I am curious about why you keep watching even though you don't understand. Let me explain the reason why you keep watching despite not understanding. Please join Discord. Come in, and I'll let you know. If you don't come in, then... That's how red pill followers are, basically. Their life is all about running away, running away, always avoiding. I'm preparing. Ah, great! Finally, the conversation with Re1ji has started. Yes, you’re in! You can click on the main button here. Would you like to try clicking the main button? Koan has joined. Are you a man? Oh, really, are you a man? Give a round of applause, everyone! So, Koan, what are you curious about? Why do you keep watching something that makes you feel bad? This is my content, you know. If it makes you feel bad, can't you just not watch it? No, I’m watching it to broadcast to people even though it makes me feel bad. Is it over? Hello? Yes, I need to mix it with the broadcast.

Do you have any more questions? Why is it suddenly over? Just a moment, let me adjust the broadcast. Okay, it's been a while. I was just curious about why you watch it. So, why do you watch my content? Well, I saw it in the algorithm, and since it appeared in the algorithm, I watched it too. Oh, then that's fine. Is that the end? That's what I was curious about. By the way, do you have anything to say about Red Pill? I'm just curious, especially about that person. Oh, really? That's it? Well, I don't think there's much to say about that person. What do you mean? There are many weirder people on YouTube. Oh, for sure. But someone like Red Pill seems pretty ordinary. Oh, someone like Red Pill seems ordinary? Yes. I see. What part seems ordinary to you? To me, you and Red Pill seem the same.

What parts do you think are similar? There must be some characteristics that are similar, right? There must be criteria for evaluating what is considered the same. From your perspective, you mentioned the story about the floating clouds earlier. How about 1 Minute Science? When I watched 1 Minute Science's videos, it seemed to me that they take information and use it to convey stories about science to people. From my perspective, that's not science. Are you a scientist? Are you a scientist? Oh, I’m looking at papers. What is your major? What kind of work are you doing? Yes, what kind of work are you doing? Didn’t you just say that? Didn’t I ask what your major is? Yes, what is your major? Yes, I graduated from college, but I’m doing something else. You graduated from college, but you’re doing something else? What do you mean by that?

You graduated from a university with a major, but you are doing something else, right? I'm really sorry, but I couldn't understand that sentence. Think about it. Let's say there is someone who graduated from medical school. They might feel that their major doesn't suit them, and there are people who are not doctors. You can think of it as that case. Does that make sense? It seems like it doesn't. I asked what your major is, but you answered that you are working under a professor in a field that is not your major. That's not the right response. 

If I wanted to do this job and thought about it since I was young, but then realized that it wasn't for me when I actually tried it, what would happen if that was during college? So what? I asked what your major is. I'm not trying to belittle you.

You asked me what my major is without any intention behind it. I apologize if I came off as aggressive; that was not my intention. If you felt that way, I sincerely apologize. I was just asking what your major is. I’m looking into it as a hobby. No, I’m a graduate student. Let me clarify again. So, you’re saying you’re a graduate student? I didn’t ask if you were a graduate student; I asked what your major is. If you say you’re a graduate student, then what should I do? I’m majoring in criminal psychology. Yes, I’m majoring in criminal psychology. So, that’s it, but why did we go through all this? It’s a rewarding field, after all.

I think it's important to consider that criminal psychology is indeed a significant field of study. However, returning to the previous question, the content discussed by the 1-Minute Science channel is claimed not to be scientific from their perspective. So, why do they believe it is not scientific? It is true that the foundation is scientific, but I wonder if it remains scientific from the midpoint onward. I’m not sure. Their own arguments are likely included, right? 

Now, going back to the earlier question, you mentioned that 1-Minute Science and Red Pill are not much different. What aspects do you think are similar? You mentioned that from your perspective, both the 1-Minute Science and Red Pill channels discuss circular arguments. I understand that. However, I personally find those who capture attention to be somewhat acceptable.

I'm just rambling on my own, so it's fine. Yes, but I've seen people who are even worse, so it seems okay. Do you understand? I understand, but am I really getting this? What does this even mean? I'm sorry, I... I'm sorry. Wait a moment. So, when you say red pill, it sounds like you're just talking nonsense. You seem cuter, though. Well, that could be true. Are you suddenly confessing? Yes, it is cute. But it's not the cute kind of cute; it's more like... how should I put it? It's not a fabrication. Can I express this a bit more strongly? Of course, go ahead. It's like a feeling of poison, I think. I usually keep reptiles, you know. I'm sorry, I...

