- The gender pay gap is, simply put, the gap in the pay
levels of the median man and the median woman. We've seen huge progress in
closing the gender pay gap from 64 cents on the
dollar a few decades ago, 

to 82 cents on the dollar now. So that obviously represents huge progress by women in the labor market. It's obvious when we think
about it for a moment that it's not- that doesn't mean all women
earn less than all men. 

And when we look quite
hard at the picture, what we see is that 40% of women now earn more than the median man, which was only 13% in 1979. Imagine a world where the
earnings of women and men 

looked exactly the same, would be 50%. So we're not at 50% of
women earning the same as the median man, but we're at 40%. And so what that means is
there are a lot of women 

who are earning quite a
lot more than a lot of men, and that's great news. What that means is that we
are getting closer and closer to gender equality, even
if we haven't got there yet in terms of earnings. 

The question then becomes:
Why is the gap there? Why was it there before? Why is it there now? And there are a number of things that could be causing the gender pay gap, and the one that's most commonly
cited is discrimination: 

is that women are paid less
for doing the same work as men. And that clearly used to be
a relatively large factor in the past. It's one of the reasons why
we have equal pay legislation, to make that illegal for
employers to engage in.

But as women have progressed, that's become less and
less part of the story. A much bigger part of the story has become two really big factors: One, that women are tending
to be in occupations that are lower paid. So there's differences in occupation,

which we have to understand,
but the really big one is differences in
child-rearing and childcare. So what happens with the discussions about the gender pay gap is, I think, quite a lot of misunderstanding. You'll get people on,
particularly on the right,

saying it's a myth! Once you control for
education and occupation and time spent raising kids,
the gap almost disappears - it goes down to say,
three percentage points, four percentage points, and that's true. But then the question is:

Well, why do we have that
occupational segregation? Why are the women the ones taking the time out of the
labor market to raise the kids? Maybe that's where the
structural inequality is now. So it's not a myth, it's
just math, it's still there,

but it's also not true, as
many perhaps on the other side will claim, that it's evidence
of purposeful discrimination. That's really not the
main driver of it anymore, even though that's a popular explanation. You hear the gap and
think: "Oh, there you go,

it must be discrimination." But it's not really employer
discrimination driving it now - it is these different patterns of work. So if we look at the earnings
trajectories of men and women until they have children,
they look very similar now -

there's almost no difference. But then, once they have children, women's earnings significantly
decline relative to men. For women, having a child
is the economic equivalent of being hit by a meteorite. Whereas for men, their
earnings continue to go up.

There are two big reasons why having kids has this big effect on women's
earnings and employment: Number one is the simple one - that they take more time
out of the labor market to look after kids,
especially when they're young.

So, most women with kids who aren't ready to go to school yet, so in the first four
or five years of life, are either working
part-time or not working. That's not true for the fathers. But almost to rub salt in the wounds,

the very age at which most women are taking that time
out of the labor market or going part-time, in one way or another, slowing down or reducing their
time in the labor market, turns out to be years
that are really critical

for career development,
especially in certain careers. Just at the point where your
career is starting to take off, you're taking on seniority, getting promoted into
management roles and so on, that's when you take this hit. And so what that means is the impact

of the time you take out of the labor market isn't just that time, it's the long-run effect it's had on your career progression. So there is this double hit that predominantly women face in terms of having kids. Given the main reason for the gender pay gap

is this 'parenting gap,' the amount of time that women versus men are putting into raising kids - that doesn't mean it's not a problem. It means it's a different kind of problem. And there are various things we should and can be doing to address it:

Number one is to reduce just how big an impact taking time out of the labor market or working part-time has on your career. So much more generous paid leave, for example, the U.S. is about the only country of advanced economies

to not have federal paid leave. The second thing is we can redesign career ladders such that there isn't such a big impact as people just getting to that point where they're going to be promoted. So we have to redesign careers so that they are more compatible with flexibility.

The other really big thing we have to do is both to encourage and enable fathers to do more of the work on the homefront. It may well be true, but going forward, women will still do more of the care in the very early years.

I do think there's some evidence that that is a preference that women have, but that, that doesn't mean that they do it all the way through. There's a huge role for fathers all the way through parenting, including in adolescence.

I sometimes feel like the
discussion about parenting assumes that kids are grown
up at the age of five, and it's just about the early years, and having raised three boys to adulthood, I'll tell you, it's not a few years. 

