It sounds to me like you're saying there's basically no limitations. Your intuition says to what larger language models are limited. So when I currently play with it, it's quite limited. I wish that it was way better, but isn't that your fault versus the large model's fault?

Of course, it's always my fault. There's probably a way to make everything your fault. I just want to get you on the record saying yes, everything is my fault. That works, doesn't work in my life, at least that is usually the most useful perspective for myself, even though the

sci-sight, I feel no, I sometimes wish I could have seen myself as part of my environment more and understand that a lot of people are actually seeing me and looking at me and not trying to make my life work in the same way as I try to

help others. And um, making this switch to U this level three perspective is something that happened long after my level four perspective in my life, and I wish that I could have had it earlier. And it's also not now that I don't feel like I'm complete. I'm all over the place.

That's all where's happiness in terms of stages is on three or four. Take that tangent. You can be happy at any stage or unhappy. Oh, um, but I think that if you are at a stage where you get agency over how your feelings are generated and to

some degree, you start doing this when you leave adolescence. I believe that you understand that you, you are in charge of your own emotions to some degree, and that you are responsible for how you approach the world. That uh, it's basically your task to have some basic hygiene. How and the

way in which you deal with your mind and you cannot blame your environment for the way in which you feel, but you live in a world that is highly mobile and it's your job to choose the environment that you thrive in and to build it. And sometimes it's difficult to get the

necessary strengths and um energy to do this and independence. And the worse you feel, the harder it is, but um it's something that you learn. It's also this thing that we are usually incomplete, like I'm I'm a rare mind, which means I'm a mind that is in

complete in ways that are harder to complete. So for me, uh it might have been harder to initially to find the right relationships and friends that complete me to the degree that I become an almost functional human being. Uh oh man, the search space of humans

that complete you is an interesting one. Mhm. Especially for Yosh shabak, that that's an interesting because talking about brute force search in chess. Yeah, I want I wonder I wonder what that search tree looks like. Like I think that my rational thinking is not good enough to solve that task. A

lot of problems in my life that I can conceptualize as software problems and uh the failure modes are bugs and I can debug them and write software that takes care of the missing functionality, but there is stuff that I don't understand well enough to uh to

use my analytical reasoning to solve the issue, and then I have to develop my intuitions and often I have to do this with people who are wiser than me. And that's something that's hard for me because I don't have, I'm not born with

the instinct to submit to other people's wisdom yeah so what kind of problems are we talking about this is stage three like love I found love was never hard hard then fitting into a world where most people work differently than you and have different intuitions of what should

be done ah so empathy um it's also it's aesthetics when you come into a world where almost everything is ugly and you come out of a world where everything is beautiful I grew up in a beautiful place and as a child of an artist yeah and um in in

this place it was mostly nature mhm everything had intrinsic beauty and everything was built out of an intrinsic need for it to work for itself and everything that my father created was something that he made to get the to work for himself and I felt the same

thing and when I come out into the world and I am asked to submit to lots and lots of rules I'm asking okay when I observe your stupid rules what is the benefit and I see the life that is being offered as a reward it's not

attractive when you were born and raised in an extraterrestrial prince in a world full of people wearing suits so it's a it's a challenging integration yes but it also means that I'm often blind for the ways in which everybody is creating their own bubble

of wholesomeness or almost everybody and people are trying to do it and for me to discover this it was necessary that I found people who had a similar shape of soul as myself so Bessy where these are my people people that um treat each

other in such a way as if they're around with each other for eternity. How long, how long does it take you to uh to detect the geometry, the shape of the soul of another human, to notice that they might be one of your kind? Um, sometimes it's instantly and I'm

wrong and sometimes it takes a long time. You believe in love at first sight? Y- yes, but I also noticed that I have been wrong so uh sometimes I look at a person and I'm just enamored by everything about them and uh sometimes this persists and sometimes it

doesn't. And I, I have the illusion that it they're much better at recognizing who people are as they grow older, but that could be just cynicism. No, no, it's not cynicism, it's um it's often more that I'm able to recognize what somebody needs when we

interact and how we can meaningfully interact. It's not cynical at all. You're better at noticing? Yes, I'm much better I think in some circumstances at understanding how to interact with other people than I did when I was young. So that takes us, doesn't mean that I'm

Is everything Joscha's fault? @lexfridman

Joscha Bach Bits

발표자가 대규모 언어 모델의 인식된 한계에 대해 논의하면서 단점이 모델 때문인지 아니면 응용 프로그램 때문인지에 대해 질문합니다.

발표자는 모든 문제에 대해 책임을 지고 개인적인 잘못에 대한 관점을 강조합니다.

과거의 관점에 대한 성찰과 대인 관계의 역학에 대한 더 넓은 이해에 대한 열망.

개인의 성장 단계와 감정에 대한 주체성의 중요성에 대해 논의합니다.

화자는 행복을 감정적 주체성과 자신의 감정 상태에 대한 책임감으로 연결합니다.

정서적 웰빙에 대한 개인의 책임과 지원적인 환경 선택의 중요성을 강조합니다.

번창하는 환경을 구축하는 데 있어서의 어려움과 기분이 우울할 때의 어려움에 대해 논의합니다.

화자는 자신의 성격이 '불완전'하고 만족스러운 관계를 찾는 데 어려움을 겪고 있다고 설명합니다.

개인 관계 및 문제 해결의 어려움

호환 가능한 사람을 찾는 것을 복잡한 검색 문제로 은유합니다.

연사가 특정 개인적 문제를 해결할 때 이성적 사고의 한계에 대해 설명합니다.

해결 가능한 문제와 소프트웨어 버그 및 직관의 필요성을 비교합니다.

타고난 본능이 부족하여 다른 사람에게서 지혜를 구하는 데 어려움을 겪습니다.

까다로운 문제의 구체적인 사례

관계를 탐색하고 다양한 가치관을 가진 세계에 통합하는 데 따르는 어려움.

양육과 외부 세계의 미적 차이에 대해 토론합니다.

규칙의 이점을 이해하지 못한 채 규칙을 받아들이기 어려움.

발표자의 독특한 관점은 기존 사회로의 통합을 방해합니다.

같은 생각을 가진 사람 찾기 및 호환성 파악하기

비슷한 가치와 관점을 가진 사람을 찾는 것의 중요성.

이상적인 관계를 영원성이 있는 관계로 설명합니다.

다른 사람의 호환성을 인식하는 데 걸리는 시간에 대해 논의합니다.

첫눈에 반하는 사랑에 대한 믿음, 그러나 오류의 가능성을 인정합니다.

시간이 지남에 따라 대인 관계 기술 향상

다른 사람의 요구를 이해하고 의미 있게 상호작용하는 능력이 향상됩니다.

불완전함에도 불구하고 대인관계 기술이 지속적으로 성장하고 있음을 인정합니다.