[Music] [Music] m [Music] I don't know, it's it's in this book you

actually talk about how near-death experiences show decreased brain activity.  Absolutely, near-death experiences don't in all of them depend

depends on how you classify, how you define the term near-death experiences, but uh in most of them, I would say you

have no blood flow, uh your metabolism is grinding to a halt. Can there be some minor brain activity deep in the brain?

Yes, but if there if there that were enough to explain lifetimes of intense experience, then why on Earth have we got

the brain we've got? We could do with the brain of an ant, right? If so little brain activity were enough to explain

everything. So skeptics have to decide: do we need a brain to be conscious or not? They can't have it both ways. If we do

need a brain to be conscious, you can't explain near-death experiences with some residual, unmeasurable amount of brain

activity left. Talk to me about evolution because right now we have a model of evolution, Darwin's model, which says that there are

random mutations and then there's natural selection for the ones that that seem to be dominating; that it's entirely a

mechanical process, and consciousness is therefore an emergent property that we can't, of course, explain

how it emerges, but it must emerge because there was a universe before we became conscious; that there is a

universe. So first of all, what's your take on evolution? Is evolution driven by consciousness? Are things like

genes, like everything else, just images of processes in consciousness? And uh, what is driving this complexity, this emergence? Yeah, this

uh, experience of the universe, even if everything is in consciousness, which is my position. I'm

Sure, it's your position as well. Everything are images of processes in consciousness, excitations of consciousness. Uh, then, of course,

evolution unfolds as a process in consciousness. It there's nothing else it can be; it has to be that it's the

evolution of dissociative processes in consciousness and how they arise and how they persist and reproduce. But even

then you're left with the question: Is it meaningless and mechanical, even though it is in consciousness? Because

consciousness can unfold in mechanical ways. The laws of physics are fairly, fairly mechanical, and they express conscious

archetypes. Or does it have a—is there a, an emotional charge driving evolution towards a goal, a purpose? Yeah.

I think that is the more, the more relevant question. My position is the following: I think there is sufficient

evidence, uh, to believe that species evolve from other species by the accrual of genetic mutations that favor survival.

Uh, that's literally evolution by natural selection. The problem is that many people today embed into that term something for which there is no

proof whatsoever, which is that the mutations underlying the process are random—in other words, patternless—that they don't obey any trend; they

don't have any sense of direction themselves; that all pattern is added by natural selection after the fact; that

the mutations are trendless. There is no proof for that. We cannot run a randomness test on the set of

mutations that have happened on Earth since 3.8 billion years ago. We don't have the data to run the random

randomness test. For a randomness test, even if you lose a little bit of the data, you may

lose the pattern. The pattern may have been there, but you can't see it because you lost data. Available on curiosity.

Stream premium factual shows at CuriosityStream.com

Bernardo Kastrup & Dr. Deepak Chopra: Waking Up To Our Immortal Being

The Chopra Well

임사 체험은 종종 뇌 활동의 감소를 수반합니다.

대부분의 임사 체험은 혈류 부족과 신진대사 중단을 수반합니다.

경미한 뇌 활동은 지속될 수 있지만, 경험의 강도를 설명하기에는 불충분합니다.

회의론자들은 의식을 위해 뇌가 필요한지 결정해야 하며, 잔존하는 뇌 활동으로는 임사 체험을 설명할 수 없다고 주장합니다.

다윈의 진화 모델인 무작위 돌연변이와 자연 선택에 대해 설명합니다.

진화가 의식에 의해 주도되는지에 대한 질문; 의식의 과정의 이미지로서의 유전자.

의식 내 과정으로서의 진화, 해리 과정의 진화.

진화가 무의미하고 기계적인 것인지, 아니면 목적을 향한 감정에 의해 주도되는 것인지에 대한 질문입니다.

진화의 무작위성 가정이 가진 문제점

생존에 유리한 유전적 돌연변이를 통해 진화하는 종을 뒷받침하는 증거가 있습니다.

돌연변이가 무작위라는 가정은 입증되지 않았습니다.

데이터 부족으로 인해 지구의 돌연변이에 대한 무작위성 테스트가 불가능합니다.