지식의 본질과 인간의 인식

### 지식의 본질: 현실과 우리의 감각에 대한 이해
* 👋 "손가락이 어디 있죠? 간단한 질문이지만, 우리가 무엇을 어떻게 알고 있는지에 대한 더 깊은 질문으로 이어집니다."
* 🧠 고유 수용성 감각과 같이 잘 알려지지 않은 감각을 포함하여 우리의 감각은 주변 환경을 이해하는 데 도움이 되지만, **착시 현상과 촉각 착각**에서 알 수 있듯이 완벽하지는 않습니다.
* 🔍 지식 철학 또는 인식론은 우리가 진실이라고 믿는 것을 정당화하는 방법을 탐구하는 학문으로, **플라톤은 지식에는 진실, 믿음, 정당화가 필요**하다는 점에 주목했습니다.
* 💡 '모든 총각은 미혼이다'와 같이 우리가 선험적으로 알 수 있는 진리는 **경험적 증거를 통해 검증할 필요가 없습니다.**
* 연구에 따르면 기억은 고립된 뇌 위치에 저장되는 것이 아니라 **장기적인 강화를 통해 강화되는 복잡한 뉴런 네트워크**로 구성되어 있습니다.
* 📦 추정치에 따르면 인간의 뇌는 **약 2.5페타바이트의 정보를 저장**할 수 있으며, 이는 **300년 동안 TV 채널을 계속 녹화**할 수 있는 용량에 해당합니다.
* 🌀 자기중심적 곤경은 외부 세계에 대한 모든 지식이 우리의 마음을 통해 걸러진다는 점을 강조하며, **우리의 지각을 넘어선 현실의 존재에 대한 의문**을 제기합니다.
* 🐱 고독주의는 자신의 마음만이 확실하다고 가정하는 반면, **실재론은 외부 세계의 존재**를 주장하며 우리가 믿을 수 있을 뿐 확실하게 알 수는 없다고 주장합니다.

마이클은 인간 지식의 한계를 탐구하며, 우리의 이해는 불완전한 감각을 통해 걸러진다는 점을 강조합니다.

Hey, Vsauce. Michael here.
Where are your fingers? Seriously. It's a pretty easy question.
You should be able to answer it. But how do you know?
How does anyone know anything? You might say, well,
I know where my fingers are. I'm looking

right at them. Or, I can touch them, I can feel them, they're
right here and that's good. Your senses are a great way to learn things. In fact, we have way more than the usual
five senses we talk about.

For instance, your kinesthetic sense, proprioception. This is what the police evaluate
during a field sobriety test. It allows you to tell where your fingers
and arms and head and legs in your body are all in relation to each other

without having to look or touch other things. We have way more than five senses, we
have at least twice as many and then some. But they're not perfect.
There are optical illusions, audio illusions, temperature sensation illusions, even tactile illusions.
Can you turn your tongue upside down?

If so, perfect. Try this.
Run your finger along the outer edge of the tip of your upside-down tongue. Your tongue will be able to feel
your finger, but in the wrong place. Our brains never needed to develop an understanding

of upside-down tongue touch.
So, when you touch the right side of your tongue when it's flipped over to your left side
you perceive a sensation on the opposite side, where your tongue
usually is but isn't when it's upside down.
It's pretty freaky and cool

and a little humbling, because it shows the limits of the accuracy of our senses, the only tools we have to get what's out there in here. The philosophy of knowledge, the study of knowing, is called epistemology.

Plato famously said that the things we know are things that are true, that we believe and that we have justification for believing. Those justifications might be irrational or they might be rational, they might be based on proof, but don't get too confident because proven is not a synonym

for true. Luckily, there are things that we can know without needing proof, without needing to even leave the house, things that we can know as true by reason alone. These are things that we know a priori. An example would be the statement

"all bachelors are unmarried." I don't have to go survey every bachelor on earth to know that that is true. All bachelors are unmarried because that's how we define the word bachelor. Of course, you have to know what the words

bachelor and unmarried mean in the first place. Oh, you do? Okay. Perfect. That's great. But how do you know? This time I mean functionally, how do you know? Where is knowledge biologically in the brain? What are memories made out of?

We are a long way from being able to answer that question completely but research has shown that memories don't exist in the brain in single locations. Instead, what we call a memory is likely made up of many different complex relationships all over the brain between lots of brain cells,

neurons. A major cellular mechanism
thought to underlie the formation of memories is long-term potentiation or LTP.
When one neuron stimulates another neuron repeatedly, that signal can be enhanced over time. LTP, wiring them more strongly together

and that connection can last a long time, even an entire lifetime.
A collection of different brain cells, neurons that fire together in a particular order over and over again frequently and repeatedly can achieve long-term potentiation, becoming more sensitive to each other and more
ready to fire in the exact same way

later on in the future.
They're a physical thing in your brain, firing together more easily because you strengthen that pattern of firing. You memorized.
This branching forest of firing friends looks messy, but look closer.
It could be the memory of your first kiss.
A living souvenir

of the event.
If I were to go into your brain and cut out those cells, could I make you forget your first kiss or could I make you forget where your fingers are? Only if I cut out a lot of your brain. Because memories aren't just stored in one
relationship, they're stored

all over the brain. The events leading up
to your first kiss are stored in one network, the way it felt to the way it smelled in
different networks, all added up together making what you call the memory of your first kiss. How many memories can you fit

inside your head?
What is the storage capacity of the human brain?
The best we can do is a rough estimate, but given the number of
neurons in the brain involved with memory and the number of different connections
a single neuron can make

Paul Reber at Northwestern University estimated that we can store the digital equivalent of about 2.5 petabytes of information.
That's the equivalent of recording a TV channel continuously for 300 years. That's a lot of information.
That is a lot of information about

skills you can do and facts and people you've met, things in the real world. The world is real, right? How do you know?
It's a difficult question, but it's not rocket science.
Instead, it is asking whether or not rocket scientists
even exist in the first place.

