카말라 해리스: 젠더 정치와 대통령 선거 캠페인의 역학 관계

카말라 해리스의 출마는 여성의 선거 참여가 증가함에 따라 정치 역학 관계에 중대한 변화가 일어나고 있음을 의미합니다.

### 카말라 해리스: 대통령 선거에서 젠더와 인종 정치 탐색하기
* 🗣 카말라 해리스 후보는 **2016년 힐러리 클린턴이 받았던 비판**을 연상시키는 성별 및 인종 차별적 공격을 선거 유세 현장에서 받고 있습니다.
* 👩 흑인 및 남아시아계 여성으로서는 최초로 주요 정당의 대선 후보를 이끈 해리스는 **자신의 능력과 인격에 의문**을 제기하는 비하 발언에 시달려 왔습니다.
* 📊 여론조사 전문가들은 해리스가 **회의적인 유권자, 특히 대학 학위가 없는 백인 유권자**의 마음을 얻는 데 어려움을 겪을 수 있지만, **더 많은 여성 유권자를 동원**하여 이를 상쇄할 수 있다고 제안합니다.
* 💪 클린턴이 후보로 출마한 이후 **#미투와 여성 행진 등의 운동**으로 여성 유권자들이 힘을 얻고 선거 참여가 증가하면서 정치 환경이 크게 변화했습니다.
* 🗳 해리스의 캠페인은 인종과 성별을 언급하지 않은 수락 연설에서 볼 수 있듯이 **분노보다는 정책에 초점**을 맞춰 인종과 성별에 대해 다른 접근 방식을 취하고 있습니다.
* 🤷 그녀의 캠페인은 공격에 분노로 반응하는 대신, 비방하는 사람들을 **'이상하고 연락이 안 되는 사람'**으로 묘사하며 조롱하는 방식을 선택했습니다.
* 📈 최근 여론 조사에 따르면 **해리스가 주요 인구 집단에서 지지를 얻으며 48% 대 47%로 트럼프에 근소한 차이**로 앞서고 있는 것으로 나타났습니다.
* ⚔ 선거가 다가오면서 경쟁이 치열해져 **11월 5일까지 해리스와 트럼프의 치열한 접전**이 예상됩니다.

On the campaign trail, Kamala Harris is facing a lot of comments like this: That is the laugh of a crazy person. She slept her way to the top. It's a fact. And back in 2016 with Hillary Clinton, a lot sounded the same. Well, I think the only card she has is the woman's card. It's very loud and shrill. And she does not come off well. But in the eight years since Hillary Clinton lost, a lot has changed. We all, this country, have given women a lot more leeway in the last eight years to be who they are in politics in a way that we never have before. Here's a closer look at how the politics of gender have shifted and what it means for the presidential race. I accept your nomination. Vice President Kamala Harris is only the second woman and the first woman of Black and South Asian descent to head a major party's presidential ticket. Even before she became the Democratic nominee for president, Kamala Harris faced various racial and gender-based attacks on her

candid to see those attacks began just days after Harris secured the Democratic nomination. KLA Harris is somebody who's not competent to be president of the United States and has a very evil, wicked Jezebel agenda. Other conservatives have suggested she slept her way to the top, referencing her brief relationship with former San Francisco mayor Willie Brown. It is relevant when a young candidate tries to sleep her way into politics and into power. In a resurfaced clip from 2021, Republican vice presidential P JD Vance questioned why Harris hasn't had any biological children. We're effectively run in this country via the Democrats, via our corporate oligarchs, by a bunch of childless cat ladies. Hillary Clinton experienced similar attacks on the campaign trail. Social F, I think a lot of it with Hillary Clinton has to do with style and delivery, oddly enough. She shouts, we heard a lot about shrill voices at the time, we heard a lot about women yelling at the time. Amanda Ria was the national political director for Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign.

