MacBook Pro 비교: M1, M2 및 M3 성능 평가

### M1, M2, M3 Pro MacBook Pro 비교: 가격, 성능 및 권장 사항
* 💰 기본 모델인 14인치 M3 Pro MacBook Pro의 가격은 Apple 신품 기준 **$1999**입니다. 리퍼브 M1 또는 M2 버전은 원하는 구성의 재고가 있는 경우 Apple에서 구입하거나 Best Buy와 같은 다른 스토어에서 구입할 수 있습니다. 기본 모델의 중고 가격은 **M1 Pro의 경우 약 $1100-$1300**, **M2 Pro의 경우 약 $1400-$1600**입니다.
* 🧠 웹 브라우징, 이메일, 멀티태스킹과 같은 일상적인 사용 시나리오에서는 **M1, M2, M3 Pro 모델 간에 눈에 띄는 차이가 거의 없습니다.** 이러한 작업의 경우 **세 모델 모두 비슷한 성능**을 발휘합니다.
* 🎮 게임의 경우, 현재 Mac 게임은 **M3 Pro의 새로운 레이 트레이싱 기술**을 지원하지 않습니다. 따라서 **M3 Pro의 게임 성능은 경우에 따라 M2 Pro와 동등하거나 약간 떨어지는 경우**도 있습니다.
* 🖥 널리 사용되는 3D 워크플로우에서 **M3 Pro는 M1 및 M2 Pro 모델보다 훨씬 뛰어난 성능**을 발휘합니다. 이는 **Blender와 같은 앱에서 지원되는 M3 Pro의 새로운 하드웨어 가속 레이 트레이싱 기술** 덕분입니다.
* 🔋 M3 Pro는 **M2 Pro에 비해 약간 더 시원하게 작동**하고 **배터리 수명이 약간 더 긴, 보다 효율적인 플랫폼**으로 설계되었습니다. 하지만 배터리 수명의 차이는 일반적으로 **집중적인 작업 중에만 눈에 띄게 나타남**니다.
* 🛒 **M3 Pro는 예산 제약 없이 최신의 최고급 모델**을 원하는 사용자나 레이 트레이싱의 이점이 있는 3D 작업이 포함된 워크플로우를 사용하는 사용자에게 적합합니다. 대부분의 사용자에게는 **M2 Pro가 더 저렴한 가격으로 대부분의 영역에서 M3 Pro와 비슷한 성능**을 발휘하므로 최고의 가치를 제공합니다.
* 🚀 새로운 M3 Pro 가격의 거의 50% 수준으로 제공되는 **M1 Pro는 경쟁력 있는 성능**을 제공합니다. M2 또는 M3 Pro 모델의 추가 기능 및 성능 향상이 필요하지 않은 사용자에게 적합한 선택입니다.

이 비교 동영상에서는 M1, M2, M3 Pro MacBook Pro의 물리적, 성능 및 가격 차이를 강조하여 살펴봅니다.

if you're looking to pick up either an M1, M2, or M3 Pro MacBook Pro, it's really easy to make a very expensive mistake. Should you get the latest and greatest, or maybe just an older version to save some money? And if you do, how does it compare performance-wise? So, I made this video to hopefully make the decision a little bit easier for you and potentially even save you a couple of hundred. And yes, I bought all of these Macs with my own money. This is not sponsored. And yes, I do need help, or at least a cheap hobby. So let's start with the easiest part of this video, which is the physical differences, or rather the lack of. I mean, they're all the same dimensions, same weight, same ports. Even the screen is the same, although the M3 Pro screen can get 20% brighter, which might be important if you use your MacBook in really bright environments like outside. Even when I pop off the back cover and look at the internals, the cooling solution and fan

setup is almost identical. This is because the biggest difference are on the inside starting with how you can configure each MacBook. Now bear in mind, only the latest M3 Pro MacBook can be customized. Apple no longer sells the M1 or M2 Pro brand new, so if you want any customizations, you'll need to find one with the exact specs you want. Now, in my opinion, this is a pretty big negative right because there are quite a few customizations possible. Now, in this particular video, I am comparing the base model Pro chips with no upgrades. Here's a comparison chart showing you some of the differences. The configuration of the base models in this video on the left, and the number in brackets on the right is the maximum possible configuration you can select. For the CPU, you'll notice the M3 Pro actually decreases the number of performance CES but increases the number of efficiency cores. The GPU is a similar story. There's two less GPU cores on the M3 Pro base model compared to the previous M2 Pro generation. So right off

