삶의 의미 찾기: 빅토르 프랭클의 목적 철학

### 빅토르 프랭클의 로고테라피: 고통과 삶에서 의미 찾기
* 🔍 빅토르 프랭클은 **"고통에는 항상 의미가 있다"**고 결론지었습니다.
* 🏞 현재 사회 상황, 특히 삶에 의미가 없어 보이는 서구 사회에서 사람들은 **뿌리 깊은 무의미함을 극복하기 위해 만연한 소비주의와 산만함**을 일삼는 경우가 많습니다.
* 프랭클에 따르면 **돈, 지위, 권력, 쾌락은 의미의 결여로 인한 실존적 공백에 대처하기 위한 수단**일 뿐입니다.
* 🌟 "행복은 반드시 뒤따르는 것이므로 추구할 수 없다"는 프랭클의 말처럼 의미의 공백을 채우기 위한 수단으로서 **행복을 추구하는 것은 역효과**를 낳을 수 있습니다.
* 💡 의미는 행복과 성공의 근간이며, 의미가 부족하면 **쾌락, 돈, 명예, 권력에 탐닉**하게 됩니다.
* 🎨 삶의 의미는 사람, 순간, 상황에 따라 다르며, **작품을 만들거나 행동을 할 때, 무언가를 경험하거나 누군가를 만날 때, 피할 수 없는 고통 속에서 의미를 찾을 때** 발견할 수 있습니다.
* ♂ 프랭클의 철학은 **"살아야 할 이유를 찾는 것(심지어 죽을 이유까지)은 무의미하고 절망적인 존재를 어떤 상황에서도 살 가치가 있는 삶으로 변화"**시킨다는 것으로 요약할 수 있습니다.
* 그는 **"살아야 할 이유가 있는 사람은 거의 모든 '방법'을 견딜 수 있다"**고 믿었습니다.

빅토르 프랭클의 철학에 따르면, 고통에서 의미를 찾는 것은 절망적인 존재를 살 만한 가치 있는 삶으로 변화시킵니다.

“The meaning of life is to give life meaning.” What keeps a human being going? 
The purest answer to this question is perhaps to be found in the worst of 
places. Austrian psychiatrist, philosopher, and author Viktor Frankl spent three years in 
four different concentration camps. He was at the mercy of sadistic SS guards and the so-called 
“Capos:” prisoners with special privileges who willingly collaborated with the Nazis and 
were even more ruthless than their masters. The camp inmates were constantly exposed 
to famine, sickness, slave labor, and the possibility of punishment or execution. There 
was no freedom. The prisoners moved around like a defenseless flock of sheep, kicked and beaten 
by their shepherds, stripped of all human dignity. What’s left to live for in such a horrible place 
like a concentration camp? When they’ve taken all your liberties and possessions, and when death 
at short notice is almost inevitable, is there

any reason not to give up on life? Viktor Frankl concluded that there’s always a reason to live, even in the worst conditions: there’s always meaning in suffering. And if we can grasp this meaning - this star in the sky - we can overcome even the most painful circumstances. According to Viktor Frankl, it’s not pleasure, nor success, and power that essentially drives people; it’s finding something - a purpose, a meaning - to live and even die for. What’s the purpose of my life? What’s the meaning of all this? These questions echo the current societal condition, predominantly in the Western World, in which our lives seem to revolve around working a meaningless job to earn money so we can buy stuff as a means to dull our sense of meaninglessness. During times of globalization, secularization, and relative peace, we’re less likely to find meaning in being part of a tribe, religious community.

or defending our countries and loved ones against 
neighboring enemies. Everything has become so dull, so pointless, that we engage in rampant 
consumerism and distraction just not to feel a deep-seated sense of purposelessness that 
plagues our existence. And before we know it, nihilism kicks in, and we begin to ask 
ourselves: What’s the point? Why keep going? We cannot compare the circumstances of 
the modern-day Westerner with those who lived in the concentration camps during 
the Second World War. But oddly enough, we walk around with similar existential 
questions and have similar reasons for giving up on life altogether: the lack of 
purpose, hopelessness, meaninglessness. When we’re trapped in what Viktor Frankl 
called the ‘existential vacuum,’ what awaits us is despair. During his days in the concentration 
camps, he noticed a division between two kinds of people: those who had given up on life and those 
who had not. The first group was more prone to

illness and death; the second group was more 
likely to survive. The difference? A sense of meaning or, more specifically, the discovery of 
purpose in their unbearable living conditions. For example, Frankl himself was a doctor 
and found purpose in helping the inmates who suffered from illnesses. One day, he refused an 
opportunity to escape the camp so he could stay with his patients. He wasn’t motivated by money, 
status, power, or even freedom: his purpose, in his case taking care of his fellow human beings 
and not abandoning them, was so important to him that he was willing to die for it. His life had 
become a sacrifice of most profound significance. On the other end, Frankl wrote about those 
who collapsed under the harsh conditions of the camp. They always had the same reasoning 
for giving up, and I quote: “There’s nothing anymore to expect from life.” End quote. Devoid 
of meaning and faith that things could turn out