working behind the scenes to manage relationships with key stakeholders when you're preparing someone for an interview or you're preparing them for the debate and the constraints around women. You can't be too hard, you can't be too soft. I think the humorlessness in her campaign is one of the strategic deficits that she's facing. Donald Trump would be yelling and not be nice intentionally. Meanwhile, I was getting calls where she had to be nice and at the same time make sure she's credible. Harris's multi-racial identity has also fueled more attacks. Some Republicans have called Harris a Dei hire, suggesting she only received the nomination because of her race and gender. She's openly a Dei hire 100%. She was a Dei hire. They seem much more animated by the idea that she's been promoted because of her race and gender, that she has not succeeded on her own merits. They realized it had to be a black woman in the vice presidency, now the presidency. That's exactly the reason Kamala got her job when you're an

operative, and you look at the numbers, or you're doing the data analysis, you just know there's a group of people who are going to hear comma as a women's name and say, That's not for me. Many Democrats are worried that Kamala Harris may struggle to earn the support of voters who view her skeptically as both a woman, a woman of color, and a California liberal, particularly those white voters without college degrees in places like those crucial blue wall states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Polling experts say Harris could offset any drop-off in support from white men by adding more women, but history suggests this could be a challenge. One of the really remarkable things about Hillary Clinton's candidacy, given the history she was poised to make, was that she didn't really galvanize female voters around her candidacy. But a lot has changed since then. The fallout from Trump's election mobilized women in an entirely new way. Immediately after Donald Trump was elected in 2016, we had the Women's March, millions of women

pouring into the streets all over the world. At the time, it was the largest single-day protest in history. Women around the country have changed; they actually see themselves as part of this electoral process, not it happening to them. Then, in 2017, the #MeToo movement began gaining momentum. It brought renewed attention to barriers women faced in the workplace and helped Democrats by mobilizing young female voters. In 2019, there were more than 100 women representatives in the House for the first time in history. Then, in 2022, the Supreme Court overturned the federal right to abortion. Our bodies, our bodies. Once they have seen that abortion rights are at stake, we see a lot of women getting off the sidelines, registering to vote, and coming out to vote, even in red states that don't usually vote for Democratic candidates. Why exactly is it that they don't trust women? Well, we trust women. After the Democratic National Convention, a Wall Street Journal poll found Harris expanded her lead as the candidate best suited to handle abortion rights. Things are also shifting on the

Republican side, we also saw a woman Republican candidate, Nikki Haley, be the last candidate standing against Donald Trump in the Republican primary and get quite a lot of votes. Although, of course, she was not successful. The fact that we have seen more women in those roles just gives you a different view of what could be in this changing political landscape. Harris's campaign is taking a new approach to the rhetoric leveled at her race and gender. In 2016, Hillary Clinton talked a lot about her gender and reacted with maximum indignation and outrage when Trump said anything offensive. You can put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. So far, Harris has avoided race and gender as a central part of her campaign messaging, a major shift from Clinton's glass ceiling rhetoric. In her speech accepting the Democratic nomination, she did not mention race or gender even once. The feeling among her campaign is that she makes a statement simply by being who she is, and she doesn't have to spell it out for people.

he suggested that you happened to turn black recently for political purposes, questioning a core part of your identity. Yeah, any same old tired playbook. Next question, please. That's it. That's it. Rather than expressing that outrage and indignation, they've tried to laugh it off. They ridicule it. They've depicted it as weird. Well, it's true. These guys are just weird. And you know, they're running for He-Man Women Haters Club or something. Trump has a long history of derogatory comments against women, with Republicans vying for more female and black voters. This could be a liability for the Trump campaign. Crazy Nancy Pelosi said she was always saying she's crazy as a bed bug, that one. You know, you could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever. Some GOP leaders urged Republicans to stay away from criticizing Harris's race and gender. This election, as I noted at the outset, is going to be about policies, not personalities. Um, this is not personal with regard to Kamala Harris and her her

