Yes, our thin cyanide friend is here. Ah, originally, people say that all these prices are discounted, and they don't actually get any money. Ah, well, they set the selling price high, and that's just how it is, right? Otherwise, are you saying they should sell at a loss? Of course, the people who make these products need to make a profit. They will charge a reasonable price, but sometimes they sell it at a higher price, and sometimes at a lower price, right? I also do that. Yes, there must be a production cost. Ah, and our representative, Ki Eun-hye, speaks with such a beautiful voice that it naturally heals the heart. Yes, if only Ki Eun-hye had done well in stocks, she would be sitting right here. It's really unfortunate. If you study for about three years, yes, give it a try. Yes, this is the third segment with our reporter, Park Byeong-chang.

Welcome. Hello, it's nice to see you. Now, shall we take a look at the U.S. market and move on? The U.S. market has experienced fluctuations for two consecutive days, with different indices rising and falling, showing only slight movements. Yesterday, the Dow dropped by 0.5%, and the Nasdaq fell by 0.25%. These are not significant changes, as the movements are small. Therefore, it seems that the market closed in a mixed state. We are currently waiting for the employment report to be released when the U.S. market opens tonight. Yesterday, there were indicators that could only be described as mixed. Both good and bad indicators were released simultaneously. The ADP private employment report showed an increase of 99,000 jobs, while the expectation was for 140,000.

Recently, there has been a lot of concern about employment. This means that the employment indicators are coming out shockingly. It's understandable to worry; when employment indicators are shockingly low, it raises concerns that an economic recession may come much faster than we expect. However, the number of initial unemployment claims came out at 227,000, which is a decrease of 5,000 from last week. Additionally, the ISM Services PMI that I mentioned yesterday, which is important, came out at 51.5, while the expectation was 51.3, and last month it was also 51.3. Now, if we look at this with 50 as a benchmark, if it falls below that, it becomes a problem. If it had dropped significantly below 50, it would have been quite shocking. So now that we are looking at that...

I was quite worried, but it came out to be 51.5. So, the manufacturing PMI was 42, which raised concerns about a slowdown in manufacturing. That day, it dropped by 3%. However, the service PMI came out stronger than expected. Looking at this, employment figures were not good, and the total number of unemployment benefits was somewhat stable, while the service PMI was decent. This suggests that the index is in a situation where it cannot be pulled in any particular direction. As a result, I think the index closed in a mixed state. Nevertheless, the overall concern about a recession continues. 

If we look at the 10-year government bond yield, it was 3.72%. Right now, the 2-year yield is at 3.73%, which is almost the same. The 10-year government bond yield adjusts for economic conditions, while the 2-year yield estimates the benchmark interest rate. Therefore, seeing the 10-year yield drop sharply indicates that...

Concerns about the economic downturn continue, and that sentiment is currently dominating the market. Because of this, if you look at oil prices, the WTI futures are at $69.30, having fallen below $70. Overall, trading is reflecting the basic sentiment that the economy is not doing well. Looking at major stocks, Apple rose by 0.69%, but its fluctuations are not severe. In fact, the stocks with the most volatility are those associated with growth sectors, particularly in AI. Nvidia is currently experiencing the most significant fluctuations; it rose slightly by 0.94% yesterday, reaching $107. There is considerable debate about whether Nvidia will break the $100 mark. If it does break $100, many believe it should be bought without hesitation.

There are various discussions going on, including the idea that it won't break out. So, Nvidia is currently at around $107, and there is quite a bit of controversy surrounding that. It's a situation that we're watching closely. I think it will break out. The market is, well, it's just the market. Rather than just chatting about it, it seems like we're just talking casually. Yes, the price is currently sitting at $880, but the price we’re waiting for never comes, right? That's the market. Yes, that's true. Personally, I don’t really have a specific price I’m waiting for. Sometimes, I think, “Should I wait for this?” and I keep an eye on that price, but it never reaches it. Thank you for your good advice. Here’s another good tip: I may not have seen it, but everyone knows. However, let’s talk about it again.

