사후 세계에서 비무슬림의 운명

### 이슬람에서 비무슬림의 운명: 신학적 및 법학적 관점
* 🕋 선량하거나 이슬람에 대해 들어본 적이 없는 비무슬림의 운명에 대한 이슬람의 견해는 **복잡하고 민감한 문제**입니다.
* 📜 꾸란과 순나에서는 **"이슬람 이외의 종교를 찾는 사람은 결코 받아들여지지 않을 것"**이라며 이슬람이 알라가 인정하는 유일한 종교임을 강조합니다.
* 🛤 이맘 아마드가 해설한 하디스에 따라 **심판의 날에 시험을 받게 될 이슬람에 대해 들어본 적이 없는 사람은 예외**로 합니다.
* 🤔 이슬람을 진지하게 조사하고 이슬람이 사실이 아니라고 결론을 내린 사람들의 운명에 대해 논의할 때 논란이 되는 문제가 발생하는데, **학자들마다 이 가상 시나리오에 대한 의견이 다르**습니다.
* 🌍 화자는 예외를 규칙으로 삼아서는 안 되며, **무슬림만 천국에 들어갈 수 있다**는 것이 이슬람의 일반적인 믿음이라고 강조합니다.
* 💔 무슬림이 아닌 사랑하는 사람의 운명에 대한 감정적인 질문이 다루어지며, 연사는 **개인에게 특정 운명을 부여할 수 없다는 점**을 강조합니다.
* 📚 연사는 공개적인 자리에서 이혼이나 기타 민감한 문제에 대해 특정 파트를 찾는 것을 경고하며 **개별적이고 사적인 상담의 필요성**을 강조합니다.
* 🤲 전체적인 메시지는 이슬람이 구원에 이르는 구체적인 길을 가르치지만, **알라는 궁극적으로 정의롭고 자비로우며 최종 심판은 그분에게 달려 있다**는 것입니다.

알라는 자신의 법을 따르며, 알라는 자신의 창조물에서 자신이 원하는 대로 할 권리를 인정하여 그러한 법을 입법화했습니다.

one paavana kailani Jonah alert eternal Northey name. What is the Islamic ruling about the fate of the non-Muslim or the kafir who was good or who didn't hear about Islam? So this is a question that is always asked about. Well, I have good friends, I have good neighbors, I have relatives, I have people in my workplace. They are good people or maybe I don't know them. But there are a lot of good people in this world. What will happen to them in the after? So before we even begin answering this question, we need to first and foremost acknowledge that Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala is the Hakham and the heckum and the malik and the magical milk before we even say anything and open our mouths. We acknowledge Allah is the rub and we are the McCook and Allah has the right to do as he pleases in his creation so no one can ask Allah and challenge Allah in what Allah does la am.

I afraid oahu muse alone no one now use Allah. Whatever Allah does, nobody can ask him. He is not asked about what he does. This is what the Quran says. Now use a Maya file. One whom used alone, they will be asked about what they do. So, to try to perceive Allah as wisdom and knowledge from our own paradigm is the height of arrogance. To try to judge Allah from our finite judgments is the height of arrogance. In the end of the day, Allah is the Harlech and the hardik has the right to do as he pleases. Now, does this mean that Allah azzawajal inaudible will do something that is unjust? No, because Allah says in the Quran, Well, I of Lamoure Ibuka ah ha da. Allah does have a code of law. He does. Allah does have a code of ethics that he follows. But who obliged Allah to follow that code? Who can tell me? Allah did himself. Who obliged Allah to follow that code? Allah

did himself Kotaro bucum alan f c/e what a rama kitab arab Bochum ala nafsi your lord decreed for himself. The hadith and sahib o haughty your lord has a kitab with him that he wrote before he created the heavens and the earth. And in that kitab is written and the hadith goes on and on. Even Allah has a key table. Even Allah has a, you can call it a Shetty, a constitution, whatever you call it. He has a code of law. But who legislated that law? Allah did, not us. There is no entity above Allah to legislate our with AB Allah. So Allah has a code. And Allah Azza WA JAL has said in that code, In the lauhala of lumis-foil adhara, Allah will not show injustice and atoms weight. So there is no injustice that Allah can do. But who defines injustice? Injustice is defined in the Quran. I recited in so in the Salah right now that not as it was.

