재판 절차: 관할권 분쟁 및 증인 문제

### 법적 절차: 주제 관할권 및 증인 증언 분쟁
* 📜 브룩스 씨는 기각 신청에 대한 사법부의 결정에 항소할 의사를 밝히며, **기록상 관할권이 아직 입증되지 않았다는 점**을 강조했습니다.
* 👥 그는 주정부가 소환한 **증인 3명이 출석하여 증언할 준비**가 되어 있음을 확인하며 절차상 이견에도 불구하고 증인 채택을 강행하겠다고 주장했습니다.
* 🔍 증인의 이름 발음에 혼동이 있었기 때문에 **브룩스 씨가 심문을 위해 관련 파일을 찾는 데 어려움**을 겪었습니다.
* 🗣 브룩스 변호사는 **필요한 서류가 없으면 증인에게 효과적으로 질문할 수 없다**고 주장했고, 이로 인해 법정과 긴장이 고조되었습니다.
* ⚖ 판사는 배심원단이 관할권에 대한 진행 중인 법적 논의에 영향을 받아서는 안 된다며 **브룩스 씨에게 다음 증인을 진행하라고 지시**했습니다.
* 📅 브룩스 씨는 케이시 형사의 증언이 시사하는 바에 대해 우려를 제기하며 **그의 어머니인 던 우즈를 증인 목록에 추가**하고 **감옥 통화와 관련된 전화 기록에 대한 소환장**을 요청했습니다.
* 📞 판사는 **던 우즈를 증인으로 추가**해 달라는 요청을 승인하고 브룩스 씨에게 전화 기록에 대한 소환장을 진행하는 방법에 대해 조언했습니다.
* 🔄 이러한 문제를 해결한 후 법원은 배심원단을 다시 불러들일 준비를 하면서 **브룩스 씨가 출석한 세 명의 증인 중 한 명**을 부를 것으로 예상했습니다.

브룩스 씨는 증인 증언을 진행하기 전에 해결되지 않은 법적 문제를 해결해야 한다고 주장합니다.

put in place yesterday. I want to speak for the record that I intend to appeal that judicial decision made about the motion to dismiss. Actually, we didn't address subject matter jurisdiction. It still has yet to be proven for the record, and I wanted to address the fact that with this, um, is it Kohler? Is that how you pronounce the name? We're going to continue with the witnesses. I've addressed subject matter jurisdiction repeatedly. There's a written decision. I stand behind it. You have three witnesses that you subpoenaed. The state made arrangements for them to be here. Whatever order you want to call them in this morning is fine, but those three are here. That's what I was trying to address right now. How do you pronounce the name? Kohler? Kohler? Still probably don't have to ask the witness. I'm still having trouble finding the file for that particular witness. Um, yeah, call the jurisdiction. So I don't know how I'm supposed to. Mr. Brooks, you were well advised. These are your witnesses that the state made.

arrangements. You knew who was going to be called. I put that on the record yesterday. So, of those three, however, whatever order you want, but I'm not moving past those three. I need to jump to others. I didn't say anything about moving past the three. No, but I just set the tone for today that we're gonna keep moving. Okay, I simply stated I'm not ready to ask that witness questions if I can't even find the uh. I understand the work, but that's you not having your paperwork on you, not anybody else. So, what am I supposed to ask him? I can't answer that, sir. You know that's a rush to judge me. You can't rush me to judgment when I'm notifying the court that I cannot find the record. I just... I'll make a record yesterday. You asked a question. Hold on a second. Can you have them step a second? Yesterday, you did say you did not have a file for one of the witnesses, and you did a great job from my perspective. So, idea what you

did a fine job. I just wanted myself with one sheet for that particular witness at that time. Three paragraphs. How you're prepared or not is solely on you, sir. You've had all of this information. Now we're at the end of the third week of trial. These are your witnesses. I presume that you are prepared in whatever way that is. How can I be prepared for? I'm not so. Witness is just supposed to get up there and just. I'm just like, yeah, I'm not gonna have this commentary. Okay, I'm done. The jury's coming out. Be prepared. So that's the rest of judgment. That judgment. It's clearly arrested judgment. If I'm telling you that I don't have the phone. How am I supposed to? No, I'm not. I'm not attempting to delay nothing. You want to come check the boxes yourself. You always trying to pull some fast, fast maneuvers, Mr. Brooks. And misjudge your honor. Mr. Brooks, the jury's coming in. Yeah, they deserve to know this too. It's still issues that need to get addressed.

