The person who's under an arrest warrant from the ICC can't travel to any country that's a member of the ICC without

getting arrested. I don't see that affecting Muhammad B very much. Sure, um, but it definitely affects

Netanyahu. It definitely affects Galant, and uh, I think I know—I've been saying it for a while, but I I have I

believed it when I said it, and I believe it now. Netanyahu's days are numbered. I said before that I thought that he would

be gone by autumn. We're technically still in autumn, so it may still happen, inshallah. Um, so he can't travel. Europe has said

now—uh, Burrell has said—that the the countries of the EU have to respect the ICC, uh, respect the the

respect the judgment of the ICC, and in other words, carry out your responsibilities as a member of the ICC,

meaning if Netanyahu sets foot in your country, you have to arrest him. Uh, America is not uh, part of the ICC,

so Netanyahu can still go to America. Still has a shot at Florida retirement. Yeah, yeah, but he—he's done. He's cooked. His

days are numbered, and I don't know if he's going to survive. Someone said in the chat whether

or not he's going to survive the the Trump administration. Uh, I don't think he's going to see the the Trump

administration, in my opinion. I don't think he's going to see the Trump administration. I think he's not going to

survive the Biden administration, which technically isn't over, even though to what extent it's ever been a

Biden administration, I don't know. The very fact that the case could be made at the ICJ shows the changing power

dynamics in the world, and the very fact that an arrest warrant could be issued against Netanyahu is an indication that

The power structure is sick of Netanyahu, and they are tired of Zionism. They want this to be over. See, there are some

positive signs, like, uh, Joseph Borrell saying we have to stand with the ICC because there are... we have

to understand this.  This is what I've also talked about: that they... it's very, very important to Westerners to look good and

to look like they are good. It's very, very important to them. We can't conceive of how important it is because we only

understand how important it is to *be* good. Yeah, as Muslims, we understand the importance of actually being good, so we

can't really... we want to be good no matter how we look. Yes, we don't even mind if being good makes us look bad.

We don't mind. But for them, they want to make sure that they look good, uh, and part of that means, well, we

built these institutions like the United Nations, like the ICC, uh, like the World Court, uh, uh, we... like the

EU. We built these things, and they're supposed to be institutions that, uh, uh, enshrine our wonderful, beautiful

virtuous Western civilizational values, so-called. So we can't abandon that, and we can't allow those things to be, uh, uh,

openly hypocritical. South Africa really put them on the spot, and they were able to do that because BRICS exists. They

put, uh, uh, the Western world on the spot by bringing this case to the ICJ, not the ICC, to the

ICJ, because the only way that they could maintain not appearing blatantly hypocritical was by just never charging

their allies, never bringing a case against their allies, uh, who are, you know, guilty of war crimes, guilty of crimes against humanity

and so forth. Because, uh, we don't want to charge them. I mean, we don't want to convict them, so let's

just not charge them because if we if we if we charge them, we're going to end up having to convict them because the

evidence is insurmountable. Right? So South Africa put them on the spot because they got the

case to the ICJ, and now it's like, well, what are we supposed to do now? We can't

we can't let our institutions lose all credibility. They they believe in those institutions for their uh for for the

value of providing the image of goodness and virtue and values. The filters, yeah, the the image. Yeah. So we can't let those

institutions be undermined because then our whole image is undermined, you know, because they still believe somehow that people believe in

their image. I don't know who's left that that believes in their image, uh, but so so this is what I was talking

about, like in terms of whether or not we could get uh France and the UK on board with Article 6, or at least to get them

to not veto it at the Security Council. And that's because they want to look good; they want to look like they're

good, uh, and they want to be able and and if that requires them to throw their friend under the bus so that they can uh

not be uh equally tarnished because you're all in trouble now. Let's be honest with the ICC arrest warrant against

Netanyahu. You're all in trouble because the same thing that he's uh accused of, the same thing that he's

charged with, the same reason why they want to arrest him—all of you are accomplices, all of you are complicit in

that, and that could be easily proven legally. So uh you need to cut a deal now to uh what do you call it,

immunity. We need to be exonerated; we need immunity from prosecution if we agree to go along with uh charging and

convicting and jailing and punishing Netanyahu, and by extension the United States. We need to look; if you're not going

like, if Netanyahu is going down, then you also have to go down, and we need to dissociate from you because that's the

first thing that they do. No matter who it is, on an individual basis, a Westerner will never stand by someone who gets in

trouble. They will never stand by someone who gets in trouble, even if they were the best

of friends, and even if just yesterday they were talking about how wonderful they were, uh, how this is the great

humanitarian. As soon as they get in trouble, oh, he was... I have nothing. I I don't even know him, actually. I just in

passing, I I saw him on the street one time. I never really knew his name. You know, like they say, you know, I'm sure