It goes on and on and on for decades. And so finding a way for moms and dads to share more equally the
tasks around parenting over that longer timeframe
is hugely important. And that's why if we
do have leave policies, they should be available
to men equally as to women. 

And they should be available
at any time in a child's life and not just in the early years because parenting is a
marathon, not a sprint. And I think we can ask
fathers to do much more without necessarily saying they have to do it right at the beginning. 

The good news about the gender pay gap is that it has been shrinking
over the last few decades. We have seen women really
making good progress relative to men. The bad news is that we're now at a point where some of the structural
obstacles to continued progress 

have become much clearer,
and in particular, the different ways in
which forming families and raising kids bears on
women's economic progress compared to men. So, we've gotten a long way, but we've also revealed now,
some really deep problems 

which are about the very ways in which work and family go together, or in some cases frankly,
don't go together very well, and how that is mostly affecting women. So, that means that to make more progress, we're going to have to work a lot harder. 

- Get smarter, faster with videos from the
world's biggest thinkers. And to learn even more from
the world's biggest thinkers, get Big Think+ for your business.

Is the gender pay gap a myth? | Richard Reeves

Big Think is the leading source of expert-driven, actionable, educational content -- with thousands of videos, featuring experts ranging from Bill Clinton to Bill Nye, we help you get smarter, faster. Get actionable lessons from the world’s greatest thinkers & doers. Our experts are either disrupting or leading their respective fields. We aim to help you explore the big ideas and core skills that define knowledge in the 21st century, so you can apply them to the questions and challenges in your own life. Other Frequent contributors include Michio Kaku & Neil DeGrasse Tyson.

Head to bigthink.com for a multitude of articles just as informative and satisfying as our videos. New articles posted daily on a range of intellectual topics. ​Join Big Think+ to gain access to an immense library of content. It features insight from many of the most celebrated and intelligent individuals in the world today.

   - Subscribe for daily videos.
   - Business inquiries and fan suggestions welcome.

Big Think

성별 임금 격차 해소 진행 상황

성별 임금 격차는 달러당 64센트에서 82센트로 크게 감소했습니다.

모든 여성이 모든 남성보다 소득이 적은 것은 아니며, 여성의 40%가 남성의 중간 소득보다 더 많이 벌고 있습니다.

이러한 진전은 수익에서 성 평등을 향한 움직임을 나타냅니다.

많은 여성이 많은 남성보다 훨씬 더 많은 수입을 올립니다.

성별 임금 격차가 발생하는 이유

예전에는 차별이 주요 요인이었지만 지금은 덜합니다.

이제 직업과 자녀 양육의 차이가 더 중요한 요인으로 작용하고 있습니다.

격차의 원인에 대한 오해가 존재하며, 일부에서는 특정 요인을 통제하면 격차가 허구라고 주장하기도 합니다.

이러한 격차는 직업 분리와 여성의 불균형적인 육아 책임으로 인해 지속되고 있습니다.

의도적인 차별은 더 이상 주요 동인이 아닙니다.

남성과 여성의 수입 궤적은 자녀를 갖기 전까지는 비슷합니다.

아이를 낳는 것은 남성보다 여성의 수입에 더 큰 영향을 미칩니다.

여성은 육아를 위해 노동 시장에서 더 많은 시간을 할애하며, 파트타임으로 일하거나 아예 일하지 않는 경우가 많습니다.

이 시기는 경력 개발의 중요한 시기와 일치합니다.

그 영향은 쉬는 시간을 넘어 장기적인 경력 발전에도 영향을 미칩니다.

성별 임금 격차의 주된 이유는 육아에 소요되는 시간의 차이입니다.

더 넉넉한 유급 휴가가 필요합니다.

커리어 사다리는 유연성을 높이기 위해 재설계가 필요합니다.

아버지들이 더 많은 육아 책임을 분담할 수 있도록 격려하고 지원해야 합니다.

육아는 초기뿐만 아니라 장기적인 노력이 필요한 일입니다.

상당한 진전이 있었지만 구조적인 장애물은 여전히 남아 있습니다.

일과 가정 생활이 교차하는 방식은 여성에게 불균형적으로 영향을 미칩니다.

이러한 뿌리 깊은 문제를 해결하기 위해서는 더 많은 노력이 필요합니다.