Did I not focus well? What did you say about the toad? So, the puppy looks the same, but you see it as a non-poisonous toad. Can you explain what that means? Oh, the explanation has come up in the chat. Please check if this is correct. I'll read it to you. I like reptiles, and I have a unique taste for them. Saying that I find them cute is not really a compliment, is it? It's more like just stating a characteristic. It's a compliment, but it doesn't feel like one. Yes, please don't say anything about my voice. Oh, right. Yes, please don't comment on my voice. Everyone's voice is different. So, you think I'm cute, but that could be a compliment that doesn't feel like one. But why did you suddenly find me cute?

It came out, but is there anything I couldn't take care of? What does anyone say? Oh, please chat a bit. Yes, don't worry about it. Well, I’ve become quite distracted, so just a moment. Ko-mi, please don’t worry either. I won’t look either. Yes, the reason why Heukja said I’m cute is... why did that suddenly come up? Ah, I need to see more people than that person. So, I’ve seen more than what Heukja has shown. Yes, that’s why it feels cute. But that cuteness can be a compliment or it might not be. By the way, I’m not interested in the opposite sex, nor the same sex, or anything like that. I like thinking. I like books. Yes, I like books and I’m not interested in the opposite sex. Yes, um, by the way, do I... I mean, Heukja or...

Red Pill or Yong Chan-ho, they're just people who are a bit off, that's all. Is there anything else you would like to say? Even if you call Yong-woo names like demon or whatever, from my perspective, he looks like a person. But I don't see you as a person. Oh, you don't see Heuk-ja as a person? Yes, but you see Yong Chan-woo as a person. Can I ask why you see Yong Chan-woo as a person? Yes, it's because of the environment I grew up in. What kind of environment was it, if you don't mind me asking? It's hard to explain, but it feels like Heuk-ja looks like an animal. Why is that? Why do you think so? I just feel that way. It's not based on any evidence; it's just the impression I get when I see him. So, what kind of impression do you get when you see Yong Chan-woo? He seems like a somewhat unique person. A unique person? Then I'm curious about Yong Chan-woo.

Honestly, I think it's not a big problem that some people say whatever they want on the internet, as there are many such people. By the way, I have talked with Yong Chan-ho and asked about his main account and other things, so I am aware of his main account. What do you mean by knowing his main account? I found that really funny. Well, do as you please, Korea Matrix. No, that's not it. What do you mean by knowing his main account? You seem to not grasp the context at all. I don't really understand what you're saying, so if you could explain it a bit more clearly, that would help. Even if you explain it to me, I still can't get it. I feel like your explanation is quite lacking. Let's just talk. Do you not want to continue this conversation anymore? Looking at the chat, it seems like...

You said not to look at it, but I wasn't looking earlier. Now that I've seen a bit, it feels a bit off. I understand. But if you felt bad, I apologize on your behalf. It's not that I felt bad. Well, that's not true either. It's just that I realized there are people like that. So, you don't really want to have a conversation now. But if you want to talk later, I'm available. So, today, you can't do it right now, right? Well, I can do it now, but... I have a good chat that came up. Should I read it? A good chat came up asking if you like books. It says, I heard you like books. What book have you read recently? Can you introduce a book you've read recently? Is it a domestic book or a foreign book? Just the most recent one you've read.

가장 마음에 드는 책이 무엇인지 말씀해 주실 수 있나요? 최근에 읽은 책이 아니어도 괜찮고, 본인에게 가장 인상 깊었던 책에 대해 이야기해 주시면 좋겠습니다. 어떤 책이었나요? 

유교라는 책을 읽으셨다고요? 유교 관련 책들이 많지만, 그 중에서 '중용'이라는 책을 읽으셨군요. 사람들이 책에 대해 궁금해하는데, 그 책을 읽으셨을 때 어떤 느낌을 받았는지, 간단하게 책을 소개해 주시고 어떤 생각을 하게 되었는지 말씀해 주실 수 있을까요? 

한마디로 요약하지 않으셔도 되고, 좀 길게 말씀해 주셔도 됩니다. 하지만 길게 말씀하시면 여기 있는 사람들이 싫어할 수도 있으니, 적당히 해 주시면 좋겠습니다.