There are three major trends, and when I wait for good stocks, they don’t come and just pass by. But when I’m waiting, my price suddenly gets executed, and then they drop. Ah, those are the declining stocks. Ah, right, I think that’s true. Yes, yes, they are declining stocks. When it gets executed, it falls again. Right, right, right. Ah, you are truly impressive. Now, when you trade in the stock market like this, ah, when it gets executed and you’re happy, it immediately drops and keeps falling endlessly. So, even when we trade every day, I set my price about 3% below. But when that gets executed, it doesn’t go up that day or the next; it drops even more. That’s definitely the vibe that comes from experience. Ah, I wanted to mention that Tesla has risen 4.9% for two consecutive days, so it’s up about 10%.

Tesla has been rising for various reasons lately. I brought some news today, mentioning talks about the release of FSD. I explained how I see the reasons for Tesla's rise. I believe it has a significant impact due to the presidential election. In China, Tesla seems to be benefiting from this situation. Meanwhile, the communication sector, including Amazon, Meta, and Apple, isn't making major movements. Right now, only the semiconductor sector is showing significant activity. It seems that the market has been fluctuating in a narrow range for two consecutive days, waiting for cues. Tonight, there’s the employment report coming out. If it shows an increase of over 100,000 jobs, it might suggest that the economy isn't as bad as expected.

Even if it doesn't happen, concerns about an economic recession will continue, right? Yes, they will. The concerns about a recession are long-term and will persist. This is simply a reality. In the short term, as many of you may have heard from various people, including myself, we have discussed that the second half of the year will be challenging. We've consistently mentioned that it won't be easy because there are too many uncertainties. So, as you asked, concerns about a recession will likely continue. Personally, I believe that there won't be a significant market crash due to a recession this year. However, there may be much greater worries for next year. Therefore, we need to take a longer-term perspective on the debate regarding the recession.

Every time the economic indicators come out, there are underlying concerns because they are fundamentally there. If the indicators come out poorly, there will be worries about the economy, and if they come out well, people might think, Oh, maybe it's not that bad, and the sentiment will fluctuate. I think this will continue; if the next indicators come out positively, we might see a rebound, but then new concerns will arise. 

Now, since you mentioned it, let me show you a good chart. Here is the ISM Services PMI. Yesterday, I showed you the Manufacturing PMI, which has been declining. The ISM Services PMI is above 50 right now, and it hasn't dipped below 50 yet. However, if you look closely, after the pandemic in 2020, it rose to this level and then came down, and while it hasn't dropped below 50, it's still very precarious. It's fluctuating a lot.

The service industry is like this too. It's right above. So, even the service PMI is currently falling, which means that the U.S. economy is also declining. If this situation continues to worsen, it ultimately leads to concerns about a recession. To answer your question, the data is quite erratic. The manufacturing PMI keeps declining, and while it is holding on, if it starts fluctuating and drops, then we really need to worry. If it rebounds, we might think it's not so bad, but there is a possibility of that happening. The employment report is similar; it is moving in a comparable manner, and I will discuss that shortly. Yesterday, our market started with a plus of 6 points, or 0.68%, and at one point during the day, it rose over 1%. However, in the afternoon, it began to decline. Foreign investors sold off around 5,858 units yesterday.

Samsung Electronics recorded a net sell-off of 67.6 billion won. Ultimately, I think this reflects a market sell-off. While there is a general trend of selling, if we look at recent trading, most transactions involve buying or selling Samsung Electronics. This has been the case before; there hasn't been much else besides Samsung Electronics to trade. In the first half of this year, Samsung Electronics was the most bought stock. Therefore, trading in other stocks isn't as significant. This is why we see a lot of trading activity surrounding Samsung Electronics.

I expressed that this is a typical sign of a bearish market. During a bearish market, utilities tend to move a lot. Utilities are active, and I am interested in stocks related to value-up, which will be announced at the end of this month. So, I brought up the listing yesterday. Value-up related stocks are still performing relatively well and are moving actively.

The cosmetics sector is still somewhat decent. Despite the expectations for export data and future performance, cosmetics stocks had dropped significantly. Of course, there are some stocks that didn’t fall, but many have decreased considerably from their peak, showing a slight upward trend from the lows. This segment has seen some increases. 

