왕국 상속과 왕국 입성: 신학적 관점

### 왕국 상속과 입회: 자유 유예 관점
* 🏰 모든 그리스도인은 **하나님의 왕국에 들어가 그리스도와 함께 다스리고 통치할 영광스러운 몸**을 받게 될 것입니다.
* 📊 그러나 상속은 보상을 전제로 하기 때문에 **모든 기독교인이 같은 수준이나 정도에서 왕국을 상속받는 것은 아닙니다.**
* 🎖 베마 자리 심판(고린도후서 5:9~10)은 **신자들이 행위에 따라 평가와 보상을 받게 되는 곳**입니다.
* 🌟 이는 요한계시록의 이기는 자의 개념과 연결되는데, **이기는 자에게만 그리스도와 함께 통치할 권리**가 주어집니다.
* 🔥 베마 시트 판결의 심각성에 대해서는 **보상 상실, 징벌적 손해, 왕국 제외** 등 다양한 견해가 있습니다.
* 📚 개혁주의 신학은 **천년왕국을 영성화하는 경향**이 있으며, 이는 **베마석 심판에 대한 그들의 견해**에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다.
* 🤔 일부에서는 **베마 시트 판결의 의미와 잠재적 감정에 대한 이해**가 부족합니다.
* 🔗 왕국에 들어가는 것과 왕국을 상속받는 것의 차이는 **자유은총 운동에서 구원론의 핵심적인 측면**입니다.

그리스도인은 왕국에 들어가게 되지만, 보상과 상속은 신실함과 순종에 따라 달라집니다.

So, is there a difference between inheriting the kingdom and entering the kingdom? Because I think that has to play with how we look at soteriology. So, it seems to me within the free Grace movement in general, there's an agreement that when you become a Christian, you have eternal life, and we believe in eternal security. So, every Christian will enter into the kingdom of God. That means Christians will have a glorified body, a resurrected body, to rule and reign with Christ in the Kingdom. So, all Christians will enter it. Now, the question is, well, what about inheriting it? That's different. That is predicated upon reward. So, all Christians enter, but not all Christians inherit at the same level or the same degree. Or if you have a cup, you can get an eight-ounce cup, a 12-ounce cup, a big guzzler, or a Dixie cup, fill them to the top. They're all full, 100% full, but they all have a different capacity.

all Christians will be happy and ruling with Christ, but we will all have a different capacity. I think this may be what Peter gets at in 1 Peter 1:11 when he says, If you practice these things, you will have an abundant entrance into the kingdom of God. Abundant entrance. Now, everybody will enter, but some will have an abundant entrance. I take it that is the idea of inheriting more. This would lead us then into bema seat theology, where at the bema seat (1 Corinthians 5 or 2 Corinthians 5:9-10, Romans 14, and then other places), we will stand before the Lord. He will evaluate our life, and He will reward us and then give us a role in the Kingdom. This would be tied into Revelation 2 and 3 in the concept of the Overcomer. To those who overcome, they will be given a reward to rule with my heavenly Father. In Revelation 2:26, Jesus was faithful.

if we're faithful, we'll be given the right to rule with him, but that's only to those who overcome and are faithful. Not all Christians overcome, not all Christians are faithful, not every Christian became a martyr and died for their faith. There were plenty of cowards, right? Paul talks about those who will stand before the Lord, and all of their works are burned up, all even if that's a literary device, all right, and yet they will be saved, so as Through Fire. Now, there's three passages in Ephesians, Galatians, and First Corinthians 6 that talk about where Paul, same author, talking to a Christian audience, exhorting the audience, and telling them that those who practice such Behavior shall not inherit the kingdom of God. Now, if you're reformed, you say, Aha, if a person who says they're a Christian practices these sins, that proves they're not a Christian and they go to hell. Arminian theology would say, No, no, there's a real Christian, but now they're practicing those sins.

they lose their eternal life, and they go to hell. But then the free Grace side says, No, no, there's a real believer, but he's really sinning, and he won't come away from it. And at the bema seat, he will forfeit his reward. He will not inherit the Kingdom as a Christian in a glorified body to serve Jesus. So, that's the typical way we look at that inheritance and entrance differential. Now, I like how you put that. I definitely believe that there's this misunderstanding as far as what the Judgment seat of Christ is actually going to be like. So, when people hear, Oh, you know, we're going to have a loss of rewards, you're gonna have a loss of rewards, you might even hear from Jesus Christ at the Judgment seat of Christ, You know, you wicked servant, you know, because you didn't serve properly. But they don't think that's enough, and I

