Now, let's move on to the second topic. However, as I see in our comments section, there are some people raising issues about our lawyers. Honestly, conservative values fundamentally pursue the value of liberalism. Ideologically, there are liberal and conservative philosophies. The keyword of conservative philosophy is freedom. Freedom fundamentally involves diversity. Therefore, if it's not an adversarial difference of opinion, but just a difference of opinion, it's not adversarial between factions. It's not an irreconcilable difference. Fighting is necessary for someone to win or lose, to settle the game. But within our group, such adversarial differences do not exist. However, as far as I know, our lawyer, Mr. Seo, has his own YouTube channel and appears on broadcasts a lot.

And we also appeared in our Avengers, so in a way, now that we are human, there may be no turning back. There may be no turning back, but still, now looking at one's own, now, what kind of current social role, when you see this, I will try to give a fair and objective evaluation while maintaining strict neutrality as much as possible. But why do you think you are misunderstood as a pro-government figure now? I've been doing my show for nine years. In the old days, during the presidential election, Yoon Suk-yeol, Hwang Kyo-ahn, Choi Jae-young, and Hong Joon-pyo appeared a lot, right? At that time, I expressed my position. I supported Choi Jae-young as my first choice, then Hwang Kyo-ahn as my second choice, and three days later, Yoon Suk-yeol. But then Yoon Suk-yeol became a presidential candidate. From that point on, the one I supported was Choi Jae-hyung.

I actively pushed Yoon Suk-yeol, and President Yoon watched my YouTube a lot. Since the time he was a candidate, I have been supporting him. I honestly expressed my position back then. Then, at the second party convention, when Lee Jun-seok and Na Kyung-won were running, I supported Na Kyung-won, even though I criticize Lee Jun-seok. Next, when Kim Geun-hye ran, I supported Na Kyung-won. At that time, the trend was to support Kim, but I truly believe that President Yoon Suk-yeol was the right choice. Unfairly, they tried to push for Kim, but I insisted on a fair competition until the end, advocating for Na Kyung-won. However, I was heavily criticized for that. At that time, I expressed my position. But do you remember this time? Do you remember? But this time, I am now strictly neutral. Why? There are several reasons for this. First, I have had a long-standing relationship with Kyung-won, and also with our senior colleagues.

Hyungdong, it's been a long time, and then Senior Yoon Sang-hyun has been like a brother for 15 years, and then even though there is no personal connection in the field of oriental medicine, I continue to support the director of that oriental clinic. Then, when Hong Jun-pyo criticized the director of the oriental clinic, I strongly criticized him, so my brother is a mortician in Daegu. Oh, so my mother called me. So, everyone, when Hong Jun-pyo, the mayor of Daegu, criticized Chairman Han Dong-hoon unreasonably, our lawyer Seo Jung-wook said that it shouldn't be like that. How much did he criticize on TV? He criticized sharply, but our lawyer Seo Jung-wook's younger brother is now a public official in Daegu. He is a public official, but not long ago, when he went to see Hoon, I have a YouTube channel, Seojong TV. He was talking about it and even put English subtitles. I have never criticized the field of oriental medicine in a personal way. So, among these four people, it's difficult to push one person and also.

These days, I've been searching a lot for conservative YouTube channels. There are many YouTubers who excessively criticize figures like Hanui Wonjang, Hong Cheol-gi, and others. It's too harsh the way they criticize people. On the other hand, there are also opposing views. I find it really sad that right-wing and left-wing supporters are fighting like this. For various reasons, I've decided to maintain neutrality this time and remain objective. I believe firmly in staying neutral. When I watched, the lawyer Seo Jeong-wook, who appeared on conservative YouTube channels, was quite different. Whenever someone requests him to appear, he usually declines. In the past general election, there were YouTubers like Lee Bong-gyu and Go Sung-kook who participated in the movement called 2-8 Movement. When I look at them, aren't they part of the same group? Currently, those people are openly carrying out anti-Hwangeun movements.

