소개팅 비용을 둘러싼 논란

한 여성이 데이트 신청을 거절당한 후 데이트 비용의 절반을 지불하라는 요구를 받아 현대 데이트 에티켓에 대한 논쟁을 불러일으켰습니다.

### 데이트 문화 변화: 데이트 비용 환급을 요청하는 남성들
* 💰 한 남성은 소개팅 후 두 번째 만남을 거절하자 **데이트 비용의 절반을 요구**한 여성 공무원에 대한 이야기를 공유했습니다.
* 🔄 과거에는 데이트 비용을 남성이 부담하는 것이 일반적이었지만, 이제는 **데이트 비용을 분담**하거나 관계가 진전되지 않을 경우 **상환을 요구**하는 방향으로 변화하고 있습니다.
* 🙋 많은 사람들은 두 번째 데이트에 관심이 없는데 **왜 공짜 식사를 받아야 하는지** 의문을 제기하며 여성이 **자기 몫을 지불**해야 한다고 주장합니다.
* 👩 이 여성의 요청에 대해 일부에서는 **"터무니없고 답답하다"**는 의견이 있는 반면, 평등의 문제로 보는 시각도 있어 **놀랍고 논란의 여지**가 있는 것으로 여겨졌습니다.
* 💡 기성세대는 남성의 요청을 **"사소하다", "진짜 남자도 아니다"**라고 생각하는 반면, 젊은 세대는 이를 더 용인할 수 있는 관행으로 여기는 등 세대 간 의견 차이가 있습니다.
* 👫 이 사건은 여성이 더 이상 연애에 관심이 없다면 **첫 데이트에서 공짜 식사와 음료를 받을 의무를 느끼지 않는** 등 변화하는 데이트 규범을 강조합니다.
* 🔮 이 텍스트는 관계에서 금전적 손실을 피하려는 남성의 경향이 계속 강화될 수 있음을 시사하며, **향후 여성들이 데이트할 때 이를 고려해야 할 필요성**을 나타냅니다.
* 💬 이 글은 이러한 데이트 문화 변화에 대한 독자들의 생각을 묻고 **콘텐츠 구독과 좋아요를 독려**하는 것으로 마무리됩니다.

Hello, there is a story about the controversy surrounding the entertainment kindergarten Romi. After a blind date, when I rejected a follow-up meeting, I received a message asking for money. The person is a female civil servant, and after I declined the follow-up, she asked me to send her money. We had the blind date last weekend, and after not being in touch, she contacted me yesterday to suggest meeting this weekend. I had to decline because I already had plans. So, I rejected the follow-up. However, she is asking me to send half of the date expenses. How should I respond to this? It's quite surprising. She sent a screenshot of our conversation from last week when we had drinks and dinner, along with a message asking how much I should send. These days, it's common for people to split the costs from blind dates, unlike in the past. But during the meeting, whether to split the costs or for the man to pay everything, and then on the way home...

I have occasionally seen stories about women asking for half of the bill after a date, but this is the first time I've come across a situation where, after a week of meeting, a woman was asked to pay half after being rejected for a second date. From the woman's perspective, this must be quite absurd and frustrating. After a week of having dinner and drinks, it feels like a casual outing, and even if one were to split the bill coolly, opinions are divided. Contrary to the thoughts of the woman who shared her story, many people argue that she should pay half and question why she should get a free meal. There are also comments about whether the man is the child of a civil servant, suggesting he has a sense of entitlement, as he seems to take advantage of the situation by getting free meals every weekend. Another point raised is that the culture of men paying for everything has changed, and women now seek equality. Additionally, there are those who argue that if she didn't want to eat, she shouldn't have been forced to go out.

Send it over. It's not wrong again, but just send it and let's wrap it up neatly. How should I react? It sounds like you're saying it's natural to receive a meal from someone else. Oh, is this another person's situation? You got a free meal and now you're asking for sympathy? If you don't have feelings for the guy, isn't it natural to suggest ending things on the day of the blind date or to just let him go? Are people like this really the ones setting up blind dates? They seem to match well together, but both look quite pitiful. The matchmaker's judgment is good, but the meal cost is half. Oh, I'm a woman, so isn't it okay for me to just send it? You rejected him, right? You didn't set up the next appointment, and the other person isn't going to just dig up money from the ground. But if you had drinks and a meal, shouldn't you at least cover some of the drink cost? If women aren't interested, they usually pay for themselves and leave. I don't want to see him again either, and since I'm not interested, I'll pay for myself, of course.