ethnicity or her gender had nothing to do with this whatsoever. I think it tells you a lot about where the country is on these issues that Republicans know that these attacks don't play well. Harris's rapid ascension to the top of the Democratic ticket has upended Trump's once-comfortable lead in the polls against Biden. A Wall Street Journal poll conducted in August found Harris is narrowly ahead of Trump. Harris had 48% support to Trump's 47%. She has improved her standing in the polls primarily by getting Democratic base voters off the sidelines. She's improved on Joe Biden's standing with young voters, women voters, people of color. But Trump has remained at about the same level. The other thing that's interesting, particularly in the battleground states, is she's not losing any of Joe Biden's supporters. This is still a race that is within the margin of error, too close to call, and it's going to be a knockdown drag-out fight between these two candidates from now until November 5th.

What Harris Learned From Clinton’s 2016 Election Strategy | WSJ

The Wall Street Journal takes you inside carefully selected stories and events in a visually captivating way so you can dig deeper into the news and insights that matter to you. 

The Wall Street Journal

카말라 해리스는 선거 유세 과정에서 그녀의 능력과 인격을 공격하는 댓글로 인해 상당한 비판에 직면해 있습니다.

해리스는 주요 정당의 대선 후보로 나선 두 번째 여성이자 최초의 흑인 및 남아시아계 여성입니다.

지난 8년 동안 여성의 정치 환경은 변화했지만, 힐러리 클린턴이 직면했던 것과 유사한 성별에 기반한 공격은 여전히 중요한 이슈가 되고 있습니다.

카말라 해리스의 도전과 전략적 포지셔닝

카말라 해리스는 인터뷰와 토론을 준비하면서 주요 이해관계자와의 관계를 관리하고, 친절함과 신뢰성 사이에서 균형을 잡아야 하는 어려움에 직면해 있습니다.

그녀의 다인종 정체성은 공화당원들로부터 공격을 받았고, 공화당원들은 그녀의 지명을 "신의 고용"이라고 비판하고 있습니다.

민주당은 해리스가 회의적인 유권자, 특히 주요 경합주에서 대학 학위가 없는 백인 유권자의 지지를 얻는 데 어려움을 겪을 수 있다고 우려하고 있지만, 트럼프의 당선으로 인한 여파로 여성 유권자를 새로운 방식으로 동원할 수도 있습니다.

여성 운동이 정치에 미치는 영향

2017년의 여성 행진은 역사상 가장 큰 규모의 일일 시위로 기록되었으며, 여성들이 선거 과정에 참여할 수 있도록 힘을 실어주었습니다.

미투 운동과 낙태 권리를 위한 투쟁은 젊은 여성 유권자들을 동원하고 정치에서 여성의 대표성을 높였습니다.

카말라 해리스의 캠페인은 인종과 성별 메시지에 대해 다른 접근 방식을 취하고 있으며, 이러한 문제를 명시적으로 다루기보다는 자신의 존재와 영향력에 초점을 맞추고 있습니다.

정치적 정체성과 캠페인 역학 관계

연사는 자신의 정체성에 대한 의문을 제기하는 것을 비판하고 비하 발언을 하는 사람들의 접근 방식을 조롱합니다.

트럼프는 여성에 대한 부정적인 발언을 한 전력이 있으며, 이는 공화당이 더 많은 여성과 흑인 유권자를 끌어들이기 위해 노력하는 그의 선거 운동에 부담이 될 수 있습니다.

공화당 지도자들은 카말라 해리스의 인종과 성별을 비판하지 말 것을 권고하며 이번 선거가 인신공격보다는 정책에 초점을 맞춰야 한다고 강조하고 있습니다.

카말라 해리스가 2024년 선거에 미치는 영향

카말라 해리스가 민주당 경선 후보로 부상하면서 여론조사에서 트럼프에 근소한 차이로 앞서고 있습니다.

해리스는 젊은층, 여성, 유색인종 등 민주당의 주요 지지층으로부터 지지를 얻고 있습니다.

두 후보가 오차범위 내에서 접전을 벌이고 있는 가운데 11월 5일까지 치열한 접전이 펼쳐질 것으로 예상됩니다.