DNC의 언론의 자유 탄압과 토론 논란

### 언론의 자유 억압과 민주적 토론의 딜레마
* 🗣 현재 민주당 전국위원회(DNC)는 언론의 자유 탄압에 대한 우려를 제기하며 **2020년 민주당 토론회 개최를 폭스 뉴스에서 차단**하고 있습니다.
* 📺 톰 페레즈 DNC 의장은 **폭스 뉴스가 민주당에 대한 편향성**을 이유로 들며 공정한 토론을 주최할 자격이 없다고 주장합니다.
* 🤔 비평가들은 다른 네트워크가 자체적인 편견에도 불구하고 비슷한 조사를 받지 않는다고 주장하며 **DNC의 근거에 의문**을 제기합니다.
* 🗨 에드 렌델 전 민주당 전국위원회 의장은 민주당 전국위원회의 결정에 혼란스러움을 표하며 **실수라고 생각**하며 **폭스 뉴스에서 토론회를 개최해야 한다**고 주장했습니다.
* 📊 렌델은 폭스 시청자 중 일부만 설득해도 **미시간주처럼 선거에서 중요한 주에 영향을 미칠 수 있다**고 지적합니다.
* 🔄 마이크 허커비 주지사는 토론은 정당 자체에서 통제해야 한다고 강조하면서 **민주당 후보에 대한 폭스 뉴스의 접근을 허용하는 방안**을 지지합니다.
* 💬 허커비는 현재의 토론 형식이 정직한 토론이 아닌 **'TV 쇼'**로 전락했다며 토론 과정을 재구성할 것을 제안합니다.
* 🕊 두 주지사 모두 반유대주의와 인종차별을 직접적으로 해결해야 한다는 데 동의하며 **민주당이 이러한 문제에 보다 투명하게 대처할 것**을 촉구했습니다.

민주당은 폭스 뉴스가 공정한 토론을 주최할 수 있는 능력을 약화시킨다고 믿으며 폭스 뉴스를 두려워합니다.

>> Laura: WELCOME BACK TO THE INGRAHAM ANGLE TONIGHT. THE EFFORT TO SUPPRESS FREE SPEECH ACROSS THE COUNTRY, NOT JUST HAPPENING ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES. THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE NOW BLOCKING FOX NEWS FROM POSTING ANY 2020 DEMOCRATIC DEBATES. T WILL MAKE DNC CHAIR SAYING, THE NETWORK IS NOT IN A POSITIN THE NETWORK IS NOT IN A POSITIT THE NETWORK IS NOT IN A POSITIO HOST A FAIR AND NEUTRAL DEBATE. THE NETWORK IS NOT IN A POSITIO HOST A FAIR AND NEUTRAL DEBATE. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO BIAS AT THE BECAUSE THERE ARE NO BIAS AT THE OTHER NETWORKS? >> EVERY TIME AT PRIME TIME, DEMOCRATS ARE DEHUMANIZED, ATTACKED RELENTLESSLY BY FOX NEWS PRIME TIME HOSTS.

ALMOST HARD FOR ME TO IMAGINE THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY DEBATE TAKING PLACE IN THOSE HOURS WHEN FIGURES LIKE NANCY PELOSI AND ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ ARE CONSTANTLY DEMONIZED AND ATTACKED. >> Laura: OKAY PURE LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT FOR A MOMENT. THE LIBERAL MEDIA AND ALL THE OTHER CABLES, THE PRIME TIME POSTS, THEY GET A FREE PASS TO THE VISCERA PRESIDENT TRUMP SINGLE NIGHT? >> WHICH BRINGS US TO THE BIG MAN HIMSELF, THE BIGGEST LIAR OF ALL, >> DONALD TRUMP IS A LIAR. WE SEE A LIE AND LIE AND LIE AGAIN. >> RACISM AND SEXISM DRIVING THIS PRESIDENT THE POSITIVES BASE. >> Laura: JOINING ME NOW HIS FORMER DNC CHAIR AND FORMER GOVERNOR OF THE GREAT STATE OF

