김건희 명품 가방 사건: 무혐의 처분

검찰의 김건희 씨에 대한 기소 취하 결정은 특혜 의혹과 책임감 결여에 대한 분노를 불러일으켰습니다.

### 김건희 명품 가방 사건: 논란과 비판 속 무혐의 처분
* ⚖ 김건희 씨와 관련된 명품 가방 사건에 대한 수사가 **무혐의 처분**으로 마무리되면서 사법 절차의 공정성에 대한 우려가 제기되고 있습니다.
* 📜 비판자들은 이 결론이 **청와대의 영향을 받았다고 주장**하며, 소극적인 수사가 미리 정해진 결과로 이어졌다는 비난을 제기하고 있습니다.
* 🎁 검찰이 제시한 증거에는 **최재용 목사로부터 500만 원이 넘는 금품과 직무와 관련된 청탁**이 포함돼 있지만, 검찰은 **직무와 관련이 없는 것으로 판단**했습니다.
* 🔍 이러한 조사 결과에도 불구하고 법률 전문가들은 **호의를 대가로 선물을 요청하는 것은 심각한 범죄**이므로 뇌물죄에 따라 기소할 수 있는 근거가 있다고 주장합니다.
* 📣 시민사회 단체는 검찰의 신뢰성과 동기에 의문을 제기하며 **이 사건에 대한 특별 수사**를 촉구하는 등 여론의 반발이 거세졌습니다.
* 📰 검찰의 이번 결정은 과거 정치적 편향성을 드러낸 사례와 유사해 **검찰이 독립적인 기관이 아니라 권력의 도구**로 기능한다는 주장으로 이어지고 있습니다.
* 👥 이러한 의혹이 제기되는 가운데, 과거 정치적 숙청을 연상시키는 **야당 인사들을 향한 수사**가 진행되면서 정치적 표적 수사에 대한 우려가 커지고 있습니다.
* 💬 현재 진행 중인 상황은 정의와 개혁에 대한 요구가 대중 사이에서 계속 울려 퍼지고 있는 가운데 **거버넌스의 책임성과 투명성에 대한 필요성**을 강조합니다.

The Kim Geon-hee luxury bag incident has concluded with no charges filed, and reactions indicate that even prosecutors cannot accept this behavior. In fact, one current prosecutor did not hesitate to voice a life-threatening criticism. It seems that this prosecutor made such statements because they believe they can withstand various pressures, including external influence. This is shocking.

Before we start the video, please subscribe and like. The investigation team of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office has reportedly concluded that there are no charges in the luxury bag case involving Mrs. Kim Geon-hee. Critics argue that this conclusion was reached after a passive investigation that seemed to follow the directives of the presidential office, ultimately leading to a predetermined outcome. The facts surrounding the luxury bag incident involving Mrs. Kim are considered clear by many. In June 2022, Pastor Choi Jae-yong delivered Chanel perfume and cosmetics worth 1.8 million won to Mrs. Kim. In July of the same year, he provided items worth 400,000 won.

I sent a one-won whiskey and a book passport, and in September, I gifted Kim a Dior 100 worth 3 million won. Pastor Choi, who proved that he provided over 5 million won in goods to Mrs. Kim, stated that before handing over the money, he made requests to Mrs. Kim for the burial of former Congressman Kim Chang-jun in the National Cemetery after his death, for a meeting with President Yoon Suk-yeol and his wife during the visit of the American Former Congressmen's Association, and for the retransmission of Unification TV. Earlier, Pastor Choi also requested to attend the state dinner at the Shilla Hotel commemorating President Yoon's inauguration in May 2022. However, the prosecution concluded that this exchange of money was not related to the president's duties and found no violation of the anti-bribery law. This conclusion mirrors the logic of the National Rights Commission's termination decision, which has drawn public criticism.

The prosecution, which has stronger investigative powers than the police, was able to more actively uncover and determine the job-relatedness of the money received by Mrs. Kim. This is the reason behind the legal community's suggestion that the specific crime of aggravated punishment law for soliciting bribes or violations of the Attorney-at-Law Act could apply to Mrs. Kim. Soliciting bribes refers to the act of facilitating matters related to a public servant's duties and receiving or promising money or benefits. The Attorney-at-Law Act punishes those who receive or promise money for soliciting or facilitating cases handled by public officials. However, the investigation team of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office concluded that even this could not be applied to Mrs. Kim, finding no charges and opting for a complete exemption. On this day, Pastor Choi stated in a press release that he had asked Congressman Kim Chang-jun to stabilize the national situation after his passing and requested the re-broadcasting of Unification TV. These details have been confirmed through KakaoTalk messages and audio recordings, indicating that this was a solicitation.

