- There's no question the
multiverse is having a kind of moment in popular culture. You know, Marvel movies
have been leaning into it. "Doctor Strange in the
Multiverse of Madness," various Spider-Man movies,
but also "Rick and Morty"

and "Everything Everywhere All At Once." You might think it's the fault of physics because physicists have been
talking about a multiverse for a few decades now, both in cosmology and quantum
mechanics, but in fact, as often happens in
Hollywood and elsewhere,

you ignore what the scientists say, and you do your own kind of thing. The kind of multiverse that is being used in Hollywood is more like
the philosophical idea of the set of all possible worlds. It's clear why this would
be so interesting to people

because we've all made decisions. We've all wondered what life would be like if they were a little bit different: if an election had gone a different way, if our team had won a different way, if we had not gotten hurt, if we had asked that
person out for a date-

and this sort of makes us think, well, maybe we're in the wrong universe, we're in the wrong timeline. There's another world out there, that's the one I wanna be in. Now science comes along - physics, my own field -

and says, "You know, it's possible, there literally are other
universes out there, places where things are different." But there's different ways in which science can lead us
to the idea of a multiverse. I'm Sean Carroll, I'm
a theoretical physicist

and philosopher at Johns
Hopkins University, and I'm the author of "The Biggest Ideas in the
Universe: Space, Time and Motion." I think it's really important
when we're thinking about physicists' versions of
the multiverse to realize

physicists never start out by saying, "Hey, wouldn't it be cool
if there were a multiverse?" It is always the place they're dragged to kicking and screaming because they're trying to
explain what we do observe.

You know, a big criticism
of multiverse ideas is that you can't observe the multiverse, you can't falsify it,
you can't test it, etc. But what you can do is
observe what happens in ours. And what you want to do as a scientist

is come up with a theory—which is kind of a story—a theory that accounts for what we see, for the data that we can have access to. And some theories, some very, very simple, very
easy to write down theories,

like the inflationary theory of cosmology or the many-worlds theory
of quantum mechanics, they both explain what
we see in our universe, and unambiguously predict the
existence of other universes. In cosmology, which is
maybe the most famous one

up until recently, there's
literally just parts of our universe that are so far away, where conditions can
be radically different. They can either be kind of like us, but with different details or even different laws of physics, different particles and
forces, and the whole shebang.

There's an entirely different conception called 'The Many Worlds
of Quantum Mechanics,' which is both in some sense more realistic and easier to bring into reality,
but also more mind-blowing. It just says whenever you have
a quantum mechanical system

which, spoiler alert, all
systems are quantum mechanical at heart, but whenever you
measure it in a particular way, you can get different
possible measurement outcomes. This is something we've
understood for 100 years now. The question is:

What happens to the alternative
measurement outcomes that you didn't observe? So if you have a particle,
an elementary particle like an electron, and you're
gonna observe its location or its spin or something like that, the equations will tell you

that certain outcomes are possible, certain outcomes are not. An electron is never
gonna turn into a proton. They have different
electrical charges that will literally never happen. But
the electron could be spinning either clockwise or counterclockwise,

and the Many-Worlds version
of quantum mechanics says both of those will generically come
true in different universes. So this is literally a parallel universe. This isn't someplace very, very far away. This is a simultaneously existing
reality where the outcome

of a quantum mechanical
experiment turned out differently to ours - and
if big noticeable things in the world depend on the
outcome of that experiment, you could wind up in a very
different looking universe. Human beings love to put themselves at the center of every story,

So when you start talking about the multiverse and different ways things could have gone, they instantly start thinking, "Oh, if I had made a different decision, things would've turned out differently." And that's fine if you're just being philosophical

and thinking about the space of all possible ways the world could have gone. But if you're thinking like a physicist, you solve the equations. It has literally nothing to do with human beings making decisions. If you think about the cosmological multiverse,

the other universes are literally billions of light years away. They have nothing to do with you and your choices throughout the day. The quantum mechanics multiverse is a little bit of a different story because it does happen sort of everywhere. There's things going on that create two parallel realities,

but the things that are going on are not human beings making decisions. There's subatomic particles being measured in some quantum mechanical way. If anything, it's the quantum measurements that force you to make a decision, not your decisions forcing different universes to come into existence.

After all, you are a body made of a whole bunch of quantum mechanical particles, electrons and protons and neutrons. If you choose to describe yourself that way, there are different versions of you branching the universe.

So then you have to ask, "Well, if I could have seen the electrons spinning clockwise or counterclockwise, and I saw it spinning counterclockwise, what is my relationship to the person who saw it spinning clockwise?"

Are they me just in a different universe or are they a separate person?" I think the clear answer here is there's a relationship, but they're a different person. It's very much like identical twins - you have one fertilized egg that's at one point in time

a single cell that is one entity there in the universe, but it splits into two different people. I think that's how we should think about different versions of ourselves in the multiverse. They might share a past, but once they've diverged,

once they're in a universe of their own, they're now separate people. It's not weird or impossible to contemplate, it's just a slightly more sophisticated version of our notion of personal identity updated for the multiverse.