PENNSYLVANIA ED RENDELL ALONG WITH GOVERNOR MIKE HUCKABEE. GOVERNOR RENDELL, LET’S START WITH YOU. WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON WITH YOUR PARTY? OKAY? GILLIBRAND, KLOBUCHAR, JUAN WILLIAMS ALL SORTS OF PEOPLE ON OUR NETWORK, THE LIKES OF WHICH WOULD NOT BE CONSERVATIVES ON PLACES LIKE CNN ANYMORE. THEY BASICALLY GOT RID OF THEIR PRO TRUMP, TRUMP FROM THE CONTRIBUTORS. WHAT’S GOING ON? WHY ARE DEMOCRATS AFRAID OF FOX NEWS, AFRAID OF MARTHA MacCALLUM AND BRET BAIER, CHRIS WALLACE, REALLY? >> BEFORE I ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, I WANT TO SAY HELLO TO MIKE HUCKABEE. MIKE AND I SERVED AS GOVERNORS

TOGETHER AND COLLABORATED ON MANY INITIATIVES WHEN WE SERVED IN THE NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION. TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, I DON’T KNOW. I THINK IT’S A MISTAKE FOR THE DNC TO DO WHAT IT DID. BUT AS YOU SAID, IF I WAS DNC CHAIR, I THINK TOM PEREZ IS DOING A GOOD JOB. IF I WAS DNC CHAIR, LARA, I SAY GIVE ME BRET BAIER, CHRIS WALLACE, ROD WILLIAMS, ANY WAY, ANY TIME ANY NUMBERS OF AND YOU CAN HAVE THAT FOX DEBATE ANY WAY, ANY TIME ANY NUMBERS OF TIMES. >> Laura: I’M CONFIDENT. >> Laura: I’M CONFIDENT. >> Laura: I’M CONFIDENT. >> Laura: I’M CONFIDENT. >> Laura: I’M CONFIDENT. >> Laura: I’M CONFIDENT.

>> Laura: I’M CONFIDENT. YOU CAN PICK THE COMMENTATORS AND MODERATORS, I THINK WE SHOULD HAVE THE DEBATE ON FOX. LET ME TELL YOU. EVEN IF YOU PERSUADE 3% OF FOX VIEWERS, 3% LAST TIME OUT CARRIES MICHIGAN. >> Laura: FAT CHANCE -- I’M JUST KIDDING. YOU ARE MAKING A VERY VALID POINT. GOVERNOR HUCKABEE, I WANT TO PLAY SOMETHING ELSE FROM PEREZ, BECAUSE HE DOUBLED DOWN ON THIS. THE BARRING OF ANY FOX NEWS HOSTING OF A DEMOCRATIC DEBATE. LET’S WATCH. >> THIS IS ABOUT -- IN THIS NEW YORKER REPORT, IT’S ABOUT INTERFERENCE AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF FOX NEWS. >> WE READ IT.

WE WANT TO HAVE 100% CONFIDENCE -- THE DEBATES ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT THING, ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS WE CAN DO. >> I GET IT. I GET YOU WHAT INSURANCE. >> Laura: SO NO ISSUES -- I WANT TO PLAY ONE MORE THING FOR YOU. WILLING TO BELIEVE THAT FOX DOESN’T CARE ABOUT ISSUES, THE ANCHORS ARE NOT GOING TO CARE ABOUT ISSUES. >> WILL YOU PROMISE -- AND HOW SOON WILL YOU MOVE YOUR CLOTHING COLLECTION, THE CLOTHES THAT ARE MADE IN CHINA AND MEXICO? YOU SAID SEVERAL THINGS IN THAT DEBATE THAT WERE NOT TRUE, SIR. >> DO YOU THINK THERE SHOULD BE ANY RESTRICTIONS? >> CAN YOU DEFINITIVELY SAY TONIGHT THAT YOU WILL DEFINITELY