The theory that the Sun moved around the Earth worked great. It predicted that the Sun
would rise every morning and it did. It wasn't until later that we
realized what we thought was true might not be.
So, do we or will we ever know true reality

or are we stuck in a world where the
best we can do is be approximately true? Discovering more and
more useful theories every day but never actually reaching true objective actual reality. Can science or reason ever prove convincingly that your friends and YouTube videos and your fingers

actually exist beyond your mind?
That you don't just live in the matrix? No.
Your mind is all that you have, even if you use instruments, like a telescope or particle accelerators.
The final stop for all of that information is ultimately

you.
You are alone in your own brain, which technically makes it impossible to prove that anything else exists.
It's called the egocentric predicament.
Everything you know about the world out there depends on and is created inside your brain. This mattered so much to Charles Sanders Peirce
that he drew a line

between reality, the way the universe truly is, and what he called the phaneron,
the world as filtered through our senses and bodies, the only information we can get. If you want to speak with certainty you live in, that is you react to and remember and experience your

phaneron, not reality. The belief that only you exist and everything else, food, the universe,
your friends are all figments of your mind is called
solipsism. There is no way to convince a solipsist that the outside world

is real.
And there is no way to convince someone who doubts that the universe wasn't created
just three seconds ago along with all of our memories.
It's a frightening realization that we don't always know how to deal with.
There's even

The Matrix defense.
In 2002 Tonda Lynn Ansley shot and killed her landlady. She argued that she believed she was in
the Matrix, that her crimes weren't real.
By using the Matrix defense she was found not guilty

by reason of insanity, because the
opposite view is just way more healthy and common. It's called realism.
Realism is the belief that the outside world exists independently of your own phaneron.
Rocks and stars and Thora Birch would continue to exist even if you weren't around

to experience them.
But you cannot know realism is true.
All you can do is believe.
Martin Gardner, a great source for math magic tricks, explained that he is not a solipsist
because realism is just way more convenient and healthy and it works.

As to whether it bothered him that he
could never know realism was true, he wrote "if you ask me to tell you
anything about the nature of what lies beyond the phenomenon, my answer is how should I know?
I'm not dismayed by ultimate mysteries, 

I can no more grasp what is behind such questions as my cat can understand what is
behind the clatter I make while I type this paragraph."
Humble stuff. What strikes me is the cat.
Cats do not understand keyboards, but they know the keyboards are a fun place to be. 

It's a great way to get the attention
of a human, they're warm and exciting, surrounded by noises and
flashing lights, plus cats love to get their scent
on whatever they can, a mark of their existence. We aren't that much different,
except instead of keyboards 

we have the mysteries of the universe. We will never be able to understand all
of them. We won't be able to ever answer every single question, but walking around in those questions, exploring them, is fun.
It feels good. And as always, 

thanks for watching. Do you want more unanswered questions?
Well, you're in luck. Today, nine other amazing channels on
YouTube have made videos about questions we still haven't fully answered. Alltime10s has organized them and to watch them all 

click the annotation at the end of this video or the link at the top of the description.
Enjoy. 

Is Anything Real?

Vsauce

주변 환경과 감각적 한계 파악하기

손가락 위치를 알고 어떻게 알 수 있는지에 대한 질문입니다.

일반적인 오감을 뛰어넘는 학습 방법으로서의 감각.

운동 감각(고유 감각)과 신체 인식에서의 역할.

불완전한 감각과 감각 착각의 예.

감각의 한계를 보여주는 거꾸로 혀 실험.

인식론(지식에 대한 연구) 소개.

플라톤의 지식에 대한 정의와 '증명된'과 '참된'의 구분.

선험적 지식과 '모든 총각은 미혼이다'라는 예시.

지식의 기원과 뇌의 생물학적 근거에 대해 질문합니다.

기억은 단일 위치에 저장되는 것이 아니라 뇌의 복잡한 관계로 저장됩니다.

장기 강화(LTP)와 기억 형성에서의 역할.

뉴런이 함께 발화하여 연결을 강화합니다.

기억은 한 곳에 저장되는 것이 아니라 뇌에 물리적으로 존재하는 것입니다.

인간 두뇌의 저장 용량(2.5페타바이트 추정).

외부 세계의 현실에 의문을 제기합니다.

현실을 증명하는 데 있어 과학적 지식의 한계.

과학이 마음 너머의 존재를 확실하게 증명할 수 없음.

자기중심적 곤경과 경험을 창조하는 뇌의 역할.

찰스 샌더스 피어스의 현실과 페이너론의 구분.

현실이 아닌 파네론 속에서 살아가고 반응합니다.

고독주의와 외부 세계의 존재를 증명할 수 없는 불가능성.

현실에 의문을 제기하는 예로 매트릭스 변호를 들 수 있습니다.

독립적인 외부 세계에 대한 믿음으로서의 현실주의.

마틴 가드너의 현실주의에 대한 실용적인 수용.

지식의 한계를 인정하고 궁극적인 신비를 포용합니다.

고양이와 키보드의 비유를 통해 우주와의 관계를 설명합니다.

답이 없는 질문을 탐구하는 즐거움.

마무리 발언 및 관련 동영상 홍보.