전직 CIA 장교가 영화와 TV 속 대테러 묘사를 리뷰하다

### CIA 요원, 영화 속 대테러 장면에 대한 평가
* 🎬 전직 CIA 요원 존 키리아쿠가 다양한 영화와 TV 프로그램의 대테러 장면을 리뷰하며 현실감을 평가합니다.
* 🔫 그는 일반적인 영화 속 묘사와는 달리 대부분의 CIA 요원들은 일상적으로 무기를 휴대하지 않는다고 지적합니다.  파키스탄이나 아테네와 같이 위협이 높은 지역은 예외입니다.
* 👤 카를로스 더 자칼을 예로 들며 '외로운 늑대' 테러리스트의 묘사는 현실적인 것으로 간주됩니다.  대중교통에 대한 공격도 인프라 취약성으로 인해 그럴듯한 것으로 간주됩니다.
* 화학, 생물학 및 핵무기를 찾는 정보 기관의 묘사가 정확하며 이중 첩자와의 위험한 만남의 위험도 묘사되어 있습니다.
* 💥 캠프 채프먼에서의 자살 공격 묘사는 사실적이지만 그 규모는 과장되어 있으며, 이러한 공격은 여전히 지속적인 위협으로 남아 있습니다.
* 🏠 오사마 빈 라덴 급습에 대한 묘사는 특히 야간 급습과 스텔스 헬기 사용 등 정확성이 높다는 평가를 받았지만 빈 라덴의 위치를 고문에 의한 것으로 잘못 표기했습니다.  이 영화의 CIA와의 협력은 간첩법을 위반할 가능성이 있다는 비판을 받고 있습니다.
* 💧 물고문과 수면 박탈 등 '강화된 심문 기법'의 사용에 대해 논의하며, 키리아쿠는 이러한 기법의 불법성과 실행 가능한 정보를 얻는 데 비효율적이라는 점을 강조합니다.  영화 '더 리포트'는 이러한 사건을 정확하게 묘사했다는 점에서 높은 평가를 받았습니다.
* ✈ 드론 공격으로 인한 민간인 사상자의 안타까운 현실과 책임의 부재를 강조하며 드론 공격에 대해 다룹니다. 영화 '홈랜드'는 일부 할리우드식 꾸밈에도 불구하고 일상적인 작전을 사실적으로 묘사했다는 평가를 받고 있습니다.

할리우드에서는 대테러를 잘못 묘사하는 경우가 많지만 일부 영화에서는 이 분야의 위험성과 복잡성을 정확하게 묘사하기도 합니다.

AMA got a possible jackpot from all accounts. Uh, that's that's how it played out. There was never any intent to take

Bin Laden alive. My name is John Kiriakou. I'm a former CIA counterterrorism officer, and after the 9/11 attacks, I

became the CIA's chief of counterterrorism operations in Pakistan, where I led a series of raids that

resulted in the capture of dozens of al-Qaeda fighters. I went on to be the chief investigator at the Senate Foreign

Relations Committee. Today we'll be looking at counterterrorism scenes in movies and TV and judging how real they

are. Yeah, literally none of that is true to life, but that's that's what makes you love James Bond. First of

all, I'll say almost no officers carry weapons. You have to be in a in a post that is rated as high or critical threat

for uh terrorism. Uh, the only posts where I ever carried a gun were Athens and uh and Pakistan. Um,

otherwise I was I was always unarmed. And you're not going to walk into Parliament just opening fire; it's just it's just

not real life. You got me now. Here is your price. Love it that as part of this film was absolutely

believable. In this James Bond movie, R is considered to be what's called a lone wolf terrorist, somebody who's not a

member of an organized group. He acts alone. Those are more prevalent than you might think, and the person who comes to

mind most immediately is Carlos the Jackal. This is a guy who successfully kidnapped, get this, all at once, every

single oil minister in OPEC. But for all intents and purposes, Carlos was a lone wolf. Attacking public transport is quite

easy. Transportation is probably the weakest link in our infrastructure. In Tokyo, there was an attack some years ago uh by

Uh, the Aum Shinrikyo terrorist group—it was more of a cult that adopted terrorism as a policy—where

they spread poison gas through the ventilation system and killed a whole bunch of people. So, although we haven't

seen something like this happen, it is possible.  I'll give it a couple of different ratings, so...

shooting up Parliament—no, sorry, one. But a threat to transportation, while it's not, you know, crazy action-packed like we saw with

you know, uh, Raoul blowing a hole in the ceiling—that's not going to happen—but that threat is real. So I'd say seven or

Good evening, Mr. Hunt. The weapons you recovered in Belarus were confirmed to be VX nerve gas, capable of

devastating a major city. So at the beginning of this clip, Ethan Hunt was told that he's looking for nerve gas.

That's true. I mean, every major intelligence service hunts for chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons. $50

million to let Benji go. They come one step closer... Shoot me! Stop! Yeah, you know, there are elements of reality in that.

