스마트폰 카메라 비교: 삼성 갤럭시 S24 울트라의 승리

### 스마트폰 카메라 대결: 갤럭시 S24 울트라가 왕관을 차지하다
* 📸 표준 와이드 사진에서는 **Vivo의 X100 Pro가 가장 정확한 색상과 노출**로 승리한 반면, **Xiaomi와 삼성은 색상 정확도에서 어려움**을 겪었습니다.
* 🔍 초광각 부문에서는 **삼성이 가장 디테일하고 노출이 잘 된 사진**을 촬영하여 우승했으며, **Huawei와 Vivo는 과다 노출과 프레이밍 문제**로 인해 아쉬운 성적을 거두었습니다.
* 👩 Vivo는 인물 모드에서 **가장 사실적인 색상과 최고의 가장자리 감지 기능**을 제공하는 반면, **Xiaomi는 과다 노출**로, **Huawei는 일관되지 않은 화이트 밸런스**로 어려움을 겪습니다.
* 🎥 후면 카메라 동영상 품질은 **삼성과 샤오미가 동률**이며, 안정화 부문에서는 **삼성이 앞서**지만 색 정확도는 **샤오미가 더 우수**합니다.
* 🤳 전면 카메라 사진 및 동영상은 **Huawei이 압도적**이며, 사진 품질은 **삼성이 2위**, 동영상 선명도는 **Vivo이 2위**를 차지했습니다.
* 🔊 삼성의 갤럭시 S24 울트라는 **최고의 소음 제거 기능**으로 오디오 부문에서 우승한 반면, Vivo와 Huawei는 이 부분에서 약간 뒤처졌습니다.
* 🔍 또한 삼성은 **100배 줌으로 가장 세밀한 사진**을 찍을 수 있는 줌 카테고리에서 선두를 달리고 있으며, Vivo는 **3배 줌으로 자연스러운 사진**을 찍을 수 있습니다.
* 🌃 저조도 환경에서는 **삼성이 다시 한 번 빛을 발하며 가장 선명하고 노출이 잘 된 이미지**를 만들어냈고, **Vivo가 2위**를 차지했습니다.
* 🏆 전반적으로 **갤럭시 S24 울트라가 카메라 비교에서 승자**로 떠올랐으며, **Vivo의 X100 프로는 예산이 부족한 사용자들에게 강력한 경쟁자**입니다.

스마트폰 카메라 비교에서 갤럭시 S24 울트라가 준우승을 차지했으며, Vivo X100 프로가 3위를 차지했습니다.

Welcome back to yet another smartphone camera comparison between these four bad boys in Wy Berlin. So here we have the Vivo X100 Pro, Xiaomi 14 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, and the newest and latest Huawei P70 Pro. Hey, I'm Olive, your host here at versus.com, and I'd like to thank Hide.me VPN for sponsoring this video. As always, we'll start with standard Wi-Fi photos as we feel that's the mode that people use most frequently. In this first example, Vivo has undoubtedly produced the most accurate photo with spot-on colors, great exposure, and deep contrast. Huawei also delivers accurate colors, though slightly less vibrant, and the contrast could be a bit higher. Samsung's shadows are a bit harsh, and the orange color is slightly off. Xiaomi's photo isn't looking too good as it has inaccurate colors and overly high exposure in certain areas. Next, in a closer wider shot, Huawei performs well, while Xiaomi this time impresses with its high contrast and vibrant colors, resulting in a tie between the two.

vivo's image is decent, but lacks sufficient warmth, and the shadows, particularly across my face, are too harsh. Samsung, however, struggles with overly lifted shadows and exposure, making the image less appealing. In the final example, all the images are acceptable and usable. However, being very critical, xiaomi delivers the best result with a nice warm tone and truly white whites. Vivo and Huawei have overly warm whites, and Samsung's image suffers from an unappealing green undertone. Next, let's take a look at some Ultra wide examples, which is a really good mode for capturing more of your scenery. In this one, it's a tough call. Initially, Vivo seems to have the best result, but the top of the building is slightly cut off, which isn't ideal for an ultra-wide photo. Xiaomi has this issue even more pronounced, although they generally produce better photos. This flaw prevents us from giving them full points. The purpose of an ultra-wide lens is to capture everything in the frame, and they have unfortunately failed in this regard. Samsung's photo isn't perfect either.