Han Dong-yeon, during the general election, those who hosted a joint broadcast with Pastor Jeong Kwang-hoon, aren't they? They might feel a bit sorry, but they are not the mainstream of the People Power Party. They may enjoy conservative and right-wing views, but they are not the mainstream of the People Power Party. However, now our Seo Byeong-sa is appearing on their channel, so there could be some misunderstandings following that. However, if one has a clear stance, it should be fine. For example, if you watch my TV show, you will see that first, candidate Na Kyung-won appeared and had an interview. Next is Park Jung-eun, and Park Jung-hoon, who is running for the National Assembly this time, is a friend of mine personally and my academy mate. So, this time, with the wrong information from the teacher Wi Jung, this was the second interview with Park Jung-hoon. Then yesterday, Won In-young announced her candidacy, so I...

I did this interview over the phone, and now it's being broadcasted. I am currently at the Park Jung-eun and Han Dong-hoon camp. Next, we have Won Il-yong, Han Dong-hoon, and then Na Kyung-won. Whichever camp they are from, welcome. I can answer anything now. In this way, I think the channel's broadcast is like this. For example, where is Yoon Shim? I tend to focus on objective facts rather than my own field. It's more about Won Il-yong and what President Yoon has influenced. Of course, this broadcast is based on opinions. Perhaps, this may sound different to Chairman Han Dong-ho's fans. However, I still believe that we need to broadcast the facts. Even if you are not a journalist, YouTube is also a form of broadcasting. I will share my experiences and thoughts here.

It seems to fit the broadcast. So, in his position, Lawyer Seo Jong-wook expressed his opinion like this, so I don't think it's necessary to see this problem so seriously. So, even if it's confirmed now, it's not in the category of medical malpractice. Oh, it's not a medical accident, it's confirmed. Now, if I go out to On Bong-gyu and Go Sung-gu, even if I don't cover the medical scene at all, I wouldn't criticize it like that. I wouldn't even criticize it for 10 seconds. Maybe you remember in the news that the head of a hospital called the president. This ended in a short 10 seconds. So, as a courtesy, try to do well. It was a cold atmosphere. I heard this because I was reporting, so I asked for an explanation. But even that, I thought it was a fact, so I did it. I didn't make up the story. Now, in the political circle, in its own way.

From my perspective as someone who has experienced the presidential election, things like that are just rumors and slanders. During the election, everyone made phone calls, and when Han Dong-hwa called, it was very... like, face-to-face, somewhat twisted, and they keep spreading these slanderous rumors. So, we should consider that. Now, moving on to the second topic. Mayor Hong Jun-pyo hates Chairman Han Dong-hoon, everyone knows this. After the general election, Mayor Hong Jun-pyo met with President Yoon for a while and then expressed strong criticism against Chairman Han Dong-hoon, saying that he knows more about Yoon's true intentions.

According to our lawyer's interpretation, currently, among Won and Na Kyung-won, Won is closer to the heart. However, why did Won support Na Kyung-won yesterday instead of Won Lee? Now, Mayor Hong Joon-pyo dreams of running for president, right? But Han Dong-hoon and Won Il are potential competitors for the presidency. However, Na Kyung-won is aiming for the Seoul mayor position. It's not about the presidency yet. This is my subjective opinion. If we talk about it objectively, it might be subjective, but based on common sense, that's how I judge it. You can listen to my personal opinions and thoughts. In my case, my goal is the Seoul mayor position, not running for president yet. In this case, from Mayor Hong Joon-pyo's perspective, there are two things to consider: first, by pushing Na Kyung-won forward, he could gain an ally in the presidential election. So, who were the four finalists in the party's primary until 2021? Yoon Seong-yeol and Hong Joon-pyo.

Yoo Seung-min and Won Il, you know, that kind of thing. Hong Jun-pyo and Yoon Seong-yeol, who have now become the elected president, have lost their dreams. The remaining three will not run for re-election in three years, right? However, in the case of Representative Na Kyung-won, even if she becomes the party leader this time, she is not going directly for the presidency. She often talks about wanting to try being the mayor of Seoul around her. So, even if Na Kyung-won becomes the party leader, there is no competition between her and me for the presidency. That's the kind of situation. Director, last year, I sent you an article. Last year, when Mayor Hong Jun-pyo was trying to run for the party leader against Representative Na Kyung-won, there was a certain reading material. Please find that and post it as I sent it to you. So, this time, shouldn't we see it as a declaration of support for Na Kyung-won? And I did two things.

