테런스의 슈퍼 대칭: 기하학에 대한 색다른 관점

### 테렌스 맥케나의 독특한 기하학 이론과 논란의 여지가 있는 아이디어
* 🔮 테렌스 맥케나는 **루빅스 큐브와 호버만 스위치 피치에서 알 수 있듯이 항상 새로운 것에 대한 가능성**을 고려해야 한다고 믿습니다.
* 🧠 그는 **수학보다 공학에 기여할 수 있는 가능성**이 더 크다고 주장합니다.
* 🌀 맥케나는 자기 참조적인 프랙탈과 같은 대칭을 연상시키는 **'슈퍼 대칭'**이라는 개념을 소개합니다.
* 맥케나에 따르면, 그가 제시하는 기하학적 패턴은 **서로 자연스럽게 어울리는 초대칭 구조**를 형성합니다.
* 🌌 그는 이러한 패턴이 **자연적인 십면체와 이면체를 예측하고 생성**하여 무작위가 아닌 기하학을 보여준다고 주장합니다.
* 🧬 맥케나의 이론은 패턴을 전기장과 자기장에 연결하여 **균형 잡힌 힘으로 인해 약한 힘이 발생**한다고 설명합니다.
* 🧩 맥케나의 사고에는 다양한 개념을 자유롭게 연상하는 것이 포함되는데, 그는 이를 **방대한 연상의 정신적 저장고**를 가지고 있기 때문이라고 말합니다.

테런스는 과학 용어에 대한 이해에 대한 회의적인 시각에도 불구하고 자신의 기하학적 혁신이 공학 분야에서 잠재력이 있다고 믿습니다.

The jogan Experience so to claim that a guy can't do engineering on platonic solids and come up with something new. The Rubik's Cube, the hberman switch pitch. Uh, these things prove that that's not true. I think it's a foolish thing almost always to pretend there's nothing new. Under the Sun, you should always consider it well. There might not be correct, but there's only one way to find out. Well, there's a difference between, you see. Terren has much greater odds of contributing to the world of engineering than he does to the world of mathematics. I mean, the odds that he's doing something new in mathematics. I'll be blunt, are very, very small. Even though I have patents on it, that shows that all of this is. I don't want to go there. The patents do not speak to what you think that they speak to, that's okay. And look, you, you, you can see into my heart. I'm not trying to. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. But we were talking. I, I told you that they

produce a super symmetrical structure. That super symmetry. I don't know that you know what a super symmetry is. What does super symmetry mean to you Terrence? Super symmetry means that all things come together, fit together, relate to each other. They come, they're self-referential, and they are from a fractal that comes back to that same fractal space. That's super symmetry. So what you mean is a symmetry that is amped up. But super symmetry is a reserved term that means something hyper particular. And that's what this between bans and fans. That's what this is. This is the bans, the for the Layman out there, the boan, the cloud, that the whole Bon thing is the force field or the energy field that the firion is considered the matter aspects of it. So if we can go into his, he's got five of these patterns, one of which he calls the. What is wrong with the term super symmetry then? I want to see an an algebra, which is a linear Vector space, which has an object called a

bracket, and I want to see that that bracket obeys a super Jacobi identity. Otherwise, there's no supersymmetry. So it's a specifically used scientific term, term of art. Yeah, but its geometry is its own proof. Supersymmetry and geometry allow you to visualize. Like you look at the ocean and you see the supersymmetry associated with it. I think what he's saying is you're talking about a thing, and you're using the term supersymmetry, and he's saying that supersymmetry only applies to a very specific thing because in their math, the platonic solids, like I said before, have a discrete symmetry. You can only line up the blocks, and all of those things, you can't put all of them together and tell a full story to where they fold into each other. I don't think he's disagreeing with you with that. I think he's disagreeing with the term using a reserved term of art, and you're using it incorrectly, and you're going to pay a

penalty, and okay, I don't want to play. No, this is a thing where like if I'm watching an MMA fight and someone's doing commentary, and they call it kick wrong, I'm why are you doing this? You don't even know. You don't even know what that is like. You incorrectly reference something that's very specific that we've been talking about for a long time. If you're getting intimate with your lady and you're into rough play and she's not wearing any clothes, is it a rear naked choke if she grabs you from behind? No, a rear naked choke is a particular move, yes. It doesn't have anything to do with what she did, right? So, is there, unless she gets the hooks in question, in the world of physics, in the world of mathematics, is there a super symmetrical system, geometric system ever been produced in mathematics? Yes, in mathematics, yes. We've never seen super what, what super poner algebra, yeah, but that, that, that's not

that that's on a plane that's not that doesn't that's not volumetrically that doesn't scale up Terrence. You have an entire way of thinking that is completely foreign to everyone that I know, and I've tried to understand what it is. Oh, I'm sorry, no, it's not a question. I don't think he's saying this is a negative. No, no, no, I didn't see it as a negative. What I'm trying to say is if the reason that science works as well as it does is that up until very recently, there were clear rules, cultures we agreed to leave certain things that are at the door like our religious beliefs. We agreed to submit to certain sorts of things. We were decent to each other, and that system is in a process of collapse at the moment. All right, now to point well Terrance comes from an earlier way of thinking when things were much more wide open. You don't find many polymaths anywhere in a respectable position anymore. Um, Terren is coming from a polyic.