being somewhat underexposed with harsh shadows, but it looks better than Huawei's image, which has an unappealing green undertone and a dull appearance. In this next example, Samsung looks decent with good exposure and accurate colors. Huawei is close behind with slightly more saturation, though it lacks sharpness. Compared to Vivo, however, Vivo's tighter framing isn't ideal. Xiaomi's photo has taken on a strong magenta hue, which is overpowering in the already warm scene. In the final example, all of the devices have performed adequately with only minor variations in saturation and exposure, none of which are particularly notable. Though it's time to experiment with some portraits, so let's see which one of these has the nicest bouquet and the most realistic edge detection. Vivo and Huawei excel in color accuracy and authenticity, delivering the best edge detection by preserving even the tiniest hairs on my head. Xiaomi shot in portrait mode falls short with an unappealing result that is overly exposed and has off undertones. Samsung's

photo is decent, but has somewhat unrealistic edge detection. In the next round, Vivo and Huawei tie again. Vivo offers the most authentic and accurate photo, while Huawei's edge detection is superb. Xiaomi continues to struggle with extreme overexposure, making the photo look quite dull. Samsung produces nice skin tones and good exposure, but its edge detection is slightly off, cutting out bits of my hair in the final image. All of the devices encounter some difficulties due to the challenging setting for the camera's white balance. Vivo achieves the best balance of exposure and contrast with the most accurate coloring. Huawei follows with slightly higher exposure noticeable on my face and hand, but its edge detection remains impressive. Xiaomi disappoints again with an overly shiny face, and while Samsung's overall image isn't bad, its edge detection is not the best. Let's pause for a moment and briefly talk about safety. A VPN keeps you safe online by turning your information into secret code and hiding your computer's location. This means no one can see what websites

you visit or find out where you are. If that sounds like something you'd find useful, then you'll want to hear this next part. Hide.me VPN is one of the fastest offshore VPNs, with 24/7 support and cross-platform access. Enjoy 10 GB speeds across 2,300 servers globally. You can also navigate the web with a trusted ally, Smart Guard, proactively guarding against malware, tracking ads, and phishing threats in real time. Plus, they don't store logs, ensuring your actions remain yours. Best part? You can start for free. Click the link in the description to secure your online freedom with Hide.me VPN. Simple, secure, and yours. Time to test out some videos, which is an absolutely crucial category when deciding which smartphone to go for. In this first wide example, Xiaomi initially seems to deliver the best results. However, as you keep watching, it's evident that Huawei maintains the most consistent and authentic look throughout. Both Samsung and Xiaomi produce usable results, though they differ in brightness, making the choice a

matter of personal preference. Vivo starts off well, but as I move closer to the camera, the exposure decreases, losing a lot of detail. In the next wide example, all the videos look very similar, with only minor variations in exposure and saturation levels. Overall, each device provides a decent result, though leaving a little to comment on. In the following Ultra-wide example, Huawei and Vivo appear slightly overexposed in certain areas. Vivo also struggles with fluctuating brightness, which is quite distracting. Conversely, Samsung and Xiaomi handle all aspects pretty well, with Xiaomi showing slightly higher saturation. In the final Ultra-wide example, Samsung and Xiaomi continue to offer the most detailed results, with Xiaomi having a wider frame and slightly less exposure. Huawei's video lacks contrast, and its colors appear somewhat dull, while Vivo has the tightest frame and occasionally struggles with fluctuating exposure levels. Time for a workout session, AKA stabilization, which is a crucial part of ensuring that your videos are as smooth as possible. Let's go for a run. Both shots were captured using the