It seems that it's okay now. It's really hot right now, and the chat is moving quickly. People seem to enjoy topics like the Doctrine of the Mean. This is because they subtly like books with Confucian or intellectual content. So, it would be nice if you could briefly explain that. However, I think it would be best to talk about it lightly. Looking at the state of the chat, it's okay. So, what does the Doctrine of the Mean mean? What does it signify in that book? The Doctrine of the Mean is about balance. Can you explain it a bit more casually? Just the simplest way to explain it is to say it's about balance. If you can understand it at that level, that would be great. I also want to understand the meaning of the term balance.

I know, but the book titled The Doctrine of the Mean doesn't end simply with just three words. Usually, if you were to explain it to someone who hasn't read the book, you wouldn't summarize it that briefly, would you? I wonder why people don't practice the Doctrine of the Mean. Why don't they just do it? So, I'm curious about whether you want to have a conversation or not. That's what I'm really wondering. It seems like you don't really want to talk, right? 

What do you mean by it's in the middle? If you really want to have a conversation, then we can talk; otherwise, I can leave. I do want to have a conversation, but when I ask you to introduce the book on the Doctrine of the Mean, and you just say it's simple, that's not really an explanation, is it? If I go into more detail, I feel like people will react in a certain way. What kind of reaction do you think they would have? Oh, they might say that it's the same as past examples.

I was thinking about how you would respond if I asked you what you think. It seems like it would be the same as past love, right? Is that the correct answer? Yes, that's the answer. Can you respond in a way that I can understand? I asked if you could explain moderation a bit longer, and I was wondering what kind of reactions would come up in the chat. You mentioned past examples, but what were those examples? You said that even if I talk, you would still want me to speak, so what does that mean? Who are you talking to? Oh, I just noticed something in the chat that caught my eye, but it seems like you don't want to talk to me. I actually want to have a conversation with you, Koah. What should we talk about? I asked if you could explain moderation a bit more, but when I looked at the chat, it seemed like you didn't want to.

So, it's about doing things with proper etiquette, right? It's about doing things appropriately. I don't quite understand what exactly it means, so I will ask again. Could you explain a little more about it? In the chat, someone said, How else can I explain it? The phrase aljal ttak seems to be a very insufficient explanation, doesn't it? They said it was explained in a way that people here would understand. But what does that mean? I thought people here liked simple explanations, but it seems they don't like complicated ones. I don't know. I recently read the book The Doctrine of the Mean, but is there no simple explanation for it? It seems like you can't even understand what the Reddit user is saying. Even though it was explained simply, you still couldn't grasp it. And if I explain it in a complicated way, you say you won't understand.

What are you trying to say? You haven't explained it in a complicated way. When someone explains things complicatedly, they say they don't understand and that it's just vague. But when I explain it very simply, they say it's too short. So, how should I adjust my explanation? I expressed that Red Pill's comments are vague, but there’s no context in that content, and I don't dislike him. He just seems like a person. I understand that. But I'm not talking to Red Pill; I'm talking to Koane Aru. Since you keep mentioning him in the chat, I want to clarify that I'm not discussing Red Pill right now; I'm talking to Koane Aru. So, let's focus on the conversation. I'll say it again: your comment about the middle way being just right is indeed a lack of explanation, right? Yes, it is a lack of explanation.

It's quite urgent. Could you please provide a brief introduction that people can understand, along with your thoughts on the book Act Accordingly? Usually, when asked to introduce a book, one would mention where it was published, who the author is, and what the general content is. However, are you aware that your explanation might differ from how an average person would explain it? It's surprising because you are discussing the concept of moderation, which you describe as doing things in moderation. As far as I know, that's not entirely accurate. So, from your perspective, what does moderation mean? I haven't read the book myself, so how can you assert that moderation isn't just about doing things in moderation? I'm just asking because I don't know, and I would appreciate a clearer explanation.

I don't understand. You didn't know about that book, so why are you arguing that it's not true? From my perspective, it's reasonable to say that people who haven't read the book can understand it. Based on my thoughts and personal experiences, that's how I felt about the book. No, I’m asking you to explain. You've shared your feelings, but when it comes to reasonable arguments, if people who haven't read the book ask you to explain the book that Ko Ah's Haru recently read, wouldn't you describe how the book is structured, what the beginning is about, what the middle discusses, and what the conclusion is? But the reason you’re not explaining it that way is... Are you currently maintaining moderation? What does that mean? I'm curious about that.