allotted. Was it over? This is injustice to say that one person does a crime, and the other person will be punished. That is injustice, and Allah has said that's not going to happen. Let as it was a rotten wizard. Ohhara, however, to punish someone for a crime that that person has committed, that is not injustice. And who gets to define a crime? Allah Azza Wajal will define. There are certain things we might not view them as being as criminal as others, but that's because of the culture and the time and the place that we are born into. So that is the first point to answer this question, and that is we are not in a position to challenge Allah Subhana WA Ta'ala. Allah follows his own laws, and he has legislated those laws. The second point when it comes to assigning mercy, assigning as AB, assigning heaven and hell, we have a very, very clear rule. We do not assign individuals to heaven and hell. We do not assign personalities to Jenna and knob to Rama. We talk about generalities, not specifics.

okay your friend Michael dies no one has the right to say if Michael died is a Muslim or non-muslim. He's gonna go to heaven, he's gonna go to hell no one. Your friend Mustapha dies no one can say Mostafa was a pious man is gonna go to general doesn't matter. We are quiet about individuals except if Allah has said Tabitha Abena have been wet tub Mohammed or Mikasa say Allah what neuron we can say Abu Lahab is an nerr because Allah says so otherwise. We are quiet about individuals we never assign any individual to any specific fate but we speak in generalities we speak with conditions. Those who believe and do righteous deeds will go to Jenna this is generalities. Those who reject Allah will go to Jahannam this is generalities. Mustafa Michael who might have done this and that we are quiet because we do not know what is inside of them okay. The third point it is very very clear in the Quran and Sunnah that there is one path that leads

to Jannah in the dinner. In the law Hill Islam, the religion that is acceptable to Allah is al-Islam. Allah says in the Quran: Who knew who the know sort of a metal ball mill data Ibrahim a hanifa walk Allah who knew who the no no surah taha do they said not a lot they said be a hoody Bennis ronnie you shall be guided bell no well here is helpful attribute negate what preceded it no I will follow the middle of Ibrahim who worshipped Allah alone. Allah subhana WA Ta'ala says in the Quran: One may ever tell the layer on islami dinan fan a new cobalamin who wahooo a favorite amino acid. In this is the most explicit verse in the Quran that is imaginable. You cannot even were the verse that is more explicit. It's not even possible in the Arabic language. Whoever chooses any other way of life other than Islam, it shall not be accepted of him and shall be in the hereafter amongst the

losers, you cannot get more explicit than this. There are other evidences as well. The rejection of the Prophet (sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam) is a rejection of Allah. For in Nahum Lanka, the boon equality Nevada media battle ahead on whoever rejects the Prophet system is rejecting Allah. This is a very explicit notion. You cannot be a believer in God while you reject His prophets. Allah says in the Quran, and again, these are so many verses. Let me just see the Siddha verse here. Allah says in the Quran, In the living area Karuna billahi wa rasulih. Those who do cover with Allah and His messengers while you do while you read oon a new fairy of kobane allahi wa rasuluh. And they want to distinguish between Allah and His messengers. Why apple una not me no be Berlin why knock through be Belden will you read une année attack Adobe Nadal iike Sevilla. And they say, We'll believe in some prophets and will reject other prophets. And they think they want to

find a middle ground between this notion now before I end the verse. Which religions believe in some prophets and reject other prophets? Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism. Which religions believe in some prophets and reject other prophets? Tell me there. Who then the Nosara allah is revealing this verse about them. Those who want to differentiate between Allah and his messengers, and they want to say, We'll believe in some prophets and will reject other prophets, and they think, Well, you know, and yet, I do banette attica sabina. They think they're gonna find a middle ground. Now listen to this. This is Arabic Surah Al-e-Imran. Listen to this carefully. Allah iike Homolka Fiona. How these are the real kaffir own means. You got so close. How could you reject? Then you must reject knowing that you have rejected the truth. The one you see when you speak to a Hindu, a Buddhist, or Tao, the confusion. They don't even believe in our God. They don't believe in the concept of prophets. They don't

