선거 무결성과 이민이 민주주의에 미치는 영향

### 민주주의를 위한 마지막 기회: 다가오는 선거의 이해관계
* 🗳 트럼프가 승리하지 못하면 이번 선거가 미국의 민주주의를 지키기 위한 중요한 전환점이 될 수 있다는 주장이 제기되는 등 **이번 선거는 미국의 민주주의를 지키기 위한 중요한 선거**로 여겨지고 있습니다.
* 🔥 민주당이 스윙 스테이트의 수많은 불법 이민자를 합법화하여 **사실상 스윙 스테이트의 개념을 없애고 권력을 공고히 하기 위해 적극적으로 노력**하고 있다는 믿음이 있습니다.
* 📊 보고서에 따르면 경합주에서 불법 체류자 수가 크게 증가했으며, 일부 주에서는 **최대 700%까지 증가**하여 민주당에 유리하게 선거를 좌우할 수 있는 것으로 나타났습니다.
* 🤔 백악관 특파원 만찬은 **트럼프가 크게 구운 사례**로 꼽히며, 도전에 물러서지 않는 것으로 유명한 트럼프가 이러한 조롱에 강한 반응을 보일 수 있다는 추측을 불러일으키고 있습니다.
* 💬 이 토론에서는 오바마에 대한 트럼프의 **'출생자' 주장에 대한 논란**을 다루며 정치적 내러티브를 둘러싼 복잡성과 잘못된 정보를 강조합니다.
* 🗣 민주당의 전략은 유권자 기반에 도움이 되는 이민 정책을 포함한 다양한 수단을 통해 **스윙 스테이트들을 파란색으로 바꾸는 것**이라고 주장합니다.
* ⚖ 이 대화는 또한 **정치인의 증거 인멸**과 같은 행위에 대한 책임이 부족하다는 점을 비판하며 법률 시스템의 이중 잣대를 시사합니다.
* 🔍 궁극적으로 민주주의의 미래가 다가오는 선거 결과에 달려 있다는 점을 강조하며 **유권자들이 선거 과정에 참여할 것**을 촉구하고 있습니다.

이번 선거는 불법 이민과 정치 조작이 증가하는 가운데 민주주의를 지킬 수 있는 미국의 마지막 기회입니다.

the Jogan experience and uh. It's meant to be you're roasting the president like Trump's just there. He's like actually you know just he's like there as part of the support. And then they turned it around and just started roasting Trump. And he's just sitting there. I'm like he's like yo I just came to the dinner. I wasn't I'm just here to support. You know we know what it was because of right the birther stuff. Oh okay yeah that's what it all was. It was all Trump was at the head of a lot of these people spreading this rumor online that Obama's birth certificate was forged and he's actually from Kenya. What's weird is if you go back to Obama's early days there are some things that say he's from Kenya. Like I think in his something from college said he was from Kenya. But you know that could just be you know people print things wrong all the time. It doesn't mean he's actually from Kenya. But Trump was one of those guys that was

like spreading that supposedly false rumor, pushing it hard. I'm not. This is the kind of thing where I want to just go and look at saying what. What did he actually say? No, he definitely was. He was definitely saying, you know, look, he. I don't think he has the time to go into things like very deeply. Yeah, and so I think he could probably be influenced by a bunch of people like these Marjorie Taylor Green type people who come to him with some wild ass theory. Sure, he might be. And I think there's a lot of that stuff that gets fed to people on purpose so that they'll say incorrect things so that they're easy to dismiss. And I think there's also a lot of people that just make [__] up, and you know, they tell you the Earth is flat, and then a bunch of people watch a YouTube video, and they believe it. Yeah, well, but on that White House correspond to. I was there, and the degree to which they attacked Trump in that, in that White House.