Didn’t I ask you first? You keep repeating the same thing. What book did you read recently? I’m asking what the book is and if you could explain it a bit. What does that even mean? Please tell me everything from the beginning to the end. Didn’t I ask a question? If you’ve read a book recently, I asked if you could give a brief explanation of that book and share your thoughts in a way that people can understand. But when it comes to explaining the book, isn’t it usually about where the book came from, how it’s structured according to the table of contents, what happens at the beginning, in the middle, and the conclusion? That’s what I was thinking. You did mention your thoughts, but let’s keep it appropriate.

That's right, but the explanation about the book is missing. I understand. It's important to be polite and moderate, but wasn't there no explanation about the content of the book? Is it necessary to include that explanation? It's not absolutely necessary. Can you provide it? There's no need to. I was just asking if you could. Do you really want me to do it? If you don't want to, you don't have to. It's your choice. What specific points would you like me to explain? Let me reiterate: what parts of the book do you usually want explained? I'm curious about how the book is structured, such as the introduction, main body, and conclusion. I mentioned earlier that I asked about the introduction, main body, conclusion, and the structure of the book. Do you think saying just do it appropriately is a correct answer? I think I should turn off the chat as well. I'm trying to pay attention. Please repeat what you said.

It fell because of the chat window. Can you explain the book? You already explained it, didn't you? What kind of feeling do you want me to explain? Can you explain the structure of the book and how the introduction, body, and conclusion are organized? But you explained it earlier, so why are you going in circles? I asked you to explain the introduction, body, and conclusion. Are you saying that you were being polite and appropriate? Did you not mention the introduction and graduate students? I said the introduction, body, and conclusion, and I asked if you could explain the structure of the book a bit. But you keep saying to be polite and appropriate. Is this correct? Don't you think it's wrong? I don't think it's wrong based on my standards. You don't think it's wrong based on your standards, but what about general societal standards?

Can you think it's wrong? Well, that depends on the person. By the way, I'm curious about which graduate school you attend. Could you tell me about your graduate school? I wonder if you are someone who prefers to keep personal information private. What did you say? I didn't hear you. Where do you attend graduate school? Oh, is this how it is in Korea? Are you a foreigner? I really don't understand why I need to know this. You don't have to tell me. Since it's a sensitive topic, I understand if you prefer not to share. That's why I asked if you could let me know. It's okay if you don't want to share. It's a sensitive issue, right? You really don't have to tell me. I keep asking, but if you don't want to answer any questions I ask, you don't have to.

Ah, I appreciate that point. Of course, if you don't want to do something, you shouldn't have to. That's the nature of conversation, right? If you don't want to answer a question, you simply don't have to. It's up to you. But I was a bit skeptical about which graduate school you attend, as a graduate student. The most important thing for me as a college student is how to write a thesis and how to structure it. Fundamentally, there should be a conclusion, right? However, just writing an introduction, body, and conclusion in a polite and appropriate manner isn't enough. What do you think? I was staring at you too much, so I’m sorry, I didn’t catch that. I apologize, I didn’t hear you. Ah, in dealing with people, I’ve become too familiar, and I overlooked that relationship. I guess I need to meet more people. Oh, um, now, what kind of person...

You are asking about the concept of moderation, and I would like to confirm if this is correct. May I ask about moderation? However, it is true that not meeting people is appropriate, considering my major. Can I ask about moderation again? I mentioned it earlier, but I have another question. Can I ask again? Yes, in Chapter 23 of the Doctrine of the Mean, it starts with the idea that we should not overlook small matters and should do our best. The question was how this can relate to living moderately. It says we should do our best in small matters. Yes, that is what Chapter 23 of the Doctrine of the Mean states. However, the question arose about how this can be interpreted as living moderately. In that era, doing one's best was essential for survival, but what about our current times? What is the situation now? In the past, it was a time when one had to do their best. Yes, but can we not do our best now? May I share a bit of historical context? Of course.

In the past, people could die from a sword. Can you explain what kind of era that was? It was a time when conflicts often arose, a period in which the concept of moderation was relevant. What era are we talking about? It was a time when one couldn't just do things moderately; one had to work hard. But can we say that the past and the present are the same? There were fields in the past where one had to work hard, and there are also fields today where one must put in effort, right? Yes, that's correct. But how can the concept of moderation apply in modern times? Does it include the average life expectancy? Yes, if we take that into account, I believe that moderation is the answer. If I may ask again, there were fields in the past where one had to do their best, and there are also fields today where one must do their best. So, whether in the past or present, applying moderation seems appropriate.