We didn't even address everything. I addressed all of the issues. No, I still had another one that didn't have nothing to do with nothing we just talked about. There was a whole nother issue that needed to be addressed that I needed to bring on the record to your attention. We'll address it later. It needs to get addressed now before we go any further because it's an important matter just like the subject matter jurisdiction is important. That hasn't been proven on the record, ladies and gentlemen of the jury. Time for evidence presented or arguments to be made by the Box. Disregard evidence in the record, all of these statements at this time. All right, that's an unfair with you. The court will address legal matters outside. We need to address the legal matter that I was trying to get to before you. You may call your next witness, sir. I'm not calling any witness until I get an answer, your honor, your public servant. There was a legal matter that needed to be addressed beforehand so we don't have to take up

time afterwards to address something that needs to be addressed now that way Mr. brother and you yourself. I will address it at the next break. Call your next witness, please. Are you asking me? I'm directing you to call your next witness. Yeah, we're not going to move past this seeing this out. You took an oath to protect the Constitution. I have your oath. I have a copy of your oath right here. The oath that you took. You're on Mr. Brooks. I'd like to continue with testimonies. We have witnesses waiting for you. Please call your next witness. The oath that you swore to protect the Constitution, which you are now not doing, Mr. Brooks. Oh, you're going against your sworn oath, Mr. Brooks. Call your name as you as you notify the jury every time when there's legal matters. We take them out outside of their presence, and we're going to talk to testimony right now. Paul, you're next to put you one notice on the record for something that needs to be brought to your attention into the Court's

Attention, and I will address it. That's what I'm really seeking to do. It's something that shouldn't have to wait because it'll take valuable time later. At least if I notify you right from the onset, you'll already know what we're looking at, and we can nip it in the bud before everything starts to roll over it. I will address it at the next break. If you want to write something down, that's fine, and give it to my clerk. I have nothing in writing. I know there's witnesses available and ready to go. Call your next witness. You're introducing, Your Honor. You have to answer this question. That's Mr. Brooks. They should determination. Call your next witness, please. You're rushing me to judge me. There's no rush to judge me. There's a rush to judgment if you won't address a legal issue that I informed you that I have some legal issues that needed to be addressed before you just run right past that, Your Honor. Your Mr. Brooks, are you not? It is 9:37.

Sorry. 8:37. You're right. Call your next witness, Your Honor. You're rushing me to judge me. There's no rush to judgment. Call your next witness. Is that a legal matter that needed to be addressed? And I'm merely trying to... and I apply the court telling you I'm denying the request to address it at this moment. Call your next witness. You say what? I'm denying your request to address it at this moment. Please, something that we're supposed to do before Mr. Brooks comes out. I'm just seeking to understand why we all... we do this. Everyone is in the courtroom waiting for you. Please call your next witness. Do this every single day. We've done it every single day. So, I'm simply trying to make sure that the court is notified. Let's put it in writing, hand it to the bailiff, and if I deem it important enough to interrupt the witness, I will, but call your next witness. How can I? I cannot call the witness and write something down. And do you can take a minute to write down what it is? I'm not...

asking you why I needed to be addressed beforehand. Mr. Brooks, the jury is remaining in this courtroom. Call your next witness, please. John, are you rushing me to judge me? There's no rush to judgment, sir. Are you not a public servant? You're on Mr. Brooke. Do I not have your oath under 906 11? This court has the authority certified copies that you said on record that you would not provide for no good reason. That these are three, sir, three of you are doing this, right? And I've repeatedly told you, you can see the juries here, you're doing this. We need to go forward. Same thing. I'm not attempting to delay the proceedings. I'm not attempting to be disruptive. I'm merely trying to notify your honor in the court for the record beforehand. That way, everyone's at least on notice of the issues that need to be taken up instead of waiting until a break or a lunch and things of that nature, which kids, it's my authority. It's the courtroom that I'm deciding over. I'm

not going to dress it at this moment. I'm not going to answer. You're not swear as a public servant that you were protecting Mr. Price Constitution. Did you not do that three times? I have all of them here. You're off your honor as a public servant, and now you're rushing me to judge me. There's no reason I'm doing things lawfully by trying to notify you and notify the court of issues that need to be addressed for him. We are in the evidential phase of this trial. You're rushing me to judge me, your honor, and object today, please, your honor, object to that. Your objections notice no, and I want illegal reconsideration of your ruling. If not, um, I reject that ruling and take exception to that ruling. Understand? I'll request a legal or effectual basis for your ruling, a written judicial finding effect, and conclusion of law for your ruling. And if not that interlocutory declaratory appeal for this matter, and if not, these needies need to be stayed until this matter is before uh adjindicated.

