preamp. So, let's see what chat GPT gives us. All right, so chat GPT is recommending the

project debut carbon Evo, which does come in red, as well as the U-turn audio orbit special, which also comes in red. It also recommends the regga plan R1, and I need to make sure that comes in red. Yeah, it doesn't. It only comes in white, black, and walnut. But chatbots do this sometimes, where in an attempt to answer your question, it'll just spit something out. It is also interesting that it didn't include the project debut carbon evo2, which is relatively new, also comes in red. And that was chat gbt 40. So let's see what kind of answers Gemini Advance gives us. So Gemini recommended the project debut Caron Evo. Good. Also recommended the regga plan R1 plus, but it does say it doesn't come in red. So it actually did delineate there. And then it also recommended the fluence RT82, which I believe also doesn't come in red. Yeah, the colors are natural, black, wood grain, white. So comparing to the two, it's

really hard to kind of say which one did better. Chat GPT in this instance gave more correct recommendations of turntables like Cayman red, but it did recommend one that didn't come in red and said that it did. Google Gemini Advanced recommended two that didn't come in red at all, but at least was able to tell me that it didn't. I guess Gemini Advance ultimately was more correct even though it gave less correct recommendations. Now to travel recommendations. Generally, these chatbots are going to be pretty good with itineraries for New York, Los Angeles, Tokyo. So to really test these chatbots, I kind of throw random little towns at them and see what they can yield. So one of our co-workers, Karen, she hails from Festus, Missouri, which is a small town. And let's ask ChatGPT to give us a travel itinerary for Festus, Missouri. Yeah, so on ChatGPT, it gave a decent itinerary for what to do in Festus, Missouri, a town of

about 10,000 people, according to Kin, having breakfast at the main and Mill Brewing Company is a little bizarre considering it's a brew house. The mid-morning going to the FES City Park seems okay, and then for lunch, going to La Pachanga Mexican restaurant. It's the place she's been to, and she likes so the recommendations while maybe not most magnanimous. It seems to be generally accurate. Gemini is telling us to go to the holiday and express, and then it's telling us to head over to the Jefferson National Expansion Museum in nearby St. Louis. So, it's already pulling us away from Festus, which is fine, I guess. And then for restaurants, it's telling us to go to the Pasta House Company, which is a local favorite, as well as the M State Historic Site. This is also a place that's not in Festus specifically, but in a nearby town. Google is definitely like looking to go to areas around Festus, Missouri, but overall, it seems like they

both have similar results, telling you to go to places near and around the area. So, one of the great things about AI is using it to minimize some of the busy work that comes in our lives, such as writing emails. So, I usually do a pretty basic test to write an email where I'll ask it to write my manager a simple request to take the day off for a religious holiday or something like that, and to write it in a manner that's professional yet fun and festive. They all seem to do a pretty good job on this. The email that ChatGPT gave us has the right amount of exclamation marks and has the tone of something that's a bit more casual. It also adds some emojis, which is a nice touch. Gemini is a bit more religious. It starts with the Eid Mubarak header, and it says that Eid is coming up. Definitely has all the exclamation marks that you would want. Then, it also gives the recommendation to bring baklava and halwa for my co-workers.

and say I'm hoping you can improve my request. No emojis though, but either way, they're both fine. Earlier, I published a review of a new video game about 1,600 words, so a bit of a long review, right? So let me see. I'll just ask Chad you to summarize this article for me. So summarize this article for me. I'm just going to paste the entire article, and it's actually outputting pretty quickly as well. This is an accurate summary. It definitely borrows a lot of my language, so it definitely is like taking my words and just kind of cutting out a lot of the, I wouldn't say fluff, but a lot of the more important contextual information. It's weird that it says the game has been praised for its polished gameplay. I guess suggesting like larger discussions within the gaming industry or so. Maybe it would have been more accurate to say this game was praised by the author for its polished gameplay. For example, it did get some of my feelings about the