believe in the concept of why they don't understand this. As for the Anika table, they believe in our God, what Allah, who never in how come why at the God of Abraham, the God of the God of Isaac. They believe in the same God. They believe in Revelation. They believe in heaven and hell. They believe in the whole paradigm that is coming from the Abrahamic traditions. So out of all of mankind, who should recognize the prophets more than anyone else, those who know what a prophet is. So when the final prophet sallal I sent him comes, they should recognize him, and they did recognize him. Yeah - ah-hoo Kamiya a typhoon a banana whom they recognized him like they recognized their own sons, and yet they chose to reject the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sent him. So the Quran, the Sunnah is very clear. Hadith is as I must them. The profitsystem said one led in FCB ad he I swear I give a custom by the one in

whose hands is my soul my Roy he is giving a custom by Allah who controls his own life. He mentions himself in the custom to show how that the status of our system. I swear by the one in whose hands is my own soul, there is not a single yahoodi or nasarah knee who hears about me and my message and then rejects it except that he shall be from havona. This hadith is assigned Muslim, the second most authentic book, and assign hadith so the evidence is in the Quran and Sunna are too numerous to mention, and I will no mind sharing with you. Many many years ago when I was a grad student at the OU, there was a conference and a university academic conference where academics Muslim and non-muslims were presenting papers about the concept of salvation in Islam and can we find some wiggle room for something outside of Islam. The majority of presenters, Muslims and non-muslims, were arguing that basically in fact all of them other than me were arguing that yes we can.

reinterpret the Quran. And this and that it was only my paper. That I was very nervous. I was a grad student. And I was gonna say something. Nobody. And these were all big names in the field. This was a very prestigious conference. And there were all big names. Those and the video is there. You could actually see me sweating and nervous. I'm still in my early 30s at the time. And it's still a grad student. And it was a very nerve-wracking experience to have all these big names. But I presented the paper. There was some minor controversy. But eventually the paper was published by Oxford. It is published by Oxford history press. There's a whole book called Islam of the salvation of others. And you'll find my paper. And in it I go into all of the details and evidences from the Quran and Sunna. And then I mention as well this issue was so explicit that there has never been a controversy in the history of Islam about it. The not just the form of the

hip of Sunni Islam. All strands of Sunni ISM. All strands of sadism, the nationalism of sheer ism, of evolved ISM. All strands of mortis ilysm. All strands of all strands of Islam said if you're not a Muslim and you reject Islam knowingly, there is no hope for you. This is a newfangled interpretation that is coming that has no precedence in the classical tradition whatsoever. And then I said let's put the : a Sunnah to the side. Even logically, even rationally, does it make any sense for God to send a messenger and the messenger is coming with the revelation and the messenger is saying, I am God's final prophet unto you and my revelation is the final revelation and the purpose of the revelation is to tell you you don't need to believe in the revelation. Even logically, it makes no sense. When Allah sends a messenger, the messenger must be obeyed. So from the Quran, from the Sunnah, from unanimous consensus, and from logic and rationality, I proved that it makes

no sense to say that there can be salvation outside of Islam. Now, having said this, I then went on and I said all of this. We are talking about the paths that lead to Allah, and we say there is one path that leads to Allah, only one path, and this does not mean that if somebody says he's on the path that he is actually on it. i.e., somebody says he's a Muslim, doesn't mean he's gonna go to Jannah does immediate automatically, nor does it mean that if somebody is not on the path that they might not be forgiven as an exceptional scenario. And because to enter Jena, the path does not lead to gender if it's not Islam, but it is possible that somebody on another path might be forgiven by Allah due to specific circumstances, and we all know exceptions are not made the rule. The rule is very clear. What is the rule? Whoever searches for a religion other than Islam, whoever chooses a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted of him, and he shall be from the

losers in the hereafter from the Hassan in the hereafter. So, it is possible that a person is not a Muslim and ends up in gender. That is an exception we never make it the rule. We never say, Oh yes, non-Muslims are entering heaven. No, or else you say something like this: the purpose of Islam becomes meaningless. In fact, let me be even more explicit: both the kanima's are thrown out the window. Not even one kanima. Both the calamus can be destroyed: la ilaha illa Allah. There is no deity worthy of worship other than Allah. Somebody says, I'm gonna worship Buddha. I'm gonna worship Krishna. I'm gonna worship Brahma. And you say, Oh, that's okay. You're okay. I'm okay. You have destroyed the first Kadima, have you not? Nothing is worthy of worship other than Allah. At that, that's what the Kadima says. That is exactly what the Economist says. If you say to a non-Muslim, Sure, you can morally and obviously legally even an Islamic state.