Sometimes, part of the job, especially in counterterrorism, is that you have to put yourself in dangerous positions like

that. Well, there was one situation where I was handling a double agent. He didn't know that I knew

he was a double agent, and he didn't know that I knew that he had been instructed to shoot me in our final meeting. So we

had prepared a team, just like you saw here in the clip, to protect me. It's not as sexy as this, with a beautiful

woman sitting there next to you, you know, with a gun in your ribs to do you the favor of killing you. Um, you know, and the

technology isn't on your contact lens, uh, but the idea is correct. On realism, I'd give it a four because

The danger of that, of that kind of meeting, sure, is accurate. It's a little cooler than it is in real life, and the rest of

it's just Hollywood. Hey, put your hand out of your pocket. The attack at Camp Chapman was a

catastrophe for the CIA. I actually worked with several of those people. There was a source who had been offered

up to us by a third-country intelligence service. He got right into the center of the base. It was a failure

at every step of the way. There were, there were almost immediate improvements, uh, after this happened. So, suicide attacks happen; um, they're not supposed

to happen at that grand scale, but it's always a danger. This is depicting the Osama bin Laden raid, and the clip is as close to

real life as we're going to get in a film. There are a couple of things that are consistent with all counterterrorism

raids, especially counterterrorism raids related to al-Qaeda. First of all, they're all at night, usually in the middle of

the night, uh, in Pakistan. We only did our raids after 2 a.m., or at, or after 2 a.m.

because you want people to be asleep; you want them to be caught unawares. That's what they did in this case. Now, they came

in to the bin Laden compound with, with two stealth helicopters. So this was far, far more complicated than anything I

ever did. What a possible jackpot, from all accounts, uh, that's, that's how it played out. There was never any intent to take

bin Laden alive. There are similarities in the real-life raid that the movie got wrong, and they got it

wrong on purpose. In the movie, they were able to deduce bin Laden's location thanks to the torture program, that is

not true. I can't be any more clear about it; it's just simply not true. What led to

Bin Laden's location was really great analysis. A targeting analyst is going to pour through sometimes millions of pieces of data to put this thing together.

where you can say we've narrowed it down to this neighborhood in Abbottabad, Pakistan. The one thing that bothers me

the most is when Hollywood perpetuates the myth that torture prevented acts of terrorism or disrupted acts of terrorism.

And to me that myth is dangerous in that it affects public opinion. This was a film that the CIA made a policy decision

on that it was going to cooperate fully, to the point where senior CIA officers gave them inappropriately

classified briefings over a classified mockup of the bin Laden compound. Okay, that's that's chargeable under the

Espionage Act. The CIA just turned it over. Why? Because it made the CIA look good. This clip, as a clip, the clip that

we just watched, I would give it a nine because it is pretty much the way things played out, but no, it wasn't the torture

that gave up Osama bin Laden. [Music] My name is Ali Soufan. I'm with the FBI.

There's only one interrogation technique that works: rapport building. Another person that you saw in the clip was Ali

Soufan. Ali, uh, Ali and I work together both in Yemen and in uh, in Pakistan. Ali Soufan went to the secret site and Ali

did what the FBI has been doing: he established a rapport with his prisoner. And after about six weeks

of this rapport development with Ali, he finally opened up and he gave us actionable [Music]

information. We stop the music when he starts talking. Then he can sleep. Learned helplessness. So briefly, in this clip you

see one of those contract psychologists, um, James Mitchell, explaining to Ali Soufan what his goal is. His goal is

learned helplessness; that's the goal. The goal is to completely break him psychologically. Now, they did that by

using what they called "enhanced interrogation techniques." Some of them were very, very minor and mild; it sort of

worsened to things like sleep deprivation. We saw that in the clip with the loud music, and you saw Aboba hanging

by his, uh, wrists with handcuffs, so he can't kneel or sit or lay or get comfortable in any way.

1, 2, 3... where is the next attack? Waterboarding, which most Americans now know about and was supposed to be the worst,

and it's pretty darn bad. We waterboarded each other in training just to see what it's like; it's awful. Sleep deprivation

and the cold cell actually killed more people, where, you know, it's already 50°—you're you're so cold, you're naked, and

then you have this ice water thrown on you, and your body just stops working; you go into, into, uh, into shock and just die.

You can put whatever euphemism you want on it; you can call it "enhanced interrogation techniques." I don't care what you

call it; what we did to some of those people was just illegal. Just to be transparent, I was the

script advisor on that film, and, um, it was written by a friend of mine. Everything in that film was true;

everything was based on the Senate Torture Report. In this clip, we see Adam Driver, who is portraying the Senate

Intelligence Committee's lead investigator on the CIA's torture program. What was released was not the Senate Torture Report; it was a very

heavily redacted copy of the executive summary of the torture report. The report itself was 5,000 pages long; the

executive summary was 500. They waterboarded him 183 times. Everything they got from him was either a lie or

something they already had. Well, now what we saw in this clip was Adam Driver uh briefing Senator Diane Feinstein, this

who at the time was the senior Democratic senator from California and chairwoman of the Senate

intelligence committee on his findings. His findings were that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, was

waterboarded 187 times; Abu Zubaydah was waterboarded 83 times. Neither one of them gave

up any actionable intelligence uh during torture. I objected to the CIA's use of so-called enhanced interrogation

techniques, which I believe to be torture, and I went public with that information in December of 2007. I resigned from the

CIA to go into the private sector. All this time, by the way, I'm waiting for somebody to come out and say something,

and nobody said anything. As a result, I was prosecuted and served 30 months in prison, but I'm glad I did. Somebody had

to do it, and in the end, I think it made the country a safer place. This clip and the movie, "The Report," as a whole is a 10—a strong 10.