more favorable, our bodies and minds begin 
to wither as we’ve lost our will to live.  Frankl wrote about a prisoner who had dreamt about 
the end of the war and his release. His dream also   revealed the date on which the liberation would 
happen: March 13th, 1945. He was full of hope. But   when March 13th finally passed, nothing happened. 
As the prisoner’s prophecy was naive and he had no   purpose within the context of his imprisonment, he 
was struck with disappointment, suddenly got ill,   and died of typhus shortly after.
But looking at the horrible and hopeless   circumstances that some people find themselves 
in, is it fair to expect that they find meaning?   Aren’t some situations simply too 
overpowering, so much so that they   eliminate one’s responsibility to choose?
When the war was over, Frankl reflected on the   validity of human liberty during the horrors of 
the concentration camps. He concluded that we are

indeed able to preserve a “vestige of spiritual freedom” and of “independence of mind” even in such terrible conditions of mental and physical stress. Thus, we always have a choice. I quote: We who lived in concentration camps can remember the men who walked through the huts comforting others, giving away their last piece of bread. They may have been few in number, but they offer sufficient proof that everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms—to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way. End quote. The ruthless Capos without morality, the sadistic SS guards with no respect for human life, the prisoners who lost their will to live, the guards who tried to help the inmates, those who found meaning in the deepest of suffering: they were all responsible for their life choices. Hence, regardless of how terrible life is, we still can and must decide in what direction we go.

Do we choose to betray our people and commit 
brutal acts to escape torture and death in the concentration camps? Do we choose to succumb 
to peer pressure and hateful ideologies? Do we choose to embrace a nihilistic, destructive 
mindset due to living in a consumerist society that seems spiritually and morally bankrupt? Do we 
choose to become a plaything of our circumstances? According to Frankl, the spiritual freedom we have (which cannot be taken away) makes life 
meaningful and purposeful. I quote: The way in which a man accepts his 
fate and all the suffering it entails, the way in which he takes up his 
cross, gives him ample opportunity—even under the most difficult circumstances—to 
add a deeper meaning to his life. End quote. Imagine having to get out of bed every morning 
without a meaningful long-term goal. The only reason you get up is that you have to get to 
work and engage in activities you don’t like,

just to financially support a meaningless 
existence and the many pointless pleasures, to cope with it. You blame your past, parents, 
circumstances, and even your genetics for not having anything going for you. But, in reality, 
you can still transcend your predicament and find purpose despite any external situation.
The question is, of course: how? Before we get into that ‘how’ of meaning, it’s helpful to look 
at the ‘why’ of meaning. Especially in the current age, there’s a tendency to focus on money, status, 
power, and pleasure rather than a meaningful life. But, according to Frankl, these pursuits 
are ways to cope with an existential vacuum. They are a consequence of a lack of meaning. In 
a society highly concerned with pursuing pleasure and achieving wealth, it’s often difficult 
to realize that these pursuits don’t fill our existential emptiness and are only 
cheap substitutes for what truly matters.

A more direct approach for dealing with 
the pain of meaninglessness we see today is the pursuit of ‘happiness.’ In some 
circles, like the good-vibes-only movement, happiness has even become a requirement. Frankl 
describes a characteristic of American culture: one is “commanded” and “ordered” to be happy. 
There’s nothing wrong with ‘happiness,’ of course, as happiness is probably the ultimate pleasant 
state of mind and the eventual by-product of following, for example, Stoic and Buddhist 
teachings. But, so argues Frankl, happiness itself cannot be pursued, as it must ensue. I quote: One must have a reason to “be happy.” Once the reason is found, however, one becomes happy 
automatically. As we see, a human being is not one in pursuit of happiness but rather 
in search of a reason to become happy, last but not least, through actualizing the potential 
meaning inherent and dormant in a given situation.

End quote. The same goes for success, according 
to Frankl. Success must also ‘ensue’ and not be   ‘pursued,’ as it’s the unintended side effect 
of one’s dedication to a more significant cause.   It must happen. The more we care about 
it, the less we can focus on our cause,   and the less likely success will occur. But 
if we dedicate ourselves to a purpose and   don’t care about success, the more likely it 
will happen as a byproduct in the long run.  So, it seems that meaning is at 
the root of happiness and success,   and the lack of it at the heart 
of indulgence in and addiction to   pleasure, money, fame, and power. Having explained 
this, let’s take a look into the ‘how’ of meaning. First of all, according to Frankl, the meaning 
of life depends on the person, the moment, and

circumstances. So, there’s no one-size-fits-all type of meaning that suits everyone at any time. He compares the futile quest for general meaning, to a question posed to a chess champion: “Tell me, Master, what is the best move in the world?” There’s none. The best move in chess depends entirely on the situation in the game and the characteristics of one’s opponent. We cannot invent the meaning of our existence, but we can detect it. As Frankl stated, meaning is inherent and dormant in a given situation. We can discover our purpose only if we interact with the world or determine what the world needs. Frankl wrote that we find out the meaning of life in three different ways: (1) by creating a work or doing a deed (2) by experiencing something or encountering someone (3) by the attitude we take toward unavoidable suffering. The first one lies in achievement and accomplishment. Creative pursuits like

