hey there, it's Nick here, getting educated about two Canon everyday zooms: the 24 to 70 millimeter f/2.8 L II and the 24 to 105 millimeter f/4 L II. These two lenses are compatible with Canon DSLR cameras, and being standard zooms, people buy these with the hopes of keeping them on their camera for most of their day shooting. With such an important role, which one do you choose? Let's see if we can get to the bottom of [Music] that [Music] first. Let's take a look at the EF 24 to 70 millimeter f/2.8 L USM II. This lens covers a wide to short telephoto focal range. It's great for most of the things that you will encounter on a daily basis, including street scenes, landscapes, and portraits. Being an L-series lens, this lens features excellent optics, featuring a range of high-end elements to assure images are sharp and detailed throughout the entire zoom range. It is also a ruggedly built lens with

dust and moisture sealing, as well as a protective fluorine coating applied to the front element of the lens. Compared to the 24 to 105 millimeter, it has the advantage of having a maximum aperture of f 2.8, which is a full stop faster than the 24 to 105 millimeter. This is better for low light shooting and for producing shallower depths of field. It is also noted by Canon enthusiasts that due to covering less range, this lens performs well consistently and produces minimal distortion. With that in mind, let's take a closer look at the EF 24 to 105 millimeter f4L IS USM II. As is obvious by the name of the lens, the 24 to 105 millimeter ventures more into telephoto territory. While it might not sound like much, the extra 35 millimeters of zoom provided by this lens is a considerable advantage. With this extra reach, you're less likely to encounter subjects that you can't reach, so you won't need to pack an additional

lens in your kit. Despite having a slower maximum aperture of f/4, it does extend its low-light shooting performance somewhat by featuring built-in image stabilization. That being said, some users do report issues with the image quality of this lens compared to the 24 to 70 millimeter. Distortion is present at the widest focal lengths, while when shot wide open, the lens does show signs of light fall-off. In conclusion, both of these lenses are capable of excellent images and will please Canon shooters with different goals in mind. If you want the most versatile option that will help you frame your image more often than not, the 24 to 105 millimeter is a good choice, while if image quality is paramount to your work, the 24 to 70 millimeter is the best option. Want to know more? Head to ted's dot com dot au forward slash blog or keep updated by subscribing to Ted's on YouTube or following Ted's on Instagram at ted's underscore cameras for all the latest to education. You can also join Club Ted to stay

updated on the latest news and content, as well as be eligible for all club ted-only offers. Thanks for watching, and we'll see you next time.

The Canon 24-70mm vs 24-105mm- Get #TeducaTED

The Canon 24-70mm vs 24-105mm- Get #TeducaTED