Interestingly, in yesterday's market, low-priced stocks, those priced at 1,000 or 2,000 won, as well as stocks below 10,000 won, were the strongest performers overall. However, this is completely unrelated to the major indices. There are some connections to the major indices, and I’ve listed some stocks that rose yesterday among the significant ones. For instance, SK Hynix increased by 2.99%, and LG Electronics rose by 3.3%. Our LG Electronics, which doesn’t usually attract much interest, showed this performance.

Without any discussion, LG Solutions rose by 2.6%, and Samsung increased by 2%. What this means is that the finished products in the secondary battery sector are quite good in terms of supply and demand. I mentioned yesterday that there are some stocks that tend to rise when the market drops, and they don’t fall as much during downturns. When the market stabilizes even slightly, they immediately rebound. Recently, there has been a good supply for these stocks. 

Another notable point is that KT rose by 3.5%, and Gangwon Land increased by 7.8%. Have I mentioned Gangwon Land before? Oh, I don’t usually talk about Gangwon Land. Well, they are planning to increase the number of booths. There were reports that Gangwon Land will add more gaming machines and booths. Every time they announce something like this, the stock tends to fluctuate. As for Gangwon Land, their operating profit is...

There are some limitations. The growth potential is not very high. Just to clarify, I'm not speaking negatively about Kangwon Land stocks; they do rise and fall to some extent. However, they cannot be infinitely expanded. This is because the operating profit of Kangwon Land is often perceived negatively, as it is seen as money lost by others. Therefore, the growth potential is not that large. Anyway, Kangwon Province has risen by 7.8%, and recently, E-Mart has increased by about 3%. CJ Daesung has risen by 5.7%, KEPCO by 2.2%, and Krafton by 4.3%, while Suseong has increased by 3.5%. Yesterday, the index went down, but we have been continuously discussing sectors like semiconductors, bio, and pharmaceuticals, among others.

In the first half of the year, we talked a lot about power equipment. How do we deal with power equipment? Right now, power equipment is moving along with AI. You know, I held off for a long time before getting in. I waited a lot, and when power equipment was first mentioned, I should have jumped in. Then, about two weeks later, I thought, Should I have entered? It's going up too much. After another two weeks, I kept thinking, I should have entered back then. Eventually, I did get in, and now it seems like it's down about 30%. Did power equipment move along with AI? Power equipment is simple. It's all about NVIDIA. If NVIDIA holds up, whether it goes up or not, the stock just stays aligned with it. The related stocks in our market are all moving in the same way. Anyway, thank you for your comments.

I provided an answer like that. If you look closely at the stocks, there are sectors that we usually don't mention. Isn't that right? Because there is no liquidity in the market for specific sectors or stocks, the market tends to be weak, which leads us to focus on these areas. One characteristic of this is that utility stocks, essential consumer goods like E-Mart, and value-up related dividend stocks are included here. Therefore, certain sectors are not specifically identified. They have some individual characteristics. That's why we keep saying that the market is focused on individual stocks. There was a tendency to look at stocks individually. However, yesterday was a bit disappointing; the market went up but then came back down at the end. This happens because of the current market sentiment.

There is so much uncertainty. So, since we want to verify that uncertainty, there are many thoughts about reducing it when it comes up. In our country, I can share my opinion, but I don't know the answer. What I mean is that right now, there is a lot of news circulating about value-related issues or tax-related matters, and the most critical one is about financial investment. As I see it, if the financial investment tax is confirmed, it could lead to a loss of 124 trillion won from our market. When I saw that, I thought, This is a threat. I'm not advocating for it, as you know. So, I believe we should either postpone or abolish the financial investment tax. I think we need to take our time, create a system, and approach this properly.

I am a person who thinks that this should not be done. However, seeing the news and how they are creating a lot of chaos among themselves, it seems that the results of the implementation are not the most important thing right now. It is extremely noisy at the moment. The reason I express it this way is that it is psychologically very detrimental. Our market is very, very vulnerable psychologically. Because of such factors, we are in a very weak state. That’s why I am talking about the market. Yes, I will say that. The semiconductor event in Taiwan is ongoing until today, and today we also have the U.S. employment report that we have been discussing. If the market has fallen due to anxiety over this, it could be reflected in that, but the fact that it has fallen is...