It is said that the application of living is not being implemented, but they have rearranged it according to the times. From my perspective, I feel that the current era requires some translation. I think it is necessary to appropriately translate living. What does that have to do with wanting to have conversations with others? Some people keep saying they want to talk, and I wonder if that is possible. I feel like I am lacking something, and those who want to talk seem to be saying that. I am curious about why they would want to live like that. Personally, I have something I want to ask Koane Aru. I will share my thoughts on what I have felt. Is that okay to say? 

I don't think Koane Aru is necessarily at a higher level of consciousness or intellectual capacity than others. Earlier, they mentioned something like, Look at the level of the chat, which makes me wonder if there is something particularly outstanding about them.

I felt something like that. Am I mistaken? I tend to change my attitude depending on the person I'm dealing with. So, from your perspective, should I show respect and treat such people with courtesy, or is it normal to respond in the same way? I usually respond with courtesy. I see. Is that it? However, even when I respond with courtesy, I often encounter people who behave that way, so I think I need to change this a bit. What I've felt is that you keep saying that your way of dealing with people is lacking and that you need to improve. Could you explain which aspects you think need to be changed? I think we need to distance ourselves from people. You mean we should distance ourselves from these kinds of people?

I think there are people who only see one side of things. Can you explain what this side is? Depending on the context, it can appear in various ways, so I can't make a definitive judgment. Why is it said that we should keep a distance from these people? Is it unclear which side they belong to? Would you like me to explain it in detail or summarize it? Can I explain it in a way that is easy to understand? 

Yes, there are people who only see half of the world. Is there an example? Perhaps you could provide an example instead of just explaining binary thinking. For instance, let's consider the moon. There are people who only see the front side of the moon, and there are those who want to see the back side as well. Can you imagine someone who only looks at the front side of the moon and is dazzled by it, or someone who looks at the back side and is equally amazed? But you know that the back side cannot be seen, right? However, I do try to see it, even if I can't.

Ah, I see. It's a metaphor, right? Oh, you don't know what a metaphor is? People here really asked me for an example. If you ask for a metaphor, I can provide one. They asked for an example, right? A metaphor and an example are not the same thing. When you say example, it refers to a specific event that we can all relate to. Can you explain it like this? For instance, let's think about our country's culture. Someone posted an apology statement. Can we know who that person is? Well, let me give you an example in a spiritual sense. There is a person named A, but is that a sensitive topic? No, no, anything is fine. The possibility of someone being reminded of it is there, so mentioning it here... Oh, it's okay. In fact, being reminded of it might be the most appropriate example, right? If everyone can relate to it. But I don't want that.

I don't like that person either, so who is that person? Ah, I mean, since that person is an example of what I dislike, I want to avoid mentioning them. Isn't this also a kind of courtesy? Ah, well, I understand. Please go ahead. Is there another way to do this? Oh, I see that there are many people like that next to that person. It must be tough. What do you mean by that? Oh, it's just a monologue. I'm talking to you, but is it polite to talk to myself? Ah, I apologize for that. Could you give me an example? Since I often find myself alone, talking to myself has become a habit. I understand that talking to myself is a habit, but you keep saying it's about courtesy. You can't just act without courtesy. However, I am aware of what courtesy is. I didn't ask if you were aware of it. I said it was an uncourteous action. Could you perhaps give an example of someone you are reminded of?

Let me clarify that what I'm saying is just my perspective. If someone feels a connection, that's just their misunderstanding. Okay, I'll continue. Yes, if someone predicts something and I say it, those people will see it. If they feel a connection, then they are mistaken. Okay, so there's a person who killed someone. They apologized in front of the judge. The sound just cut out, so I need to repeat that. A person killed someone and submitted an apology in front of the judge. Then there's person B, who also lied to someone and submitted an apology. Both of them submitted apologies, but once they went outside the courtroom, they both got criticized harshly. They were really torn apart. However, person A did not submit an apology. Person B, on the other hand, felt offended and submitted an apology. But person B...

People often get insulted. Why do they get insulted? Haven't they eaten enough? This is not just about frustration; I asked for examples related to these people. Why did you handle that as an example? From my perspective, I can somewhat understand now. Those who disagree say it was about people. Let me clarify again. You referred to these people, so I asked which group you were talking about. Can you provide an example? Who are you referring to? By the way, just to mention in advance, the sign I referred to is not about murder but about complicity. I understand what complicity is, but I asked for examples related to these people. Who are these people? What do you mean? Who are they? Oh, you said you wouldn't mention it earlier, right? Why?