Supporting Na Kyung-won to become the leader has the advantage of securing allies if the leader becomes successful. Secondly, making friends with enemies. Making an enemy an ally, in terms of the mayoral perspective, it seems right to support Na Kyung-won. Because only then can they cut off the potential competitors like Han Dong-hoon, Won Yong, in advance, and then cover Na Kyung-won to secure her support in the future. This kind of strategy has a positive effect. I think this was the intention. For example, did you find the Facebook message from last year? Last year, it was written like this. During their university days, they had a personal relationship. President Yoon was in the 7th law school at Seoul National University, and Na Kyung-won's husband was in the 8th year, 3rd class. They were very close. Even after entering society, they were drinking buddies. Even now, they seem to confuse their personal relationship from their university days and hold important positions in the government, dealing with low birth rates and an aging society, as the vice chairman of the subcommittee on climate and environment.

It was squeaky while connecting that, but no matter how many times I look at it, it's just awkward. I don't know what they're trying to do, but going to the National Cemetery to visit the graves of the late presidents Lee Seung-man, Park Chung-hee, and Kim Young-sam, and coming down to Daegu today to be sanctified at a temple with no connection at all, what kind of behavior is this? And what kind of instructions were given? Yes, if you truly respect the president, who still has four years left in office, wouldn't it be better to stop now? Just blindly following a fickle public opinion survey will eventually lead to a big disaster. I heard that during the verification process, there were issues of building speculation that came out during the verification process of the minister. Whether it's true or not, shouldn't the priority be to clarify that? A year ago, it was so cold, or rather, it was like this, but this wasn't a year ago.

Since 2010, the relationship between these two has not been good. From that time, there was tension. From that time, there were prominent figures in the political circle. They were rivals. Hong Jun-pyo and Na Kyung-won. Yes, that's right. But as I see this, what I feel a lot is that in politics, there are no eternal enemies, no eternal allies. Therefore, thinking like this, I don't know how this will eventually split up. While this goes on, there is no guarantee that Hong Jun-pyo and Han Dong-woo will remain allies. This is something we will never know forever. Politics, well, but now, since I know Hong Jun-pyo well, perhaps in the presidential candidate selection, if Han Dong-hoon wins, and Hong Jun-pyo loses, then what will happen? No, if that happens, considering Hong Jun-pyo's age, he may not retire. Yes, retirement. He is over 70, so I...

I think that's how it will be, but let's look into this one thing here. As a member of the National Assembly, Na Kyung-won gained a significant income yesterday because currently, with 80% of the party members voting, when combined, Yeongnam accounts for 40%. Yes, the party's weight is, well, but among them, TK has a bit more, like 20%, while 21% is TK1 and 19% is PK. But in terms of population, Busan-Ulsan has much more, but there are more party members in Daegu-Gyeongbuk, right? So, because of receiving all this from the two provincial governors, one could say that she has achieved remarkable results. At first glance, one could think this way, but when we look at the influence that Mayor Hong Joon-pyo holds in Daegu-Gyeongbuk, how much impact will it have on the grassroots sentiment? It will have some influence on the grassroots sentiment of the party members. Now, the recent Gallup Korea survey on the next...

During the leader survey from June 11th to the 13th, for three days, Lee Jae-myung was in first place with 22%, followed by Han Dong-hoon with 15% in second place, Cho Kuk with 5% in third place, and Hong Jun-pyo with 3% in fourth place. However, looking at the support rate of TK, Hong Jun-pyo is at 7%, Lee Jae-myung at 13%, and Han Dong-hoon at 25%. Yes, so Han Dong-hoon is coming out more than three times higher. Therefore, no matter how much support there is for the mayor of Daegu and even if there is a clear presence in Daegu, in terms of the presidential election, one's hometown, Daegu, may not receive significant support. Please consider what kind of actual effect and voting effect it will have. So, objectively speaking, Mayor Hong Jun-pyo in Daegu does not have a strong presence in terms of the city's National Assembly members or the society. However, in Daegu, the number of party members per population is extremely high, which shows strong cohesion and solidarity. But Mayor Hong...

