면접관의 반응과 면접 대상자에게 미치는 영향

면접관의 반응을 이해하는 것은 성공적인 면접을 위해 매우 중요한데, 감정적 단서와 후속 질문은 지원자가 해당 직무에 적합한지 여부를 나타낼 수 있기 때문입니다.

### 면접관의 반응: 다양한 인터뷰를 통한 인사이트
* 🧐 인터뷰 후에는 구체적인 사실이나 증거는 기억나지 않는 경우가 많지만 **후회나 스트레스의 순간과 같은 감정적인 기억**은 머릿속에 깊이 새겨져 있습니다.
* 👂 면접이 끝나면 사람들은 **모든 종류의 의사소통과 제스처에 더욱 민감**해져 결과를 알아내려고 노력하는 경향이 있습니다.
* 📉 많은 사람이 불합격을 암시하는 댓글을 들으면 불안감을 느끼지만 **정확한 합격 기준**을 판단하기는 어렵습니다.
* 👀 면접관마다 합격 기준이 있으며, **한 면접관이 합격**하더라도 여러 가지 이유로 **다른 면접관이 불합격**할 수 있습니다.
* 💬 면접관은 지원자의 경험이 회사나 업계와 관련성이 부족하거나 답변이 주제에서 벗어난 경우 **후속 질문을** 하는 경우가 많습니다.
* 🔄 면접관은 완전히 다른 유형의 경험이 있는지 반복해서 물어볼 수 있으며, **이는 그들이 찾고 있는 것과 일치하지 않는다는 것**을 나타낼 수 있습니다.
* 🔍 면접관은 지원자의 이야기의 일관성을 확인하기 위해 **주제를 조금씩 바꾸는 질문**을 자주 던집니다.
* 🔮 면접에서 자신 있게 돋보이려면 **자신의 진로와 목표를 명확하게 요약**하는 태도를 갖는 것이 중요합니다.

Yes, so today's topic is about the reactions of interviewers that will be a highlight in the interview. People often feel anxious about whether the interviewer's reactions are positive or negative. Therefore, rather than providing a specific solution today, I would like to talk based on the experiences of many interviews, focusing on areas where I lacked, the tone of the interviewers, and their reactions. Of course, we mentioned that we are the inspiration, but there are concerns about whether this really helps a lot in interviews. I want to share this video to alleviate those worries a bit. In fact, I have already talked about videos related to signals of approval from interviewers in a previous video. It would be helpful to refer to that video as well. Today, the content is a bit different. We will specifically look at the concrete expressions and contents that are often given in interviews. Let's start by exploring this together.

What if you come? You must have thought about it. So, in that situation, it's not easy, and it's natural that many people find it difficult. As a result, specific facts or evidence are not remembered, but emotional memories seem to be deeply engraved in your mind. Moments that you regret, moments when the interviewer looked unhappy, moments when you were sweating during the interview, these things seem to be more vividly remembered in your memory. The fact that the word interview itself is associated with stress seems to be the reason for that. When you try to find a distinction not from specific facts or evidence but from emotional aspects, there may be some differences from reality. Therefore, after the interview, it seems like your ears become more sensitive, and all kinds of communication.

If you write down all the comments, there are gestures like this. If you have it, you pass, if you don't, you fail. Even though you know that's not the answer, you might not watch this video like that. For example, how can you express your feelings very frankly after meeting someone? Today, based on my experience and analyzing the actual interview comments of various interviewers, I will accurately point out that comments like this situation in the interview is likely to fail so try your interview once, and if not, wait for the results with a little more peace of mind. When I looked into various comments and communities, I found that many of you are preparing for the interview at Red University, but when it comes to unfavorable situations, some hesitate, saying they heard comments like it seems like you failed and then were eliminated after a few weeks.

I did the Nia algebra. It's not about eliminating names. I said I have numbers for all applicants. So, it might be a bit difficult to say that the condition banner is the decisive factor. Or if you ask when it can come out, it means it's a pass. But looking at the comments, it seems like it's not helpful. This can be known by looking at the interview. Each interviewer has their own criteria for passing. Probably, the first question will be from one of the interviewers. There are several interviewers, and even if one interviewer passes, the others may fail, or even if the interviewers in the HR team work hard, due to various criteria, it seems that they may go beyond the passing process. In general, in such cases, it tends to end up as a failure. It could be an individual opinion, and this is

It's really absurd to stare at your daughter as if you're looking through her. I wasn't like that with my daughter. I looked at the person I really wanted to see with eyes like that. When I saw the tremble in the person's voice, I thought, Is that person's true thoughts, or are they just wearing good thoughts they've heard somewhere? I had a lot of thoughts like this. These can be seen as elements for verifying such thoughts, or depending on the personal tendencies of the interviewer, these behaviors can vary. Enviously, we need to carefully consider whether such things as high chances of passing are really enviable. So, we need to carefully consider these things. In fact, when we gathered and analyzed data on what questions the interviewers asked the candidates and how they answered, we found that.