You keep asking questions. If you think of someone when I mention these people, that's your delusion. Earlier, you asked for an analogy, saying that these people are rude. Can you give an example of who these people are? I never asked who you are. I don't understand why the person chatting is saying that. What do you mean? You said you wouldn't mention it, but now you want me to mention it. You could just not say anything. Can you please answer the questions? It's really rude right now, isn't it? So, what are you curious about? Wasn't that really rude just now? You keep asking me to focus on the conversation, but speaking like that is rude, isn't it? You keep being rude about the part where you apologized earlier.

Isn't it really rude to just say yes? Yes, what do you think about that? I'm sorry about that. What do you think about doing something rude again? Oh, that person did the same thing, huh? Now I've become just like that person. Who is that person? Oh, it's someone you know, right? There are people who continue to communicate in their own way. So, do you realize that your way of speaking is disrespectful to the other person? Yes, because I talk just like that person. Do you recognize that speaking disrespectfully to someone might make them angry? Yes, it does. But why would the other person get angry? Why is it me? So, did that person get angry or not? Did I speak to you disrespectfully? Oh, I'm just imitating that person. I'm talking to you.

Have you ever asked that person to imitate you? You say that other people are being rude, but are you aware that you are continuously speaking to me disrespectfully? Yes, I am aware. I know that, but what is the reason for that behavior? Are you ignoring me? I partially agree with that. So, can I think that you are partially ignoring me? Yes. Then, get lost, you bastard. Yes, that seems to be the case. What kind of person is this? It's really frustrating. Conversations don't work with people like this. These kinds of people are not capable of having a conversation in the first place. Do you think I did this unknowingly? They fundamentally can't face people and do anything. I assure you, they are not graduate students, nor are they majoring in criminal psychology. They are just someone who stays in their room and does nothing. I assure you. Now, let me read the super chat. There are many...

I bought it. Yako, get your mental state together; the opponent is a profiler. QB, 2,000 won. This new content is surprisingly well put together; I admit it. I'm not the main writer. I'm really not the main writer. It's true, it's true. When I think about how people here are the kind who can't be associated with, just because they cursed at Ko, I feel like I'm going underground. Implementing justice is like a sugar cube, 2,000 won. Right now, I'm profiling Ko. Yes, a crime psychology major who claims to be a graduate student, but I can't even say which university he attends. He can't even talk about it. He can't possibly be someone who loves books and reads them. From what I see, he has probably never read the Doctrine of the Mean. He doesn't even know what it is. Reenactment, 2,000 won. I'm starting to get a bit scared. There were moments that were quite chilling. Ah, that person has the same vote; they are also participating in democracy.

You mentioned that as a Korean, you like the Coupang Brothers' 2,000 won books. What book have you read recently? When he talks about the Doctrine of the Mean, he says something like, That's not what the Doctrine of the Mean is, and tries to pass the explanation onto me. But I noticed that he often uses the tactic of deflecting my request for an explanation into a question. It doesn't work; that kind of thing doesn't work, you fools. I'm curious about what thoughts you had when you read the Coupang Brothers' 2,000 won book. You definitely can't say anything, right? I'm really curious about what book you read recently. Is it that hard to talk about? Oh, I haven't read any books lately. I've been so busy with the tasks assigned by my professor that I haven't read any books. The most recent paper I read was...

Let me explain this to you. You can't do this? Coupang is 2,000 won. You’re not watching Noh Jin-tok, are you? Oh, that Jin-tok was really funny. People immediately stop responding and seem to be searching for something. They start looking it up right away. Noh Jin-tok is one of the greatest philosophies of life, the Doctrine of the Mean. It's really important. Oh, Coupang Brothers, 5,000 won. The term Doctrine of the Mean has a general definition. However, the author's detailed thoughts on its importance are likely contained in the book. What does the author think about the Doctrine of the Mean? I'm asking you to share that. They say he’s ignoring it, thinking he’s a very outstanding person and looking down on others, so he’s not responding. Who is the author? The author is Confucius, right? But I'm curious, the author of the Doctrine of the Mean committed suicide, but the Doctrine of the Mean is by Confucius.

It's not a book written by someone else; it's a book authored by our company. It's not Confucius; it's the character for 'self' in 'suicide.' Earlier, there was a mention of someone lying and submitting a letter of reflection, which might be related to the black character. It seems that Yongwoo apologized, but I don't understand why Yong is getting more criticism for that. By the way, you have never engaged in similar behavior as 'in.' Min-kyu, you clearly said, I will definitely say it out loud, but it seems you didn't. The characteristic of these people is that I have never heard of 'black character,' but I only watch foreign YouTube channels. I feel like I want to say, That's not true. I know, I know. I just kept pretending not to know. That's why I kept asking who these people are. There is a channel called 'Koan's Day.' I shared the Discord address. Please share the YouTube link for 'Koan's Day.' I'm curious.

