돌로레스 캐논: 회귀에 대한 진실과 믿음 분석하기

### 영적 텍스트의 불완전성: 돌로레스 캐논의 작품에 대한 비판적 시각
* 📚 돌로레스 캐논은 **요한을 제자들 사이에서 모임과 숙소를 주선하는 핵심 조직자**로 묘사하며, **형과 함께 그 역할**을 수행했다고 밝혔습니다.
* 🤔 그는 **캐논의 글의 많은 측면**을 높이 평가하지만, 개인적인 관점을 통해 필터링되어 부정확할 가능성이 있다고 강조합니다.
* 💬 그는 특히 에센 사람들에 대한 그녀의 묘사에 동의하지 않으며, **역사적 증거가 여호수아와의 관계에 대한 그녀의 주장과 모순**된다고 주장합니다.
* 🔍 그는 영적 경험을 검증하는 데 있어 **경험적 증거와 다양한 관점의 중요성**을 강조하며, 캐논의 방법이 연구 결과에 한계가 있었을 수 있다고 지적합니다.
* 🔄 그의 회귀 경험은 다른 최면 치료사에 의해 형성되었는데, 그는 **캐논의 접근 방식에서 그가 인식하는 것과는 대조적으로 개방형 질문**을 사용하여 그를 이끌지 않았습니다.
* 🧠 그는 어떤 영적 텍스트도 무오류한 것으로 받아들이지 말라고 경고하며, **개인이 스스로 진리를 찾고 모든 정보는 개인적인 해석의 대상**이 될 수 있음을 인식하도록 권장합니다.
* 🌍 그는 시청자들에게 이러한 주제에 참여하고 생각을 공유하여 **영적 신념과 관습을 비판적으로 검토하는 커뮤니티**를 육성할 것을 촉구하며 글을 마무리합니다.

존은 주최자이지만 어떤 신념도 절대적인 진리로 받아들이지 말라고 경고했습니다.

Okay, here's the video that a lot of people have been curious about, and uh, I figure it's time to finally do it. In her book, Dolores Cannon said that John was the disciple who would usually organize things, going ahead of the group and making sure some rooms were

available and needs were taken care of. A PR person if you will. Do you recall taking on this, these tasks? Um, now I've said on several other videos that I was the one who would go to the, me and my brother, who actually would go forward and set up rooms and

set up and find uh, housing and lodging, and and set up meetings and find the people who wanted to hear his message. So, yes, but there's a bigger, par, bigger thing in this video that I want to address, and that is Dolores Cannon. [Music]

Dolores Cannon is an interesting and interesting author to me. Many people think that everything that she wrote is perfect and and absolute factual truth, but just like every other text, every other new age dogma, everything that she wrote about came through Dolores Cannon's filter.

And and in coming through Dolores Cannon's filter, it has the imperfections of Dolores Cannon. As in anything that comes from me, as the imperfections of John. Um, I I have read almost everything she's written because I'm fascinated by it. I think

it's very interesting. There's there's things in her books that I 100% agree with, including this one of going ahead and and setting things up and doing all that. I totally agree with that. Her whole thing about the Essenes, I completely disagree with.

because she her writings talk about you know that was that was the encampment that was where Joshua did his stuff that was all this stuff and she really lays it out as if Joshua was in the scene and Joshua was not in the scene I

remember very clearly avoiding the scenes because they were zealots they were the ones who wanted to start a war and in fact if you look historically the first armed conflict with Rome was led by John the Essene and so when I see her her writings

I go okay so that doesn't ring true for me at all and then people want to argue well that's what she said because she must be infallible well it's just creating a new dogma just like people think the Bible's infallible

whether the Quran's infallible or you know the Bhagavad-Gita is infallible and it's just new it's just a new age religion now it's becoming a new age religion and it's very interesting because when you

break out of the spirituality aspects of it you go into the scientific side of it the empirical evidence is dependent on multiple points of view so in other words the same evidence has to be found from multiple sources um and usually what that is is different scientists

doing those things um and so the learners kind of have real strict belief that her she would only work with people that she was the only person who progressed them and how do I know this because I asked her to regress me and she turned me down because I had

already been regressed so she was working within this construct of only her information, she was not bringing in anything else to verify or corroborate it. It was it was her own funnel. Now any any good, uh, not to say she wasn't good, but any good

hypnotherapist will tell you that it's better to have multiple hypnotherapists because of the fact that a hypnotherapist can in fact, through just the inflection of words, can put in a belief, can put in their personal beliefs into a

regression. That's why I specifically went and and searched out the people, the people who regressed me because I wanted someone who was certified, someone who was who was knowledgeable in lots of things and wasn't destined or or predisposed to one, so

and when you hear my regression, it's it's it's interesting because she very much is like leading me places without leading me, if that if I mean, she's not giving me things to think or say, you know, what what do you see? She's asking these

questions that are completely open-ended so that the experience is my own, not someone else's. And I I think after hearing her first few regressions, I think that Dolores herself ended up getting some specific beliefs that ended up becoming infused into later regressions.