There were opinions that it was very rude for the guy to contact her a week later and ask for this. But if you're going to split the bill, you should either split it that day or contact her right after going home. It seems very calculating to refuse the after-date and then ask for half later. This mindset of not wanting to lose anything is very unappealing. It feels like there are only men like this left in our country, especially among those in their 20s and 30s. It's funny; it seems like he made the right choice by not going on the after-date. It might be better to just give her the money and settle things cleanly. There have been consistent cases since last year where men pay for the date and then later contact the woman asking for half, leaving her shocked or feeling bad. This seems to be a common occurrence among men in their 20s to early 30s, questioning why they should pay for the woman.

Many people are now wondering if they need to spend more money. As a result, there seems to be an increase in individuals who either demand a 50-50 split from the beginning or, like in the current situation, request reimbursement for the money they spent when things don't go well afterward. In fact, older generations might find these situations hard to understand and may think, What is the man doing? Isn't that petty? He's not even a real man. However, it's clear that the younger generation's mindset has changed significantly. From a woman's perspective, it's no longer taken for granted that she will just enjoy a meal and drinks on a first date and then think, Next time, I'll pay. Instead, if she doesn't feel a connection with the man, she might accept the meal but then reject any follow-up.

Transferring costs unilaterally to men is really not respectful on a human level. If women feel uncomfortable or don't want to see someone again after a date, it's better to split the bill or settle the payment neatly. This way, they can avoid negative comments and have a clean resolution. The notion that all men in their 20s and 30s are just one type of man can understandably frustrate women who have experienced better treatment in the past. However, times have changed significantly and will continue to evolve, so it's important to consider what kind of man to date and how much money to spend when meeting someone. If women truly want to avoid the so-called one type of man, they should consider dating older men or those who can meet their expectations, rather than settling for men with average conditions.

If a man insists on not wanting to split expenses evenly, it ultimately means that I won't be able to meet the person I want, and I will only continue to feel bad. Therefore, from the women's perspective, it is better to split costs whenever possible. Moreover, in the future, men are likely to have an even stronger tendency to avoid financial losses in relationships, so it seems necessary to acknowledge this and approach dating accordingly. Now, what do you think about the men who ask for their half back after being rejected for a date? Please share your thoughts in the comments. Don't forget to subscribe and like. See you next time! Goodbye!

소개팅 에프터 거절하니까 돈 보내래요.. 하남자네요

친구들 안녕~ 연애유치원에 온걸 환영해요🥰💕

연애유치원 로미언니

소개팅 거절 후 결제 요청에 대한 논란

한 남성이 소개팅에서 후속 만남을 거절당한 후 비용의 절반을 부담하라는 요구를 받아 소셜 미디어에서 논쟁이 벌어지고 있습니다.

이 상황은 현대의 데이트 문화와 비용 분담에 대한 기대치에 대한 의문을 불러일으켰습니다.

이 문제에 대해 의견이 분분한 가운데, 일부에서는 여성의 비용 지불 요청을 지지하고 다른 일부에서는 남성의 거절과 비용 부담에 대한 기대에 대해 비판하고 있습니다.

데이트 후 청구서 분할 요청에 대응하기

특히 사전 합의가 없었다면 데이트 후 비용을 분담하라는 요청을 받으면 불편함을 느끼는 것은 당연한 일입니다.

많은 사람들은 상대방에게 관심이 없다면 자신이 비용을 지불하고 넘어가야 한다고 생각합니다.

데이트 후 계산을 나눠 내라고 요구하는 남성이 점점 더 많아지고 있으며, 여성들 사이에서 충격과 불편함을 야기하고 있습니다.

데이트 규범의 변화: 데이트 비용 분담과 성별 기대치의 변화

젊은 세대는 이제 데이트 비용을 50대 50으로 나누거나 상환을 요구하는 경향이 있는데, 이는 기성세대가 이해하기 어려울 수 있는 사고방식입니다.

더 이상 남성이 데이트 비용을 전액 부담하기를 기대하지 않고, 불편한 상황을 피하기 위해 기꺼이 비용을 분담하려는 여성들의 관점이 변화하고 있습니다.

데이트 규범이 계속 진화함에 따라 여성은 파트너를 선택할 때 자신의 기대치와 재정적 역학 관계를 고려하는 것이 더욱 중요해지고 있습니다.

관계에서 불균등한 비용 분담이 미치는 영향

불균등한 비용 분담은 원하는 사람을 만나지 못하게 하고 부정적인 감정을 지속시킬 수 있습니다.

관계에서 금전적 손실을 피하려는 남성의 성향이 앞으로 더욱 강화될 가능성이 높기 때문에 여성은 가능하면 비용을 분담하는 것이 유리할 수 있습니다.

데이트 거절을 당한 후 환불을 요청하는 것은 신중한 고려와 논의가 필요한 주제입니다.