he can worship other than Allah legally politically. You will have the freedom, but morally is it allowed from an ethical perspective to worship other than Allah. La ilaha illaallah means what? No. So when somebody bows down to an image of Jesus, we say you are worshipping other than Allah. This contradicts that kalima. Is it not the case if somebody comes as, Oh yes, good le Khattab and good hindus and good will enter Jan, you have negated the first kalima. Then obviously the second kalima, Muhammadur Rasulullah sallallahu are you Selim, and that person does he believe Mohammed Rasoolallah, yes or no, the non-Muslim, no, and you say, Oh, don't worry, you're gonna go to Jannah. So you have negated the second kalima. My dear brothers and sisters, please use what Allah has given to say that other paths are acceptable is a negation of Islam. It is a negation of the Quran. It is the negation of both.

kanima's, and it makes the whole purpose of revealing a book and sending a prophet nonsensical and illogical. If everybody is going to gender, why reveal a new book and cause more confusion? The purpose is the final revelation. Now we said there are exceptions. How do we know they're exceptions? Firstly, Allah says in the Quran, logically, live alone F's and allow shahe. And Allah says in the Quran, wama kana Medina hata never Thoris Allah. We will not punish anyone until the Prophet has been sent. And that's why our Prophet SAS um said that whoever hears about me and then rejects me AHA. So the one who doesn't hear about our Prophet SAW Selim or our scholars at to this, the one who doesn't hear correctly, i.e., he had a very negative image of Islam and he didn't know what Islam was. He never read the books of Islam, he never met a Muslim. So this person, what is his fate? Do we automatically say they're gonna go to Jannah, which is what some of our

previous caller said that is also not very logical because if the one who doesn't know Islam automatically enters Jenna, and you are a Muslim, and you meet this person, why should you give him dower when automatically is entering Jannah. Think about it like that. This also doesn't make any sense. Some of our scholars said this, but it makes no sense. The correct position is mentioned hadith in wasn't Imam Ahmed that our Prophet SAW some said there will be four people on the day of judgement, and he mentioned them. The old man who couldn't think straight when Islam came to him in the the decrepit old man, number one. Number two, the deaf person. Remember before there was sign language, a person born deaf meant he is not communicating. Nobody consulted him, doesn't understand anything. The you know Helen Keller inventing sign language changed the whole world for that group of people and allowed them to communicate. Otherwise, for centuries and centuries, a person born deaf could not communicate with anything, and so there was as if they were living in a different dimension.

the one born deaf, and the one born between two prophets, and El Fattah, right, and the one up to the no prophet was sent to. So the process mentioned, they will say to Allah on Judgment Day, Oh Allah, it's not our fault, and each one will give an excuse. So Allah will say, What if I had sent you a prophet and you saw the Prophet, would you have believed in him? Of course, on Judgment Day, what will they say? Yes, of course. So Allah will say, I will test you. Then Allah will send an angel, and the angel will have something that looks like fire, and they will recognize him to be from Allah as an angel. And the angel will say, If you truly believe in Allah, jump into this. And so those who trust Allah and jump in will be saved by Allah and enter Jannah, and those who don't will have rejected. The point is there will be a test on Judgment Day for those people. We can make chaos upon this and say anyone who did not hear of Islam and lived in times

and places where there was no access to Islam. That person will be tested on Judgment Day. No problem. Ok. Now the real estate offer. The real controversy comes about the categories of people who had access to Islam and Muslims to a library to the internet. They had access to Google and they were too lazy to do their own research. You see there's two points. Number one, we as Muslims are obliged to preach and teach. Fair enough. Number two, the non-Muslim is obliged to ask and learn and research. The two are independent. Wajib. We firmly believe a person born outside of Islam will not be at peace in their soul. Something will be wrong with them. They're not gonna find comfort in their religion. This is because their fitrah will not align up with their theology to what we believe. Why we believe this. I've given a lecture a few weeks ago after Fajr. I gave a long lecture but they show the viscera. I don't know if it's online or not. But this is the concept of fitrah.