Correspond Center was really, it was so over the top. It was like making everyone uncomfortable, really. It was really over the top, you know. I mean, I think like sort of a passing joke of like, you know, a few passing jokes are fine, but they twisted the knife big on Trump in that. And you could see Trump just getting angrier and angrier and more and more upset. I wonder if, and it's like, man, this is not good karma, you know. That's what I was thinking at the time. I'm look, I was two tables away from Trump, and I'm looking, I'm like, man, this is too much, you know. Well, it's kind of crazy what they made out of that because that's the kind of guy that if you tell him he can't do something, he's going to just keep trying. Like, what, it was a big mistake to rag on him so, so much with that White House Correspondent Center. Well, just look at the way they've attacked

him in ter with just using the legal system like this thing in uh New York where the 34 different felony counts were essentially misdemeanors that there are bookkeeping errors that they decided even though it passed the statute of limitations they decided to try him for these didn't identify a felony abuse of the law is what's going on but most people would have quit most people people up to the een Carol lawsuit and this lawsuit and all the other ones of their the Insurrection thing the Georgia thing all these different things they getting kicked off a Twitter most people would just like this is too much I can't take this but he's so [ __ ] crazy he's like all right come on we're going to war and he just digs his [ __ ] heels in and keeps going yeah it's it's the wrong guy to do that to just do attacking him at the White House Correspondence Dinner most people been humiliated he got angry and he's like yeah all right say I can't be president

I was thinking about running for about 15 years. Finally, I'm going to run. Yeah, yeah, that was a real bad move. Um, but yeah, I mean, I can certainly understand like making some jokes about like, you know, a few sort of passing jokes on Trump, but man, I was there at that dinner, and they ragged on Trump so much. It was insane. The reason why I would push back on that, because I would say there's a bunch of different speakers, right, and Trump would obviously be a target, and if they all attacked him, it's because he's like, if you're gonna make fun of people in the audience, and especially in the zeit, guys, that whole birther thing was big, and most people were dismissing it as being a ridiculous conspiracy theory. So who the [__] is this guy saying this? And so you have 8 to 10 individual speakers that are writing monologues. Of course, they're all going to hit Trump. Yeah, well, anyway, obviously, it was

a mistake. They shouldn't have done that. And, and, but like I like you invite people to watch that the original source material. And uh, I think a few jokes are fine, you know, it's like, but, but it's like he shouldn't be the, like it felt like he was the primary object of the roast. Yeah, which is that's, that's not the whole point of the thing is it's a roast of the president, not a roast the audience. The thing about it is like he's easy to roast. And then on top of that, Obama was like loved and cherished by the left. And most of those people are on the left. There's only so far you can push, you know. You can't ask him about a chef, you know, there like what happened with the chef, bro. You can't like certain things you can't bring up. You want to what's your favorite sport paddle boarding. Yeah, isn't that guy, wasn't that guy a really good swimmer. Tell me what happened, you know exactly. You can't bring that up like if

you're going to roast Hillary. You can't bring up the death count. Like, uh, Hillary, what's the best way to stay in touch? Email. Yeah, it's if you're doing one of those, you know, she destroyed the servers and poured like bleach on the servers. Like, like computers. That's, she poured bleach on them. That's, yeah, that's what I believe. That's like, it wasn't just like they took a hammer to it. They like destroyed the, like, there was no possible way to actually get forensics on the thing. What was in there? That's what I, I mean, what was in there? What was in there? Why would they care so much? That's so crazy. Yeah, the whole thing is there was no, there was no legal action against that, which is clear destruction of evidence. Well, it's also, there's this other narrative that always drives me crazy is that, uh, he's going to destroy democracy. So, so in order to destroy democracy, we have to install a president without a primary. We have to have a candidate that is the least liked.

vice president of all time, the least popular vice president of all time, and then use gaslighting and the full force of the media machine to turn her into the future and hope, and then we're gonna - she's going to be changed even though she's a sitting vice president. And then on top of that, this idea of change when the Democrats have been in control for what, 12 or 16 years, right? Which is crazy, like this is the change. Yeah, I mean, obviously, I view this election as a turning point, like a fork in the road of destiny that is incredibly important. You know, I've not been politically active until this election, and the reason I've been politically active this election is because I think if we don't elect Trump, I think we will lose democracy in this country. We will lose the two-party system, and let me explain why. So, there's only like six or seven swing states. The margin of

victory in those states is small, often like 10 or 20,000 votes. Um, what the Democrat administration has been doing is importing vast numbers of illegals into swing states. Um, you can look at the numbers on the actual government website, meaning you don't take my word for it. You'll just look at the numbers as reported by the government, which is controlled by the Democrats. Um, and what we've seen is triple-digit increases in the number of illegals in every swing state, some cases 700% increases. These are gigantic numbers. Um, so if you have a state that went that has a 10 or 20,000 vote margin and you put 200,000 illegals into that state, you 10x the, you swamp the, it's not a swing state anymore. It's going to vote blue. And then, and once the swing states vote blue, there is no election anymore. There's only a Democrat primary, which is so crazy, and it's so

