예수의 죽음과 부활에 대한 역사적 증거

### 예수의 죽음과 부활에 대한 역사적 증거
* 📜 역사적 조사에 따르면 자연적 설명이 실패하면 **예수의 죽음을 둘러싼 초자연적 사건**이 발생했을 가능성이 있습니다.
* ✝ 학자들은 일반적으로 예수의 죽음에 관한 세 가지 핵심 사실에 동의합니다. **예수는 십자가에서 죽었고, 제자들은 그가 부활했다고 믿었으며, 심지어 그의 적들 중 일부도 이 믿음을 받아들였다는 사실**입니다.
* 📚 예수의 생애를 기록한 40여 개의 고대 기록은 **1세기에 예수의 존재를 강조**하는 반면, 당시 로마 황제였던 티베리우스에 대한 기록은 **10건밖에 남아 있지** 않습니다.
* 🧑 폴라 프레드릭슨, 바트 에르만 등 저명한 학자들은 **예수의 십자가 죽음은 역사적으로 확실**하다고 주장하며, 레자 아슬란 같은 무슬림 학자들도 이 사실을 인정하고 있습니다.
* 💬 폴라 프레드릭슨은 **"예수님에 대해 우리가 알 수 있는 것이 있다면 본디오 빌라도 아래서 십자가에서 죽었다는 사실"**뿐입니다.
* 📖 게리 하버마스와 마이클 리코나가 주창한 **최소한의 사실 주장**은 대다수의 학자들이 **예수의 죽음 이후의 역사적 사건에 동의**한다고 주장합니다.
* 👥 처음에 예수를 반대했던 예수의 형제 야고보와 다소의 바울이 초기 기독교 교회의 지도자로 변모한 것은 **예수의 부활 주장**을 뒷받침합니다.
* 🌌 요세푸스와 타키투스의 글을 포함한 역사적 기록은 **예수의 생애와 십자가 처형을 확증**하며 예수를 둘러싼 기적적인 사건들을 강조하여 **예수에 대한 이야기가 심오하고 역사적으로 중요**하다는 것을 시사합니다.

예수의 존재와 십자가 처형은 여러 출처의 역사적 증거에 의해 강력하게 뒷받침됩니다.

if there simply is no good explanation, naturalistically speaking, we can use the historical process of investigation to conclude that quite likely maybe something supernatural happened here. What happened when Jesus died? Shortly after his death, we take a look at what happened, and those historical scholars we've already referred to in general agree with three facts. The video that you're about to watch deals with the historic facts for Jesus and his crucifixion and his resurrection. A lot of people get things very wrong when it comes to this topic, so I'm going to go ahead and play the video, let Nabil make his presentation, and then I'm gonna hop in on the back end and basically build on top of some of the claims that he makes. I'm going to give you guys quotes, I'm going to give you guys actual sources from history so that we can avoid the meme of what are your sources, trust me bro. Let's get into it. What are the sources regarding Christianity? And some of you might be even asking Nabil, why should I even believe Jesus is real?

why should I ever even believe that he's a man who existed? The first thing I'm going to start off by telling you is that it is incontrovertible, according to the historical principles of investigation, that a man named Jesus existed in the first century. How do we know this? We have over 40 records of Jesus' life from ancient times describing this man who is essentially a carpenter in Palestine. He didn't have much of anything. He wasn't a centrally important figure at the time, yet we have 40 sources that refer to him. You know who the emperor was at Jesus' time? Someone shouted out Tiberius. Good. Tiberius was the emperor of Rome at that time. Now, this is a man who obviously we should have a lot written about. We can expect tons and tons of records about this man, can't we? The historical records contain Tiberius' name by 10 different individuals. That's it, 10 for Tiberius, the emperor of Rome, 40 for Jesus. You can see we have excellent reason to

believe that this man, Jesus of Nazareth, lived and existed in the first century. That's why very, very few, in fact, I could probably count it on one hand, actually just I know of two scholars who study the historical Jesus, actually claim that Jesus never existed. And one of them is Bob Price, who most other scholars say he's just not even possible what he says, so we can dismiss just due to the reasoning and due to the lack of scholastic support that this is actually the case. So Jesus certainly exists. Okay, what can we know about him? Well, of the scholars that study him, and keep in mind there is an entire area of historical studies called historical Jesus studies, so we have scholars who've been studying this on all sides. These aren't all Christians by any means. Actually, the most influential ones wouldn't allow, wouldn't align themselves with Orthodox Christianity. You have people like Paula Frederickson, Marcus Borg, Bart Ehrman. You have people along these lines who would say like John Dominic Crossan, who would say

