종교에서 신앙과 과학의 교차점

### 신앙과 과학을 포용하기: 신앙과 실용적 지혜의 상호작용: 신앙과 실용적 지혜의 상호작용
* 🙏 화자는 '종교'의 라틴어 어원이 하나로 묶는다는 뜻이며, 이는 영적인 맥락에서 하나가 되려는 열망과 일치한다고 강조하면서 **종교적**이라고 밝혔습니다.
* 📖 특히 "과학은 신을 실천적으로 추구하는 것"이라며 신앙과 과학의 공존을 탐구한 **"존 웨인, 서부로 가다"라는 제목의 대학 논문** 등 과거 작업을 회고합니다.
* 🔬 화자는 **믿음과 과학은 모순되는 것이 아니라 서로 보완하는 관계**라고 생각하며, 이러한 관점을 가진 인물을 영화에서 묘사하기로 한 동기가 되었습니다.
* 📜 그들은 **성경의 문자적 해석과 은유적 해석의 복잡성**을 인정하고, 성경이 제공하는 도덕적 발판을 인식하면서 **고대의 지혜를 현대 생활에 적용하는 방법**에 대해 의문을 제기합니다.
* ❤ 연사는 **황금률과 잠언과 같은 성경의 가르침**에서 인간관계와 일상 생활에 긍정적인 영향을 준 실용적인 지침을 찾습니다.
* 🔥 그러나 그들은 **불타는 떨기나무나 예수님의 치유와 같은 기적적인 신앙 요소**를 일상 생활에 어떻게 접목할 수 있을지에 대해 불확실성을 표합니다.
* 📚 이들은 성경의 해석에서 비롯된 조작과 배제의 가능성을 인정하면서 **성경의 귀중한 교훈을 분별하는 것**이 중요하다는 점을 강조합니다.
* 🤝 궁극적으로 이들은 신앙과 사회 문제를 헤쳐나가는 데 있어 용서와 이해가 필수적이므로 오용된 부분 때문에 **성경 전체를 무시해서는 안 된다**고 주장하며 **성경에 담긴 긍정적인 메시지**를 인정해야 한다고 주장합니다.

종교에 대한 사회적 오해에도 불구하고 신앙과 과학은 공존할 수 있으며, 귀중한 교훈을 제공합니다.

I mean, you are you. You are. Am I wrong here? You are religious in some way. Yeah, yeah, absolutely. And I want to bring this up in this day and age when people go, No, I'm not religious. I'm only spiritual. You know what the Latin root of religion is? Re legare, and legare means to bind together. Re means again. Well, in a world that's saying, I'm only spiritual because I want unity, that's exactly what religion means. We bastardized the meaning of it over time, and we've excluded people, and we've corporatized it and such. But yes, I am religious. Um, that character, you know, I had written stories. I'd written a college paper called John Wayne Goes West, and it was about how do you how do you how can you be a believer in a world of science. And I remember writing things like during the making of that movie, like science is the practical pursuit of God. Um, the two are not excluded. They dance together. They go together. Um, belief and science.

and I never saw those as contradictions, and that's part of what the reason I attacked that role and became a part of that movie. I wanted to play a person that had that point of view of a believer in a world of science, not at the exclusion of Science and not at the exclusion of belief. Yeah, it's a confusing role for a lot of people if someone is a believer and also a proponent of science, um, because they want to know what are your literal beliefs. Like, do you take the Bible at its literal word, or do you use it as some sort of a guidebook of the experiences of these people that lived thousands of years ago that have been translated from multiple different languages back to English? And is there wisdom in those translations? Is there wisdom in those original thoughts? These thousands of years of people contemplating and mulling on these things, and that so many have used these as a scaffolding for morals and ethics and for societies. Yep, it's... it's... it's... I mean, you

know for people that go, Oh, it's a circus book, or people that are non-believers, and I'm like, Well, it's still the best one going. Um, there's a lot of great truth that comes out of the Bible, and it is open for a lot of people. It has been interpreted and reinterpreted. It has been translated, has been handed down. Um, I for myself, I don't know what to do in my daily life with the burning push. I don't know what to do with that. Um, I do know what to do with love your neighbor like yourself. I do know what to do with Matthew 6:22, If the eye be single, their whole body will be full of light. I do know what to do with some Proverbs that I can take into daily practice and go, Oh, I felt my life. I felt improvement. I felt success in my relationships, in my relationship with the day, with my career, by following that. Um, by treating others how I wanted to be.