crazy people are fine with that. Well, I guess people on the left will be fine with that because they think that's a good idea. They just want to win. They just want to win, correct? Like, the thing is, one does not need actually any grand conspiracy theory for this. You just have to look at the simple matter of incentives. If the Democrat Party wants to win, like, basically achieve permanent victory, all they need to do is turn the swing states blue. They have permanent victory, and then we're a one-party state, and then they will keep doing that, obviously. They'll keep stacking the deck by bringing in vast numbers of illegals into the swing states, keep stacking it so that the next election, each successive election, will be worse than the last one, and that's what's happening. If you want to see, like, well, is this actually going to happen? Look at California. California is super majority Dem, 70% Dem. A month ago, they passed a

law making it illegal to show ID in any election in California. So, a friend of mine went to vote in Palo Alto because he was like, Is this for real? He tried to show his ID, and they reacted like if you show a cross to a vampire. Okay, like no, we can't even look at that ID. It's illegal for them to even look at your ID if you want to present it in California. Why? For any election at all, even like city council. What logical reason other than to cheat would you ever have that law? The reason is to cheat. That's the only, only, like you can never make an argument any other way. And I think 84% of people polled believe that you should show ID to vote. So, it's against the will of the people. Yes, and we are extremely rare. We're an outlier in not requiring ID. Basically, almost every country on Earth requires ID to vote. So, the as soon as you make

you ban ID for voting. It makes fraud impossible to prove, 'cause how do you trace the fraud, right? Yeah, it's insane. It's insane. It's insane. And what I'm saying is that how is it legal? What I'm saying is like this election is the last chance to preserve democracy in America. Mark my words. Everything they accuse Trump of, they are guilty of. And if Trump doesn't win, this will be the last real election in America. And we will, if the Kamala, if the big cement Kamala puppet machine wins, they will legalize the illegals in the swing states. There will be no swing states. Every election going forward will be a guaranteed Democrat win, and it'll actually be worse than California. The reason it'll be worse than California is because the one thing that keeps California from being super crazy is that you can move out of California like you and I did. You and I used to be in California, but we moved.

to Texas. We're still in America, but if the Dems win this election, they will legalize enough illegals to turn the swing states, and everywhere will be like California. There will be no escape. That is so insane. This is the final. This is it. This is the last chance. Has anybody tried to want, like, go out and vote? Vote like your life depends on it. Vote like your future depends on it because it does. This is the last chance, man. Is there any argument against this? Has anybody tried to debate this? Has anybody tried to say that this is nonsense, this is a conspiracy? Has anybody made any sort of a rational argument? The left actually, interestingly, does not want to pick up much on this argument because the more attention you look, the more you look at it, the more obviously it is true. Because you just say, like, Well, are the numbers correct? Have there really been this many illegals that have been imported into swing states? Yes, they haven't just walked across the border. They've been flowing in, flowing

in airplanes, yeah, using a shipping app. Yes, yeah, they made an app. Well, the app always existed, but it used to be for people coming over here, like shipping with goods, so they could track you while you're in America, so you could legally be here. They know where you are, and then they changed it to allow that app to schedule illegal aliens to come across the border. Yes, asylum seekers, come on in. Yes, oh, you have an app and fly people in. They're literally being flown in, yeah, to the swing states. And so, the reason that I think the left doesn't want to push back on this is because the more attention they get that this gets, the more people realize it is true. Yeah, it is true. That's why they don't, that's why they're just pretending that they're pretending. I'm not saying anything, but I'm like, yo, they're literally flying vast numbers of illegals who are then beholden to the Democrats. And sometimes I get their rebuttal of people

say like well you know the these um uh illegals are they don't have the same social values as the democra party because they're like more socially conservative. I'm like yeah but that's that's not the point the that if you look at the masa's hierarchy of needs that they're they their primary thing is is staying in the country and getting their friends and family in and then the Democrats give them all these benefits like like tons of benefits more benefits than if you than citizens literally yeah um so so that so you they're beholding to the Democrats for all these benefits um they want to get their friends and family in which the Democrats support and the Republicans don't so they vote them and you can look empirically at California and say like did did they did they vote Republican or Democrat in California. Oh they voted Democrat big time well Reagan Reagan give them amnesty in the 1980s and that changed the the state basically except for Arnold changed the state entirely blue yes and Arnold was an