SUPPORT THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT, EVEN IF IT’S NOT YOU? >> Laura: THOSE ARE ALL EXAMPLES OF FOX NEWS ANCHORS BEING MORE THAN TOUGH, PROBABLY FAIR, WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP. CANDIDATE TRUMP. >> LAURA, FIRST OF ALL, LET ME SAY HELLO TO ED RENDELL. I WISH HE AND I WERE RUNNING THINGS BECAUSE HE AND I GOT ALONG GREAT AND GOT A LOT OF THINGS DONE. BY GOLLY, WE SHOULD BE IN CHARGE. ED, GREAT TO BE WITH YOU. I’VE BEEN IN THE PRESIDENT OF THE BAIT STAGE TO GO DIFFERENT TIMES -- ACTUALLY, MANY DIFFERENT TIMES. BUT ONE THING PEOPLE FORGET, IT’S NOT THE VENUE FOR THE NETWORKS, IT’S THE VENUE FOR THE TWO PARTIES. I’M GOING TO BE LIKE THE

CONTRARY IN HERE AND I THINK TOM PEREZ IS MAKING A MISTAKE. I DO AGREE WITH ED RENDELL, THERE OUGHT TO BE FOX ACCESS TO DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES, BUT HERE’S WHAT I WOULD SAY TO BOTH THE CHAIRMAN OF THE DEMOCRAT AND REPUBLICAN COMMITTEES, RONNA McDANIEL AND TOM PEREZ, TAKE CHARGE OF DEBATES. THESE ARE FOR YOUR CANDIDATES. I THINK THE WHOLE PROCESS IS RIDICULOUS AND OUT-OF-CONTROL AND IT IS IN NEED OF A GREAT BLOW UP. THERE SHOULD BE A COMPLETE RESTRUCTURING OF HOW THEY ARE DONE. THE PARTIES NEED TO CONTROL THE DEBATES IN TERMS OF TIME, THE PLACE. THEY OUGHT TO PICK THE PEOPLE WHO ASK THE QUESTIONS BECAUSE IT HAS TURNED INTO A TV SHOW, NOT AN HONEST FORUM.

THE QUESTIONS ARE RIDICULOUS AND INSULTING. I WOULD LOVE TO BE ABLE TO GIVE THE POLITICAL CHAIRMAN AN EARFUL OF WHAT THEY CAN DO TO GIVE THE MESSAGE TO THEIR VOTERS. WE WENT, I THINK THAT’S A BRILLIANT POINT. LOCAL REPORTERS ARE OFTEN BETTER AT DOING SOME OF THESE INTERVIEWS ON SOME OF THE BIG ISSUES, NOT TO TAKE ANYTHING AWAY FROM THE BIG NAMES, BUT I LIKE SOME OF THE LOCAL REPORTERS’ INPUT. GOVERNORS, I WANT TO GET YOUR REACTION. THE HOUSE VOTED OVERWHELMINGLY TO APPROVE A BROAD RESOLUTION CALLING OUT RACISM AND ANTI-SEMITIC COMMENTS WITHOUT NAMING CONGRESSWOMAN ILHAN OMAR. THE DEMOCRATS SEEM TO BE, I DON’T KNOW, THEY DON’T WANT TO NAME HER DESPITE THE FACT THAT

THAT’S WHAT BROUGHT THIS WHOLE THING UP, OBVIOUSLY, INITIALLY LINKING JEWS TO MONEY, THEN TALKING ABOUT CERTAIN PEOPLE HAVING A DIVIDED ALLEGIANCE TO OTHER COUNTRIES. SHOULD HAVE IT BEEN RESTRICTED TO THE ANTI-SEMITISM? A LOT OF JEWISH AMERICANS, AT LEAST ON SOCIAL I’M READING TONIGHT, ARE PRETTY OUTRAGED. >> I’M THINKING IT SHOULD HAVE FOCUSED ON THE ANTI-SEMITISM. IT SHOULD HAVE SAID THAT CONGRESSWOMAN OMAR MADE A MISTAKE. BECAUSE SHE DID MAKE A MISTAKE. AS AN AMERICAN, I CAN TELL YOU THE THING THAT’S MOST CUTTING TO THE THING THAT’S MOST CUTTING TM THE THING THAT’S MOST CUTTING TE THE THING THAT’S MOST CUTTING TI THE THING THAT’S MOST CUTTING TS