Court of competition jurisdiction because we have not proven jurisdiction in this court as of yet. Subject matter jurisdiction has not even been proven on the record, your honor. I don't even know the true nature and cause, Mr. President, against me. I don't even understand that part. I understand you requested a complaint. I haven't, your honor. There's so many issues, Mr. Brooks. I'm not attempting to, Mr. Brooks, be disrespectful in any way. We need to continue the later procedure. Your requests are denied, your honor. I'm gonna instruct the jury at this point to disregard and not consider any of what has just happened since you walked in. It should not be held against Mr. Brooks in any way. These are legal issues that this court may or may not need to address, but they do not bear in any way and ultimately the issues that these that you as jurors will have to decide. And I'm instructing you, I'm to disregard what you have just heard and seen, your honored with everything that I just said be part to be made part of the

record. It's on the record. I'm telling the jury that it shouldn't affect anything that they're doing in any way. With that, it's a rush to judgment, Mr. Brooks, because you're honest. I just showed your oath that you scored it, took your swear. Please call your next witness. You took these oath of offices. You did, Your Honor, three of them. I understand very recommendable that you know that you decided to be a public servant in Israel in these type of matters around it. I respect it to the fullest, but also, you have to uphold these old States. All right, I'm gonna have to excuse the jury since Mr. Brooks, he's not calling his witness. We'll hopefully bring you back out shortly. You have to honor these oath of offices. You have to, as a public servant, Your Honor. I respect you being a public servant, and this is not to take a shot at you in any way, but these issues, they need to be addressed. They need... I'm excusing the jury. Can you please stop.

Your honor, this is arrested judgment. This is a clear bias. Mr. Brooks, you are to stop talking. Are you asking me? I'm advising you, or you will forfeit your right to be present in this. So, you're holding for the questioning of your first witness. They should hold me in contempt. I'm not holding you in contempt. And how can you remove me from the courtroom when I haven't given consent? Mr. Brooks, I'm advising you at this moment to call your next witness, or you will forfeit the right to call these witnesses. You can't, you can't under 906 11. You are refusing to call a witness. I didn't refuse anything, your honor. And you can't, you can't deny me my Sixth Amendment right, which has disappeared while you question your first witness, because it is now 8:44, and you've consistently talked in front of the jury, who's no longer in this courtroom, on issues that you have been advised and are fully aware are not

relevant to their determination despite what you believe. The loss subject matter Juris no you that's what that is what you referenced in front of the journey and then you reference the issues subject matter jurisdiction as you know is not as I don't know. The state has to be. The state must prove it has to be sure jurisdiction in federal cases with criminal court jurisdiction in the state of Wisconsin. Don't have criminals. We don't have subject monetary station or personal jury Mr. Brooks or Personnel churches. You don't. You haven't proved. You have not. I excuse the jury. I'll give you the opportunity to raise whatever issue it was but you need to do it now where we're moving forward. That's what I want to do. That's what I was attempting to do and if you interrupt me one more time you're gonna go do it from the other courtroom. All right. I'm he can go to the other courtroom and we will address these issues because you are not being respectful. You are disruptive. You are interrupting. I will give you one more

opportunity. Don't interrupt me again. Don't roll your eyes at me. Don't sigh at me. You have delayed these proceedings now by 15 minutes because of your non-stop commentary. I'm gonna sit down, and I'm gonna listen to you. What issue do you want to raise, sir? So, are you letting me make an offer of proof of my appeal? No, because that's not what's relevant at this time, sir. You don't need to make an offer of proof. Tell me what the issue is. I said you have a legal issue you want to raise before we get going. What is that issue? Okay, the legal issue is this. Detective Casey yesterday testified for the second time under oath in reference to exhibits 13-14 that show the backyard of my mother's home, which he stated that he had been to the home, had seen the backyard, all this stuff, when he did not in fact even with my mother. It was brought to my attention that my mother in fact never spoke to any law enforcement from Waukesha.

would you like to add her to your witness list to call her? Yes, I would. All right, willing to come, but that's not something we needed to address this right away because of the issue of the subpoena. That's the reason why I needed to be addressed. That's the reason why I was trying to attempt. It could have been done on a break. All right, so you would like you're asking me to add Dawn Woods to the witness list for you. Yes, but I also have a question about the subpoena. The subpoena for whom? For my mother. But I would also like to subpoena the phone records so it can be made part of the record of the conversation. Since the prosecution listens to all the phone calls, they should be able to have heard that phone call as well, so they should be on notice of what was said. I don't know what phone call you're referring to. If you're referring to a jail phone call, then to a jail phone call that was made last night, October 20th.