that of Jesus, we can know for a fact that he died on the cross. Now, keep in mind that's one of our three points that we're proving for Christianity, or attempting to show to determine its reliability. Did Jesus die on the cross? The scholars who study his life, regardless of whether they're atheist, Buddhist, agnostic, Hindu, Christian, it doesn't matter, they all conclude that Jesus died on the cross. Now, if I left it there, it would be an appeal to authority, and we're trying to be academically rigorous tonight, so I'm not going to do that. I'm going to give you some of their reasons why they believe Jesus died on the cross, but we're going to keep it brief because scholars are unanimous on this issue. By the way, it's not just them; even Muslim scholars will argue that Jesus did die on the cross. How many of you heard of Reza Aslan's book recently, Zealots, that came out this year? A few of you raised Reza Aslan's a scholar who has

studied the historical Jesus, and as a Muslim, he says, Yes, Islam denies Jesus' death on the cross, and I am a Muslim, but I confirm that Jesus' death on the cross is historically certain. In fact, he builds his whole book off the fact that Jesus died. So even as a Muslim, he says Jesus died on the cross. So why do they say this? Well, because first off, all the evidence that we have, all the records of Jesus' life which talk about his death, indicate that he did die. If they say anything, it says that he did die on the cross under Pontius Pilate, which is why Paula Frederickson says, If there's anything we can know about Jesus, anything at all, it's this: that he died on the cross under Pontius Pilate. If you go away from Christian records, you go to Jewish records like Josephus, we can also see in the first century that non-Christians are saying Jesus died on the cross. We go to Gentile scholars, they are also agreeing that Jesus died on the cross. In fact, we also

have some of them saying that these people believe he's risen from the dead. We'll get to that in just a moment. So we have excellent reason to believe Jesus died on the cross because all the records point to that. Plus, if you study the historical process of crucifixion, nobody ever in the hearing, in the entire history of the Roman process of crucifixion, no one ever survived a full Roman crucifixion. So we have excellent reason to believe Jesus died on the cross. Did he rise from the dead? This is an important matter, and lots of historians say we cannot investigate the resurrection because that's not a historical matter, that's a supernatural matter, and you can't study supernatural matters. Well, that's jumping the gun just a bit. If every explanation that is naturalistic falls short and falls very short of explaining what happened, and we have reason to believe that something supernatural may have happened, if there simply is no good explanation, naturalistically speaking, we can use the

historical process of investigation to conclude that quite likely maybe something supernatural happened here. So, what happened when Jesus died? Shortly after his death, we take a look at what happened, and those historical scholars we've already referred to in general agree with three facts that are considered relatively incontrovertible. And I'm giving you what's called the minimal facts argument. If you want to look into this, it's called the minimal facts argument, primarily promoted by a man named Gary Habermas, who has written a book called The Historical Jesus. Also by his protégé, Michael Licona, who's written a book called The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus. He wrote alongside Gary Habermas, and he's also written his manifesto, a rather large book that serves well for curing insomnia. Um, he's written that as well. Sorry, Mike. We're actually going to have Mike on the channel here in the upcoming months, and he also is in the documentary. So, um, great guy. It's funny that nipple is taking a shot at him here. He's written

that as well. And if you want to look at a very thorough investigation of the Historical Method on whether or not Jesus died, I suggest you take a look at this book published by Erdman's. Michael Lacona is the author. The argument runs as follows: pretty much all, every scholar who studies this, at least a vast majority, if not virtually all scholars, conclude three things happened after Jesus died. Well, number one, the first one is that Jesus did die on the cross, which we just looked at. Number two, that the disciples, Jesus' disciples, all believed he had risen from the dead. So, the disciples truly believed that Jesus had risen from the dead. And according to most historical Jesus scholarship, Christianity wouldn't have gotten off the ground if it weren't for that fact. Fact number three: fact number one was Jesus died on the cross, fact number two, the disciples truly believed he had risen from the dead, fact number three: people who were enemies of Jesus or not his disciples also believed he had risen from the dead. Now, who are we

talking about we're talking specifically about two people: James, the brother of Jesus, and Paul, or Saul of Tarsus, as it were. James, the brother of Jesus, did not follow Jesus during his lifetime. We see in The Book of Mark that Jesus' family comes up and says to people around Jesus that he is out of his mind, basically that he's crazy, which is what leads Jesus to say, Who is my mother and brother and sister? It's those who do the will of God. So, Jesus' family is not on his side. It wasn't until after the resurrection, or supposedly the resurrection, when all of a sudden the disciple James becomes a, I'm sorry, the brother of Jesus, James, becomes a leader of the Christian church. And also Saul of Tarsus. Who is this Saul guy? Saul was the student of Gamaliel, one of the chief leaders of the Jews in the time. This man was primed and groomed to be a leader of Jews, a leader of Pharisees. He was going to have all kinds