The prosecution has concluded that the gifts were a means to meet with the inspector as a sign of gratitude, which does not make sense to me. When giving gifts, there can be various meanings, including both a sincere gesture and a request. I do not understand how one could conclude that there was only one pure meaning behind the act of giving gifts. On the 22nd, Lee Chang-soo, the head of the Seoul Central District Prosecutor's Office, reported the investigation's conclusion to Prosecutor General Lee Won-seok. Although the Prosecutor General, who has emphasized strict handling, could convene the investigation review committee by his authority, it remains uncertain whether the conclusions could be overturned through the review. When the prosecution's decision of no charges was announced, there were voices of criticism in the legal community, openly suggesting that it was a form of favoritism. A prosecutor official stated that if President Yoon Seok-yeol had conducted the investigation, he would certainly have been charged with bribery or violations of the Attorney-at-Law Act. In the past, former President Park Geun-hye faced comprehensive...

A president who has been punished for bribery indicates that the relationship of reciprocity must be widely acknowledged. Following the same logic, the president's spouse can be identified as someone who can facilitate matters related to the president's duties, given their immense power. A lawyer who is a former judge stated that not only are there allegations of soliciting bribes or violating the lawyer's law, but if President Yoon was aware that Kim Yeo-jung received money and valuables, bribery charges could be applied. He also remarked that questioning whether solicitation took place in such cases is itself a peculiar matter. Lee Chang-min, chairman of the Lawyers' Association for a Democratic Society, pointed out that there are testimonies from the giver and footage of the bag being received, declaring that this case has been fully substantiated. He asserted that it has ended but has turned into a concealed case due to the prosecution's conclusion of no charges, resulting in a judicial decision not being made. Legal professionals are expected to take some action soon.

I only hope that we do not suffer from pressure. The criticism from civil society and the opposition is growing stronger day by day. The People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy stated that the prosecution no longer has a reason to exist. Now, Kim Geon-hee has said that a special investigation is necessary. Following the National Anti-Corruption Commission, which faced criticism over its interests, it has been reported that the prosecution has concluded that there is no wrongdoing in the case involving First Lady Kim Geon-hee's luxury bag. This adds further weight to the public opinion calling for a special investigation. Major media outlets reported on the 21st that the Seoul Central District Prosecutor's Office sent a report to the Supreme Prosecutor's Office, concluding that there was no wrongdoing in the luxury bag case involving Kim Geon-hee and six other individuals. The prosecution determined that the luxury items received by the First Lady from Pastor Choi Jae-yong were not related to President Yoon Seok-yeol's official duties, and thus there was no obligation to report it.

The spokesperson for the Democratic Party, Do Seung, stated during a briefing that although the political prosecution may issue a fraudulent exemption, the public can never forgive them. He pointed out that if the prosecution handles the luxury bag case without proper investigation, it will prove the necessity of a special investigation team by itself. 

The civic group Participatory Justice also issued a statement titled Isn't the prosecution, which has acted as a servant of power, ashamed? They criticized the prosecution's final conclusion of no charges against Kim Geon-hee, arguing that it only demonstrates the need for a special investigation. The group noted that considering the prosecution's consistent behavior of conducting investigations with a predetermined outcome, such as replacing the head of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office and conducting royal business trips, the conclusion of no charges against Kim Geon-hee was predictable. They emphasized that this conclusion did not deviate from the guidelines set by Kim Geon-hee and the presidential office.

I condemn the prosecution, which has once again shown itself to be a tool of power. In particular, this organization stated that the prosecution's handling of the case reported by the People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy, without even a minimal investigation and only concluding with a legal review, is no different from the National Rights Commission. They criticized the prosecution for voluntarily becoming a servant to power, denying its existence as an investigative agency, and collectively condemned both the Rights Commission and the prosecution. 

On June 10, the Rights Commission concluded the case involving First Lady Kim Geon-hee as non-indictable, led by figures close to President Yoon Seok-yeol, including Vice Chairman Jeong Seung-yoon, who is from the presidential campaign team. After the investigation officer from the Rights Commission passed away on the 8th, Vice Chairman Jeong expressed his condolences. The side of Pastor Choi Jae-young sent a statement to the media on that day, denying any relevance to the president's duties and stating that the prosecution's decision of non-indictment was completely incomprehensible.

He argued that there is no evidence, particularly stating that he believed the prosecution was a means to show gratitude. He pointed out that when giving gifts, there are various meanings involved, including both appreciation and requests. He questioned how one could conclude that there was only a single, pure meaning when giving a gift. What is even more frightening is what happened after the Kim Geon-hee case was concluded with no charges. He was worried about the possibility of external pressure on the prosecutors, but indirect external pressure has already begun. Jo Guk, the leader of the Innovation Party, announced that former National Assembly member Lee Sang-jik, who was appointed as the head of the Small and Medium Business Administration during the Moon Jae-in administration, was summoned by the prosecution, which is currently under investigation. This indicates that indiscriminate targeting of opposition figures is becoming a reality. On the 21st, Representative Jo Guk posted on his Facebook that the prosecution contacted the offices of lawmakers.