We got lucky, Jac, with NATO satellite, and that's the location right there. Cam on.

Yeah, I can't tell you how many times we droned weddings or funerals, and then we'd have to say, "Oh, sorry, here's a

million dollars; our apologies." So that is unfortunately true. Uh, what's not true is it wouldn't be up to an individual case

officer to order an air strike. She could call the head of CTC and recommend the air strike, and he says, "Go for it." Members

of the Pakistani Taliban vowed retaliation for the alleged attack. Hesam Hakani has been martyred. Yeah, this kind of

thing happens all the time. So in this clip, this member of the Pakistani Taliban named Hakani uh was was the

Targeting the Haqqani network—it's a real network, a real terrorist network, right on the Afghan-Pakistani border.

They're really Afghans, but anyway, be that as it may, we learned later on in this season that Haqqani wasn't at the

site and had left. That is also something that's quite common. You know, rarely, rarely does the American

government admit to a mistake. There was a mistake in Afghanistan just days before we pulled out, where we killed

this, you know, high-value target who was loading missiles into the trunk of his car. He was actually not only not a high-

value target, he was an employee of the American government, and we just blew him up with a missile from a

drone. And then said, "Ah, sorry, our bad."  We added that Mr. Haqqani was attending a wedding at the time of the attack and

that over 40 members of his family were also killed. And then you end up killing civilians virtually every single

time, which is another problem. The National Security Council, the Department of Defense, and indirectly the CIA say that they do

CIA Officer Rates 9 Counterterrorism Scenes In Movies | How Real Is It? | Insider

What you want to know. 

Visit our homepage for the top stories of the day: https://www.businessinsider.com
Insider on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/insider
Insider on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/insider
Insider on Twitter: https://twitter.com/thisisinsider
Insider on Snapchat: https://www.snapchat.com/discover/Insider/2708030621
Insider on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@insider

If you have a permissions or licensing request, please connect with our partners at PARS International who will be able to provide you with an accurate quote for the overall usage rights that you’re interested in. A representative from PARS will contact you shortly after filling out this request form: https://www.parsintl.com/publications/insider/


Insider

영화 속 대테러에 대한 CIA 요원의 관점

전 CIA 대테러 담당관인 존 키리아쿠의 소개와 그의 경험을 소개합니다.

대부분의 CIA 요원은 일상적으로 무기를 휴대하지 않으며, 위험도가 높은 직책은 예외입니다.

외로운 늑대 테러리스트를 묘사한 제임스 본드의 한 장면을 자칼 카를로스 같은 실제 사례와 비교하여 분석합니다.

대중교통에 대한 실제 위협의 사례로 도쿄에서 발생한 옴진리교 공격에 대해 논의합니다.

미션 임파서블의 신경가스와 관련된 장면을 분석하여 대량살상무기를 찾는 정보 기관의 현실을 조명합니다.

캠프 채프먼에서 자살 공격을 묘사한 장면을 분석하여 이러한 공격의 현실과 그 후의 개선 사항에 대해 논의합니다.

야간 급습과 스텔스 헬기 사용을 강조한 오사마 빈 라덴 급습 묘사에 대한 평가입니다.

영화에서 빈 라덴을 찾는 데 고문이 한 요인으로 묘사된 것을 비판하며 데이터 분석의 역할을 강조합니다.

심문에서 라포 형성의 중요성에 대해 논의하고, 이를 향상된 심문 기법의 사용과 대조하여 설명합니다.

우발적인 민간인 표적 공격, 책임 소재 불명확성 등 드론 공격의 현실에 대한 논의.

드론 공격을 묘사하는 장면을 분석하여 묘사의 부정확성과 이러한 사건의 일반적인 발생을 강조합니다.

드론 공격으로 인한 민간인 사상자에 대한 투명성 부족과 반성 부족에 대한 비판.

특정 테러 공격에 대한 묘사 분석

뭄바이 테러를 묘사하는 장면을 분석하여 범인의 초기 오인과 호텔 직원들의 영웅적인 행동을 강조합니다.

정보 협력을 묘사하는 장면을 분석하여 이러한 협력의 공통점을 강조합니다.

뮌헨 올림픽 대학살을 묘사하는 장면을 분석하여 핵심 내러티브의 정확성과 꾸밈새를 강조합니다.

인도 항공 814편 납치 사건을 묘사한 장면을 분석하고, 사건과 탈레반의 역할 묘사에 대해 토론합니다.

CIA를 사실적으로 묘사한 <더 리크루트>에 대한 최종 평가.

쇼의 비현실적인 사건 묘사에 대한 비판 *24*.