심폐소생술 및 법적 결과: 생명을 구하는 행위 및 소송 수행하기

생명을 구하기 위해 심폐소생술을 시행하는 행위는 추행의 고의가 없어 강제추행으로 처벌할 수 없습니다.

### 심폐소생술 실시의 법적 의미: 변호사의 관점
* ⚖ 생명을 구하기 위한 심폐소생술은 **강제추행의 의도가 없고 합법적인 행위**이므로 강제추행으로 간주해서는 안 됩니다.
* ⚖ 심폐소생술을 시행한 개인이 범죄로 유죄 판결을 받은 사례는 없으며, 이는 **의료 행위 자체가 적절했는지**에 초점이 맞춰져 있기 때문입니다.
* ⚖ 2014년 보고된 한 사례에서는 응급 치료 중 피해자의 젖꼭지를 만졌다는 이유로 처음에는 **성폭행 혐의**로 기소되었으나 결국 **무죄 판결**을 받았습니다.
* ⚖ ️ 오해나 허위 고발이 있을 수 있으므로 **관련 사건의 사실 여부와 진실성을 확인**하는 것이 중요합니다.
* ⚖ 불합리해 보일 수 있지만, **피해자가 형사 사법 시스템에 고소를 제기하는 것**을 물리적으로 막을 수는 없습니다.
* ⚖ ️ 누군가의 생명을 구하려다 억울하게 범죄 혐의를 받는 경우, 변호사가 무료 변호를 제공하고 **불확실성이 장기화되는 것을 방지하기 위해 신속한 수사**를 촉구합니다.
* ⚖ 변호사는 **진실과 거짓 고발을 구별**할 필요성을 강조하고 이러한 경우 **적극적인 평가와 조사의 중요성**을 강조합니다.
* ⚖ 이 영상은 시청자들에게 **비슷한 상황에 처했을 때 질문하고 법률 자문을 구할 것**을 권유하며 마무리됩니다.

That is an act beyond common sense, so touching only the breast is considered forced molestation. That's true. You cannot physically prevent the victim from pressing charges. If I truly face such a case, I will provide a free defense. Hello, everyone. I am your one and only attorney, Attorney Hana. I was watching YouTube a while ago, and there was an article that caught my eye. What was that article about? It was about a case related to an online post. A person was accused of sexual assault while performing CPR. The person was accused by the woman whom he performed CPR on. As a result, he was sentenced to pay 8 million won as a settlement. What does a settlement mean? It means that in a court trial, although guilt is acknowledged, the sentence is suspended considering various mitigating factors. It is one of the verdicts of guilt. In reality, this...

You're trying to save people, but can you be punished or not? Of course not, and it seems difficult to confirm the sincerity. If I may give my conclusion first, it is a failure to save people, but can it be punished as a forced indecency crime? No, it cannot be punished. Even if punished, it would not be right. For the crime of forced indecency to be established, there must be intent for the indecent act. There must be intent to physically touch or make contact with a person for the purpose of forced indecency, and it must also be an unlawful act. In the case of performing CPR to save a person, there is naturally no intent for indecency, and it should not be recognized as a crime. Therefore, there should not be any cases prosecuted, and based on the analysis of precedents, there have been no cases where someone performing CPR has been convicted of a crime.

When we look at cases where medical treatment related to CPR has led to legal punishment, it's not about emergency responders or passersby trying to save a life, but rather cases where the perpetrator was in the act of harming the victim to some extent when the victim regained consciousness. They used the excuse of performing CPR to touch the victim inappropriately or commit sexual assault. Although there may be cases where individuals have been punished for such actions, there is still no case of mandatory punishment for performing CPR. I couldn't find the court decision that was made around the time of the incident based on those reasons. It seems a bit difficult to believe the content realistically, and it seems necessary to verify the facts and the truthfulness of the details. However, there have been cases where emergency responders have been prosecuted and tried. As reported in an article from 2014, there was a case where a victim who had lost consciousness was being given first aid.

In the case, it was initially considered as sexual assault due to touching the victim's nipple during emergency medical treatment. However, the conclusion was that it was innocent. It was not charged as a general sexual assault. The prosecution argued that touching the nipple was an act beyond common sense, leading to a charge of forced sexual assault. During the trial, despite acknowledging the act of touching the nipple, it was considered that the person was trying to check for consciousness since the victim was unconscious. Therefore, the verdict was innocence. So far, in cases where emergency medical treatment is provided, the trials have mainly focused on whether the medical treatment itself was appropriate. It is unlikely to be prosecuted. Of course, it is not a case that can be prosecuted now. In my opinion, the biggest issue is...

I am a bit skeptical that this will become a lawsuit. If it does become a lawsuit, there will inevitably be disruptions in terms of having to go to court or to the police. That's true. You can't physically prevent the victim from filing a lawsuit. In a way, it may seem unreasonable and, of course, it can be felt as such. However, in the overall criminal justice system of our country, there is a law that the victim cannot physically prevent from suing for the damages they have suffered. Of course, if the victim files a false accusation, there is a risk of being punished for false accusation later. It is necessary to actively assess the content of the lawsuit and determine whether it is a true or false accusation. In cases where someone is unfairly sued, the investigation should be promptly concluded, and if someone has been sued, then first of all,

As the accused, it is necessary to actively investigate and promptly conclude the case to prevent being in such an unstable position for a long time. In actuality, there have been no cases where someone was unfairly accused, prosecuted, or tried for saving a person's life. However, if such a situation arises where I am wrongfully accused of a crime while trying to save someone's life, I will provide a free conclusion. If such a case occurs, please feel free to contact me anytime, leave any questions in the comments regarding the matter, and please subscribe and like the video.

정말로 '심폐소생술'하면 성범죄자가 될까?

하나뿐인 변호사

심폐소생술과 강제추행에 대한 오해

심폐소생술을 실시하는 것은 강제추행의 의도가 없으므로 강제추행으로 간주되지 않습니다.

최근 한국에서 800만 원에 합의한 사례가 있지만, 심폐소생술은 강제추행죄로 처벌할 수 없습니다.

판례에 따르면 사람을 살리기 위해 심폐소생술을 시행한 행위가 범죄로 이어지지는 않았습니다.

심폐소생술 관련 사건의 법적 결과

가해자들은 심폐소생술을 핑계로 성폭행을 저질렀지만, 심폐소생술 시행을 의무적으로 처벌하는 규정은 없습니다.

응급 구조대원이 치료 중 성폭행 혐의로 기소된 사례도 있지만, 한 사례에서는 의식 확인을 위한 신체 접촉이었기 때문에 무죄로 판결된 바 있습니다.

재판은 주로 의료 처치의 적절성에 초점을 맞추기 때문에 기소로 이어질 가능성은 낮습니다.

소송 제기가 형사 사법 시스템에 미치는 영향

피해자는 자신이 입은 피해에 대해 소송을 제기할 권리가 있으며, 이는 물리적으로 막을 수 없습니다.

그러나 허위로 고소를 제기하면 처벌을 받을 수 있습니다.

소송 내용을 적극적으로 검토하여 사실과 허위 고소를 구분하고 불공정 소송에 대한 조사를 신속히 마무리하는 것이 중요합니다.

억울한 누명을 쓴 영웅을 위한 무료 법률 지원 제공

생명을 구하다가 범죄 혐의로 억울한 누명을 쓰는 일은 드물지 않습니다.

이러한 상황에서 억울한 누명을 쓰게 되는 경우 무료 법률 지원을 받을 수 있습니다.

언제든지 도움을 요청하고 더 많은 업데이트를 구독하세요.