inside internal innate nature that Allah created us upon. We firmly believe if you worship a false God, something you feel is not right inside of you, that should cause you to think, to reflect. Something's not right. I don't believe in three gods, three gods kam Jesus can't be God. He's a human being. He was born. How could one person be God? He ate, he drank, he was on the cross. So the average rational human being, the fitfully, should clash. When it clashes, they should research, they should ask, they should Google, go to a library. So there is an obligation on them as well. Suppose somebody was too lazy and didn't do that. The default is that person himself or herself has fallen short, and they will go to Jahannam. And this is proven by many evidences of them had Athens Ohio Buhari III. She had a great uncle, Abu Bakr's great uncle, a famous man by the name of Abdullah bin Jihad. It was in his house that the famous treaty took place, as well the famous treaty took place.

fulfilled all took place as well in the house of Abdullah bin Judyann. It was right in front of the Kaaba, was a massive house, and it was a very prominent house that are another what used to be in that house. Pasha said, Ya Rasul Allah, I been chewed on, you know how he was, and he would feed the hungry, and you know, basically, he would, in our language, he's saying he had a good heart. Will Allah accept that from him on judgement day? This hadith is nahi Bihari AHA YCJA Radi Allahu Allah is asking and nebesa Lala who I sent him about someone who was a philanthropist. Every day, his house was open to the for Quran is a keen. Every day, camels are being slaughtered, given to the poor every. He is the most generous of the college. Everybody loved him. Yaa Rasul Allah, will I been to the an get rewarded for those deeds lah ya been to Saudi law no Oh

daughter of a Saudi Allah because he never once said in his life Rob balefully or bill for you now. This is a very, very deep hadith meaning. He was not religious in his life. We're talking about pre-Islam. If he wanted to see here's the point. And I honestly, it doesn't. I don't understand why people are confused at this. A non-Muslim who never desired God and Allah and the Hereafter. Why are you worried whether he got it or not? He never wanted it. Why should he get it? Yes, agreed. The one who was a religious person in his own religion. The one who was struggling with faith. The one who was searching for the truth. He never heard of Islam. That person shall we hope a lot of good for, right? But the one who rejected religiosity. I don't believe in religion. A hardcore atheist, for example. We can say generically, even though we don't say specifics. Generically, an atheist who rejects God. Is there is no chance for that person because that is no

religiosity. It's one thing you have the wrong religion, and you think you have the right one. It is a totally different ballpark when you say there can be no God, and the signs of Allah are everywhere. Big difference between the two. So even just down never was religious, and he never once said Rob bill Philly or bill friendly. And of course, the other issue comes, which is a very controversial one, which maybe one day will answer the fate of the prophets of the life Selim, and what is the sorry, the fate of the parents of the Prophet SAW, said, and what is their fate. And that's a whole other controversy. Bottom line, I went into a lot of detail here. Bottom line, that this question, we understand why it's so relevant, people want to ask it, we understand people, why people get emotional, but at the same time, from a textual and logical and rational perspective, from a unanimous perspective, every single evidence of the Sharia and our common sense tells you religions are either right or wrong. There's no middle.