I'm sure it's true with those people who say, you know, when they talk to... they they talk to him after they arrest some guy,

uh, like I don't know, a serial killer or something. They arrest him, and the neighbors all say, 'Well, he was quiet and

kept to himself.' No, I bet he didn't. He probably came over to your house. I'm sure you guys knew each other. You

probably hung out together. You probably actually were friends, but now it's like, 'I I don't know. Never. He he was just

strange. He never really talked to anybody,' right? You know this is how they are. This is this is their character. So

this is why also, like, like I have said, and many people criticize me for saying, uh, because they don't know better, by

now you have to wait and see what...  Trump is a mascot of a of a faction of

power. If you know what that faction of power wants to do, don't think for a minute that Trump is going to oppose

That and whatever rhetoric he's going to use will be actually for the purpose of achieving that. For example, I'll give

you an example: Trump said that they were going to be tough on Iran, uh, meaning sanctions; that they were

going to sanction Iran even more. Okay? The reality is that is going to do nothing but help BRICS; that is

going to add to the impetus for the, um, disconnecting and delinking of the Global South countries and other

countries in the world, all of the BRICS countries, from the American economy and from the American payment

transfer system, the SWIFT system, and so on. Because they have—they have now—what they launched, when was it, last month?

In October, when they had the meeting in Kazan, the BRICS meeting, they

launched a payment system which is basically, uh, nullifying sanctions, right? Because so it doesn't matter; you can

all—all that does is, um, isolate America more and strengthen the building of economic ties and coordination and

collaboration between the BRICS countries and the Global South countries. All of that—all of that is doing is

actually building the foundation and the groundwork for the move of the global economy out of the previous system. It's—that's—all of that is

part of the transition. It has nothing to do with being tough on Iran. Yeah, but it helps, but that—but

Livestream Excerpt: ICC Arrest Warrant Against Netanyahu

Middle Nation

ICC 체포 영장 및 네타냐후의 여행 제한 조치

ICC 체포 영장이 발부된 개인은 체포되지 않는 한 회원국을 여행할 수 없습니다.

이 영장은 네타냐후와 갈란트의 여행에 상당한 영향을 미칩니다.

연사는 네타냐후의 정치 경력이 거의 끝났다고 생각합니다.

유럽연합 국가는 ICC의 판결을 존중하고 이행해야 합니다.

네타냐후는 ICC 회원국이 아니기 때문에 여전히 미국을 여행할 수 있습니다.

변화하는 글로벌 권력 역학 관계와 ICC 사례

ICC 사건은 글로벌 권력 역학 관계의 변화를 반영합니다.

이 영장은 네타냐후와 시오니즘에 대한 전 세계적인 피로감을 나타냅니다.

조셉 보렐의 ICC 지지 성명은 긍정적인 신호로 강조되고 있습니다.

서방 국가들은 정의를 지키는 것보다 긍정적인 이미지를 유지하는 것을 우선시합니다.

남아프리카의 역할과 서구의 위선

남아공은 이 사건을 국제사법재판소에 제소하여 서방 국가들에 이의를 제기했습니다.

서방 국가들은 신뢰성을 유지하고 위선적으로 보이지 않기 위해 동맹국에게 요금을 부과하지 않았습니다.

남아공의 조치로 인해 서방 국가들은 자국 기관의 신뢰성에 대한 문제를 제기할 수밖에 없었습니다.

서구 국가들은 기관이 투영하는 선과 미덕의 이미지를 중요하게 생각합니다.

서방 동맹국들은 네타냐후의 범죄 혐의에 연루되어 잠재적인 결과에 직면해 있습니다.

서방 국가들은 네타냐후의 행동에 공범이자 공모자로 간주됩니다.

서방 국가들은 네타냐후의 사건에 협조함으로써 기소 면제를 받을 수 있습니다.

서양인은 이전 관계에 관계없이 문제를 겪고 있는 개인과 거리를 두는 경향이 있습니다.

트럼프의 역할과 브릭스의 영향력

트럼프의 행동은 더 큰 권력 역학 관계의 맥락에서 바라봐야 합니다.

트럼프의 수사는 특정 세력의 이익에 부합할 수 있습니다.

이란에 대한 강력한 제재는 의도치 않게 BRICS와 글로벌 사우스를 강화할 수 있습니다.

BRICS는 제재에 대응하기 위해 결제 시스템을 출시하여 잠재적으로 글로벌 경제력을 변화시킬 수 있습니다.

이러한 조치는 글로벌 경제가 이전 시스템에서 벗어나 전환하는 데 기여합니다.

Livestream Excerpt: ICC Arrest Warrant Against Netanyahu

Livestream Excerpt: ICC Arrest Warrant Against Netanyahu

스크립트