if I sat before you today and gave you a big red button and said, "Here, if you press this button you will get uploaded in this way. The sense of identity that you have lived with for quite a long time is going to be gone." Would you press the

button? Um, there, the cover I have, um, family. So I have children that want me to be physically present in their life and interact with them in a particular way. And they, um, have a wife and, um, personal friends. And there is a particular mode of interaction that I

feel I'm not through yet, but apart from these responsibilities, and they're negotiable to some degree, I would press the button. But isn't this everything, this love you have for other humans? You can call it responsibility, but that connection, that's the ego death, isn't

that the thing we're really afraid of is not to just die, but to let go of the experience of love with other humans? This is not everything. Everything is everything, right? So there's so much more, and you could be lots of other things. You could identify with lots of other

things. You could be identifying with being Gaia, some kind of planetary control agent that emerges over all the activity of life on Earth. You could be identifying with some hyperia that is the, uh, concatenation of Gaia with all the digital life and digital minds and

so in this sense, there will be agents in all sorts of substates and directions that all have their own goals. And when they're not sustainable, then these agents will cease to exist. Or when the agent feels that it's done with its own mission, it will cease to exist in the

same way as when you conclude a thought, the thought is going to wrap up and give control over to other thoughts in your own mind. So there is no single thing that you need to do, but what I observe in myself is being is that sometimes I'm a parent

and then I have an identification and a job as a parent, and sometimes uh I am an agent of Consciousness on Earth, and then from this perspective, there's other stuff that is important. So this is my main issue with uh Ela's perspective that he's basically marrying himself to

a very narrow human aesthetic, and that narrow human aesthetic is a temporary thing. Humanity is a temporary species, like most of the species on this planet, are only around for a while and then they get replaced by other species in a similar way as our own physical organism

is around here for a while and then gets replaced by the next generation of human beings that are adapted to changing life circumstances and average via mutation and selection. And it's only when we have AI and become completely software that we become infinitely adaptable and

we don't have this generational and species change anymore. So if you take this larger perspective and you realize it's really not about us, it's not about Ela or Humanity, but it's about life on Earth or it's about defeating um entropy for as

long as we can while being as interesting as we can, right? Then um the perspective changes dramatically, and AI uh preventing AI from this perspective looks like a very big sin, but when we look at the set of trajectories that such an AI would take that

supersedes humans uh I think Elzar is worried about like ones that not just kill all humans but also have some kind of maybe objectively um undesirable consequence for life on Earth like how many trajectories when you look at the big picture of life on Earth

would you be happy with and how much worry you with AGI whether there kills humans or not there is no single answer to this it's really it's a question that depends on the perspective that I'm taking at a given moment and so there are perspectives

that are uh determining most of my life as a human being yes and uh there other perspective I zoom out further and imagine that when the Great oxygenation event happened that is photosynthesis was invented and plants emerged and displaced a lot of the fungi and algae in

favor of plant life and then later made animals possible imagine that the fungi would have gotten together and said oh my God this photosynthesis stuff is really really bad it's going to possibly displace and kill out of fungi we should slow it down and regulate it and make

sure that it doesn't happen uh this doesn't look good to me

Infinitely adaptable - @lexfridman

Joscha Bach Bits

화자는 가상의 시나리오를 제시합니다: 현재의 정체성이 사라질 것을 알면서도 버튼을 눌러 의식을 업로드할까요?

가족 및 친구와 같은 개인적인 책임이 결정에 영향을 미치는 요인으로 고려됩니다.

다른 사람과의 연결과 사랑을 잃는 것에 대한 두려움이 망설임의 잠재적 원인으로 논의되고 있습니다.

연사는 사랑과 인간관계가 전부는 아니며, 인간의 경험을 넘어서는 다른 형태의 정체성과 목적이 있다고 주장합니다.

인간 존재를 넘어서는 대안적 정체성과 관점

연사는 가이아 또는 행성 제어 에이전트와 같은 더 광범위한 실체와 동일시할 수 있는 가능성을 탐구합니다.

각자의 목표와 수명을 가진 에이전트의 개념을 마음속의 생각에 비유하여 소개합니다.

발표자는 부모 또는 의식의 대리인 등 다양한 정체성과 우선순위 사이를 오갔던 자신의 경험을 공유합니다.

연사는 인간의 미학에 너무 편협하게 초점을 맞춘 관점을 비판하며 인간은 일시적이라고 주장합니다.

더 넓은 관점: 지구상의 생명체와 엔트로피와의 싸움

연사는 지구 생명체의 중요성과 엔트로피와의 투쟁을 강조하면서 더 큰 관점으로 전환합니다.

이러한 넓은 관점에서 볼 때, AI 개발을 막는 것은 잠재적인 실수로 간주됩니다.

인공지능의 궤적에 대한 우려와 지구 생명체에 미칠 수 있는 잠재적인 부정적인 결과에 대해 논의합니다.

연사는 AI의 영향력을 평가하는 주관성을 강조하며 관점의 중요성을 강조합니다.

원근법과 위대한 산화 사건 비유

연사는 자신의 인생 선택에 영향을 미치는 다양한 관점에 대해 이야기합니다.

광합성의 출현이 다른 생명체에 영향을 미친 대산화 사건에 비유할 수 있습니다.

발표자는 곰팡이가 광합성을 막으려는 가상의 시나리오를 상상하며 변화에 저항할 때 발생할 수 있는 잠재적 결과를 강조합니다.