path, yeah, neither Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior. He isn't correct. How can both be? And that's why even other faith traditions, by and large, are finding this to be a conundrum, a paradox. Those Christians are no longer faithful to their teachings. You ask them, Why should I be a Christian then? What's the purpose of being a Christian? Because this is now a politically correct statement that, Oh, everybody's okay, you're okay, I'm okay, we're all okay. And that's not okay. Yes, we live in this world in peace and harmony, no question about it. Yes, we have good adapt, no question about it. Yes, we are kind and merciful, no question about it. But on Judgment Day, there is one religion that will be rewarded, and there is one religion that is correct. Not you cannot both simultaneously be correct. Either it is okay to worship an idol, or it is not okay. Either you bow down in front of Jesus Christ, or you don't. Are the you worship Allah, or you don't. There is no

middle ground so we say in the dinner in the in Islam and this is what we preach to the people but we also realize there will be exceptions there might be many exceptions but we never make the exceptions into a into a what into a rule we never preach the exceptions because when you preach the exception you're negating the rule you don't go and tell people all guys don't worry many people will be forgiven on Judgment Day go ahead and commit sins no you don't do that do you you say the general rule the sinner is gonna be punished that's what we preach right that's the whole purpose similar thing goes over here we preach there is one way and on the day of judgment there will be exceptions I want final point again I went to a lot of detail but this is very this is very sensitive issues and people get very emotional understandably understandably the real one of the real problematic issues in our time so we talked about the one who has never heard of Islam but was overall religious we

hope good for that person. We hope good for that person on Judgment Day. We don't pronounce any judgment that that person never heard of Islam. Talk about the tribes of Brazil. Some, you know, go back 500 years. The people living in this land, the native Indians, they would never have heard of Islam. We hope good for them that if they were faithful to their morality and they tried to live good lives. And inside, everybody knows what is a good life. We are hopeful but we don't pronounce a judgment. We talked about those who have the potential to hear Islam but they don't do so. And we say that's not good news. That's not that optimistic if they just lock themselves shut in their houses. If they just want to live their lives like animals and don't think about higher cause, they are falling short. So that's a problem on them. Now we get to a real controversy and that is what if somebody is intellectually curious and they do research into Islam and for whatever reason they sincerely conclude

that Islam is not true. This is a very small subcategory of people, by the way, very small, right? The one who is very interested in religion, the one who is saying, I want to know what is the purpose of life, how Hindu come and tell me, Sikh come and tell me, Tao will come and tell me, Muslim come and tell me, and then he does his research and then he decides, I don't like any of these faith traditions, and he looks into a deep dive into Islam and for whatever reason, now why has he rejected Islam for whatever he doesn't understand the fifty ruling of this or whatever, and there are many reasons, there are many rulings in Islam, they're not politically correct, and a person born and raised in, you know, 2019 America has certain notions of morality and gender and sexuality where automatically if a religion says other than what this person is born into, that religion must be false. You get where I'm coming from there, right? Now, this is a scenario and why there was a very small subset, is it possible for a person who

is sincere and open-minded to come to the conclusion that Islam is not from God. Mistakenly you understand the question. You guys following me. What is your verdict? Yeah, what do you say? Is it possible to be sincere and end up rejecting Islam? You would reject here sincerity is not the same as intellectuality rationality sincerity is not the same as common sense goes back to how pure the photo is suppose the feather has been corrupted. See this is a very difficult question, and I'll be honest with you. This has been troubling me for a long time over a decade, and I haven't come to a conclusive answer. I have done a lot of reading on this. I haven't found our classical scholars discussing it. I came across a brief statement of even Tamiya who just referenced it that if a sincere person looks into Islam can he end up projecting or not. He says the scholars have differed over this issue is it hypothetically possible or not, and then he moves on, but he does acknowledge that

there is an opinion that says that the sincere person might because of his or her own corruption of the fitrah you understand sincerity is different than the feather oh he can be sincere there are many sincere people now who are sincere that sexuality should be XYZ and when the Quran comes in says sexuality cannot be XYZ plus t elf whatever you get my point and it can only be then automatically their sincerity from their own perspective oh this cannot be from God and they end up projecting I'm giving a simple example that we understand this is a very problematic issue and in the end of the day I will say laddie I don't know I don't know and alhamdulillah we don't have to worry about Sarah Allah is just and merciful we leave it to Allah Allah is just and merciful our job doesn't change and that is to preach and teach and to guide people etc etc okay you know time is gonna just do one quick question then we're done ash Allah this