exception 'cause he was like a socially liberal famous guy. Yeah, and you know, didn't really impose any radical restrictions on any of the people that were going to vote Democrat in the first place. The whole thing is just, it's bizarre to watch play out because it just seems like there's no, this can't be actually what's happening. Did you see my conversation with Fedman about it? Yeah, he was completely in denial about it. I don't think there's that of organization. Like, what are you talking about? Exactly, just like, like, are, because you can, you can break it down. So like, are, are any of these numbers wrong? Because we got these numbers from Homeland, Homeland Security, government.gov. Okay, right. So we got it from the Dogo website. Has the government reported these numbers incorrectly? No, they have not. Those numbers, if anything, are low. So, okay, so they have in fact flown vast numbers of illegals to swing states. Yeah, bypassing the border entirely. And so that is factually true. Then you say like, well, what is

their probable voting pattern um. Oh, okay, overwhelmingly Democrat into swing states um, and oh, and then well, but do the Democrats actually want to FastTrack them for citizenship? Oh um, yes, they do um. There you can see Chuck Schumer on TV saying at a rally this year was saying he wants to FastTrack Le uh and make all 11 mil million or however many. I believe his quote was uh citizens as soon as possible. The goal is to they are FASTT tracking citizenship as quickly as possible so they can they can they. That whether one thinks it's cheating or not, it won't matter because they will be fully able to vote. And for people on the left, this is actually happening. I invite people to rebut this and show me where I am wrong, please do so. No, they can't. They can't. They can't because it's true. Well, what's to me is that there's people that are on the left like people that were Bernie Sanders supporters for ex example screwed with like talk about undermining.

democracy. Bernie should have won the nomination, and they stole it from him and gave it to Hillary. Exactly, exactly. That's what I was going to bring up. Like, they control the primary process. Yeah, exactly. So, like, if you've got a Democratic primary, it's not Democratic. We just saw that. We saw it with Bernie. We saw it with Cala. That, like, a we before Biden, you know, was summarily fired. He was posting that he's in it for the long term. He's going, yeah, yeah, he. He's not giving up. Next thing you know, Sunday afternoon, they're posting on X is that he's resigned from the race, which is. And his staff didn't even know. Like, they're reading it on the X platform that. That. That. Okay. That's how they learned about it. What do you think happened there? How did they do that? They. I mean, because they clear just not. Not in charge, obviously. They could.

have used the 25th Amendment fake president, but they would have to admit that there was a certain period of time where they knew that he was mentally compromised, yes, and so they made this decision to not do that. Well, the weird thing is that the president's supposed to be the boss, right, and yet he's obviously not the boss, right? So, who's running the country? If she's busy campaigning, she's so busy, she can't do anything except Saturday Night Live. She did that, she's so busy, she's constantly campaigning. How could you be paying attention to international relations? Yeah, how could you be paying attention to the economy? How could you be paying attention to any of those things? How do you have the time? You can't. Yeah, I mean, Biden being the president is supposed to be the CEO, the chief guy. He was commander-in-chief, but it just obviously that Biden was not. He was just a puppet, and when the various puppet masters

decided that the papz had, you know, was no longer uh useful. They just tossed out the tossed out the puppet and then got a new puppet with Kamala. I mean, Kamala can't even talk. I mean, that you invited her on your show. I think the most damage that could possibly be done to a campaign is but going in your show and seeing what how what she says in hours two and three. Two and three is when things get spicy. I'm like, oh my God, you can hide for 20 minutes melt. You can hide for 20 minutes exactly. Yeah, I mean, you can just regurgitate talking points for, you know, half an hour, maybe an hour, just where she's just saying like non-seiters. But eventually, she just runs out of even the runs out of non-seers. Well, they wanted to limit it to an hour exactly. That's why. But I was thinking of doing it initially before Trump came here. First of all, when they found out that there was a rumor. I I never had announced that