ultrawide camera. In the first test, we evaluated the standard stabilization on the devices by walking with all of them simultaneously. Honestly, there isn't a significant difference between them, though the Huawei appears slightly shakier than the others. In our second test, we enabled active stabilization and went for a run. The results were all over the place. The Galaxy definitely performed the best in terms of smoothness. Vivo exhibited some up and down wobble, which is not ideal. However, Huawei and Xiaomi were a complete disaster, with the clips being unusable. Time to test out some selfies. Let's see which one of these makes me look the best. Both Huawei and Samsung have done a good job in this first example. However, Huawei has slightly more appealing skin tones and gives a fresher look with less harsh shadows across the face. Xiaomi has the most accurate color for my suit jacket but has a green undertone for skin tones, which isn't ideal. Vivo isn't too bad, but lifting the shadows slightly would have improved it. In the next

example, I'm not sure what's happened to Samsung's performance as the contrast is extremely low, resulting in a washed-out photo. Xiaomi, on the other hand, looks quite good. Here, the green undertones are not present, and the rest of the image has accurate colors and a nice warm feel. Huawei has a nicer exposure, while Vivo is more authentic and true to reality for the low-light selfie. Vivo pleasantly surprised me, although it has strong AI capabilities for dark conditions. The result this time is natural and not overly sharpened. Huawei's colors are slightly less accurate, but it still produced a well-exposed and sharp image. Unfortunately, Xiaomi is a bit underexposed, and Samsung's contrast is too low, making the photo look washed out and overprocessed. In the front camera video test, Xiaomi is completely blurry when I'm standing further away, which isn't great. Vivo isn't too sharp either but performs slightly better than Xiaomi. Huawei and Samsung are very different, with one being brighter and warmer, and the other

dimmer and cooler both excel in sharpness and detail, so the choice comes down to personal preference. So starting with the audio coming from the Huawei P70 Pro, how do I sound? Let me know, and we will discuss these in a bit all together. Then we have the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. How is the built-in microphone on this one? I do love its noise cancellation abilities, so let's see. And here we have Xiaomi 14 Ultra. How am I sounding on this bad boy? Finally, we have the Vivo X00 Pro. How is the audio on this device? As mentioned, I've always been a fan of the S24 Ultra's noise cancellation abilities, and it continues to outperform other flagship smartphones. Xiaomi also sounds good, and you can hear me clearly. Vivo and Huawei aren't bad, but they have the least noise cancellation, which might prove problematic in noisier environments. Slow motion is a pretty convenient feature to have on your smartphone, but let's see which one of these has the best results first. Slow motion, we set all of

the devices to the highest frame rate and resolution possible. All of them can shoot at 240 FPS and 1080p. Then we set each device to the highest resolution with the highest frame rate available at that resolution. The Galaxy is the only device capable of shooting in 4k at 120 FPS, earning it an extra point. So we have finally come to the zoom category, which is also a very exciting one. Let's see which one of these can give us the most detailed and accurate photos even at a 100 times zoom. At three times zoom, the Galaxy and the Vivo appear the most natural, with Vivo having a bit more saturation, particularly noticeable in the trees. Unfortunately, Xiaomi's image is blurry, and although Huawei's is sharp, it looks overly processed and slightly unrealistic. At five times zoom, the differences become more apparent. Vivo still looks very natural, and Huawei looks better now with a less processed appearance. Samsung's image has low contrast, making it look washed out, while Xiaomi's shades and contrast are too harsh, especially in the tree area, which loses

a lot of detail at 10 times Zoom. Vivo maintains its natural look, resulting in a great photo. Huawei looks decent and sharp, but the contrast is a bit too harsh, making the trees look overprocessed. The Galaxy's contrast remains too low, resulting in a washed-out appearance, and the tree area in Xiaomi's image has become increasingly dark. At 30 times Zoom, Xiaomi's result has punchy yet not overpowering contrast with visible details on the tower. Both the Galaxy and Vivo look good, with Samsung's contrast levels finally improving. Huawei's contrast is a bit too high, losing details in the tower. Finally, at 100 times zoom, Xiaomi remains the most detailed. Samsung and VI have acceptable results, while Huawei disappoints with the least amount of visible details. Time for macro mode, which is always very exciting, you guys. Let's see which one of these can capture the most detailed and precise. [Music] photos. Huawei P70 Pro super macro feature is definitely cool and fun to experiment with. However, Samsung still