perspective. He's all over the map in terms of the quality of his thinking. As far as I understand, some of his stuff is really, really good. Some of his stuff is offensive, and it's everything in between. Now, I'm not gun for you. No, no, no, that I don't take that offensively. I take it in. I'm the fact that you're here. But let's get back to what I was saying about having if my pieces naturally come together and form those same structure. Well, here, here we have. How do they not, Eric? Here's, well, let going show them. Here's where 12 bubbles meet. If you go to the yellow one right there, um, Jamie, please tap on that. This is where the negative space where 12 bubbles meet. I call this the aurian. I named it after my oldest daughter. Okay, you can take a look at it at how it behaves here, Joe. Okay, so you can have it and you can have a larger one or smaller one. By the way, I would be honored to have I'm

going to give you some of these anything that you make of this type in my home very very cool. I'm about so when I put 10 of them together they look like this. Yeah I put 20 of them together they make a natural icosahedron. Yeah, without without breaking any rules. I'm saying that the I believe in this. This, I don't I don't disbelieve. I haven't gone through the math but I don't disbelieve this. I'm not I'm not. I want to. I said the same thing about one other thing so here's the light unit if you'll go back to the green Jamie please. This is the light unit now now now we're going to get into some stuff that's not going to be so much fun but it is going to be you. You are going to get what you want. No, you're going to love this. You're going to love this cause what I'm going to show you as I said whoa and what you said concerning here. Now look at that. That's

pretty dope put that down and it'll show you this is where 20 where I've put 20 of them together the same way. I put 20 of these together and it makes a natural docahedron. But what it's showing you is where electricity is being pushed into the center and you'll see these magnetic waves coming out. It's showing you the magnetic field so these predict and create a natural dodecahedron whereas these come together and create a natural icosahedron. That's not something that just happens by accident. No this isn't an accident you. This is I'll put it what's going on Terrence for me um can you connect all these together in one big ball of Fury yes they just keep getting because it's super symmetry they all fit together. See these together it ain't super symmetry but it's freaking right I know what you're saying. The problem is that term right keeps using that term. My my my my point is that you can run into all kinds of terms of Art in the field that you

don't know well right and Terren is like. I come on your show and I do this thing, which I've never really discussed why I do it. I have this feeling that somehow Shan Carroll 15 years ago started talking about a suite of ideas like entanglement, the Multiverse, um, these boltzman brains, whatever, and people have been talking about them ever since because it was a very successful tour. Much of the coolest stuff in mathematics in physics that's completely established, that's non-speculative, is not discussed, and I don't know why. And one of the things that I tried to do was I tried to show you the Hop vibration. I tried to do the thing about the direct string trick. Terence is bringing cool stuff from the world of geometry. It's a proof effectively that people don't know where it's coming from. A lot of this is real as geometry. He, if you look at the thing that he calls the tantin or tet, what tetrion is a tetrion, the tetrion is just

so the tetrion that is the thing that is closest to us the black thing that is closest to us yeah tap yeah that one so he then starts to make noises about it and he says things that I don't love which are that those fa he Associates with the electric field and the vertices which sometimes he calls vortices and sometimes ver I I'm not quite sure he Associates with the magnetic field yes now I don't have a clue why why he says the next thing which is and because the number of magnetic and the number of uh electric things are balanced they cancel out and therefore the weak force and to me it's just like super cool stuff and then suddenly turns into horeshit but listen why here we have this those two tetran on the end they share they both have equal pose four electric poses and four magnetic pose according to how I see it that where magnetism is spinning off of the tips the vortices because it's no longer able to maintain that Center

space face of s spinning C. I don't know what the hell you're talking about. Yeah, what? What brought you to that conclusion with what the way you're describing the energy involved in this? Well, anytime you look at electricity, that was one of the things that Victor Schauberger was talking about. Electricity is when water starts to spin to the right, it cools down. That's the natural nature of electricity. Electricity is colder. It flows better in the coldest environment. So, as it's cooling down, as it's spinning down to a higher point, trying to get to that higher point, that's the highest point there. It's looking for the highest density. That's the north. North is always the highest density. South, no matter where you are, south is always away from the higher point. When you're talking about universally, not talking about geographically on the earth, north is always seeking a higher position. South is always seeking a lower position. That's based upon stuff that Walter Russell talked about, based upon the