between 7:54 p.m. and 8:10 p.m., which I'm sure the prosecution has heard by now. And that also brings up the issue of perjury testimony, sir. The way that you will address the issues that you're talking about is to call witnesses to challenge that or to present the evidence in support of your position. If you're telling me you need to add Dawn Woods to the witness list, I approve of that. You can fill out a subpoena, and I'll direct the state to serve that upon her. And at the appropriate time, we'll have her brought. We'll indicate when in the order of folks she can be brought in, so I'll grant that request. In terms of the jail records, you'll have to subpoena the appropriate custodian or a witness who can testify to that. That's what I was trying to gain knowledge of, because I can't give you advice on that. Snatch on it. Ask for advice. I was. Is the is cannot. Is that he's asking me. I can't direct how you do that. I can't

tell you how to do that. Um, you are acting as your own attorney, and you will need to figure that out. So, you have the subpoena forms, you can research the issues, you have access to legal research materials and other things, and that's how you'll have to address. Accept the value or retirement for value. This document was that a subpoena form. Thank you. Is there any other witnesses you're asking to add to your... and you can also call Detective Casey if you want. Just so you know, said I made three times. He's able to testify. Make sure that he hasn't testified to... I will give you permission to call him as well. Well, I think it'd be necessary. You know, he know he know what he did. Wow, if you know what he didn't do. We're gonna bring the jury back out. Expect you to call a witness and what it just saw him clear because I was trying to get to that issue. What witnesses are here because I don't have the... I don't have any paperwork for...

Kohler, Kohler, Kohler, Kohler. I don't know. I was caller Stephen Guth and Erica Patterson of those three. I want you to call one of those weapons. I set the value in return for values document. Ary, since he's claiming he does not have it. Since I know that I don't have it. So let's make that record correct. You don't have it with you in the courtroom is what you're saying. I can't find it anywhere. You've had it previously. Yes, I had it at one point. All right. All right. Are you ready to proceed forward, Mr. Brooks? Yes. All right. Let's bring the jury out.

Darrell Brooks RAGES at judge for pulling 'fast maneuvers' | LiveNOW from FOX

Subscribe to LiveNOW from FOX! https://bit.ly/3HvzKqP
Where to watch LiveNOW from FOX: https://www.livenowfox.com/ 
Follow us @livenowfox on Twitter: https://twitter.com/livenowfox

Raw & unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX. 


LiveNOW from FOX

발언자는 기각 신청에 대한 사법부의 결정에 대해 미해결된 주제 관할권을 강조하며 항소하려고 합니다.

주 정부에서 소환한 증인 3명이 출석하여 증언할 준비가 되어 있지만 발표자는 그 중 한 명에 대한 파일을 찾는 데 어려움을 겪고 있습니다.

판사는 발언자에게 준비할 것을 촉구하며, 재판 기간 동안 정보를 가지고 있었기 때문에 준비에 대한 책임은 발언자에게 있음을 강조합니다.

발언자는 모든 문제가 해결되지 않은 것에 불만을 품고 중요한 법적 문제를 법원의 주의를 환기시키겠다고 주장합니다.

판사가 발표자에게 다음 증인을 부르라고 지시하지만 발표자는 법적 문제를 먼저 해결해야 한다며 이를 거부합니다.

발언자는 법적 문제의 중요성을 강조하고 판사의 상황 처리에 대한 불만을 표출합니다.

화자는 판사가 다음 증인을 불러야 한다는 주장에 좌절감을 느끼며 서두르고 불공정한 판결을 받았다고 느낍니다.

증인이 호출되기 전에 중요한 법적 문제를 해결하고 싶다는 의사를 표명하며 법원에 알리는 자신의 역할을 강조합니다.

발언자는 반복적으로 자신의 권한을 주장하고 판사의 판결에 대한 서면 문서를 요청하여 문제가 확대되기 전에 해결하려고 노력합니다.

발언자는 법원의 관할권과 자신에 대한 고소의 성격에 대해 의문을 제기합니다.

발언자는 자신의 권리가 침해당하고 있다고 주장하며 절차에 대한 혼란과 불만을 표출합니다.

판사는 배심원단에게 최근 사건을 무시하라고 지시하고 발언자에게 다음 증인을 부르도록 촉구하는 동시에 그렇게 하지 않을 경우 어떤 결과가 초래될지 경고합니다.

피고인 브룩스 씨는 재판 진행 중에 판사를 방해하고 지연을 야기하는 등 재판에 방해가 되고 있습니다.

그는 케이시 형사의 증언에 대한 법적 문제를 제기하고 어머니인 던 우즈를 증인 목록에 추가해 달라고 요청합니다.

또한 브룩스 씨는 어머니의 전화 기록을 대화 기록에 포함시키기 위해 소환장을 요청합니다.

검찰은 오후 7시 54분에서 오후 8시 10분 사이의 타임라인을 알고 있으며, 이는 위증 증언의 문제를 제기합니다.

변호사는 던 우즈를 증인 목록에 추가할 수 있으며 소환장을 작성하라는 지시를 받습니다.

변호사는 또한 구치소 기록에 대한 관리인을 소환하라는 조언을 받고 케이시 형사 증인으로 부를 수 있는 권한을 부여받습니다.