produces the sharpest and most detailed photos. While Huawei can get closer to the object, the images aren't as sharp, which is a little bit disappointing. Xiaomi also struggles with sharpness and loses quite a bit of detail. Vivo performs fairly well, but not quite as well as Samsung. Finally, let's take a look at a few low-light examples to see how each one of these devices handles darker atmospheres. Starting with a standard shot, Vivo delivered the sharpest result with the clearest exposure on my features while maintaining a low-light ambience. Huawei also did a decent job, though it has slightly harsher shadows and is the only image that turned out blurry, placing it last. Xiaomi exposed the image well, but the contrast is a bit too low, resulting in the blacks not being deep enough. Samsung's result isn't bad, but it also has slightly lower contrast. In the ultra-wide example, Samsung redeemed itself as the only device that produced a sharp image. Shi's image is somewhat clear, but it looks a

little washed out overall the Vivo and Huawei struggled sign significantly and honestly their results might not even be usable. As always, we conducted a blind test on our community page and social media, asking you to vote for your favorite photo without knowing the brand name. The winner with the most points for this portrait photo was indeed Vivo. Huawei also impressed with superb Edge detection, demonstrating a clear skill in this area, and it almost tied for first place with Vivo. Samsung and Xiaomi both struggled with Edge detection and exhibited slight color variations, particularly in skin tone. Now let's take a look at a couple of video examples. In standard wide video, Xiaomi really stands out with absolutely zero noise, deep blacks, and realistic color tones. It is also consistently well-exposed. The Galaxy has slight noise visible in the darker areas but overall produces a decent video with nicely popping colors. Huawei shows the most noise and VI's colors are a bit duller compared to the rest. All right, let's do a quick summary and see who the winners are.

comes to the camera, our scoring system is based on order of importance. Therefore, in categories such as wide, ultrawide, portrait, and videos, we have a maximum of four points possible, whereas in less important categories such as zoom and audio, the points given are less. For standard photos, the winner is Vivo. Next, we have Ultra wide photos, where the Galaxy actually takes first place. In portrait mode, Vivo once again comes first. In videos using the back cameras, it's a draw between Samsung and Xiaomi. When it comes to stabilization, the Galaxy takes first place. For front camera photos and videos, Huawei takes the win. But when it comes to audio, the Galaxy takes the win due to its impeccable noise cancellation abilities. Interestingly enough, Vivo won the zoom category. Slow-mo goes to the Galaxy due to its 4K abilities when shooting at 120 FPS. Samsung comes in first place for macro photos. And finally, Samsung also comes in first place in the low-light category. And that means that our overall winner is, in fact, the Galaxy S24 Ultra.

well done woo so that pretty much sums up these four different phones when battled against each other. We hope you found this review useful, and we would love to hear your thoughts. Which one would you choose? Definitely let us know in the comments down below. We believe the Galaxy S24 Ultra is indeed an excellent smartphone and it is a strong option. However, if you are on a bit of a budget but still want impressive results, Vivo X100 Pro is a superb choice at a relatively lower price point. It actually came in second place, just two points behind Samsung. As always, give this video a big like if you enjoyed it, and don't forget to subscribe to be a part of our versus.com community if you aren't already. With that being said, we will see you in the next video, and until then, take care. [Music]

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra vs Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra vs Vivo X100 Pro! Camera Comparison!

Versus

스마트폰 카메라 비교: Vivo X100 Pro, 샤오미 14 울트라, 삼성 갤럭시 S24 울트라, 화웨이 P70 프로

Vivo X100 Pro는 표준 Wi-Fi 사진에서 뛰어난 노출과 대비로 가장 정확하고 생생한 색상을 생성합니다.