of power in the temple. He already had all kinds of power because he was able to deliver people to prison. He was given special permission to hunt Christians down. Yet, this man was willing to go to his death over and over and over again for something, for what he claims. It was because he has seen the Risen Jesus. The earliest records of Jesus' resurrection say that 500 people saw him risen at the same time. I know that many people watch this and they think, Sure, so Jesus lived in history. There was a guy by that name, sure, whatever. And some people think that he raised because people like superstition, whatever. But I don't believe in the supernatural as a default. I've predetermined that that is impossible, and so I won't even think through or entertain any version of history that includes a supernatural element. I just have to say that itself is a worldview. It's a predetermined way of viewing reality that is itself unscientific. What do I mean by that? You cannot arrive at this place where you believe that the only form of evidence

that is viable is the type of evidence that can be placed under a microscope. Scientifically, you cannot place that claim under a microscope and measure it according to the level of scrutiny that you ask. That claim, that belief itself is unscientific. That belief itself is philosophical in nature. You've simply predetermined that something must be physically measurable in order to be considered knowable or true, and that claim is not able to be measured in that way. I now want to go to the Talmud, so I'm going to give you this as a source that he mentioned, and I'm actually going to read for you three examples in the Talmud where they write about this Jesus character in the first century. So here's the first one, forgive any mispronunciations. Shabbat 104b, quote, Jesus was a magician and a fool. Next, Sanhedrin 107b of the Babylonian Talmud, Jesus performed magic and incited the people of Israel and led them astray. Sanhedrin 43a, quote, On Passover Eve, they

hanged Jesus of Nazareth. He practiced sorcery and cited and led Israel astray, end quote. They call it black magic, they call it sorcery, but the point is that they're implicitly acknowledging the miraculous even in their record, even as haters of what he did. That's very significant. Tacitus was a Roman historian, not just a dude who wrote some things down, a person who is dedicated to recording the historical events that happened during his lifetime, a Roman historian. And here's what Tacitus wrote: Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of Pontius Pilate and at a most mischievous superstition. So, there you have an official Roman historian conceding both the life and the death of Jesus in history, which perfectly corroborates what the scriptures, meaning the Christian historic accounts, uh, also say. Let's continue. So, Josephus, a Jewish historian, again not a believer, but a person dedicated to recording the history that

happened, and here's what he said. At about this time, there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man, for he wrought surprising feats. He was the Christ. When Pilate condemned him to be crucified, those who had come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day, he appeared, restored to life, and the tribe of Christians has not disappeared. That's Josephus, a Jewish historian. You have Lucian, who was actually a Greek, a second-century Greek satirist, and this is something that Lucian said. He said, The Christians worship a man to this day, the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rights and was crucified on that account. It was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers from the moment that they are converted and deny the gods of Greece and worship the crucified Sage and live after his laws. So you have it, and there's many more. I'm just giving

kind of cherry-picking a few out just for the sake of trying to make this video short, but the point is the historic record of Jesus and of a crucified Jesus is absolutely incontrovertible, and really no one denies this. Then you also have, like I said, the Talmud acknowledging the supernatural. They're calling it sorcery, they're calling it black magic, but they're acknowledging the supernatural works done by Jesus, just framing it in a negative light. Then you have Paul, a person who persecuted Christians, coming around to being willing to die for these claims. It's not just Paul, it's also this 500, it's also all of the people whose lives were transformed by their belief in this message. The first-century Church believed in this crucified and risen Jesus. Please consider that it is far more likely that this complicated, beautiful, vast universe is the product of an uncreated, perfect, spaceless, timeless, immaterial intelligence that we call God, that that is far more likely than that all of this simply came from nothing.

for no reason. If you accept the first miracle, which is creation, wouldn't it be amazing if that Creator God did enter into the human story, did write himself into it like Shakespeare entering into Hamlet, God becoming a man, the word becoming flesh, Christ with us? And for what reason? To positively change the world. Christ for all nations, Christ the hope of glory, Christ the myth made real. If you don't want Christianity to be true, you don't understand it rightly. If you understand it rightly, you'll see that Jesus is not only the image of the invisible God, but he's the hero that we've always longed for as a species at the deepest level of our heart. That being said, I hope you guys enjoyed this video, and I'll see you in the next one. Thanks. Hey, what's up, you guys? I'm here in the edit, and I just want to make one other really quick note. This video is in no way exhaustive, meaning there's a lot more that could be said about the death and the burial and the

resurrection of Jesus. So, if you feel like, Is that it? the answer is no, that's not it. In fact, I'm going to put a video in the description, a link in the description to my documentary, which gives a lot more detail on this. I'm also going to put a link here or somewhere you'll see it on the screen for a video that focuses a little bit more on this minimal facts approach, so that you can see that this that we're doing here is almost just like a whetting of the appetite, an introduction to the conversation. There's a lot more beneath the surface here. That being said, all right, I'm gonna get back to the rest of the video. Okay, peace, bye, foreign [Music].