think a lot of people have this misunderstanding on how much regret there will be at that judgment seat of Christ when an unfaithful Christian loses all those rewards. And so, I don't want to say that a Christian is going to live with condemnation forever, by no means do I want to say that. But would you agree with me that there's this lack of understanding, the amount of importance of that judgment seat and how emotions will be tied into it? Do you know what I mean? I think there is a lack of understanding for that because we tend to think, Oh no, there's no more tears, right? That's true, but not then, thank you, that's not true. Then that's true after the millennial Kingdom. So, when you're looking at the bema seat, some people say the law, the sadness is simply the loss of reward, but you keep all the rewards you get, but you lose some, okay? Others hold to what's called punitive damage. There's not only loss of reward.

there is punishment for your evil. The third group is what's called Kingdom exclusion. If your sins are so great, you're excluded from living in the Kingdom. Although you will live out in eternity, you're still redeemed, you're still saved, but your punishment is not being able to participate at all in the Kingdom. So, you have three views of the bema seat judgment, but all three realize the significance of the event, right? It is important in reform theology, usually from an amillennial perspective. The millennial kingdom is spiritualized, so there is no Thousand Years. Well, what happens before the Thousand Years begin is the bema seat judgment. What happens at the end of the millennial Kingdom? The great white throne judgment. If you don't have a millennial Kingdom, those are brought together, and all of a sudden, you're talking about both things with the same voice, and that's a real problem. I remember Dr. Moo, Doug Moo, came to a seminary where I

was teaching Phoenix seminar, and he was talking about his new book on Galatians. So, the faculty, we were interacting with them, and I asked Dr. Moo, I said, So, tell me, what exactly then is the severity of the Judgment at the bema seat in 2 Corinthians 5:9-10? He said, Oh, that's hell. That's hell. And I said, I, I, you know, nobody said anything. I'm looking around. I went, 'No, no, I, I mean the bema seat.' Oh yeah, that's hell. That's hell. And Dr. Grudem, who was sitting right next to me, he said, Well, Doug, Doug, isn't it possible that that's a reward for faithful Christians? And Dr. Moo said, Oh no, no, no, it's way too severe for that. That's not it at all. Well, that's because there's no Millennium, and then the bema seat judgment is combined with the great white throne judgment, and they're put together, and now you got all kinds of silly talk going on, right? That's a problem.

What's the Difference Between "Entering" and "Inheriting" the Kingdom? (Dr. Fred Chay)

C4C Apologetics

왕국을 상속받는 것은 보상에 근거하지만, 왕국에 들어가는 것은 모든 그리스도인에게 보장됩니다.

모든 그리스도인은 영광스러운 몸을 갖게 되고 그리스도와 함께 통치하게 되지만, 상속의 능력과 수준은 다를 것입니다.

왕국으로의 '풍성한 입장'이라는 개념은 일부 기독교인이 다른 기독교인보다 더 많은 상속을 받게 된다는 것을 암시하며, 이는 신자들이 주님으로부터 평가와 보상을 받는 베마 자리 신학으로 이어집니다.

기독교 상속에서 신실함의 역할

신실함은 그리스도와 함께 통치하는 데 있어 핵심이지만, 모든 그리스도인이 죄를 극복하거나 신실한 것은 아닙니다.

바울의 글에 따르면 죄를 행하는 사람은 하나님의 나라를 유업으로 받지 못할 수도 있다고 하여 다양한 신학적 해석이 나오고 있습니다.

신자들의 죄의 결과에 대한 다양한 믿음과 함께 그리스도의 심판대에 대한 오해가 종종 있습니다.

그리스도의 심판대에 대한 오해가 종종 있으며, 많은 사람들이 불충실한 크리스천이 상급을 잃게 될 때의 감정적 영향을 과소평가합니다.

이 심판의 결과에 대한 세 가지 주요 견해가 있습니다: 보상 상실, 악행에 대한 징벌적 손해, 왕국에서의 생활 배제.

특히 개혁 신학과 천년왕국에 대한 관점의 맥락에서 베마석 심판의 중요성이 강조됩니다.

무 박사는 고린도후서 5장 9~10절에 나오는 베마석 심판의 심각성을 지옥이라고 묘사했습니다.

그루뎀 박사는 그것이 충실한 기독교인들에 대한 보상일 수 있다고 제안했지만, 무 박사는 너무 가혹하다고 말하며 그 생각을 일축했습니다.

천년왕국이 없고 베마좌 심판과 백보좌 심판이 결합되어 혼란과 다른 해석을 불러일으켰습니다.