초광각 모드에서는 삼성이 괜찮은 성능을 보이는 반면, Huawei은 녹색 톤과 칙칙한 외관으로 어려움을 겪습니다.

인물 모드에서는 Vivo와 Huawei가 색상 정확도와 가장자리 감지 기능이 뛰어난 반면, Xiaomi는 과다 노출과 색조가 부족합니다.

스마트폰 카메라 비교: 비보, 화웨이, 샤오미, 삼성

Vivo는 가장 사실적이고 정확한 사진을 제공하며, Huawei는 가장자리 감지 기능이 뛰어납니다.

Xiaomi는 과다 노출로 어려움을 겪고 있으며 삼성의 가장자리 감지는 약간 떨어집니다.

비디오 카테고리에서는 Huawei가 가장 일관된 모습을 유지한 반면, 삼성과 Xiaomi는 밝기 차이가 있지만 사용 가능한 결과를 제공합니다.

안정화 부문에서는 Vivo와 Huawei가 노출 변동에 어려움을 겪는 반면, 삼성과 Xiaomi는 가장 부드러운 결과를 제공합니다.

스마트폰 카메라 및 오디오 성능 비교

스마트폰 카메라의 안정화, 셀카 품질 및 전면 카메라 동영상 성능에 대한 테스트를 진행했습니다.

삼성 갤럭시의 안정화 기능이 가장 뛰어났고, 화웨이는 가장 매력적인 셀카를 촬영했으며, 샤오미는 저조도 셀카 정확도가 뛰어났습니다.

오디오에서는 S24 울트라가 뛰어난 소음 제거 성능을 보였고, 샤오미는 선명한 사운드를 제공했습니다.

카메라의 슬로우 모션 기능 성능도 평가되었습니다.

다양한 기기의 카메라 줌 및 매크로 성능 비교하기

모든 기기에서 240 FPS 및 1080p로 촬영할 수 있지만 갤럭시만 120 FPS에서 4k를 제공합니다.

3배 줌에서는 Vivo와 갤럭시가 가장 자연스러워 보이지만 Xiaomi의 이미지는 흐릿합니다.

5배 줌에서는 Vivo은 자연스러운 모습을 유지하고, Huawei은 개선되고, 삼성은 흐릿해지며, Xiaomi은 디테일을 잃습니다.

30배 줌에서는 Xiaomi의 디테일이 가장 뛰어나지만, 100배 줌에서는 Huawei가 실망스럽습니다.

매크로 모드에서 Huawei P70 Pro는 멋진 슈퍼 매크로 기능을 제공하지만 삼성의 성능은 언급되지 않았습니다.

스마트폰 카메라 배틀: 가장 선명한 사진 및 최고의 저조도 성능

삼성은 특히 저조도 조건에서 가장 선명하고 디테일한 사진을 만들어내어 최고의 성능을 발휘합니다.

Vivo도 선명한 이미지를 제공하고 저조도에서도 우수한 성능을 발휘하여 최고의 인물 사진 블라인드 테스트에서 우승했습니다.

Xiaomi는 노이즈가 없고 사실적인 색조로 표준 와이드 동영상에서 뛰어난 성능을 보인 반면, Huawei는 선명도와 저조도 성능에 어려움을 겪었습니다.

스마트폰 카메라 배틀: 갤럭시 S24 울트라가 정상에 오르다

일반 사진에서는 Vivo가, 초광각 및 안정화에서는 갤럭시가 선두를 차지했습니다.

전면 카메라 촬영과 동영상에서는 Huawei가, 후면 카메라 동영상에서는 삼성이 Xiaomi와 동률을 이뤘습니다.

갤럭시 S24 울트라가 전체 우승자로 선정되었으며, 가성비 좋은 옵션인 Vivo X100 프로가 2위를 차지했습니다.