No, I think there are things we need to consider regarding the results report. The reason we are worried about the employment report is because of these factors. Just pay attention to the flow. Right now, inflation is quite stable. It seems to be stabilizing further because many indicators of an economic recession are emerging. During a period of economic slowdown, how can inflation rise further? In the past, during our pandemic, there were side effects on the supply side, which caused that situation. However, in the current scenario, it is correct for inflation to decrease. The Federal Reserve has created that environment. Now, what remains is the employment indicators; if the unemployment rate rises further and if employment stability cannot be achieved, they say they will do everything they can to address the situation. Right now, the most important thing is...

Isn't it the core issue? Let me explain a bit. Last month, when the employment report was announced, I was surprised to see the unemployment rate at 4.3%. It had dropped significantly at that time. And if you look closely, most of the figures were not good. The Department of Labor revised the employment numbers downwards, stating that they had lowered the figures by 818,000, which indicates that the situation was not favorable. Following that, the job openings report was released, showing the lowest number in three years at 7. And yesterday, the ADP private employment report came out, showing 99,000 jobs added, which is also the lowest in three years. This trend is mostly coming from the manufacturing sector. Let me briefly mention that the ADP private employment report shows the lowest figures in three years. The service sector saw an increase of 72,000 jobs, while the goods manufacturing sector...

There was an increase of 7,000 people, but in the manufacturing sector, there was a decrease of 8,000. The large enterprises increased by 42,000, while the small businesses decreased by 9,000. This shows that polarization is becoming more severe, and the manufacturing sector is not doing well. I want to explain this in detail because it is the same in our country. Since it is the same in our country, I am sharing specific tax-related situations. However, the situation has not been good recently. Since last month, most employment-related indicators have been unfavorable. Because of the concerns about employment, everyone is waiting to see how the employment report will turn out and how many job openings will be reported. That's what I want to convey right now.

Once again, I would like to mention Wall Street. The current benchmarks being used are 100,000 private sector jobs and an unemployment rate of 4.4 to 4.5. Last time, it was at 4.3. If the figures come out higher than that, there are concerns that it may lead to a stronger conviction of an economic recession. This is something we are watching closely, as we cannot predict what will happen until the numbers are released. However, there is currently no clear forecast regarding how this will unfold. The market's movement will depend on how the numbers turn out. If they fall below the expected range, it is likely that the market will reflect a downward trend. Today is a significant day, and next week will also have a lot of important figures coming out. I've brought a few of them, including Japan's final second-quarter data.

The GDP will be released, and on the 10th, there will be a TV debate among the U.S. presidential candidates. On the same day, Apple will unveil the iPhone 16 series. There are also other announcements expected. On the 11th, the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) for August will be released. We often talk about employment, but the CPI is very important as well. On the 12th, there will be a monetary policy meeting, and in our country, the most significant event will be the simultaneous expiration of futures and options. From the 13th, there will be a European landscape school, and each of these events is crucial. Therefore, next week is also expected to be quite busy. There are many significant events, and since it is just before Chuseok, there will likely be many institutional investors who are somewhat cautious. Yes, that's right. This year's Chuseok is quite long. Additionally, during Chuseok, there will be the U.S. FMC meeting, which is something we cannot control. That's correct, on the 17th and 18th.

The market is quite sensitive, and we are much more interested in it. If we talk about our market, there is a wait-and-see sentiment due to concerns about a recession in the United States. We will have to choose one of two options. First, we want to see if there are other indicators that can dispel these concerns. On the other hand, if the indicators do not come out positively and show negative results, we will likely see a price adjustment. In that case, we would wait for the price to adjust before making a move. Both of these scenarios are currently being considered. Overall, the situation remains somewhat sluggish. Amid this, there is a simultaneous expiration next week, and when there is sufficient trading volume and a trend in either a bull or bear market, the simultaneous expiration of futures typically does not have much impact. However, the trading volume is currently quite low.