the bat. It almost seems like the M3 Pro is almost a downgrade of sorts, at least in terms of the number of CPU and GPU cores. But you do get an extra 2 GB of unified memory, otherwise known as RAM, on the M3 Pro. And in terms of SSD speed on the base model 512 GB variants, the M2 Pro is noticeably slower, but more on that in this video linked down below. Moving on, all of these chips have the same media engines, with the exception of the M3 Pro, which also has something called AV1 decode, which is great for conserving battery life while streaming video. The M3 Pro also has a number of GPU-specific upgrades like hardware accelerator ray tracing, mesh shading, and dynamic caching, but more on that later. But perhaps one of the biggest differences between these chips is the memory bandwidth. Now, we already know that Apple silicon chips take advantage of something called unified memory; that is, all the RAM can be accessed by the CPU, the GPU, and any programs currently running on the Mac where memory.

bandwidth comes in is how fast this Ram can be accessed. Both the M1 and M2 Pro chips have a memory bandwidth of 200 GB per second versus 150 GB per second on the M3 Pro, which is 25% slower. So why is this important? Well, think of it like a highway of sorts. The M1 and M2 Pro chips both have four lanes for traffic to use, for example, but the M3 Pro only has three lanes. Doesn't make a difference when there's not much traffic, but in peak hour, AKA when you're pushing the system to its limit, that may not be the case. And we'll see how this impacts the performance of these chips a little bit later on. First, let's talk about pricing. The base model 14in M3 Pro MacBook Pro I have here is $19.99 brand new from Apple. If you want the previous M2 or M1 versions, you can buy them refurbished from Apple if they have the configuration you want in stock. And it's the same with some other stores like

Best Buy, for example, I found this base model M1 Pro MacBook Pro for $439. Otherwise, you're going to have to buy on the secondhand market. So I spent a few hours researching used prices, and I found base model M1 Pro MacBooks from around $1100 to $1300 versus the M2 Pro from roughly $1400 to $1600, and that's in us. Okay, so let's get into the performance differences between these three chips, starting with just general everyday usage stuff like web browsing, emails, and multitasking. You are not going to be able to tell a difference between any of these machines. I mean flicking between different apps is smooth. I can have five or six different apps open at once with no beach ball of death or freezing. Even more intense multitasking like rendering a blend animation while browsing the web with 20 plus Google Chrome tabs open, no difference. So if this is what you do, you know, 90 or 95% of the time on these machines, and you're not really doing

anything super intensive, or if you do it's every now and then. Honestly, if you had them all side by side, honestly, I'm telling you now, you really will not notice a difference between all three of them. And speaking of multitasking, if you work in IT or maybe you own a business that has tons of devices to manage, you might be interested in the sponsor for this section of the video, Pulseway. Pulseway is the ultimate IT management solution designed to help you be efficient and flexible. With Pulseway software, you can monitor workstations, servers, virtual machines, network devices, and more, all from a central platform. Pulseway is also easy to set up thanks to its intuitive interface, autodiscovery engine, and out-of-the-box scripts. You can monitor in real time either on your desktop or on the go via the full-featured mobile app. So, in case something requires your immediate attention, you'll be notified and can fix problems from your phone or tablet. In addition, Pulseway can also handle repetitive tasks. You can automate

it processes define workflows ensure patches are applied, and more. Join over 13,000 businesses in 80 plus countries who remotely manage their IT with Pulseway. So click the link in the description below for a free trial and gain ultimate control over your IT infrastructure today. Okay, so now it's time to look at some more intensive tasks and see how performance differs between these three chips. Let's start with the CPU. Again, these are all base model configurations with no upgrades, and I'm going to make a bold claim here and say there's realistically not a huge amount of difference. Sure, the M3 Pro is clearly the superior CPU, especially when it comes to anything multi-core related, being 34% faster than the M1 Pro and 15% faster than the M2 Pro, but that doesn't always translate into real-life workflows. If you're a programmer compiling code, for example, it means a few minutes difference between a 3-year-old secondhand M1 Pro and a brand new M3 Pro. Is that really a massive difference? It's