There are some characteristics. The first is when a candidate does not receive any follow-up questions about the experience they mentioned. So, when I reflected on how it was in this case, I realized that the experience the candidate talked about lacked relevance to our company or industry, so it was not meaningful. Since the experience was irrelevant, I had to ask questions from a completely different angle. Or when the interviewer asked a question, but the answer did not align with my intentions or the experience itself. In simple terms, it was off-topic. That's why after the interview, I always advise everyone to reflect on whether they need to return to the specific question and answer it properly.

Suddenly, with the follow-up tikitaqa, when such a question comes up so abruptly, a completely different area of questions arises. Then, the fact that you are unable to catch onto something is highly likely to be a point where you are missing the mark. I would like you to separate those kinds of questions and see how other people have answered them. So, while watching the replay mode of the preserved anchovy of Jeotgal, you can see what it was that didn't quite fit for me. Really, questions that mainly come up when you've failed. The second question is, um, there are no other cases besides that, right? That's what it was. You have already followed the interview process faithfully with the guide of Team A, so it's not like that, but I'm sure you have shared your own experiences truthfully. Your experiences are the ultimate skills of the Milky Way, and you will think about what to do next. You threw all of that, too.

The interviewer kept asking if I could rewrite it, saying something like, If you couldn't handle it and now it looks like you're stuck in that, are there no other cases? There are no cases like that. Do you have completely different experiences like this? Despite throwing various cards so far, they keep asking about a completely different type of experience. In that case, my experience doesn't match what they want to draw from this interview. It's very high, meaning they're really persistent about this. I wanted to mention this. I have this kind of experience, so I'm confident. That's what I'm talking about. But the interviewer keeps asking, not about that, but to see if there have been no changes in my confidence. So, in this way, when questions like When did the power come in? are asked, it's not about what was said, but about whether it's analytical or intuitive. When it comes to my experience, they keep asking for details and such things. It's okay to do this once or twice when things like this are repeated. Yes, the fact that this is repeated means

What I mean is that written approach is not helping at all with what the applicant is saying right now. This in itself turns very red and it's not good. Of course, this could be the opinion of one interviewer, but usually in these situations, most interviewers tend to have the same opinion about this bad solution. Therefore, even if you go to the end, there have been many cases where the result was not good. So, then, what is the third type that mainly comes out in interviews? It's a similar question, but slightly changing the topic a bit and asking again without realizing that it's the same question asked before, changing it a bit and asking again. This kind of question comes up a lot when verifying the consistency of applicants. For example, applicants with inconsistent stories often get asked these kinds of questions. Let's say, you met an applicant at the interview who had these experiences.

From overseas, starting from elementary school, middle school, high school, to university, they put everything in. And suddenly, they even supported the second lieutenant at an overseas company. So, it's weird, right? It lacks coherence. Now, even if they want to avoid me, it's fine. They added fluff like motivation for applying and lessons learned for two employees. This is something that can't be confirmed right now. So, in my opinion, even if this person passes, they will go somewhere else. That's why I asked about this through the 3-stage questioning method. It's a method of questioning that I use during interviews. As a Vietnamese interviewer, I usually write it like this. First, an introductory question, then a follow-up question, and finally, linking back to the first question. I asked about this again, such as their experiences. Don't mention our company's employees yet, I said.

After that, the next question I asked was about the reasons for returning to the country. So, if these two questions didn't quite match, I don't know if they were meant to be related, but they didn't quite fit. I was more interested in the third question, asking the applicant what dreams they have that they would like to achieve. If the answers to these questions are not consistent, then what are you trying to achieve? Then, finally, the question I asked about the skills, Where else did you apply other than here? When I asked this, the applicant seemed to be lost in thought after the interview was almost over. So, confidently following their own path, they talked about working at a foreign company, saying something refreshing. By clearly summarizing this, if you want to confidently stand out in the interview, that's the kind of attitude you should have.