I absolutely believe we can imagine thinking about the multiverse as a useful psychological tool or a personal tool, right? Visualization exercises have been part of psychology for a long time, and so when we physically imagine ourselves embodied in different sets of circumstances,

we think about that possibility differently - and the multiverse is sort of a nudge in that direction, and maybe, you can argue, that technology these days is making that more possible. We see other lives in a more vivid way

than maybe we used to with virtual realities, with alternate ways of thinking about ourselves, augmented reality, just wearing a headset in the world that we're in. Apparently, there's a whole genre of 'Zillow porn,' which is not actually pornography,

It's just getting kicks out of looking at houses you can't afford on Zillow, and imagining what it would be like to live there. We're sort of peeking into alternate realities that didn't come true. These could be both positive

and negative psychological tools. We use them in the right way by imagining the way things could have gone better and then saying, "Okay, what do I need to do to increase the chances that next time it actually will go better?"

But it's psychologically not healthy to push that too far because there are some decisions we can't undo. This is why we talked about the serenity prayer, right, the ability to recognize what we can change, what we can't,

and accept the things that we can't as well as to be able to tell the difference. You can imagine in a multiverse, having made all sorts of different decisions, but in fact, there's no such thing as time travel in the real world.

You cannot actually go back and remake the decisions differently. It's fine to imagine all sorts of possibilities, but at the end of the day, we have to live and affect the universe that we're in. I like to think—maybe I'm being a physicist here

more than a human being—but I like to think that by contemplating all of these different possibilities—past, present, and future—we can put things in perspective. We can think about how, "Yeah, there was that moment when things went terribly wrong.

Either maybe I did something wrong, or there was an unforeseen event that I couldn't have controlled. But you know what? The causal influence I have on the world only extends toward the future. The choices I can make right now will have an impact

that I will feel down the road, but I cannot make a choice right now that undoes what happened in the past. I think this is a truth about physics and cosmology and the world, and psychologically, it's a very important principle to keep in mind.

The Multiverse is real. Just not in the way you think it is. | Sean Carroll

Big Think is the leading source of expert-driven, actionable, educational content -- with thousands of videos, featuring experts ranging from Bill Clinton to Bill Nye, we help you get smarter, faster. Get actionable lessons from the world’s greatest thinkers & doers. Our experts are either disrupting or leading their respective fields. We aim to help you explore the big ideas and core skills that define knowledge in the 21st century, so you can apply them to the questions and challenges in your own life. Other Frequent contributors include Michio Kaku & Neil DeGrasse Tyson.

Head to bigthink.com for a multitude of articles just as informative and satisfying as our videos. New articles posted daily on a range of intellectual topics. ​Join Big Think+ to gain access to an immense library of content. It features insight from many of the most celebrated and intelligent individuals in the world today.

   - Subscribe for daily videos.
   - Business inquiries and fan suggestions welcome.

Big Think

대중 문화와 물리학의 다중 우주

멀티버스는 마블 영화나 '릭 앤 모티' 같은 프로그램에서 볼 수 있듯이 대중 문화에서 널리 사용되는 주제입니다.

할리우드의 다중 우주에 대한 묘사는 과학적 해석과 다릅니다.

할리우드의 멀티버스는 가능한 모든 세계에 대한 철학적 개념과 일치합니다.

이는 대안적인 삶의 선택에 대해 고민하는 사람들의 공감을 불러일으킵니다.

물리학은 다른 우주의 가능성을 시사합니다.

물리학자들은 다중 우주라는 아이디어에 의해 움직이는 것이 아니라 관찰을 설명하는 과정에서 생겨납니다.

다중 우주는 직접 관측하거나 실험할 수는 없지만 일부 이론에 의해 그 존재가 예측되고 있습니다.

목표는 관찰된 데이터를 설명하는 이론을 만드는 것입니다.

인플레이션 우주론과 다중 세계 양자역학 같은 이론은 다른 우주를 예측합니다.

우주론은 서로 다른 조건이나 물리 법칙을 가진 우주의 먼 부분을 제시합니다.

이 이론은 모든 시스템이 양자역학적이라고 가정합니다.

양자역학에서 측정 결과에 따라 다른 우주가 만들어집니다.

다중 세계 해석은 대체 측정 결과를 다른 우주에 존재하는 것으로 설명합니다.

이러한 평행 우주는 멀리 떨어져 있는 것이 아니라 동시에 존재합니다.

사람들은 개인적인 선택과 연관시켜 여러 우주에 대한 토론에서 자신을 중심에 두는 경향이 있습니다.

우주론적 다중 우주에서 다른 우주는 멀리 떨어져 있으며 개인의 선택과 무관합니다.

양자역학의 다중 우주는 인간의 결정이 아닌 아원자 입자 측정에서 비롯되는 것이므로 다릅니다.

인간의 결정이 아닌 양자 측정은 평행 현실을 만들어냅니다.

화자는 다중 우주에 존재하는 여러 버전의 자신 사이의 관계에 대해 질문합니다.

일란성 쌍둥이의 비유는 분리되어 있지만 서로 연관된 자아의 개념을 설명하는 데 사용됩니다.

다중 우주에 존재하는 여러 버전의 나 자신은 과거를 공유하지만 갈라진 후에는 별개의 개인이 됩니다.

이 개념은 다중 우주 맥락에서 개인의 정체성에 대한 세련된 이해로 제시됩니다.

멀티버스는 시각화 및 가능성을 고민하는 데 유용한 심리적 도구가 될 수 있습니다.

가상 현실 및 증강 현실과 같은 기술은 대체 현실을 상상하는 경험을 향상시킵니다.

'Zillow 포르노'는 대체 현실을 탐색하는 예로 사용됩니다.

더 나은 결과를 상상하는 것은 긍정적일 수 있지만, 바꿀 수 없는 결정에 집착하는 것은 건강에 해롭습니다.

바꿀 수 없는 것을 받아들이는 것의 중요성이 강조됩니다.