a similar story with creative workflows on the Adobe apps. You're going to notice a decent improvement between generations, but while actually using these apps and doing everyday things like timeline scrubbing or adding 3D effects, the improvements aren't going to be super obvious. Moving on to video editing, you're going to spend 95% of your time playing back footage or scrubbing timelines, and I couldn't tell a difference between either version, even with fairly demanding multicam timelines with color correction or clips with heavy noise reduction applied. For example, it's the same when it comes to rendering or applying effects like stabilization to a 120 FPS 4K clip. And there is a really simple explanation for this. It's because all three chips have the same hardware video encoders and decoders, so as long as you're using one of the supported codecs, which is the case 95% of the time, video editing performance difference between the three chips will be minimal. However, if you choose to use a non-supported video codec.

the M1 Pro does start to fall behind the M2 and M3 Pro chips due to its less powerful GPU, so that's something to consider. Moving on to some popular 3D workflows, it is not a competition here at all. There are significant improvements between each generation. The M3 Pro, in particular, destroys the others because not only does it have the new hardware-accelerated ray tracing technology among other GPU improvements which the others do not, but this ray tracing technology is also supported in these apps, specifically Blender, which gained ray tracing capability in the latest 4.0 version. Now remember, there are still a lot of apps that do not support Apple silicon ray tracing, so if that's the case, you're going to be looking at results like this, still pretty good, but you know ray tracing definitely does add a big advantage. And that brings me to my next point, which is gaming. At the time of recording this video, Mac games do not support this new Ray Tracing Tech, so we get quite strange results like this. The M1 Pro is clearly

the weakest performer, although not by a huge margin. But the gaming performance of the M3 Pro is pretty much equal to the chip it's supposed to replace, the M2 Pro, in some areas, even being outperformed by it. And yes, this includes games specifically designed for Apple silicon like Resident Evil Village. And I think this is a good time to explain why the performance of the M3 Pro kind of seems a little bit lackluster compared to the previous generation, the M2 Pro, at least in a few specific areas like I mentioned before. Apple kind of handicapped the M3 Pro. It has less CPU performance cores, it comes with less GPU cores, and the memory bandwidth is 25% slower. And I can only think of two reasons why Apple would do this. Number one, intentionally making the Pro chip less powerful to make the upgrade or the Max variant chip seem like a better choice, which, you know, means more profit for Apple. Or number two, to make the M3 Pro a more efficient platform. Or who knows, maybe it's just a combination of

the two, but a more efficient platform does come with quite a few advantages. Firstly, I noticed the M3 Pro would run a few degrees cooler than the M2 Pro, but this was only noticeable when I was slamming each laptop with a really intensive task. Also, the M3 Pro seems to have slightly better battery life. I would usually get about 10 to 15% more battery left on the M3 Pro compared to the M2 Pro, uh, but only mainly when doing intensive tasks like compiling code or gaming, for example. But controversial opinion, uh, I don't really care about an extra 10 to 15% battery life because when I'm doing those intensive things, it's almost always at a desk, and there's a charger right there. So, you know, 10 to 15% is it going to be a deal breaker. I personally don't think so, especially because if you're just browsing the web or typing up emails and stuff like that, uh, you are pretty much going to notice no real difference. And bear in mind

almost all M2 and M1 Pros out there are at least 6 to 12 months old at this point, if not older, so the battery is going to be slightly consumed. So it's not a 100% fair comparison. So which one should you buy? Well, it depends. I'm only joking. I will give you some specific advice. The M3 Pro only really makes sense if budget is not really an issue and you just want the latest and greatest, and of course all the nice things that come with it like warranty and being able to customize it via the Apple Store. Duh, obviously. But if your workflow is also 3D based and you use apps like Blender, for example, uh, that's really the only area where you're going to see a significant improvement with the M3 Pro. And that's mainly because of the new Ray tracing tech. For everyone else, I just don't think you can beat the M2 Pro. I mean it's cheaper, uh, performance-wise it keeps up with the M3 Pro in almost every single area.