THE THING THAT’S MOST CUTTING. THE THING THAT’S MOST CUTTING. THE THING THAT’S MOST CUTTING. THE THING THAT’S MOST CUTTING. THE THING THAT’S MOST CUTTING. THE THING THAT’S MOST CUTTING. THE THING THAT’S MOST CUTTING. THE THING THAT’S MOST CUTTING. PEOPLE TALK ABOUT JEWS, THE MONEY, THE BENJAMIN’S, US BEING SNEAKY PEOPLE WHO CONTROL THINGS BY OUR MONEY. THAT’S TO ME THAT WERE SLOW YOU CAN MAKE TO A JEWISH PERSON. VERY CONGRESSWOMAN OMAR MADE GOOD POINTS WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT. GOO POINTS WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT. GOD POINTS WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT. GOP POINTS WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT. GOI POINTS WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT. GOT POINTS WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT. GOS POINTS WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT. GOB POINTS WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT. GOT POINTS WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT. GOS POINTS WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT. GOE

POINTS WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT GOS. POINTS WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT GOO. POINTS WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT GOL. POINTS WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT GOD. MAKE IT SUBSTANTIVELY. THERE IS NO PLACE FOR NAME-CALLING FOR ANY OF OUR AFFAIRS, BUT WE SHOULD MAKE OUR POINTS AND REST ON THE STRENGTH OF OUR ARGUMENTS. I WOULD’VE LIKED FOR HER TO BE NAMED AS HAVING MADE A MISTAKE THAT TRIGGERED THESE OF ANTI-SEMITISM, CONDEMNED ANTI-SEMITISM, AND LATER ON, WE CAN CONDEMN ALL SORTS OF HATE SPEECH. SPIEL AND WATCHED THE C-SPAN DEBATE. >> Laura: I WATCH THE C-SPAN DEBATE AMONG GOVERNOR HUK. C-SPAN DEBATE AMONG GOVERNOR HUB. C-SPAN DEBATE AMONG GOVERNOR HUE.

TODAY, IT TURNED BASICALLY ON THE DEMOCRATS' SIDE A TRUMP-BASHING FEST. IT WAS ABOUT THE MIGRANTS, GOT EXPANDED IN ALL THESE OTHER TOPICS. STEVE KING LOST THE COMMITTEE CHAIRSHIP IN THE WAKE OF MAKING HIS RACIALLY CHARGED STATEMENTS. CHAIRSHIP IN THE WAKE OF MAKING HIS RACIALLY CHARGED STATEMENTS. WHY AREN’T THEY DOING THE SAME THING FOR CONGRESSWOMAN OMAR, ESPECIALLY WHAT WE ARE SEEING OVER WITH THE LEGAL PARTY GETTING HIM ELATED DUE TO ANTI-SEMITISM? WE HAVE ANTI-SEMITIC FLOATS AND CARNIVAL PARADES IN BELGIUM. I SAW TODAY ALSO ONLINE FOR DISTURBING IMAGES OF JEWISH AMERICANS IN EUROPE. >> I JUST GOT BACK FROM POLAND THIS MORNING AND ONE OF THE

THINGS I WAS DOING THERE WAS TO PARTICIPATE IN A CEREMONY FOR THE POLISH CHRISTIANS WHO HELPED SAVE JEWS DURING THE HOLOCAUST. THE POLISH CHRISTIANS WHO HELPED SAVE JEWS DURING THE HOLOCAUST. I THINK PEOPLE NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT ANTI-SEMITISM IS NOT JUST ABOUT RHETORIC. THERE WAS A LONG HISTORY OF PEOPLE BEING BRUTALLY AND SAVAGELY MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD. WE ARE NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT MILITARY COMBATANTS; WE ARE TALKING ABOUT INNOCENT MEN, WOMEN, CHILDREN, OLDER PEOPLE. IT’S A HORRIBLE THING. IT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. I THINK NANCY PELOSI -- AND I HAVE TO GIVE HER SOME CREDIT. SHE’S TRYING, BUT SHE’S GOT HER

