Sure, but when you hold Christ up as a particular figure, the only information that I have about Jesus comes from the Bible. And rather than going through all of it again, because there's lots of people's questions, if you go to ironchariots.org, you will find a verse-by-verse deconstruction of The Sermon on the Mount, where I point out that Jesus gave some good advice, some crappy advice, and some questionable advice. And that's not enough. And there's not a secular humanist organization or country on the planet that has ever produced, as a

good thing, an intentional good thing, rapists and murderers. So, well, that's that's highly debatable. That's highly debatable. One of the things absolutely true, because there's never been a secular humanist government on the planet, I don't know, I think the Soviets were pretty

secular then with all with all due apologies, you do not know the first thing about what secular humanism is. You should read the secular humanist manifestos because what happened in Russia in communist countries was an institution of a religious-like structure, surrounded around centered

around an individual and forced atheism. None of which is consistent with humanism, none of it. And and we can talk about this later, and I'd be happy to point you to this because you can say that it was an atheist thing, um, that went awry, but you can't call it

secular humanism. It it's just not there. There's no humanism in what was done there. But

Matt Dillahunty EXPLODES on Jordan Peterson

Pangburn

예수를 도덕적 모범으로 삼는 것에 대한 비판과 철의 전차 웹사이트 소개

발표자의 예수님에 대한 지식은 전적으로 성경에서 비롯됩니다.

산상수훈에 대한 구절별 분석은 ironchariots.org를 참조하세요.

예수의 조언은 좋은 것, 나쁜 것, 의심스러운 것으로 분류됩니다.

세속적 인본주의와 부정적인 역사적 사건과의 연관성에 대한 논쟁

세속적 인본주의가 강간범과 살인자를 양산한다는 주장에 의문을 제기합니다.

소련의 사례는 세속적 휴머니즘을 대표하지 않는다는 도전을 받습니다.

소비에트 체제는 무신론을 강요하는 종교와 같은 구조로 묘사됩니다.

무신론과 세속적 인본주의를 구분합니다.

소비에트 체제에서 휴머니즘의 부재에 대한 강조