is a very easy question. Two minutes, the second question, brother. Actually, I got at least four or five questions. I'm summarizing them and I won't answer them. I explain you why I want. So the today's second question is why I won't entertain such future questions later on. Brother sends me a very long email about a specific divorce issue between him, his wife, and says, Am I divorced or not? Okay, or it does this count as divorce or not? And I got many questions from people here. My cousin did this, my friend did that, and they send me the scenario and they want the verdict. I will never entertain a specific fatwa of divorce on this table. That's not how divorce is to be decided. You send an email, my friend said this, and then you send me because you happen to be living in Epic, you send it to Shiraz or whatever. Doesn't work that way. Never ever get a specific verdict of divorce from a generic fatwa. Why is that clear? I shall never entertain such questions. I don't mind talking about

abstracts does a triple divorce counters there were no problem. Okay does this phrase counter no problem but you come to me say, Oh my cousin Ahmed said this to his wife Fatima, and you write me an email. I don't know did he really say this or not. I cannot pass a verdict on Ahmed and Fatima until, until what, until Ahmed and Fatima come in front of me and I hear directly from them, and I can ask them, Oh, but did this happen, did that happen? So please never ever ask any share about a very sensitive issue of any specific nature unless you are asking one-on-one and you are the person involved. Is that clear? I have never and this happens to me all the time. People come up to me say, Oh, my cousin in Karachi told me to come and ask you because I commuted. Well, I am not exaggerating. My cousin in Karachi said this to his wife, and he knows that I'm in your Masjid, and he come to ask her. I said, Go tell your cousin in

Karachi to go to his local Masjid in Karachi and asked to share directly, and don't come to somebody 5,000 miles away. I need to quiz, I need to interrogate if it's you. No problem, come to me, and we will have a conversation, but I cannot pass a verdict on somebody that I don't interact with about their specific marriage and divorce. And remember, never forget the hadith of that lady who came to the process of miss ideale to Allah. You know, my husband does not allow me to pray Salah. He to me when I pray, and he never praise fetcher, and he gave a long list of complaints. And the process of him, he didn't just pronounce the verdict, What an evil husband you are. He said, Call the man for me. He called the man, said, What is this? And the man explained the other Sarala. I come home tired from work, and I need to go to sleep, and I want to be with my wife. I only have that much time on it be with her. Instead, she's standing.

praying long soon as enough is and which one is more obligatory for me to take care of my knees or for her to pray her 200 at that time so the president said let no woman pray enough else Allah accept her for husband agrees for a wife the priority after the fog is to listen to the husband so this was God murder was she incorrect in saying that he gets angry at me no she was correct but she's giving her perspective then the man gives his perspective then the question of fresher comes at ya rasul'allah I try but we have a hereditary issue my family is known for over sleeping there were no alarm clocks back then ER so it runs in our family that we try to wake up we do not wake up in the morning so the problem said any if you are not then when you wake up you have to pray for meaning in this case ok you are forgiven if you genuinely try basically the woman was correct she was not lying but in the end of the day when you hear the other

side you hear it hold a different perspective, and the man was exonerated. Bottom line, never ever ask a sensitive fatu a third party. Never email anyone, even me. If you live in this community, come to me directly. Don't just email. I said this tomorrow, no, I don't. I need to quiz you. I need to ask you, well, did this happen, then that happen. It's a back and forth. So, second question, there is no question because I'm never going to entertain specific questions about especially thalaaq, and you should never be done. Rather, we can speak in generics. Go ahead and ask me, does a triple divorce count as one or not? No problem, we'll talk theoretically, but do not say, oh, I said this in an email, that to me, and then expect an answer over here publicly. Even know doesn't work that way. Come to me one on one. No problem with this, insha'Allah, that we conclude today, we'll continue tomorrow or halacha, and I will continue next week, a show that said I'm on equal.

the eternal fire he and I as in a feed Dona Ursula and world in her appearance all open Benjamin being our little teeny Gemma.

What is The Islamic Ruling Regarding The Fate of 'Good 'Non Muslims | Ask  Shaykh YQ #13

Yasir Qadhi

비무슬림의 운명에 대한 이슬람의 관점

사후 세계에서 개인의 운명을 결정할 권리는 오직 알라에게만 있으며, 그분의 결정에 이의를 제기하거나 의문을 제기하는 것은 인간에게 허용되지 않습니다.