game like overall. The reviewer seems to have mixed feelings about the game, but yeah, I mean, it's a good short summary. Both are doing a pretty decent job of summarizing art if you paste it in its entirety. So, what did we learn testing out both ChatGPT Plus and Gemini Advanced? We found that testing AI chatbots can be tricky. The answers that you get earlier in the day can differ from what you get later in the day, and that's just kind of the nature of the beast. Each time you ask a question, it's going to give you a different answer. Between the two, I did find that ChatGPT tends to give you more verbose responses, maybe sounds a bit smarter. They both made mistakes, they both gave incorrect information or less incorrect information. Ultimately, though, ChatGPT seems to be the one to beat.

OpenAI's ChatGPT Plus vs Google's Gemini Advanced. Which $20 AI chatbot is best?

CNET is the premier destination for explaining and navigating the changing world around us. Through news, product reviews, price comparisons, and more, we’ll tell you what’s new in the parts of modern life that increasingly matter more — from health, home, and money to tech, culture, and climate — and how to get the most out of them.

CNET

OpenAI Chat GPT Plus와 Google의 Gemini 고급 AI 비교

이 대결에서는 공정한 비교를 위해 실제 시나리오를 사용하여 두 인공지능 챗봇을 테스트했습니다.

두 구독 모두 한 달에 20달러의 비용이 들지만 서로 다른 기능을 제공하며 컨텍스트 창 용량도 다릅니다.

챗봇은 서로 다른 데이터 세트를 가져오고 결합하는 능력을 테스트하기 위해 퓨전 레시피에 도전받았습니다.

츄로와 턴테이블 추천을 위한 AI 챗봇 비교하기

챗봇들은 태국에서 영감을 받은 츄로에 호박 스파이스를 더한 다양한 버전의 츄로를 추천했습니다.

ChatGPT는 중간급 레드 턴테이블로 프로젝트 데뷔 카본 에보와 유턴 오디오 오빗 스페셜을 추천했고, Gemini Advance 역시 같은 턴테이블을 추천했지만 레가 플랜 R1 플러스와 플루언스 RT82는 레드 컬러가 없음이라고 언급했습니다.

두 챗봇 모두 독특하고 다양한 답변을 제공했기 때문에 정답을 결정하기가 어려웠습니다.

미주리 주 페스투스 여행 일정 비교

ChatGPT는 미주리주 페스투스에서 양조장에서의 아침 식사, 현지 멕시코 레스토랑에서의 점심 식사 등 적절한 일정을 추천해 주었습니다.

반면, 구글 제미니 어드밴스드는 인근 세인트루이스에서 휴가를 보낼 수 있는 숙소와 인근 마을의 레스토랑을 추천해 주었습니다.

ChatGPT의 제안은 페스투스에 더 집중되어 있었지만 주변 지역을 탐색하는 Gemini의 접근 방식도 유효했습니다.

AI는 이메일 작성과 같은 바쁜 업무를 최소화하는 데 도움을 줄 수 있습니다.

ChatGPT와 Gemini는 모두 휴가 요청을 위한 효과적인 이메일 초안을 제공하며, ChatGPT는 캐주얼한 어조와 이모티콘을 사용하는 반면, Gemini는 좀 더 종교적인 접근 방식을 취합니다.

또한 AI는 긴 기사를 빠르게 요약할 수 있지만 언어를 차용하거나 중요한 문맥 정보를 놓칠 수 있습니다.

ChatGPT 플러스와 제미니 어드밴스드 비교

리뷰어는 이 게임에 대해 엇갈린 감정을 가지고 있지만 괜찮은 요약이라고 인정합니다.

AI 챗봇을 테스트한 결과, 하루 종일 응답이 달라질 수 있다는 것을 알 수 있었습니다.

ChatGPT는 더 장황하고 더 똑똑해 보이는 답변을 제공하는 경향이 있지만 두 챗봇 모두 실수를 하거나 잘못된 정보를 제공하기도 합니다.

궁극적으로 ChatGPT가 더 강력한 옵션으로 간주됩니다.