Trump was coming. What I was going to do is just release it in my the way I like to do things. I don't like to tell anybody who's coming on. It'll get big no matter what. If Trump was on, it would have been huge. I'm like just put it out there. People go crazy. But he apparently or someone from his organiz someone some loose lips and then it got out. And so she contacted my management company and she they her organization her her campaign Camp contacted us and said would Joe havean. I said yes. And they said she wants you to fly to where she is. And she's only willing to do 45 minutes. Only 40. I mean that's that's. And I was like oh don't know. So I thought about doing I'm like maybe maybe I can get a sense maybe I could convince her maybe I could coax her into doing more time. I just wanted to talk to her. I don't give a [ __ ] what we talk about. We talk about

recipes. I don't give a [__] exactly. Talk to you just the things like you just can't, like you can't just output [__] non-sees for three hours, right? Um, so, but for 45 minutes, you could do, uh, maybe for 45 minutes, I could get something out of it. But then when Trump came and did the three hours, I was like, you know what? It has to be like this. This is the only way to be fair. It's got to be like three hours, and it should be in this room because this room is like a history of people actually.

Elon Musk Pleads "Vote Like Your Life Depends on It!" and Speaks on Why He Became Politically Active

JRE Clips

백악관 특파원 만찬의 논란의 여파

백악관 특파원 만찬은 트럼프 대통령의 도를 넘은 농담으로 비판을 받았고, 이는 트럼프 대통령의 노골적인 분노로 이어졌습니다.

토론은 불법 이민자의 미국 도착 일정을 잡는 데 사용되는 앱으로 옮겨가면서 민주당의 개입에 대한 우려를 불러일으켰습니다.

또한 민주당 내에서 논란이 되고 있는 예비 경선 과정에 대해서도 언급하며 후보자 조작과 의사 결정의 투명성 부족을 강조했습니다.

트럼프 대통령직과 이민의 영향

연사는 오랫동안 기다려온 출마 결심을 되돌아보고 만찬에서 트럼프가 여러 연사들로부터 받은 격렬한 비판에 대해 이야기합니다.

그들은 음모론이 트럼프의 신념에 미치는 영향에 대해 우려를 표명하고 이민으로 인한 스윙 스테이트의 중대한 변화를 막기 위해 다가오는 선거에서 투표의 중요성을 강조합니다.

연사는 불법 이민의 숫자와 영향이 너무 분명하기 때문에 좌파가 불법 이민에 대한 논쟁에 참여하는 것을 주저하고 있다고 주장합니다.

이민과 정치적 역학 관계의 영향

이 대화는 국경을 우회하여 불법 이민자들을 미국 전역으로 밀입국시키는 논란의 여지가 있는 접근 방식을 강조합니다.

연사는 여러 법적 도전과 공개적인 굴욕에 직면한 특정 정치인의 이례적인 회복력을 강조합니다.

이 토론에서는 또한 서류 미비 이민자들이 민주당의 유권자 기반에 미치는 영향력이 상당하며, 궁극적으로 캘리포니아 같은 주의 정치 지형을 형성하고 있음을 지적합니다.

민주당은 척 슈머 상원의원이 공개적으로 시민권 취득을 지지하면서 서류 미비 이민자를 위한 패스트트랙 시민권 취득을 목표로 하고 있습니다.

이 전략은 경합 주를 파란색으로 바꾸어 영구적인 승리를 거두기 위한 방법으로 여겨지고 있습니다.

이러한 접근 방식은 선거에 미치는 장기적인 영향에 대한 우려를 불러일으켰으며, 캘리포니아의 초다수당이 민주당의 향후 계획에 대한 잠재적인 모델이 될 수 있습니다.

연사는 정치인, 특히 카말라 해리스의 교체와 그녀의 비효율적인 소통에 대해 이야기합니다.

그들은 정부의 진정한 권력 역학 관계에 의문을 제기하며 바이든이 진정한 의사 결정권자가 아니다고 주장합니다.

또한 불법 이민자를 스윙 스테이트에 유입하려는 민주당 행정부의 전략을 강조하며, 이는 선거 결과를 왜곡하고 민주당의 지배를 공고히 한다고 주장합니다.

트럼프의 영향력이 선거에 미치는 영향

오바마 대통령의 출생 증명서에 대한 루머를 퍼뜨린 트럼프의 3시간에 걸친 만찬 연설이 논란의 초점이 되었습니다.

연설자는 투표 시 신분증 없이도 투표할 수 있도록 하는 등의 트럼프의 행동이 선거 사기를 추적할 수 없도록 설계되었다고 주장합니다.

그들은 트럼프가 승리하지 못하면 향후 선거에서 민주당의 승리가 보장되어 궁극적으로 미국의 민주주의가 약화될 것이라고 믿습니다.