이슬람의 가르침에 따르면 천국과 지옥의 배정은 특정 개인이 아닌 일반성과 조건에 따라 결정됩니다.

꾸란과 수나는 사후 세계로 가는 길은 명확하게 정해져 있지만 궁극적인 심판은 알라에게 있음을 강조합니다.

꾸란과 수나에 나타난 이슬람의 배타성

꾸란에서 알라의 명백한 메시지는 이슬람이 유일하게 허용되는 삶의 방식이며, 이를 거부하면 내세에서 잃게 된다는 것입니다.

이슬람에서 선지자를 거부하는 것은 알라를 거부하는 것이며, 이는 꾸란에 명확하게 명시되어 있습니다.

꾸란과 수나의 증거는 이슬람이 구원의 유일한 길이라는 생각을 압도적으로 뒷받침합니다.

이슬람에 대한 전통적인 해석에 도전하다

한 대학원생이 권위 있는 컨퍼런스에서 이슬람 밖의 구원에 대한 생각은 이슬람 전통에서 우선순위가 없다고 주장하며 논란의 여지가 있는 논문을 발표합니다.

이 학생의 해석은 꾸란과 수나의 증거와 논리적 추론에 근거하여 구원은 오직 이슬람을 통해서만 가능하다는 생각을 뒷받침합니다.

이 논문은 또한 알라에게 이르는 다른 길을 받아들이는 것은 이슬람의 근본적인 신념과 모순된다는 점을 강조합니다.

이슬람의 메시지를 받은 특별한 사례들

알라의 마지막 계시와 이슬람의 메시지를 전하는 선지자의 역할은 이슬람을 접하지 못한 사람들의 맥락에서 의문을 제기합니다.

이슬람에 대해 들어본 적이 없는 사람들이 심판의 날에 시험을 받게 될 것이기 때문에 자동으로 잔나에 들어갈 것이라는 믿음은 비논리적인 것으로 간주됩니다.

이슬람을 접했지만 지식을 구하지 않은 사람들의 운명을 결정할 때 피트라의 개념이 영혼의 평화를 찾지 못할 것이라는 믿음에 영향을 미치면서 논쟁이 벌어집니다.

내적 신념의 중요성과 비종교인의 운명

거짓 신에 대한 믿음은 내적 갈등과 죄책감을 유발할 수 있습니다.

연사는 신이라는 개념을 거부하는 비종교인은 구원의 기회가 없다고 강조합니다.

이 토론은 또한 예언자의 부모님의 운명에 대한 논란을 강조합니다.

다양한 신앙 전통은 배타성과 정확성에 대한 생각과 씨름합니다.

보편적인 수용에 대한 열망과 단일한 진리에 대한 믿음 사이에는 긴장이 존재합니다.

연사는 사람들이 특정 신앙을 받아들이거나 거부하게 되는 다양한 시나리오에 대해 설명하면서 종교적 다양성과 개인의 신념을 탐색하는 데 따르는 어려움을 강조합니다.

이슬람을 거부하는 진정성의 도전

진실한 사람이 자신의 타락한 신앙으로 인해 이슬람을 거부할 수 있는지는 복잡하고 어려운 문제입니다.

이 문제는 10년 넘게 연사를 괴롭혀 왔으며, 고전적인 이슬람 학계에서도 결정적인 해답은 없습니다.

발표자는 이혼과 같은 민감한 문제에 대한 구체적인 개인적 판결은 관련 당사자가 일대일 상담을 위해 참석하지 않는 한 학자에게 구해서는 안 된다고 강조합니다.

민감한 사안에 대한 판결을 구하기 위한 가이드라인

결혼이나 이혼과 같은 민감한 문제에 대한 판결을 구하려면 현지 종교 당국에 직접 문의해야 합니다.

구체적인 사안은 누군가에게 원격으로 문의해서는 안 되며, 대신 일반적인 질문은 공개적으로 논의할 수 있습니다.

이슬람 전통의 이야기를 통해 민감한 사안에 대한 판단을 내리기 전에 두 가지 관점을 모두 듣는 것이 중요하다는 점을 강조했습니다.