It only has symbolic meaning, so there won't be many actual votes coming in. Because the actual votes are held by the chairmen of the National Assembly, but many of the members of the National Assembly probably do not support Mayor Hong. Therefore, I don't think there will be a big shift of Daegu party members going towards Mayor Na Kyung, probably just symbolically showing support. It seems like Governor Lee Cheol-wu has more influence in Gyeongsangbuk-do. Governor Lee Cheol-wu hasn't openly supported anyone, it seems like he's being neutral. So, in reality, party members will make their own judgments, and since they tend to move as a unit, it won't have a big impact. That's how I analyze it. Yes, that's right. So, even Chairman Han Dong-hoon is expected to make some efforts in Yeongnam, but about 40% of the votes in the 80% party vote are concentrated in Yeongnam.

Because of this, and also the voter turnout could be relatively high. Since the voter turnout is high in Yeongnam, in terms of actual weight, it could increase by about 50%. So, now it depends on how and who will strategize Yeongnam. Probably, candidate Won Il-yong is also a candidate who represents the origin, looking at the presidential candidate survey. Still, expectations for Chairman Han Dong-hoon seem to be alive. Yes, that's right. However, personally, this is my personal opinion, but if I look at the support of Han's field, I think PKGA TK will be slightly higher. I think the highest support will be in the metropolitan area. If you vote for the party in the metropolitan area, it's like 6:4, 60% to 40%. The final vote is 50%. Yes, there is room for the metropolitan area to go up to 60%, but TK, I think it's about 40%. It's Han Hyeon's support, and then Busan and Gyeongnam.

About 50 constituencies nationwide, so in the capital area, it's now 60, Busan is 5 to 5, and the rest is combined with three. This is the current situation. Next, TK is actually 4 to 6. TK has a slightly higher support rate. If you look at it this way, the final vote is on the edge. Will it exceed 50 or not? Will it go over or not? So, I'm curious about how this is viewed. When we look at the voting tendencies of Honam strategically, they are very good at strategic voting. It's not an emotional or sentimental vote based on personal preferences, but rather a vote made within a strategic calculation. In the past, when they made Moon Jae-in the Democratic Party's presidential candidate, it started from Gwangju to Busan. Can't we say that strategic voting and strategic choices like this are possible? But let's see. Won Hee-ryong, the candidate, is completely in the party's hands.

Unity, the party and the government are one body, one mind, and one body. Unity is important. But Chairman Han Dong-hoon will probably come out with a healthy relationship between the party and the government. What is a healthy relationship between the party and the government? Well, when it comes to the opposition's relentless attacks, the party must take the lead and fight. Yes, the Democratic Party cannot confront the President's aides in Yongsan. So, the party must fight to protect President Yoon Seong-yeol. However, just like in the last general election, if there are issues with key figures or policy issues that somewhat deviate from public opinion, regardless of criticism or actions taken, we should not go in that direction. In that sense, there is a need for tension. Yes, constructive tension is necessary. Chairman Han Dong-hoon thinks so, and candidate Won Il-yong is completely united.

Dongcheon Ilsim, what is the meaning of one body and two heads? One side is the legislative branch, and the other side is the administrative branch. How does this work logically? Basically, it means that they now have one heart and one will, aiming for cooperation, destiny, a community of shared future, and teamwork. Candidate Won Il-yong emphasizes this, and then Chairman Han Dong-hoon has been talking about a healthy tension relationship on broadcasts for a long time. You know, a healthy tension relationship where they can check and support each other. Next, Candidate Na Kyung-won will mention two things. First, the independence of the party, and second, she herself has been protecting the party for a long time. So, Chairman Han, who has been protecting the party for a long time, hasn't it been a while since he took over? Also, Candidate Won Il-yong used to leave the party in the past and went to the Bareun Party. Therefore, the true owner of the party that has been protected this year will probably be...

In this case, the message will show the biggest difference among three people.

홍준표의 나경원 지지 왜?

할 말은 하겠습니다.


자율구독료 계좌 :   하나은행 158-910018-41304   (주)어벤저스전략회의

#신지호 #이현종 #서정욱 #강찬호


홍준표의 나경원 지지 왜?

홍준표의 나경원 지지 왜?

스크립트