Lee Sang-jik, the former head of the Small and Medium Business Administration, stated that he would attend the Jeonju District Prosecutor's Office at 9:20 AM on August 24 for a witness investigation related to his appointment as the head of the Industrial Complex. According to media reports, Representative Jo expressed that the prosecution is designating President Moon Jae-in as a suspect in this case and is pushing the investigation in that direction. He pointed out that when the approval ratings of the Lee Myung-bak administration fell, they mobilized the prosecution to aggressively pursue investigations against President Roh Moo-hyun, resulting in a tragic outcome.

Furthermore, based on the recently disclosed messages and statements from Kim Gun-hee, it has been claimed that the couple, Yoon Seok-yeol and Kim Gun-hee, shamelessly profess to respect President Roh Moo-hyun. However, in reality, Prosecutor Yoon Seok-yeol was the one who fervently investigated the family of President Roh after his passing and wrote the indictment against them. What do you think about this situation? For the sake of the good people of South Korea, political revenge should not be tolerated in any form.

I will continue to speak the truth until the end, despite external pressure. Your support through subscriptions, likes, and comments will be a great help, and the true message will resonate even more widely. Now is the time to show action. We must ensure that there are consequences, not just impeachment. This is why you need to join us in the Political Observatory. We will do our utmost to set the world right and hold Yoon Seok-yeol accountable. If you found this video helpful, please subscribe and like it. I wish good health to everyone who subscribes to and watches the Political Observatory.

김건희 명품백 끝내 무혐의 결론나자 검사들도 결국 들고 일어났다.. 현직 검사의 목숨 건 폭로, 역대급 반란 터지자 용산 결국 발칵 "윤석열 좋은날도 끝이다

정치보감

서울중앙지검이 김건희 씨의 명품 가방 사건에 대해 혐의 없음으로 수사를 종결하면서 청와대의 영향을 받은 소극적 수사라는 비판이 제기되고 있습니다.

최재용 목사가 김 여사에게 준 500만 원이 넘는 거액의 선물은 대통령의 직무와 무관한 것으로 판단해 검찰이 법적 처벌을 면제하기로 결정한 것이다.

수사팀의 결론은 국민적 분노를 불러일으켰고 이 사건에 대한 뇌물죄 및 청탁금지법 적용에 대한 의문을 제기했습니다.

선물 증여를 둘러싼 논란과 법적 의미

선물은 여러 가지 의미를 내포할 수 있기 때문에 선물이 감사의 표시일 뿐이라는 검찰의 결론에 회의론이 제기되고 있습니다.

누구도 기소하지 않기로 결정하자 법조계에서는 편파 수사라는 비난과 함께 수사 재검토를 요구하는 등 비판의 목소리가 커지고 있습니다.

논란의 여지가 있는 검찰의 결론에 대해 법률 전문가들이 대응 조치를 취할 것으로 예상됩니다.

김건희 명품 가방 사건에 대한 검찰의 압박이 커지고 있습니다.

김건희 씨의 명품 가방 사건에 대한 검찰의 수사에 대한 비판이 거세지면서 특검을 요구하는 목소리가 커지고 있습니다.

검찰은 해당 명품이 윤석열 총장의 직무와 관련이 없다며 위법성이 없다는 결론을 내렸습니다.

시민단체들은 검찰의 예상 가능한 결과가 특검 수사의 필요성을 입증한다며 분노를 표출하고 있습니다.

검찰 및 인권위원회 규탄 성명서

검찰이 영부인 김건희 씨 관련 사건을 처리하면서 권력의 도구로 전락했다는 비난을 받고 있습니다.

윤석열 총장과 가까운 인사들이 주축이 된 인권위도 이 사건에 대해 불기소 결론을 내려 비난에 직면했습니다.

이상직 전 국회의원의 소환에서 보듯 검찰에 대한 외압과 야당 인사에 대한 표적 수사 패턴에 대한 우려가 커지고 있습니다.

이상직의 예정된 증언과 정치적 논란

이상직 전 청와대 공직기강비서관이 전주지검에 출석해 관련 참고인 조사를 받을 예정입니다.

검찰은 문재인 대통령을 피의자로 지정한 것으로 알려지면서 과거 정치권 수사와 유사점을 보이고 있습니다.

문 대통령은 정치 보복의 중단을 촉구하고 책임 규명의 필요성을 강조하며 정치검찰의 노력에 대한 지지를 촉구했습니다.