mean if you're a programmer, the M2 Pro is just as good. Do you use the Adobe suite? Sure, the M3 Pro gets a nice boost, but not by a huge amount. Video editing, you won't notice a difference. And of course, I can't forget the M1 Pro. This is kind of the MacBook that started it all, at least in terms of higher-performing Apple silicon MacBooks, right? And this bad boy right now, you can get it for almost 50% the price of a brand new M3 Pro. And if you look at those performance charts that I put in this video, the performance is definitely not 50% worse than the M3 Pro, the exception being, of course, if you do a lot of 3D stuff like Blender or Cinema 4D, for example, you just cannot beat that built-in hardware-accelerated ray tracing on the M3 Pro. Now, if you are deciding between if you should go for a Pro chip or a Max chip, you should definitely check out this video I made comparing all three of the

max chips the M1, the M2, and the M3. Max, I did all the exact same tests as this video so you can compare if you should maybe save some money and go with the pro or spend a bit extra and get a pretty decent performance boost with the max chip.

M1 Pro vs M2 Pro vs M3 Pro MacBook - ULTIMATE Comparison!

Created Tech

M1, M2, M3 Pro MacBook Pro 모델 비교하기

M1, M2, M3 Pro MacBook은 크기, 무게, 포트 및 화면이 비슷하여 물리적 차이는 미미하지만 M3 Pro가 20% 더 밝은 화면을 제공합니다.

M3 Pro는 더 이상 새 제품으로 판매되지 않는 M1 및 M2 Pro와 달리 사용자 지정이 가능하지만, M3 Pro의 기본 모델에는 2GB 더 많은 RAM을 제공하지만 CPU 및 GPU 코어 수는 더 적습니다.

또한 M3 Pro는 미디어 엔진, GPU별 기능 및 메모리 대역폭 측면에서 업그레이드된 기능을 제공합니다.

맥북 프로용 M1, M2 프로, M3 프로 칩 비교

M1 및 M2 Pro 칩의 메모리 대역폭은 초당 200GB인 반면, M3 Pro는 초당 150GB로 25% 더 적습니다.

메모리 대역폭의 차이는 M1 및 M2 Pro의 경우 4 차선, M3 Pro의 경우 3 차선의 트래픽이 있는 것과 같으며, 사용량이 많을 때 그 차이가 크게 나타납니다.

기본 모델인 M3 Pro MacBook Pro의 가격은 $1999이며, M1 및 M2 Pro 버전은 리퍼비시 또는 중고 시장에서 더 저렴한 가격으로 구입할 수 있으며, M1이 가장 저렴한 옵션입니다.

다양한 칩이 성능에 미치는 영향

멀티코어 작업에서는 M3 Pro가 M1 Pro 및 M2 Pro보다 성능이 뛰어나지만 프로그래밍 및 Adobe 앱 사용과 같은 활동에서는 실제 차이가 크지 않을 수 있습니다.

비디오 편집 성능도 지원되지 않는 비디오 코덱을 사용할 때를 제외하고는 세 칩 모두 비슷하며, M1 Pro가 뒤처집니다.

그러나 M3 Pro는 3D 워크플로우, 특히 Blender와 같은 앱에서 지원되는 새로운 하드웨어 가속 레이 트레이싱 기술을 통해 상당한 개선을 보여줍니다.

M2 프로와 비교한 M3 프로의 성능

M3 Pro의 게임 성능은 CPU 코어, GPU 코어 및 메모리 대역폭에서 Apple의 핸디캡으로 인해 M2 Pro와 비슷하거나 오히려 더 떨어집니다.

M3 Pro는 배터리 수명이 약간 더 길고 집중적인 작업 시에는 더 시원하게 작동하지만 대부분의 사용자에게는 큰 이점이 아닐 수 있습니다.

예산이 문제가 되지 않고 새로운 레이 트레이싱 기술이 적용된 3D 성능이 우선시되지 않는다면, 비슷한 성능과 저렴한 가격의 M2 Pro가 대부분의 사용자에게 더 나은 선택입니다.

Apple 실리콘 맥북 비교: M1 Pro, M2 Pro, M3 Pro

M2 Pro는 M3 Pro와 비슷한 성능으로 프로그래머와 Adobe Suite 사용자에게 적합한 옵션입니다.

M1 Pro는 M3 Pro의 거의 50% 가격으로 우수한 성능을 제공하므로 비용 효율적인 선택이 될 수 있습니다.

M3 Pro는 하드웨어 가속 레이 트레이싱이 내장되어 있어 3D 작업에 탁월하며 Blender 또는 Cinema 4D와 같은 작업에서 상당한 성능 향상을 제공합니다.