treated the Golden Rule. So, I take the practical stuff myself and try to utilize it and pick out what can work for me. When you say you don't know what to do with the burning bush, like, what do you mean by that? I don't know what to do on a daily basis with the teaching of... and then he, you know, and then he showed up as a burning bush or the magic tricks, and I don't know what to do with... and Jesus healed everyone that... and he couldn't walk, and now he touched, and he can walk. I don't know what to do with that. I don't know how to take that into my life and go, Oh, there's something useful and practical and healthy for you, Matthew, that you can practice there. So, the magic that leans in towards, you know, what we would call now more fantasy, I don't know what to do with that. There are philosophies, there are proverbs, and

there's teachings that I think are very valid and very helpful um that we could all be reminded of that are in the Bible that I do find quite useful. Yeah, I think it's almost impossible to figure out what they were trying to say with a lot of the things. It's why it's so it's open to interpretation but also open to manipulation and that's where people have a real problem with it when it's used for to to separate people to uh exclude people to marginalize people to judge people. But it's it's hard for people that understand that those aspects and that those things happen to actually parse out that there's good about it too and that there's a lot of really valuable lessons in these books. 100%. Um look I I get it. I mean you you know it's like a what are our what are our fathers teach us. Is your father still Al? Well I don't really know them. I have a complicated family history. Okay well fathers are father figures. I have a

stepfather. He's still alive, and I'm close to him. Well, stepfather, when he goes, you'll find out some things where the messenger and the message weren't exactly in sympatico, you know what I mean? Does that mean that you throw the messenger out? You're like, Oh, you weren't following all that stuff. No, you take the message, the stuff that you can, that could work for you, that maybe they wanted it for you, they couldn't follow through on it themselves. There's certain parts of the Bible that have that too. You don't throw out the whole, you can't, I don't think it's, it makes any sense to throw out the whole book. It's what we're doing in society now. I mean, we're making people persona non grata because of something they do or, and you know, and that is right now deemed wrong or it's the hot point on a hot topic right now. You can't erase someone's entire

existence. Where the heck does some forgiveness go? And again, that like optimism. It's not erasing the crisis. It's not saying there wasn't a problem first. It's not saying that there's version parts of the Bible that have been people have bastardized and used in the wrong way. Um, but you don't throw the whole book out and say, well, it's all bad then. It's all these because that's false.

Joe Rogan & Matthew McConaughey Discuss Christianity

Christian Clips

화자는 종교적 신분을 밝히며 함께 묶는다는 뜻의 라틴어 '레가레'의 어근을 강조합니다.

화자는 종교와 과학이 모순되는 것이 아니라 이해를 추구하는 과정에서 함께 춤을 추는 것이라고 믿습니다.

영화에서 화자의 역할은 고대 문헌에 담긴 지혜와 역사 전반에 걸쳐 도덕과 윤리에 미친 영향을 강조하면서 과학의 세계에 대한 신자의 모습을 묘사하는 것이 목표였습니다.

성경은 다양한 해석과 번역에도 불구하고 일상 생활에 유용한 진리와 실용적인 지침을 제공합니다.

이웃 사랑이나 황금률과 같은 핵심 가르침은 개인의 발전과 관계의 성공으로 이어졌습니다.

화자는 불타는 떨기나무와 기적적인 치유와 같은 성경의 신비로운 측면에 어려움을 겪지만 성경이 제공하는 실용적인 철학과 속담에서 가치를 발견합니다.

성경의 가르침의 가치와 복잡성

성경의 가르침은 귀중한 교훈을 제공하지만 종종 해석과 조작에 개방되어 배제와 판단으로 이어지기도 합니다.

연사는 메시지와 메신저를 분리하는 것이 중요하다고 강조하며, 메신저의 단점에도 불구하고 귀중한 통찰력을 얻을 수 있다고 말합니다.

실수를 저지른 개인을 배척하는 현재의 사회적 경향을 비판하며 사람들의 행동에 대한 보다 미묘한 이해의 필요성을 강조합니다.

용서와 낙관주의가 위기나 문제의 존재를 지우지는 않습니다.

성경을 잘못 해석한다고 해서 성경의 메시지 전체를 무시해서는 안 됩니다.

모든 것을 버리기보다는 나쁜 것 가운데서 좋은 것을 인식하는 것이 중요합니다.