There isn't, so the influence of simultaneous expiration will be very significant this time. During simultaneous expiration, the market mostly moves based on the supply and demand of that expiration. Even if the U.S. market goes up or down, it may not have an impact on us; we can move based on our own supply and demand. Therefore, I would like to emphasize that our own situation is more important. When simultaneous expiration occurs, we don't know the direction yet, but of course, there are expectations. If you look at HS, there are predictions, but foreign investors are currently leaning towards the downside. Retail investors always hold positions in both directions, while institutions are neutral. So, if the market moves down, that means there will be losses. Retail investors, on the other hand, operate differently. They are not just on one side; they can make significant profits by trading in both directions.

To put it differently, the capital that can influence the market is foreign investment. Foreign investors tend to have a downward impact. However, this is just an assumption because, during simultaneous expirations, they hold synthetic positions. Given that they hold synthetic positions, I'm making an estimation. From my experience, there are likely only a few dedicated derivatives departments in securities firms these days; many have disappeared, while they used to be everywhere. In the past, I used to analyze the direction during simultaneous expirations and assess how much selling pressure institutions had, as well as how much buying and selling foreign investors had accumulated and what their positions looked like. However, no one talks about that anymore because they have all been wrong over the past few years. It's difficult to make accurate predictions due to those synthetic positions.

There is an estimate based on the transactions that have taken place so far. So rather than trying to match that, I always say that we create a new position for the next month on that day. We either strengthen the sell position or decide whether to liquidate the sell position, or whether to change to a buy position. After that, three months pass, and it's more important to look at that. 

Earlier, I showed you the service PMI chart. If you look at the number of unemployment claims on the left, it indicates that the number of initial unemployment claims has decreased as of yesterday. It has gone down by this much. Although it had been rising for a while, it has now decreased. However, what’s more important than this is the one-month and the continuous unemployment claims. The continuous unemployment claims are...

Actually, things are going down a bit. On one hand, I'm very concerned about employment, but seeing that the number of unemployment benefit claims is decreasing makes me think that the employment indicators are wrong and that there have been many corrections made. This is one of the reasons why people are saying that when a certain indicator comes out, we should check it again later when the revisions are released. Yesterday, we had the preliminary GDP figures for the second quarter, and it showed negative growth. When this was released, people were a bit surprised and started asking me questions. However, the market wasn't greatly affected because the announcement had already been made, and the preliminary data released yesterday was provisional. Nevertheless, negative growth is quite significant.

It's important, but since the negative growth has already been announced, the impact is not there. However, you should pay close attention to the details within it. Last time, the preliminary figure was -0.2, and it showed negative growth. When comparing that with this time, I looked at whether there was any increase or decrease. Exports increased by 0.3 percentage points, and facility investment increased by 0.9 percentage points. However, construction investment and consumption have decreased significantly. These items are very important. Overall, exports increased by 1.2%, but private consumption decreased by -0.2, and construction investment decreased by -1.7. Last time, the Governor of the Bank of Korea described the first quarter as somewhat abnormal, perhaps overly so, because the GDP was good in the first quarter. It was good due to the construction investment. So, taking that into account...

Our country's GDP growth rate is low this year, and they are saying it is lower than last time. So, that's what we are discussing now. If you look here, it says that in the first quarter, the growth was 1.3%, considering the base effect, and that it has come down further. This needs to be taken into account. At that time, there was a somewhat strange phenomenon regarding construction investment. They were saying that construction investment was good and it was rising, but there weren't many reasons for that. So, everyone was thinking about why that happened. Considering this, they are saying that the upcoming quarterly results may drop, and overall, they might need to lower their expectations a bit. If you look at the overall annual estimate, it is currently around 2.3%, but we need to see how it goes from here. The Bank of Korea mentioned that starting in the second half of the year, the recovery speed of domestic demand might accelerate.

There are doubts in the market about how quickly things will improve, but an announcement has been made. This situation has been communicated, and it has been interpreted as a signal that interest rates may be lowered. I just wanted to share that information with you. I have covered the first and second news items, and now for the third: if the US-China tariff war expands, it will be genuinely difficult for China. Originally, Yuanta and Nomura had downgraded their forecasts, but this time JP Morgan has also adjusted its outlook from overweight to neutral. They are saying that this tariff war will be much more serious than the previous one. There is uncertainty surrounding the US elections and a slowdown in China's growth rate. Despite this, the monetary policy remains passive, leading to a downgrade for the entire Chinese market. The reason I brought this up is that in the first half of this year, compared to the end of last year,