Where did you find such a loser? It's not that I found him; those who follow Yongcha and Red Pill are all like that. They think they are above others and believe they can ignore everyone else. I try to maintain my manners and listen to what they have to say, genuinely asking about their thoughts and what they really think. But they keep talking as if they are superior. I wish they wouldn't think of themselves as such great people. Why do they live like that? They are not great people. Would you like to see a playlist of Koah's day? Koah's day has playlists like this. This is actually a playlist made by Koah. He says it's a meta-cognition that was abandoned. It's so funny! So please, don't ever come down from that position.

From Chanwoo's perspective, I understand why he said that. So we were disappointed. You're right; you really like it. It's transparent. This is the level of Yongcheon. At this level, one cannot acknowledge their own development and, since they are not recognized by others, they feel the need to look down on others. I have to look down on others first before they look down on me. I guarantee you, he is not a graduate student anymore. It's amazing that anyone would research with someone like that. Seriously, South Korea is in a bad state. If I say this, it sounds harsh, but from the moment I heard his voice, I thought it was really strong. I believe the conversation will be very long. People like him are fundamentally disregarded and despised by the world, and they try to look down on others first to avoid being looked down upon themselves.

I need to move on, but rather than that, I will just ignore it and close my eyes. Oh, I can't see. I'm the one ignoring it first. I'm not being ignored; I keep trying to listen politely and kindly until the end. I even checked if I misunderstood anything while talking, but despite that, they continued to speak rudely until the end. So, they have no choice but to be insulted. I really wonder why people like that exist. I think it's okay for weak or lacking individuals; I have no problem with that. However, I dislike those who are weak but also bad. If such people gain even a little bit of power or taste even a bit of success in society, they can become dangerous. I dislike the weak but bad ones. They feel a sense of superiority by making others uncomfortable. That's right; it is.

In a world where I feel greatly underestimated, the only revenge I can take is to hope that everyone who talks to me gets angry and makes a mess of things. Ah, how on earth does one live a life like this? If you’re watching this, let me tell you something: just accept reality. I know you’re watching; I know you’ve set your account to private. But hey, don’t lie. What kind of college student are you? How can someone like you be a graduate student? Just live honestly. Let’s reopen Discord and see if you come in. Discord is open; you can join if you want. Are you too scared to come in? What if others come in too? Face the reality of whether you’ve become that person or if there’s no hope. If you can’t face it, you’ll just end up like Yong-ho, becoming a red pill. You’ll end up like Park Chan-woo or Jung Tae. If you don’t face it and just think you’re a great person, then at least do something.

You keep lying and saying that your life will get better if you claim to be a graduate student online, but I'm curious about how that actually improves your life. If you say you're a graduate student online, does that really make your life better? How cowardly! You might as well say, I'm currently unemployed, instead of telling such lies. What’s so great about being a graduate student? It’s just a way to show off your unnecessary intellectual vanity, pretending to be a very intelligent person. As an observer of the situation, I have the ability to analyze it. You know why I say I major in criminal psychology? In my view, those who commit crimes are the ones who are in the red. According to criminal psychology, such people commit crimes due to their psychological state. I want to express that I have insights into bad people, which is why I mention my major in criminal psychology.

There is a romantic notion about graduate school, but when you actually engage in research, you can't just call yourself a professor. It's hard to think of yourself as a professor because if you say you are, you have to specify which university and what position you hold. Professors can't just avoid that question. It's like a daily routine for them. It seems sad, doesn't it? I guess it looked impressive to understand public psychology well. That's why they claim to major in criminal psychology, but it feels pathetic. Even those kinds of people must have sexual desires, right? That's what makes it sad. I heard earlier that they have no interest in the opposite sex and are only interested in books. They say they love books too much. No, you like women. You want to meet women. I know you want to meet women, to be loved by women, to have intimate moments, to kiss, to hold hands, and to go on dates.

