[Music] Hi, welcome to another video. So, Cursor has launched its new upgrade that makes it now similar to Klein because it adds an agent to Composer. I don't know where things like Windsurf's Cascade and now Cursor's Composer are getting inspiration from. I

mean, it's pretty evident that because of Klein and other's growth, no one wants to add stuff manually to Cursor's Composer context. Now, you may say, why am I doing this video? Because I don't like Cursor, so I'm doing this to compare Cursor's

new agent thing with Klein, and I want to see if it's any good or not and what worth it brings to Cursor, and if it can change my opinion. Although I have heard that now you need to pay more to Cursor to access some new features, so be ready for my quite spicy

take. Also, I have downloaded and installed Cursor on my system just for this, so make sure that you hit the like button. I mean, what things do I need to do for you guys, but let's look at the new features that it says it has here. So, it says here that

Cursor can now pick its own context, use the terminal, and complete entire tasks. To try it out, select Agent in Composer. Okay, okay. So, it's quite similar to Klein, as I thought. I hope they didn't fork it, but let's move on. And it also has a

sneak peek at an upcoming bugfinder feature. I have heard that this feature costs more money to use, but I'll see. It also has a simpler, cleaner Composer UI with inline diffs. Okay, that's good. I guess it also has file pull recommendations in chat.

composer I don't know what this means but we'll see it also has the ability to semantically search for context in chat composer a nicer image dropping experience and several performance improvements I mean the several performance improvements must just come from the fact that they would have

upgraded the VS Code version in their fork so that's cool I guess anyway so I have cursor open here and see I'm not going to be harsh but what can I say it just looks like VS Code another thing that I wanted to say is why does cursor

have a GitHub repo I mean if it's not open source then why have this I think it's just to show to non-technical people that they are open source or something plus it also has 25k Stars what is this stop it get some help anyway so I have the

premium trial that they give out like windsurf so I have it opened here and if I go to the sidebar then you can see that we have two options here chat and composer chat is just like basic chat and here you can do what you basically do with continue which is to just chat

then you have the composer here which basically needs you to either have the files to edit opened in your editor or you can also add it manually here which is first of all pretty dumb because why do you need to do that this feature was apparently before an overlay which is

something that I also vaguely remember but now it's a TBL like Cascade from windsurf it's ironic because they used to say that they can't do it as an extension because it needs to overlay and stuff and now it's in a sidebar like

Klein's quite funny anyway this video is not about Composer, it's about the Composer agent instead. So you can now select agent here and this will make it an agentic thing like Klein or AER where it will go through the context automatically without any reference and it will run

terminal commands and stuff just like what Klein does. So let's test it. I'm going to test it with the same prompt that I tested Exponent with, which is to give it this blank Next.js project and I'm going to ask it to make a water tracker app that

allows me to track water intake throughout the day. Let's give it this prompt and let's ask it to do that. Okay, it's doing it. It is gathering the knowledge about files which is fine and now it first chooses to add new packages, which is weird because

installing packages in the first place will lag through the whole process and make the edits very delayed. Klein and even Cascade deal with the package installation last, so this is quite unintuitive. It is installing here now. This will take a lot of time. Let's wait

a bit and after like 3 to 5 minutes it's now done but the cursor apparently got disconnected, so I have to retry it here. I don't know what to say. Is this really what people go insane over, like this unintuitive thing which disconnects on its own? Anyway, it's

generating the code here. We'll need to wait a bit here for the code to be generated. I think that this agent interface, animations, and things look a lot like Windsurf's Cascade, like these small block things and stuff like that. Anyway, let's wait a bit.

[Music] And it's now done. It was a lot slower to be honest, from the prompt until generation it took about 9 to 10 minutes. I'll compare that to Klein as well, but let's run it and see if it works or not.

Okay, so it doesn't work. It gives me these errors and stuff, which is obviously not good. So this is obviously a fail. This is literally what people drool over. I don't get it, man. The same prompt was also given to Klein by me, which I also showed in the

exponent video, and Klein handled it extremely well without even one click for me, and it took about 2 minutes. Yes, literally 2 minutes, and it installed the packages and everything within that time. And it also wrote the code and everything, plus it's also fully usable.