stuff that that Victor Shaw Berger talked about but it's a problem with the definition of the words the terms right but your description of electromagnetic force and magnetism like what what or what what is happening that it's bringing you to this conclusion that you're so specifically saying that something that you literally can't even see with the human eye is happening yeah very very clearly I'm saying four magnetic fields right are pushing in on that area I don't see magnetic fields I see those spheres would be magnetism what does magnetism do it expands out what what brings you to the I say radiative field let me use the term Rad do you know what we think electricity and magnetism are you think that it's the same thing no part of the same Force they have them coupled together Jamie could I ask you to find a Faraday tensor yeah what I was trying to get to the conclusion like magnetism and electricity like what brings you to this definitive conclusion that you can so

clearly state that this is what's happening there well based upon anytime there's an electric force acting on something it causes a cavity electricity is always pulling in from the inside it's always trying to tighten the density you assume this energy exists in the Flower of Life why because that's where all those all those circles the overlapping circles they represent the magnetic field they represent the radiative field that's coming out and coming back well how why does a bubble take the shape of a ball why not a square or a triangle what's the per what why does it expand into a sphere bub a sphere is an abstraction that it's going to be the solution to many different problems if I ask you to give me the maximum possible volume with the minimum possible area I'm going to get a sphere if I ask you what what is the best thing to launch out of a uh an old style Cannon and to stack next to it you're going to say a sphere then you have a question about is that the same

concept of a sphere. You know, if I take the three-dimensional sphere of unit querian, uh, is that the same concept of a sphere? You are in part freely associating repeatedly between things that remind you of other things. Now you have an incredible Storehouse of things between your ears that you know to associate with, and your brain is like, I mean, in part, it's like if you think about the totality of your brain, it's like a Ferrari engine in a Volkswagen. The Volkswagen chassis is not capable of supporting something else that you're doing really well. And so what you're constantly doing, as far as I can tell, so the chassis being education, formal education, it's not just that. I mean, it's in part, people who see many connections are often bad at cleaning up their own stuff, and people who don't see connections are often very rigorous, and they don't do for their entire life.

Eric Weinstein Critiques Terrence Howard's Theories

JRE Clips

연사는 루빅스 큐브와 같은 예를 들며 새로운 것을 창조할 수 있는 가능성을 무시하는 것은 어리석은 일이라고 말합니다.

그는 초대칭은 특정 과학 용어이며 특히 기하학적 시각화와 관련하여 정확하게 사용해야 한다고 주장합니다.

플라톤 고체의 맥락에서 '초대칭'이라는 용어의 사용과 그것이 잘못 적용되고 있는지에 대한 논쟁이 있습니다.

연사는 종합격투기 동작과 수학적 개념이 잘못 해석되는 것에 대해 불만을 표출합니다.

또한 명확한 규칙 체계의 붕괴와 존경할 만한 위치에 있는 폴리매쓰의 부재에 대해서도 이야기합니다.

대화는 거품과 음의 공간을 언급하며 구조 형성에 대한 화자의 독특한 관점으로 전환됩니다.

특이한 기하학적 창조물과 그 전자기적 특성

물체의 독특한 배열이 자연스러운 아이코사면체와 십면체를 형성하여 흥미로운 기하학적 패턴을 보여줍니다.

제작자는 이러한 구조의 전자기적 중요성에 대한 믿음을 표현하며 우연이 아닌 본질을 강조합니다.

초대칭이라는 개념을 도입하여 이러한 물체가 더 큰 구조에서 서로 매끄럽게 맞물릴 수 있음을 시사합니다.

션 캐롤의 아이디어가 물리학에 미친 영향

션 캐롤은 수학과 물리학의 많은 기존 아이디어가 충분한 관심을 받지 못하고 있다고 생각합니다.

그는 테런스 하워드가 기하학의 세계에서 가치 있는 개념을 토론에 도입하고 있다고 생각합니다.

캐롤은 전기력과 자기력 사이의 균형과 약한 힘과의 연관성에 흥미를 느끼지만, 하워드의 아이디어 중 일부에 대해서는 의구심을 품고 있습니다.

전기, 자기, 회전하는 물의 관계

전기는 물의 냉각과 오른쪽으로 회전하는 것으로 설명되며, 북쪽에서 가장 높은 밀도를 찾습니다.

이 대화에서는 자기와 전자기력의 관계, 그리고 같은 힘의 일부인 전기와 자기의 관계에 대해 이야기합니다.

또한 자기장의 본질과 자기장의 확장에 대해서도 다룹니다.

기하학에서 전기력과 구체가 미치는 영향

전기적 힘은 캐비티 효과를 만들어 다양한 문제에 가장 효율적인 모양인 구를 형성합니다.

구의 개념은 부피를 최대화하고 면적을 최소화할 뿐만 아니라 효율적인 발사체 운동을 위한 일반적인 솔루션입니다.

서로 다른 개념을 자유롭게 연결하는 뇌의 능력은 마치 폭스바겐의 페라리 엔진처럼 인지 과정과 문제 해결 능력에 영향을 미칩니다.