And I think I really do believe that that the that she was very well intentioned and very really [Music] um, you're trying to do good work, but I just think that her method was flawed, um, because empirical evidence depends on different studies, multiple studies.

and it's the same with regressions that truth depends on multiple regressions from multiple people to verify its authenticity and to specifically filter out the uh beliefs of other regressionists so that's really kind of um my thought on this but

did he did John go ahead go ahead I remember this we would come to we would we would travel together we would come to the outskirts of a town we'd camp on the outskirts of the town John and James would go into the town would set up

housing food meetings healing sessions and when I say healing sessions I mean places where people come and take their faith and heal themselves and so yeah John was the PR guy just like Dolores Cannon said but I I don't think you should take anybody

at their word I think you should only go by what you feel is true and if what I'm saying doesn't feel true to you that is your reality that is your truth follow your truth not anybody else's truth and and realize that every piece of information you read has

been filtered through somebody's physical world mind and that you need to come to your own belief systems about the the things they're saying rather than taking everything as uh infallible fact so that's my thought on on that you guys have a great day and I'll talk to you

soon see you bye thank you my friends for watching this video if you enjoyed it please make sure that you've subscribed and you like it you share it but also comment below it let's get this community talking about these topics and and spreading this information out far and wide so we can

Change the world for the better. Thank you.

The Legacy of Dolores Cannon: My Thoughts

John of New

예수 사역에서 요한의 역할과 돌로레스 캐논의 기록

주제 소개와 John의 조직 내 역할에 대한 Dolores Cannon의 주장에 대해 설명합니다.

예수님의 사역을 위해 물류를 조직하는 데 있어 자신의 역할에 대한 연사의 개인적인 이야기입니다.

주요 초점으로 전환: 돌로레스 캐논의 작품에 대한 비판적 분석.

돌로레스 캐논의 글에 대한 비평

캐논의 인기를 인정하지만 그녀의 글의 주관적인 성격을 강조합니다.

캐논의 작업에 대한 발표자의 개인적인 경험, 특정 사항에 대한 동의와 반대.

캐논의 에센인 묘사 및 여호수아의 개입에 대한 강한 불만.

에센과 무력 충돌에 대한 캐논의 주장에 대한 역사적 반론이 있습니다.

캐논의 작품을 다른 종교 텍스트와 비교하며 무오류로 취급하는 경향에 대한 비판.

검증을 위한 경험적 증거와 다양한 관점의 중요성.

캐논의 방법론과 한계에 대해 논의합니다.

이전 회귀 경험으로 인해 캐논이 화자의 회귀를 거부한 개인적인 일화입니다.

편향되지 않은 회귀를 위해 여러 최면 치료사의 중요성.

최면 치료사의 신념이 회귀 결과에 미치는 잠재적 영향.

자격을 갖추고 편견 없는 최면 치료사를 찾기 위한 연사의 접근 방식입니다.

발표자의 회귀 경험과 개방형 질문의 중요성에 대해 설명합니다.

캐논의 신념이 이후 회귀에 영향을 미쳤다고 제안합니다.

결론 및 개인적 진실에 대한 요청

검증을 위한 여러 연구와 회귀 분석의 중요성을 다시 한 번 강조합니다.

돌로레스 캐논의 작품에 대한 연사의 관점을 요약합니다.

사역에서 존의 물류 역할이 캐논의 설명과 일치한다는 것을 확인했습니다.

개인적인 분별력과 자신의 진실을 따르는 것을 강조합니다.

정보를 비판적으로 평가하고 개인적인 신념 체계를 개발하도록 장려합니다.

동영상 구독, 좋아요, 공유, 댓글 달기를 요청합니다.

마무리 발언 및 시청자 여러분께 감사의 인사를 전합니다.