HANDS FULL WITH SOME OF THESE YOUNG DEMOCRATS WHO REALLY DON’T UNDERSTAND WHAT I CALL BASIC PLAYGROUND MANNERS WHEN IT COMES TO GETTING IN A PUBLIC OFFICE, AND IT’S CREATING SOME REAL PROBLEMS FOR THE DEMOCRATS. AS A REPUBLICAN, I COULD TAKE SOME GLORY IN IT AND SOME JOY IN THAT, BUT I DON’T BECAUSE IT’S BAD FOR THE COUNTRY. THAT’S NOT GOOD FOR ANYBODY. >> Laura: GOVERNOR, THANK YOU -- >> IN ALL DIFFERENCE, I JUST

Democrats exhibit media bias double by barring Fox News from hosting 2020 debates

Fox News

DNC, 2020 민주당 토론에서 폭스 뉴스 차단

민주당 전국위원회는 폭스 뉴스의 편향된 보도를 이유로 2020년 민주당 토론회를 게시하지 못하도록 하고 있습니다.

DNC 의장은 폭스 뉴스 진행자들이 지속적으로 민주당원들을 비인간화하고 공격하여 공정한 토론이 이루어지기 어렵다고 주장합니다.

또한 이 토론에서는 트럼프 대통령을 비판하는 진보 언론의 무임승차를 강조하며 민주당의 폭스 뉴스에 대한 두려움에 대한 의문을 제기합니다.

폭스 뉴스 토론에 대한 DNC의 논란의 여지가 있는 결정

이 연사는 폭스 뉴스의 민주당 토론회 개최를 금지한 DNC의 결정에 동의하지 않는다는 의견을 표명합니다.

그들은 Fox와 그 시청자들과 소통하는 것이 당에 도움이 될 수 있다고 믿습니다.

발표자는 DNC 의장인 톰 페레즈가 훌륭한 일을 하고 있다고 인정하지만, 더 많은 시청자에게 다가가기 위해 폭스에서 토론을 하는 것이 중요하다고 강조합니다.

정치 논쟁 재편 및 인종 차별 문제 해결

연사는 정치 토론을 재구성할 필요성을 주장하며 정당이 시간, 장소, 질문자에 대한 통제권을 가져야 한다고 강조합니다.

그들은 현재의 토론 과정이 통제 불능 상태이며 정직한 토론이 아닌 TV 쇼로 변질되었다고 생각합니다.

또한 연사는 일한 오마르 하원의원의 이름을 거론하지 않고 인종차별과 반유대주의 발언을 규탄하는 하원의 결의안에 대한 논평과 중요한 이슈에 대한 인터뷰를 진행하는 지역 기자들의 효율성을 강조합니다.

오마르 의원의 발언을 둘러싼 논란

오마르 하원의원의 유대인과 돈, 분열된 충성심을 연결시킨 발언이 유대계 미국인들의 분노를 불러일으켰습니다.

연사는 반유대주의를 비난하고 오마르의 실수를 인정하는 데 초점을 맞춰야 한다고 생각합니다.

그들은 실질적으로 지적하고 모든 형태의 증오 발언을 비난하는 것이 중요하다고 주장합니다.

민주당의 트럼프 공격과 반유대주의에 대한 우려

민주당은 최근 트럼프 대통령을 비판하는 데 초점을 맞추고 있으며, 이민자 문제는 다른 주제로 확대되고 있습니다.

스티브 킹의 인종차별적 발언으로 위원회 위원장직을 잃은 오마르 하원의원의 비슷한 행동에 대한 의문이 제기되고 있습니다.

연설자는 잔인한 반유대주의의 오랜 역사와 낸시 펠로시가 젊은 민주당원들과 직면한 어려움을 강조하며 미국의 전반적인 복지에 대한 우려를 표명합니다.