writing a book, painting, sharing stories about our sufferings and life experiences, or solving today’s problems with science and technological inventions, can help others. We’ll only find out when we get started and engage with the world, so other people’s needs become apparent. The benefit of performing good deeds doesn’t need an explanation. But it probably doesn’t have to be grandiose; even sharing a small piece of bread with a starving inmate can be a profoundly meaningful experience. The second one lies in the connection we have or find with people and things. The experience of life itself, caring about the environment and its people, can be meaningful in itself. Frankl describes this as love, as he argues that it requires love to know something or someone truly. I quote: “The second way of finding a meaning in life is by experiencing something - such as goodness, truth, and beauty - by experiencing nature and culture, or, last but not least,

by experiencing another human being in his 
very uniqueness - by loving him.” End quote. The third one lies in finding meaning in 
suffering. Frankl gives an example of an elderly   practitioner who consulted him because of his 
severe depression after losing his wife. Instead   of telling him what to do, he asked: “What would 
have happened, Doctor, if you had died first,   and your wife would have to survive you?” “Oh,” 
he said, ”for her, this would have been terrible;   how would she have suffered!” Frankl pointed 
out that the Doctor’s wife has been spared from   such suffering, and he spared her by paying the 
price: that he has survived and now mourns her.  We cannot bring back the dead. In many situations, 
like being imprisoned in a concentration camp,   there’s isn’t much we can do about the external 
factors. “When we are no longer able to change a

situation, we are challenged to change ourselves,” 
Frankl stated. By changing our attitude, we can turn adversity into triumph; we can find meaning, 
even within the worst sufferings imaginable. The philosophy of Viktor Frankl could 
perhaps be summarized like this: ‘finding something to live (and even 
die for) transforms a meaningless, hopeless existence into a life worth 
living, regardless of any circumstances.’ Hence, he quoted Nietzsche, saying: “He who 
has a why to live can bear almost any ‘how.’” 
Thank you for watching.

Finding Something to Live and Die For | The Philosophy of Viktor Frankl

Einzelgänger

인생의 의미 찾기: 빅토르 프랭클의 교훈

강제 수용소의 생존자인 빅토르 프랭클은 가장 끔찍한 상황에서도 고통 속에서 삶의 이유를 찾고 의미를 찾아야 한다는 결론을 내렸습니다.

그는 인간의 원동력은 쾌락이나 성공이 아니라 목적과 의미를 찾는 데 있다고 믿었습니다.

소비주의와 목적의식 부재가 특징인 오늘날의 사회에서 많은 사람들이 실존적 질문과 의미의 부재에 시달리며 절망에 빠집니다.

빅터 프랭클의 강제 수용소 생존 이론은 다른 사람을 돕는 데 헌신한 자신의 모습에서 볼 수 있듯이 목적 찾기에 기반을 두고 있습니다.

의미와 희망의 부재는 수용소에서 포기한 사람들의 죽음으로 이어졌습니다.

프랭클은 일부 수감자와 간수들의 행동에서 알 수 있듯이 가장 끔찍한 상황에서도 개인은 자신의 태도를 선택하고 의미를 찾을 수 있는 자유가 있다고 결론지었습니다.

프랭클이 말하는 삶의 의미 찾기

프랭클은 영적 자유를 통해 개인이 가장 어려운 상황에서도 의미를 찾을 수 있다고 믿었습니다.

그는 돈, 쾌락, 행복을 추구하는 것은 의미 부족의 결과이며, 진정한 행복은 주어진 상황에서 잠재적 의미를 실현함으로써 행복해야 할 이유를 찾는 데서 비롯된다고 주장합니다.

프랭클은 외부 환경에도 불구하고 개인이 처한 곤경을 초월하여 목적 있는 삶을 살 수 있다고 말합니다.

프랭클이 말하는 성공과 행복의 열쇠

성공은 더 큰 대의를 위한 헌신의 의도치 않은 결과이며, 성공에 너무 많은 관심을 기울이면 성취를 방해할 수 있습니다.

프랭클은 의미는 행복과 성공에 필수적이며 개인의 경험, 행동, 고통에 대한 태도를 통해 발견된다고 강조합니다.

삶의 의미는 획일적인 개념이 아니라 일을 만들고, 관계를 형성하고, 피할 수 없는 고통에서 의미를 찾는 과정을 통해 발견할 수 있습니다.

빅토르 프랭클의 인생에서 의미를 찾는 철학

빅토르 프랭클의 철학은 고통과 인간 고유의 경험에서 의미를 찾는 것을 중심으로 전개됩니다.

그는 역경을 승리로 바꾸기 위해 태도를 바꾸는 것이 중요하다고 강조합니다.

프랭클에 따르면 삶의 목적이 있으면 어떤 상황에서도 모든 존재를 의미 있게 만들 수 있습니다.