I want to eat something delicious and go to a café. I know that, but those kids also have sexual desires. However, they can't resolve them. They will never be able to solve it; they can't be loved by any woman. They can't be loved by anyone around their age or in their age group. It's really sad, right? But do you know what's less sad? They are weak, foolish, and not kind. They avoid everything, thinking, Before others ignore me, I should ignore them first. They are weak but bad, like goblins. They are really weak but evil. When those kids gather, they create a giant goblin. Among goblins, there are those who are really big, and they come together to form a powerful force. They need to acknowledge themselves. Even that Daniel Lee says the same thing: Hey, it's a day in the nose. They need to recognize themselves.

If you don't acknowledge it and just keep lying and running away, you won't be able to make any progress. You need to accept yourself and just take small steps forward, but since you can't do that, how deep must the hatred be for that woman who wants to ignore others and just start? I can't even have any kind of relationship, but women have been meeting different men since they were young. Ugh, women are all dirty; women are all bad. It's really sad. I already gave up on being recognized a long time ago, over ten years ago. So what? I didn't ask for that. That's exactly what being a loser is. A person who gives up is a loser. A person who gives up is Jang Jeong-tae. I don't understand what the problem is with your attitude. I treat you sincerely; I genuinely tried to be polite and as kind as possible, thinking there might be a misunderstanding in the meaning of my words. But you didn't even keep basic manners, and then you question why I care about manners.

I'm pathetic. I can't get in. I got insulted again, and now I'm sulking, so I can't get in. I yelled and got upset, but I'm definitely not a graduate student. I can assure you of that. In my opinion, someone who has studied a lot about the world thinks that they are a graduate student, so they just act like one. If I say I'm a professor, it sounds foolish, so I can't even make a big claim because I'm afraid of being found out. I'm scared that if I admit to being a graduate student, there will be many people willing to give me money. Right? I'm here now, but if you have something to say, come in. You know the reason you insulted me, right? It's because you looked down on me, and that's why you got this in return. If you have more to say, come in. If you have something to say, come in; I'll listen. I'm giving you a chance. If you have something to say about what I said, come in and refute it.

It's possible to come over; they say they'll give you pocket money. They must be playing outside. Why are they already playing outside? Right now, Koi Haru is busy. Will Koi Haru come in? Koi Haru, come in quickly. If you have something to say, I will give you the opportunity. Ah, Koi Haru likes animation; that's not a problem. There are many people who like animation. Yes, it's not something to criticize someone for having as a hobby. I came in. Yes, Koi Haru, do you have something to say? No, I don't. Yes, I came in because you told me to, but you said to come in if I had something to say. Ah, then I will leave. These guys lack understanding. I said to come in if you have something to say, but they don't understand. They don't even know what that short sentence means. It's really frustrating. I can't play with kids like that; they have no social skills. They don't even know what they're doing right now; they're playing a game.

I'm having an impact on the person. What is that? They're being insulted and are in a game. Do you know why they're in a game? They are currently being insulted by me and know that there is no way to resolve it, so they are escaping into a game. They are running away into a game. People like that spend their whole lives escaping into games. How can I deal with that? I have had people like that around me too. They can't even solve the small issues right in front of them, so they run away into games. What can we do? Running away into the gaming world doesn't improve their lives. I personally don't mind if someone enjoys gaming or anime; that's their hobby. Let's just have fun among ourselves. That's right, no matter how much we talk, those kinds of people won't change. They will continue to exist. We can just ignore them. But how can they pursue a master's degree? They've never even been a graduate student in the first place.

I'm not a graduate student; I've never pursued a master's degree. I'm just unemployed, playing Genshin Impact. Shouldn't I be considering whether to go to a master's program or not? This person is barely even a middle school graduate. From what I see, they struggle to respond to the bullies, and it's not working out, so graduating from middle school is currently difficult for them. At least I think these kids should have a chance to rehabilitate, but they don't. It's not okay to be lacking and foolish; I can accept that, but it's not acceptable to be bad. They shouldn't ignore others. Those kids have already been through a lot; they want to become profilers because they were bullied as children, and they want to get back at those who bullied them. That's why they majored in criminal psychology.

I was just kidding. This is really funny. You know, the person mentioned it. It's hilarious when we talk about majors. What’s your major? is legendary. What’s your major? is different from what you actually do. I want to work in a different field. That person will just ignore it and escape into the game. In the end, they say, Oh, I didn’t pay to get invited. I didn’t get invited; that’s nonsense. I’m really going to go now. It was fun, everyone.

용찬우를 추종하는 자(코하네아루)와 통화 | 용천지 ㄷㄷ

용찬우를 추종하는 자(코하네아루)와 통화 | 용천지 ㄷㄷ