In the first half of the year, there were high expectations for China on Wall Street, so there was a lot of investment in China. However, now everyone is disappointed and pulling out, which is the current situation. I brought this up to highlight that the supply and demand are rapidly changing. Regarding the Bank of Japan, there has been some mention of additional interest rate hikes by Governor Ueda. He continues to discuss this. Currently, the inflation rate is aligning with their targets, and wages in Japan are rising. If this situation continues, there may be a need to adjust monetary easing. This means that they are continuously indicating that an interest rate hike could happen in December. The market is quite dissatisfied with this situation. To put it simply, it's not just the individuals involved but also the Bank of Japan.

Most politicians in Japan think that we need to create a world with positive interest rates. They want to normalize things. This is one of the major points of contention this year. It seems like that’s how it is. 

Regarding electric vehicles, there has been some news coming out. I'll keep it brief. There are reports that the Harris administration is not supporting electric vehicle initiatives. During the 2020 presidential election, there was a commitment to mandate the sale of zero-emission vehicles by 2035. However, now that Pennsylvania is a battleground state, the stance on mandating electric vehicles has slightly retreated. With these leaks happening, it seems that there are many signs of retreat concerning electric vehicles these days. The fact that these leaks are occurring suggests that things are genuinely heading in a very negative direction. As Confucius mentioned earlier...

Volvo's importance lies in the fact that it was the first among internal combustion engine car manufacturers to declare a complete transition to electric vehicles. They announced that they would fully commit to electric cars. However, they have stated that they will complete the transition to electric vehicles by 2030, but they have also mentioned that they might reconsider this commitment. Companies like Ford and GM have already scaled back their electric vehicle plans significantly. Despite this, Volvo remains focused on electric cars. The CEO has indicated that while they are not abandoning their electric vehicle goals, they will be prepared for the transition. If the market, infrastructure, and customer awareness do not reach the necessary levels, they may delay their plans, but they will proceed once those conditions are met. Essentially, they are taking a step back to observe the market more closely before making further decisions.

China's company has acquired it. Now, electric cars have much more functionality and speed. Here, how are Volvo electric cars selling? So far in our country, only Polestar has been released. Polestar is from Volvo, but it feels a bit off to completely associate it with the Volvo logo. However, I still don’t see many Volvo electric cars around. But later, when Volvo has many electric cars on the road, people might think of them as Chinese cars. Electric cars do have some strengths, right? Yes, yes. Nevertheless, the car still has the Swedish flag on it. Oh, really? Yes, yes, that’s fully acquired, and production is happening there. Yes, that’s how it is. Now, let me first talk about the eighth leak, and we’ll discuss the seventh leak last. Earlier, our Confucius was also worried about various semiconductor issues, and there’s another concern.

There was some content that emerged. First of all, regarding the leak number 8, as I briefly mentioned earlier, Tesla will launch FSD in China and Europe in the first quarter of next year. They will introduce a safety autonomous driving support system using Autopilot. This was officially announced on their X account, stating that they are ready and waiting for approval from the respective countries. This has been seen as positive news. However, the reality is that there have been continuous accidents while using FSD for complete autonomous driving, so there is uncertainty about whether this will actually work. Nonetheless, they have announced such plans. Well, if their technology is truly good and it works well, then it would be a significant advancement. From the perspective of stock investors, this sector is worth watching. Anyway, the reason I wanted to explain news number 7 again is that Changxin Memory and other Chinese memory companies are making large-scale equipment investments.

They are currently focusing on production and are mass-producing fixed legacy memory. The reason for this is that they are preparing for stricter regulations in the United States by investing in facilities and preparing in large quantities. Do you understand this so far? However, there is now concern. Our domestic memory companies are busy monitoring how this trend is developing. The reason for this is that, although our country's Samsung and SK Hynix do not produce low-spec memory, if they start mass-producing in this area, there might be an impact on the prices of legacy memory. There is concern that this could affect the prices of fixed memory. By the way, regarding DRAM exchange, there has been recent talk about half of it.