Jesus Was NOT A Myth (15 minutes Of Evidence)

Hello there! My name is Brandon McGuire & I started this channel because I want people to have the relationship with God that I now enjoy. If that sounds wild or ridiculous to you then you are just the kind of person I'd love to connect with. I genuinely think that we've all faced doubt (or even anger towards God that we have insisted is unbelief) at one level or another.

But here's my story: Jesus has answered my questions, healed my wounds, calmed my storms, saved my soul, and changed absolutely everything for me. I want to help people to know Him too… so that He can do the same for them. 

So, I'm interacting with content from across the internet and engaging in conversations that I think are important, from a Jesus perspective.

Skeptics and seekers are welcome. 
Conversations are Good. 
Questions are Good. 

No Hate.
Just Love.

The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom. 

Enjoy!

Business Inquiries:
dailydoseofwisdom@lighthouseagents.com




Daily Dose Of Wisdom

1세기 예수의 존재는 당시 로마 황제 티베리우스에 대한 10개의 기록보다 더 많은 40개가 넘는 고대 기록에 의해 뒷받침됩니다.

역사 학자들 사이에서는 예수가 실제로 살았고 상당한 영향을 미쳤다는 데 의견이 일치하며, 그의 존재에 대해 이의를 제기하는 사람은 거의 없습니다.

역사적 예수 연구 분야에는 다양한 학자들이 참여하고 있으며, 이들 모두가 정통 기독교와 일치하는 것은 아니기 때문에 그의 생애에 대한 조사가 더욱 검증되고 있습니다.

예수의 십자가 죽음에 대한 역사적 확실성

예수의 십자가 죽음은 무신론자와 무슬림을 포함한 다양한 배경을 가진 학자들이 보편적으로 받아들이고 있습니다.

역사적 기록에 따르면 예수는 본디오 빌라도 치하에서 죽었으며, 로마의 십자가 처형에서 살아남은 사람은 아무도 없었습니다.

압도적인 증거와 학자들의 만장일치 동의는 예수의 십자가 죽음에 대한 역사적 확실성을 믿을 만한 강력한 근거를 제공합니다.

예수 부활에 대한 최소한의 사실 주장

학자들은 일반적으로 예수가 십자가에서 죽었고, 제자들은 그가 부활했다고 믿었으며, 야고보와 바울을 비롯한 정적들도 그의 부활을 믿었다는 세 가지 핵심 사실에 동의합니다.

게리 하버마스와 마이클 리코나는 이러한 믿음이 기독교의 출현에 결정적인 역할을 했다는 최소한의 사실 논증을 널리 알린 바 있습니다.

예수의 형제 야고보와 기독교인을 박해하던 바울은 모두 예수의 죽음 이후 변화된 믿음을 경험하여 초기 기독교 교회의 성장에 기여했습니다.

연사는 기독교인들을 박해했지만 부활하신 예수에 대한 믿음 때문에 기꺼이 죽음을 택했던 한 권력자에 대해 이야기하며 500명이 부활을 목격했다고 주장합니다.

그들은 초자연적인 것을 무시하는 세계관에 도전하며 그것이 본질적으로 비과학적이고 철학적이라고 주장합니다.

탈무드와 로마 역사가 타키투스는 예수의 기적적인 행동을 인정하고 그의 삶과 죽음을 확인하는 역사적 기록을 제공하며, 이는 기독교 역사 기록과 일치합니다.

유대인 역사가 요세푸스와 그리스 풍자 작가 루시안은 예수의 존재와 십자가 처형에 대한 증거를 제시하며 그가 추종자들에게 끼친 영향을 강조합니다.

탈무드는 예수의 초자연적인 사역을 인정하면서도 부정적인 시각으로 묘사합니다.

바울과 다른 사람들의 변화는 십자가에 못 박히고 부활하신 예수에 대한 믿음과 함께 1세기 교회가 설립되는 데 중요한 역할을 했습니다.

창조주 하나님이 인류 역사에 개입했다는 생각은 변혁적인 기적으로 표현되며, 그리스도의 성육신은 하나님의 사랑과 목적의 궁극적인 표현으로 여겨집니다.

예수는 인류가 항상 갈망해 온 영웅으로 묘사되며, 모든 민족에게 희망과 변화를 선사합니다.

이 동영상은 주제에 대한 소개 역할을 하며, 예수의 죽음과 장례, 부활에 대해 더 깊이 있는 정보를 원하는 분들을 위해 추가 자료를 제공합니다.