I've looked into the types of questions and comments you've asked. In the future, there may be cases where the content provided by you is difficult or challenging, so I will continue to analyze the contents submitted through the interview return, not only based on my experience but also on the experiences of many people, and I will continue to upload content that can be helpful to you in the future. If there were situations during the interview that were the most difficult to understand or challenging, feelings, emotions, attitudes of interviewers, or any other difficulties, please leave a comment below. Among those comments, I will make sure to answer them. If there are any topics that I haven't addressed today, I will make sure to find them and upload them in a video. Remember, interviews require essential skills. I will continue to create examples and theories so that you can follow along, so please subscribe and like to stay informed.

Please give it to me. Just doing that will basically cover all aspects of employment and job change. Fighting! I will continue to make promises for your successful job search and career development. Enjoy it. I will stop here. Graduation, goodbye.

면접관이 솔직히 말하는 망한 면접 특징

대한민국 청년들의 취업/창업을 함께하는 Alivecommunity 입니다! 
단순 강의가 아니라 스스로 사고하며 생각할 수 있도록  지원하며 함께합니다. 

* 제휴 문의  official@alivecommunity.co.kr 
(본 메일로 취업 및 커리어 상담은 진행하지 않습니다)

얼라이브 커뮤니티 공식 홈페이지: 
👉https://alivecommunity.co.kr/

취준을 가장 체계적으로 준비할 수 있는 신흥학교:
👉https://bit.ly/3NmtTt6

COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 ALIVECOMMUNITY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
저작자와의 협의 및 동의가 없는 영상의 사용을 금합니다.


면접왕 이형

사람들은 면접 중 면접관의 반응에 대해 걱정하는 경우가 많으며, 특히 면접관의 어조와 표정에 집중합니다.

스트레스와 후회의 순간 등 면접의 감정적 영향은 구체적인 피드백보다 지원자에게 더 강하게 남는 경향이 있습니다.

면접관의 실제 발언을 분석하면 지원자가 면접의 잠재적 결과를 이해하는 데 도움이 될 수 있습니다.

면접을 준비하는 많은 사람들이 특히 자신의 성과에 대한 부정적인 반응과 의견을 접할 때 안심과 지침을 구합니다.

면접 과정은 복잡하고 면접관마다 합격 기준이 다르기 때문에 의사 결정에 일관성이 결여될 가능성이 있습니다.

지원자 면접을 분석한 결과, 관련 없는 경험과 주제에서 벗어난 답변이 지원자의 당락을 결정하는 주요 요인으로 밝혀졌습니다.

지원자는 면접 과정에서 이러한 문제를 신중하게 고려하는 것이 중요합니다.

반복적인 면접 질문에 대처하는 전략

반복적인 면접 질문은 지원자의 답변과 면접관의 기대치가 일치하지 않는 경우가 많습니다.

반복되는 질문의 근본적인 우려를 해결하고 명확하고 일관된 답변을 제공하는 것이 중요합니다.

이러한 유형의 질문은 면접관이 지원자 이야기의 일관성을 확인할 때, 특히 지원자의 경험에 불일치가 있을 때 주로 발생합니다.

일관성 없는 면접 답변 및 질문 기법

면접관은 지원자의 일관성 있는 답변을 유도하기 위해 3단계 질문 방법을 사용했습니다.

면접관은 특히 지원자의 꿈과 동기에 관심을 보이며 일관성 있는 답변을 요구했습니다.

지원자가 외국계 기업에서 일하고 싶다는 의지와 향후 목표에 대한 질문에 대한 답변에서 지원자의 의도가 일관성이 있는지에 대한 우려가 제기되었습니다.

향후 개선을 위한 인터뷰 콘텐츠 분석

향후 콘텐츠 개선을 위해 제공되는 질문과 댓글의 유형을 분석하는 것이 중요합니다.

많은 사람들의 경험을 바탕으로 유용한 콘텐츠를 만드는 데 중점을 둘 것입니다.

인터뷰 중 어렵거나 까다로운 상황에 대응하고 미처 다루지 못한 주제를 다루는 것이 우선순위가 될 것입니다.

필수 면접 기술에 대한 사례와 이론을 지속적으로 제공하고 성공적인 구직과 경력 개발을 위한 참여를 독려합니다.