You can see it here. This is the generation that it gave me, and this is just a lot better than an error screen, just for testing. I did the same prompt testing with Windsurf's Cascade, and it was also fast and took about 4 minutes, which is fine, and I don't have a

problem with that, and it also installed everything. If I run it, then you can see that this one also works, although its generation has quite a bit of issues, but still it actually works unlike Cursor's generation. I, I don't understand Cursor's whole thing here. I mean, it doesn't work

at all. This is not one time I have used it before, and it's just unusable for me. It doesn't make sense to me why people use it, but maybe I'm special or something. If I'd have to pay for an AI-powered VS Code fork, I'll pay it to

either co-pilot or Windsurf and also save some money. Also, they have rolled out a bug fix feature which costs $10 over the $20 membership that they already have and is not accessible to me because it's apparently rolled out to only some

people, or it may be that it is only rolled out to people who have a billing method set up because you'll need to pay that $10 to access it. It was good to at least test Cursor and I thought that maybe it would change my mind, but it's just so bad that I can't

say anything. My AI code editor of choice is surely Windsurf or just VS Code with co-pilot, at least it's cheaper and you get the just basic features there. Overall, Cursor is not so cool, but Klein and Ader are pretty cool. Anyway, let me know your thoughts in

the comments. If you liked this video, consider donating to my channel through the Super Thanks option below, or you can also consider becoming a member by clicking the Join button. Also, give this video a thumbs up and subscribe to my channel. I'll see you in the next video. Till then, bye.

Cursor's NEW *Agent* Composer: The WORST Coding AGENT that I HAVE EVER SEEN (Beats Cline & Cascade?)

Facing the future with AI! 

Here you'll find content about multiple AI Tools that are actually useful and sometimes free.

AICodeKing

커서의 새로운 업그레이드 소개 및 클라인과의 비교

커서의 새로운 업그레이드는 Composer에 에이전트를 추가하여 클라인과 유사하게 만들었습니다.

이 동영상은 커서의 새로운 에이전트와 클라인을 비교하고 그 가치를 평가하는 것을 목표로 합니다.

새로운 커서 기능은 추가 결제가 필요합니다.

커서의 새로운 기능에는 컨텍스트 선택, 터미널 사용, 작업 완료가 포함됩니다.

곧 출시될 버그 파인더 기능 및 UI 개선 사항에 대해 언급합니다.

커서의 인터페이스 및 GitHub 리포지토리

커서의 인터페이스는 VS 코드와 유사합니다.

Cursor의 GitHub 리포지토리와 25,000개의 별에 대한 토론.

커서의 채팅 및 작성기 인터페이스에 대한 설명입니다.

작곡가의 수동 파일 추가가 비판을 받고 있습니다.

커서의 작곡가와 윈드서프의 캐스케이드 및 클라인의 비교.

코딩 프롬프트로 커서의 에이전트 테스트하기

에이전트의 기능을 클라인 및 AER과 비교합니다.

Next.js에서 물 추적기 앱을 만들라는 프롬프트는 테스트에 사용됩니다.

Cursor의 패키지 설치 프로세스는 비효율적이라는 비판을 받고 있습니다.

프로세스 중에 커서가 연결이 끊어집니다.

커서의 인터페이스와 윈드서핑의 캐스케이드 비교.

클라인 및 윈드서프 캐스케이드와의 결과 및 비교

커서의 코드 생성에는 9~10분이 소요되며 오류가 발생합니다.

같은 작업을 2분 만에 완료한 클라인과 비교.

클라인의 성공적인 코드 생성은 커서의 실패와 대조를 이룹니다.

4분이 소요되고 기능적인 결과를 만들어낸 윈드서핑의 캐스케이드와 비교.

저자는 Cursor의 성능에 불만을 표시합니다.

필자는 코파일럿이 있는 윈드서핑 또는 VS 코드를 선호합니다.

Cursor의 유료 버그 수정 기능에 대한 토론입니다.

커서에 대한 전반적인 부정적 평가.

마지막 생각과 행동 유도 문안.

Cursor's NEW Agent Composer: The WORST Coding AGENT that I HAVE EVER SEEN (Beats Cline & Cascade?)

Cursor's NEW Agent Composer: The WORST Coding AGENT that I HAVE EVER SEEN (Beats Cline & Cascade?)

스크립트