One of the reasons there is a lot of concern in the semiconductor industry is that since the second half of last year, prices have increased. It went up to $3.5 from $3, and now it has slightly dropped to around $3.3. I explained this verbally, saying that with this drop, DRAM prices are not rising. Meanwhile, if China starts mass-producing semiconductors, even though they won't be high-spec due to their technology, they could produce significant quantities in sectors like solar energy, steel, and chemicals. If China simply throws money at it, it could create serious challenges for us. There are various news reports suggesting this, indicating that China is catching up. On the other hand, we are struggling to keep up with TSMC and NVIDIA. Samsung needs to perform exceptionally well, but there are many discussions about how this is truly a serious situation at the national level.

It's happening, and given this situation, we could analyze and criticize it, but we need to stop insulting each other. Whether it's about the corporations or Samsung, or national policies regarding investments in the semiconductor sector, there are many people who criticize large companies. I feel that now is not the time for that, especially considering the difficult circumstances we are facing. Our country's stock prices and semiconductor industry are in a tough situation, while others are doing better. For instance, Japan's semiconductor industry is rising, and Taiwan is obviously doing well. Yet, despite all this, we are struggling. It seems that the situation is quite challenging. There have been news reports about this. Alright, is this level of news sufficient? By the way, how is your joint condition? Are you feeling a lot of pain?

Okay, bring it here. Where did you go? Oh, our director has been taking medicine and getting injections. I really didn't know. What should I do? There's nowhere for me to go. Now, let me hear this. It's strange that you come here every morning and seem fine. Thank you, I will eat well. If you want to hear this, you need to buy something. Thank you. Yes, thank you. Park Geun-young, Lee Seon-hyuk, and Yeom Seung-hwan, create healthy investment habits with the careful guidance of investment masters. Check out the 3% membership on the 3% app.

투자에 도움되는 중요한 뉴스들(240906) f. 교보증권 박병창 이사 [마켓 인사이드]

삼프로TV에 대해 궁금하시다면?

📺 평일 라이브 프로그램 안내
[06:00-07:15] 월스트리트 모닝브리핑 (월가 뉴스레터, 글로벌 인터뷰)
[07:15-09:00] 오늘아침 라이브 (뉴스3, 마켓 인사이드, 인뎁스60)
[09:00-10:00] 오프닝벨 라이브
[10:00-11:00] ⟨월~목⟩ 맞동산 (부동산) ‖ ⟨금⟩ 백년의 아침 (건강)
[15:20-16:30] 클로징벨 라이브
[16:30-17:10] 뉴스룸
[17:10-18:00] 박근형의 데일리 힌트
[18:00-19:00] 퇴근길 라이브
[19:00-21:00] 언더스탠딩

💼 비즈니스 문의 채널 안내
- 광고/협업/제작대행 문의 : (메일) ad@3protv.com, (전화) 010-2090-6748, (설문지 제출) https://url.kr/yi4rpg                                                 
- 전문가(연사) 섭외 및 기업교육 문의 :  (메일) edu@3protv.com, (전화) 02-2118-0704~0705, (웹사이트) https://zrr.kr/lRQq
- 언더스탠딩 문의 : (메일) to.understanding.official@gmail.com
- 삼프로TV IR 문의 :  IR@3protv.com 

🙋‍♂️3PRO 고객센터
- (전화) 02-2118-0707, 010-3898-2324
- (메일) edu.help@3protv.com
- (1:1 문의 게시판) https://apps.3protv.com/myqna/write
- 평일 09:00-18:00 운영되며, 주말에는 3PRO 앱/웹에 1:1 문의를 남겨주시면 감사하겠습니다.

📢사칭 주의
- 삼프로TV의 구성원과 삼프로TV에 출연하시는 분들은 문자메시지/카카오톡/전화/텔레그램 등을 통해 절대 개인적인 투자권유 및 리딩방, SNS 가입을 권유하지 않습니다.
- 만일 이러한 연락을 받으셨다면 모두 사기이므로, 링크를 클릭하지 마시고 피해가 없도록 주의하시기 바랍니다.

투자에 도움되는 중요한 뉴스들(240906) f. 교보증권 박병창 이사 [마켓 인사이드]

투자에 도움되는 중요한 뉴스들(240906) f. 교보증권 박병창 이사 [마켓 인사이드]

스크립트